VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY (VMC): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $274.51, VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY (VMC) is priced for +20.4% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/VMC

Headline

FieldValue
TickerVMC
CompanyVULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY
Current price$274.51/sh
CompositionAggregates 73% / Asphalt 16% / Concrete 11%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)20.9%
Operating margin today20.6%
Margin expansion (value-band)+0.3pp
Implied growth20.4%
Multiple paid26x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 8.7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.27σ
cohort percentile (of 78 peers)71

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.49x4expensive
Earnings4.65x5expensive
Relative1.08x2expensive
Growth1.21x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=14)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$186.711.47xyesFCF base $1.1B, growth 7% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.2%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$272.741.01xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 12.0x / 17.0x / 22.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 19.4x (blended: static sector reference 14x + trailing (TTM) 32x), scenarios: 14.5x / 19.4x / 23.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 10.7x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$92.762.96xyesBV/sh $65.13, ROE (TTM) 13.2%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$109.732.50xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$226.361.21xyesRev $8.1B, growth 7% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.3x / 4.4x / 5.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$212.941.29xyesEPS $8.40, growth 25% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.26 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$59.054.65xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.31B × (1−22%) / WACC 8.2% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$113.362.42xyesBV $65.13 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 13.2% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.6%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$110.952.47xyes√(22.5 × EPS $8.40 × BVPS $65.13) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $2.39B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$54.555.03xyesFCF $1116.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$49.165.58xyesSBC-adj FCF $1.05B (FCF $1.12B − SBC $0.06B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$271.041.01xyesEPS $8.40 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$12.3222.28xyesBV $65.13 × (ROIC 1.5% / WACC 8.2%) (excluded from median)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $8.06B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$315.000.87xyesEPS $8.40 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$90.813.02xyesEPS $8.40 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Aggregates 1operatingenterprise$6.3bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Asphalt 2operatingenterprise$1.3bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Concreteoperatingenterprise$846.6mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$5.8b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)4.48x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)3.52x
Interest coverage7.1x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.5%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Start with what the market is pricing in, then set it against the fundamentals, because for Vulcan the gap is smaller than the headline multiple suggests. The price embeds operating growth at the company's self-funding ceiling for about six years, which sounds aggressive until you look at the pricing engine underneath. Aggregates are the closest thing in industrials to a local monopoly: rock is heavy and cheap relative to the cost of moving it, so a quarry effectively owns the customers within trucking distance. Vulcan's own 10-K makes the point that each operation is defined by its location within a local market and its particular geology, and that intersegment rock is transferred at local market prices. That is the language of a business that sets price locally rather than competing it away.

The fundamentals are delivering exactly what the price needs. Q1 2026 revenue rose 7% to $1.76 billion, EPS of $1.35 beat by more than 20%, and gross margin expanded 180 basis points to 24.1%, while aggregates moved 50.0 million tons at a freight-adjusted $22.80 a ton. Crucially, the growth is price-led: full-year guidance is for 4% to 6% pricing growth against just 1% to 3% volume growth, which combined with disciplined unit costs should push high-single-digit growth in cash gross profit per ton. Pricing that runs ahead of volume is the most durable kind of growth a cyclical can have, because it does not depend on the construction cycle cooperating every year.

The demand backdrop extends the runway. Public construction remains strong on infrastructure funding, private demand is improving, and a new structural driver has arrived: data-center construction, with roughly 650 million square feet under way or announced, is aggregates-intensive. Vulcan is positioned to capture it, with about 60% of all large public and private projects sitting within 50 miles of a Vulcan facility. With interest covered about seven times and a share count that has slowly shrunk, the company can fund its growth and still return cash. The analyst consensus is a buy, the average target sits around the current price with high-end targets near $355, and the bull case is that a near-monopoly pricing franchise with a lengthening demand runway earns the premium the market is paying.

Bear Case

The cleanest bear argument is about capital allocation and the price of growth, because Vulcan has built its scale partly by buying it. The aggregates leaders grow by acquiring quarries and reserves, and doing so has left Vulcan with net debt of about $5.8 billion, roughly 3.5 times trailing operating income. That is manageable while the cycle is strong and interest is covered seven times, but it is real leverage on a cyclical business, and it means a chunk of the franchise's value was paid for at acquisition multiples that the company now has to earn back through pricing. When management is buying reserves and the stock trades at 31 times operating income, every capital decision, whether to acquire, to buy back stock near record prices, or to deleverage, has to clear a high bar to add value rather than simply chase scale.

The valuation itself is the harder problem. At 31 times operating income the price embeds growth at the self-funding ceiling for about six years, and the earnings-power family in the X-ray lands at roughly a fifth of the price. That is an enormous gap for a business whose growth ultimately rests on pricing 4% to 6% a year. Aggregates pricing has been remarkable, but it is not guaranteed to continue at that pace forever, and the sector is already showing cracks in confidence: peer Martin Marietta was downgraded on narrowing aggregate price realization and moderating infrastructure bid activity, and analysts have trimmed its fair-value estimate on more conservative growth and margin assumptions. The same questions apply to Vulcan, and 42% of analysts already sit on hold.

Finally, the volume side is cyclical no matter how good the pricing is. Guidance assumes only 1% to 3% volume growth, and that rests on public construction funding staying robust and private and residential demand recovering. A pullback in infrastructure spending, a higher-for-longer rate environment that delays private projects, or a softer data-center build than the 650-million-square-foot pipeline implies would slow volumes just as the price is counting on a long, smooth growth runway. Pay a peak-quality multiple on a cyclical, and the downside is that both the multiple and the volumes compress at the same time, which is precisely when the leverage stops being a footnote.

Valuation

Vulcan is a textbook case of a high-quality business priced for a long, uninterrupted run. At $302.81 (June 28, 2026) the market is paying about 31 times company-wide operating income, which under an 8.9% cost of capital solves to operating growth held at the self-funding ceiling for roughly six years. That spread is the signature of a durability premium, the market paying for compounding that the snapshot methods structurally cannot capture.

The premium is not irrational given what aggregates are. A 20.6% operating margin, guided pricing of 4% to 6% a year, and a near-captive position in each local market are the kind of economics that justify a multiple well above a typical cyclical. The reliability on this solve is reasonable. One measurement note belongs in view: the trailing operating income diverges by more than 10% across the two bases here, about $1.66 billion on the EDGAR basis versus $1.45 billion on the record basis, so the precise multiple depends on which trailing window you use; neither is wrong, they are different bases.

The honest read is that the entry price already capitalizes the pricing franchise close to perfection. The implied six-year run at the growth ceiling leaves little margin for a pricing slowdown or a volume air pocket, and the sector's own messengers, with a peer downgraded on narrowing price realization, suggest the pricing tailwind may be maturing. The analyst consensus captures the tension: a buy rating with an average target around the current price and a high end near $355, but with 42% of analysts on hold. The conclusion is that you are paying full price for a genuinely excellent business, so the return depends on the pricing engine running for as long as the multiple assumes rather than on any discount at entry.

Catalysts

The recurring catalyst is aggregates pricing and volume. Q1 2026 set the pace: revenue up 7% to $1.76 billion, EPS of $1.35 beating consensus by more than 20%, gross margin up 180 basis points to 24.1%, and 50.0 million tons shipped at a freight-adjusted $22.80 a ton. Full-year guidance, reaffirmed, calls for 4% to 6% pricing growth on 1% to 3% volume growth, with adjusted EBITDA of $2.4 to $2.6 billion. Each quarter's price realization is the single most important number, because the whole valuation rests on pricing continuing at that pace.

Demand drivers are the medium-term swing factor. Public construction funded by infrastructure programs and a recovering private market underpin the volume guide, and a newer structural driver, data-center construction with roughly 650 million square feet under way or announced, is a potential tailwind given that about 60% of large projects sit within 50 miles of a Vulcan facility. Watch infrastructure bid activity and the pace of the data-center build, since both feed the volume side that the cycle ultimately controls.

Sector sentiment and capital allocation round out the picture. The analyst consensus is a buy with an average target near the current price and a high end around $355, but a meaningful share sits on hold, and the peer read matters: Martin Marietta was downgraded on narrowing aggregate price realization, a warning that applies sector-wide. On capital, watch how management balances acquisitions, buybacks near record prices, and deleveraging against the roughly 3.5-times operating-income net debt, since at this multiple those choices move per-share value.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Aggregates 1 / Asphalt 2 (reported)

Concrete (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive VMC report on boothcheck