VENTURE GLOBAL, INC. (VG): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers VENTURE GLOBAL, INC. (VG) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/VG

Headline

FieldValue
TickerVG
CompanyVENTURE GLOBAL, INC.
Current price$12.42/sh
CompositionLNG revenue 99% / Other revenue 1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Multiple paid13x operating income

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 5.9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~3.5%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
cohort percentile (of 72 peers)11
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.07x5expensive
Earnings0.85x2justifies
Relative0.38x2justifies
Growth0.50x2justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 4.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=11)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$39.620.31xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 8.1x / 11.1x / 14.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.0x / 20.0x / 24.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$11.661.07xyesBV/sh $2.74, ROE (TTM) 39.3%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$26.540.47xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$18.020.69xyesRev $15.5B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.7x / 2.1x / 2.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$31.500.39xyesEPS $0.90, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.33 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$0.011242.00xyesNormalized EBIT (latest-period EBIT; under 3y history) $1.15B × (1−15%) / WACC 4.9% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median)
Residual IncomeAsset$18.420.67xyesBV $2.74 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 39.3% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$7.461.66xyes√(22.5 × EPS $0.90 × BVPS $2.74) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $6.20B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$29.040.43xyesEPS $0.90 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$1.289.70xyesBV $2.74 × (ROIC 2.3% / WACC 4.9%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $15.47B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$33.750.37xyesEPS $0.90 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$9.731.28xyesEPS $0.90 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Calcasieu Projectoperatingenterprise$4.1b$1.3b operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Plaquemines Projectoperatingenterprise$9.2b$4.2b operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
CP2 Projectoperatingenterprise$1.0m-$278.0m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Sales and Shippingoperatingenterprise$2.5b$248.0m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$35.2b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)7.94x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)6.74x
Interest coverage3.2x
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Read Venture Global by its trajectory and the picture is of a company crossing from construction into cash generation at speed. First-quarter 2026 revenue rose 59% year over year to $4.6 billion, operating income reached $1.2 billion, and net income climbed 23% to $488 million, driven by exporting 130 cargos, more than double the volume of a year earlier. That growth is not a market-share win in a mature business; it is the mechanical ramp of new liquefaction capacity coming online. The filing describes Calcasieu Pass reaching commercial operations and selling LNG under long-term contracts, while the much larger Plaquemines project ramps behind it. Each train that starts producing adds a step of revenue and cash flow that the trailing numbers have not yet fully captured.

The business model is built on long-dated, take-or-pay style contracts that turn LNG into something closer to an infrastructure annuity than a commodity trade. The filing details sale-and-purchase agreements "commencing on set dates in 2029 and 2030," with the LNG "sourced by VG Commodities from the Calcasieu, Plaquemines or CP2 projects." Those contracted volumes give years of forward visibility into demand, and Venture Global's distinctive low-cost, modular construction approach lets it bring capacity online faster and cheaper than conventional terminals. With Plaquemines Phase I targeting commercial operations in the fourth quarter of 2026 and Phase II in mid-2027, the volume runway extends well beyond today's output.

The valuation reflects a stock the market has already marked down, not one priced for perfection. Every family of method now supports the price, including the asset-value lens, which is the relevant one for a company whose terminals are enormous physical assets. Management raised full-year adjusted EBITDA guidance to $8.2 to $8.5 billion and laid out cargo targets of 147 to 154 from Calcasieu and 347 to 369 from Plaquemines for the year. The bull bet is that a fast-ramping, contracted LNG-export platform, priced at a level the conservative methods can defend after a sharp decline, keeps converting its massive build-out into the cash flow that services its debt and eventually flows to equity.

Bear Case

The bull case assumes Venture Global's customer contracts mean what the company says they mean, and that assumption just took a serious hit. An international arbitration tribunal ruled against the company in its dispute with BP, finding it failed to declare commercial operations at Calcasieu Pass on time and did not act as a reasonable and prudent operator, putting more than $1 billion of damages plus interest and costs in play, with the damages phase still to come. A separate dispute with Shell adds to the overhang. These are not abstract risks: they go to the heart of whether Venture Global's foundational customers honor their long-term agreements, and the long-dated contracts the bull thesis relies on are only as good as the company's ability to defend them. A pattern of customer litigation is the worst possible signal for a business whose entire value rests on multi-decade offtake commitments.

Underneath the legal overhang sits a balance sheet of extraordinary size. Venture Global carries roughly $37 billion of gross debt against just $1.6 billion of liquid assets, net debt near $35 billion, the inevitable result of funding multiple multibillion-dollar terminals with borrowed money. Interest coverage is only about three times, which is thin for a company still completing construction, and net debt sits at nearly seven times trailing operating income. That leverage works while every project ramps on schedule and contracted cash flows arrive, but it leaves almost no cushion. A construction delay, a financing-cost increase, a soft patch in global LNG prices, or an adverse damages award all land on a company that must keep servicing $37 billion of debt regardless.

The combination is what makes the bear case sharp. The company's growth is real but it is the growth of a leveraged developer mid-build, and the recent results already showed "lower weighted average LNG sales prices at our Calcasieu Project," a reminder that the realized price per cargo is not fixed. The price has fallen to a level the value methods support, so the stock is not expensive on the numbers, but the bear point is not about the multiple; it is about the distribution of outcomes. A buyer is underwriting flawless project execution, stable LNG pricing, and favorable resolution of the customer disputes, all carried on one of the largest debt loads in the sector. If any one of those breaks, the equity, which sits behind $37 billion of debt, absorbs the damage first.

Valuation

Venture Global is a leveraged LNG developer whose stock has already been marked down to where its assets can defend it, and that reset frames the whole read. After a sharp decline, every family of method now supports the price near $11 (June 28, 2026): asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and forward growth all sit at or above it. For a company whose value is enormous physical liquefaction terminals, the asset-value lens reaching the price is the meaningful signal, and it says the market is no longer paying a development premium but pricing closer to the underlying infrastructure.

What the price implies is modest, which is the point of a below-floor situation. The inversion reads the price as requiring only a low operating margin to be sustained, well below the roughly 34% the company currently earns as cargoes ramp, meaning the market is not demanding aggressive growth from here; it is discounting the risks around the cash flows rather than the cash flows themselves. The gap between the demonstrated margin and the modest implied one is the legal and leverage risk the market is pricing in. This is a value-and-asset situation, not a growth bet, and the central question is downside protection rather than upside multiple expansion.

Solvency is the entire story and the reason the modest implied margin still does not make the stock obviously cheap. Venture Global carries about $37 billion of gross debt against $1.6 billion of liquid assets, net debt near seven times trailing operating income, with interest coverage around three times. That debt was the price of building multiple terminals at once, and it makes the equity a residual claim behind a very large fixed obligation. The peer frame of capital-intensive energy-infrastructure operators is the right one, and Venture Global sits at the most leveraged, earliest-ramp end of it. The bet reconciles to paying an asset-supported price for a fast-ramping LNG platform on the condition that the projects finish on schedule, LNG pricing holds, and the BP and Shell disputes resolve without a damages award large enough to impair a balance sheet that has very little room to absorb one.

Catalysts

The operating ramp is the bullish catalyst. Venture Global reported first-quarter 2026 revenue of $4.6 billion, up 59% year over year and well ahead of estimates, with adjusted earnings of $0.19, operating income of $1.2 billion, and net income of $488 million, on 130 cargos exported, more than double the prior-year volume. Management raised full-year consolidated adjusted EBITDA guidance to $8.2 to $8.5 billion and set cargo targets of 147 to 154 from Calcasieu and 347 to 369 from Plaquemines, with Plaquemines Phase I commercial operations targeted for the fourth quarter of 2026 and Phase II for mid-2027.

The dominant overhang is legal. An international arbitration tribunal ruled against Venture Global in its dispute with BP, finding it failed to declare commercial operations on time and did not act as a reasonable and prudent operator, with BP claiming more than $1 billion plus interest and costs; the damages phase is expected later, likely in 2026. A separate dispute with Shell adds further uncertainty. These rulings bear directly on the long-term customer contracts that underpin the company's value, so their resolution is a discrete, high-stakes catalyst.

The variables to watch are project timing, LNG pricing, and the damages outcome. Plaquemines start-up milestones drive the volume ramp, realized LNG prices set the revenue per cargo, and the BP damages phase will quantify the financial hit. The next checkpoint is the second-quarter print in mid-2026, alongside any procedural updates in the BP and Shell arbitrations.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Calcasieu Project / Plaquemines Project / CP2 Project (reported)

Sales and Shipping (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings release, May 12 2026 · ICC arbitration ruling, 2025-2026

View the full interactive VG report on boothcheck