VENTURE GLOBAL, INC. (VG): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers VENTURE GLOBAL, INC. (VG) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/VG
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | VG |
| Company | VENTURE GLOBAL, INC. |
| Current price | $12.42/sh |
| Composition | LNG revenue 99% / Other revenue 1% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Multiple paid | 13x operating income |
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 5.9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~3.5%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| cohort percentile (of 72 peers) | 11 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.07x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 0.85x | 2 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.38x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.50x | 2 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 4.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=11)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $39.62 | 0.31x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 8.1x / 11.1x / 14.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.0x / 20.0x / 24.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $11.66 | 1.07x | yes | BV/sh $2.74, ROE (TTM) 39.3%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $26.54 | 0.47x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $18.02 | 0.69x | yes | Rev $15.5B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.7x / 2.1x / 2.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $31.50 | 0.39x | yes | EPS $0.90, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.33 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $0.01 | 1242.00x | yes | Normalized EBIT (latest-period EBIT; under 3y history) $1.15B × (1−15%) / WACC 4.9% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $18.42 | 0.67x | yes | BV $2.74 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 39.3% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $7.46 | 1.66x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $0.90 × BVPS $2.74) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $6.20B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $29.04 | 0.43x | yes | EPS $0.90 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $1.28 | 9.70x | yes | BV $2.74 × (ROIC 2.3% / WACC 4.9%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $15.47B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $33.75 | 0.37x | yes | EPS $0.90 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $9.73 | 1.28x | yes | EPS $0.90 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Calcasieu Project | operating | enterprise | $4.1b | $1.3b operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Plaquemines Project | operating | enterprise | $9.2b | $4.2b operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| CP2 Project | operating | enterprise | $1.0m | -$278.0m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Sales and Shipping | operating | enterprise | $2.5b | $248.0m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $35.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 7.94x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 6.74x |
| Interest coverage | 3.2x |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Venture Global builds and runs large LNG export terminals on the US Gulf Coast, Calcasieu Pass and the larger Plaquemines, that chill natural gas to liquid and ship it abroad, and first-quarter 2026 revenue jumped 59% to $4.6 billion as it exported 130 cargos.
- The defining risk is twofold: an enormous debt load of roughly $37 billion built to fund the terminals, and customer arbitration, with an international tribunal ruling against the company in a dispute with BP that puts more than $1 billion of damages in play.
- What moves the story next is project ramp versus legal overhang: management raised full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $8.2 to $8.5 billion and targets Plaquemines Phase I commercial operations in the fourth quarter of 2026, while the BP damages phase looms.
Bull Case
Read Venture Global by its trajectory and the picture is of a company crossing from construction into cash generation at speed. First-quarter 2026 revenue rose 59% year over year to $4.6 billion, operating income reached $1.2 billion, and net income climbed 23% to $488 million, driven by exporting 130 cargos, more than double the volume of a year earlier. That growth is not a market-share win in a mature business; it is the mechanical ramp of new liquefaction capacity coming online. The filing describes Calcasieu Pass reaching commercial operations and selling LNG under long-term contracts, while the much larger Plaquemines project ramps behind it. Each train that starts producing adds a step of revenue and cash flow that the trailing numbers have not yet fully captured.
The business model is built on long-dated, take-or-pay style contracts that turn LNG into something closer to an infrastructure annuity than a commodity trade. The filing details sale-and-purchase agreements "commencing on set dates in 2029 and 2030," with the LNG "sourced by VG Commodities from the Calcasieu, Plaquemines or CP2 projects." Those contracted volumes give years of forward visibility into demand, and Venture Global's distinctive low-cost, modular construction approach lets it bring capacity online faster and cheaper than conventional terminals. With Plaquemines Phase I targeting commercial operations in the fourth quarter of 2026 and Phase II in mid-2027, the volume runway extends well beyond today's output.
The valuation reflects a stock the market has already marked down, not one priced for perfection. Every family of method now supports the price, including the asset-value lens, which is the relevant one for a company whose terminals are enormous physical assets. Management raised full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $8.2 to $8.5 billion and laid out cargo targets of 147 to 154 from Calcasieu and 347 to 369 from Plaquemines for the year. The bull bet is that a fast-ramping, contracted LNG-export platform, priced at a level the conservative methods can defend after a sharp decline, keeps converting its massive build-out into the cash flow that services its debt and eventually flows to equity.
Bear Case
The bull case assumes Venture Global's customer contracts mean what the company says they mean, and that assumption just took a serious hit. An international arbitration tribunal ruled against the company in its dispute with BP, finding it failed to declare commercial operations at Calcasieu Pass on time and did not act as a reasonable and prudent operator, putting more than $1 billion of damages plus interest and costs in play, with the damages phase still to come. A separate dispute with Shell adds to the overhang. These are not abstract risks: they go to the heart of whether Venture Global's foundational customers honor their long-term agreements, and the long-dated contracts the bull thesis relies on are only as good as the company's ability to defend them. A pattern of customer litigation is the worst possible signal for a business whose entire value rests on multi-decade offtake commitments.
Underneath the legal overhang sits a balance sheet of extraordinary size. Venture Global carries roughly $37 billion of gross debt against just $1.6 billion of liquid assets, net debt near $35 billion, the inevitable result of funding multiple multibillion-dollar terminals with borrowed money. Interest coverage is only about three times, which is thin for a company still completing construction, and net debt sits at nearly seven times trailing operating income. That leverage works while every project ramps on schedule and contracted cash flows arrive, but it leaves almost no cushion. A construction delay, a financing-cost increase, a soft patch in global LNG prices, or an adverse damages award all land on a company that must keep servicing $37 billion of debt regardless.
The combination is what makes the bear case sharp. The company's growth is real but it is the growth of a leveraged developer mid-build, and the recent results already showed "lower weighted average LNG sales prices at our Calcasieu Project," a reminder that the realized price per cargo is not fixed. The price has fallen to a level the value methods support, so the stock is not expensive on the numbers, but the bear point is not about the multiple; it is about the distribution of outcomes. A buyer is underwriting flawless project execution, stable LNG pricing, and favorable resolution of the customer disputes, all carried on one of the largest debt loads in the sector. If any one of those breaks, the equity, which sits behind $37 billion of debt, absorbs the damage first.
Valuation
Venture Global is a leveraged LNG developer whose stock has already been marked down to where its assets can defend it, and that reset frames the whole read. After a sharp decline, every family of method now supports the price near $11 (June 28, 2026): asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and forward growth all sit at or above it. For a company whose value is enormous physical liquefaction terminals, the asset-value lens reaching the price is the meaningful signal, and it says the market is no longer paying a development premium but pricing closer to the underlying infrastructure.
What the price implies is modest, which is the point of a below-floor situation. The inversion reads the price as requiring only a low operating margin to be sustained, well below the roughly 34% the company currently earns as cargoes ramp, meaning the market is not demanding aggressive growth from here; it is discounting the risks around the cash flows rather than the cash flows themselves. The gap between the demonstrated margin and the modest implied one is the legal and leverage risk the market is pricing in. This is a value-and-asset situation, not a growth bet, and the central question is downside protection rather than upside multiple expansion.
Solvency is the entire story and the reason the modest implied margin still does not make the stock obviously cheap. Venture Global carries about $37 billion of gross debt against $1.6 billion of liquid assets, net debt near seven times trailing operating income, with interest coverage around three times. That debt was the price of building multiple terminals at once, and it makes the equity a residual claim behind a very large fixed obligation. The peer frame of capital-intensive energy-infrastructure operators is the right one, and Venture Global sits at the most leveraged, earliest-ramp end of it. The bet reconciles to paying an asset-supported price for a fast-ramping LNG platform on the condition that the projects finish on schedule, LNG pricing holds, and the BP and Shell disputes resolve without a damages award large enough to impair a balance sheet that has very little room to absorb one.
Catalysts
The operating ramp is the bullish catalyst. Venture Global reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of $4.6 billion, up 59% year over year and well ahead of estimates, with adjusted earnings of $0.19, operating income of $1.2 billion, and net income of $488 million, on 130 cargos exported, more than double the prior-year volume. Management raised full-year consolidated adjusted EBITDA guidance to $8.2 to $8.5 billion and set cargo targets of 147 to 154 from Calcasieu and 347 to 369 from Plaquemines, with Plaquemines Phase I commercial operations targeted for the fourth quarter of 2026 and Phase II for mid-2027.
The dominant overhang is legal. An international arbitration tribunal ruled against Venture Global in its dispute with BP, finding it failed to declare commercial operations on time and did not act as a reasonable and prudent operator, with BP claiming more than $1 billion plus interest and costs; the damages phase is expected later, likely in 2026. A separate dispute with Shell adds further uncertainty. These rulings bear directly on the long-term customer contracts that underpin the company's value, so their resolution is a discrete, high-stakes catalyst.
The variables to watch are project timing, LNG pricing, and the damages outcome. Plaquemines start-up milestones drive the volume ramp, realized LNG prices set the revenue per cargo, and the BP damages phase will quantify the financial hit. The next checkpoint is the second-quarter print in mid-2026, alongside any procedural updates in the BP and Shell arbitrations.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Calcasieu Project / Plaquemines Project / CP2 Project (reported)
- LNG (CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …consolidated long-term leverage and investment in accretive organic growth. Overview of Significant Events Our significant events since January 1, 2025 and through the filing date of this Form 10-K include the following: Strategic Growth • Following our pre-filing in July 2025, in February 2026, we filed an…
- FY2025 10-K: …of infrastructure, as well as the timing of satisfaction of certain events or development of infrastructure to support natural gas gathering and transport. We may recognize changes in fair value through earnings that could significantly impact our results of operations if and when such uncertainties are resolved.…
- CQP (Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Liquefaction Project in certain markets. The cost of LNG supplies from North America, including the Liquefaction Project, may also be impacted by an increase in natural gas prices in North America. As described in General in Items 1. and 2. Business and Properties, as of December 31, 2025, we have contracted through…
- FY2025 10-K: …additional liquefaction capacity adjacent to the Liquefaction Project, and we are commercializing to support the additional liquefaction capacity associated with this potential expansion project. The development of this project or other projects, including infrastructure projects in support of natural gas supply and…
- SRE (SEMPRA)
- FY2025 10-K: …to our Gasoducto Rosarito pipeline system, which enables it to receive regasified LNG from the ECA Regas Facility as well as continental gas supplied from the U.S. on the North Baja pipeline. TdM generates revenue from selling electricity and resource adequacy to the California ISO for delivery to governmental,…
- FY2025 10-K: …the capital expenditures for the project will be approximately $550 million, including capitalized interest at the project level and project contingency. The actual amount of capital expenditures may differ substantially from our estimates. We expect commercial operations to commence in the first quarter of 2026.…
- EE (Excelerate Energy, Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …and our systematic approach to project development. The growth opportunities we are currently pursuing offer diversity in both project maturity and project type, featuring a spectrum of final investment decision dates and project structures. We expect to invest in projects across the LNG value chain that offer…
- FY2025 10-K: …growth of each of our employees. We are dedicated to creating an environment where every team member feels valued and empowered to contribute their unique ideas and perspectives. As a United States ("U.S.")-based company with global operations, we collaborate with a diverse range of colleagues, vendors, customers,…
Sales and Shipping (reported)
- LNG (CHENIERE ENERGY, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …customers' energy demands and: • safely, efficiently and reliably operating and maintaining our assets; • procuring natural gas and pipeline transport capacity to our facilities; • commencing commercial delivery for, and continuing to fulfill all commercial commitments to, our long-term SPA customers; 7 Table of…
- FY2025 10-K: …our SPAs, customers purchase LNG on either an FOB basis or a DAP basis generally for a price consisting of a fixed fee per MMBtu of LNG (a portion of which is subject to annual adjustment for inflation) plus a variable fee per MMBtu of LNG generally equal to 115% of Henry Hub. The variable fees under our SPAs were…
- CQP (Cheniere Energy Partners, L.P.)
- FY2025 10-K: …to fulfill all commercial commitments to, our long-term SPA customers; • continuing to secure long-term customer contracts to support our planned expansion, including the FID of potential expansion projects; • maximizing the production of LNG to serve our customers and generating steady and stable revenues and…
- FY2025 10-K: …and the transition to a lower-carbon economy continues to evolve, as described in Market Factors and Competition , we expect the scope and extent of our future climate and sustainability initiatives to evolve accordingly. While we have not incurred material direct expenditures related to climate change, we are…
- GLNG (Golar LNG Limited)
- FY2025 20-F: …rises in colder weather and declines in warmer weather. Seasonal demand during the summer months has increased in certain markets due to energy requirements for air conditioning and, in some regions, reduced availability of hydropower generation. Certain of our tolling arrangements include both fixed capacity…
- FY2025 20-F: …in the supply of vessel capacity without a commensurate increase in demand; • the type, size and age of a vessel; • competition from more technologically advanced vessels; and • the cost of new buildings or retrofitting or modifying existing vessels, as a result of technological advances in vessel design or…
- FLNG (FLEX LNG Ltd.)
- FY2025 20-F: …of 2029 under the original time charter contracts. The addendum includes additional options for the charterer to extend each vessel up to the first quarter of 2039. Employment of Our Fleet and Our Customers We manage the employment of our Fleet. We deploy our LNG carriers on period time charters which can last up to…
- FY2025 20-F: …time basis or otherwise. If certain waiver provisions in the DRIP are requested and granted pursuant to the terms of the plan, we may grant additional share sales to investors from time to time up to the amount registered under the plan. As of December 31, 2025, the Company holds an aggregate of 427,949 treasury…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release, May 12 2026 · ICC arbitration ruling, 2025-2026