UNITED BANKSHARES INC/WV (UBSI): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $49.09, UNITED BANKSHARES INC/WV (UBSI) is priced for 11.2% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/UBSI

Headline

FieldValue
TickerUBSI
CompanyUNITED BANKSHARES INC/WV
Current price$49.09/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basisfinancials
Return on equity needed11.2%
Return on equity now8.5%
ROE gap+2.7pp
Price-to-book1.23x

Solve inputs: computed at a 9.8% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 10-year stage, on common book equity (FY2026); each 1pp of cost of equity moves the implied ROE ~1.2pp.

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history+4.81σ
cohort percentile (of 166 peers)40
sustained it ~10 years at this level72%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.26x3expensive
Earnings1.27x1expensive
Relative0
Growth0.48x2justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=6)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
Bank Fair Value (P/TBV)$22.902.14xyesTBVPS $24.76 × 0.92x (ROE (TTM) 9.2% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), credit 1.22% allowance/loans → ×0.94)
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.2x / 10.0x / 11.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax
Simple DDMGrowth$981.800.05xyesDPS $1.52, g=9.2% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3%
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$54.050.91xyesStage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$38.931.26xyesBV/sh $39.18, ROE (TTM) 9.2%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$38.811.26xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowthnoRev $1.1B, growth 19% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 5.0x / 6.1x / 7.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $3.57, growth 33% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.41 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAsset$56.100.88xyes√(22.5 × EPS $3.57 × BVPS $39.18) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativeno
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarningsnoEPS $3.57 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelativeno
PEG Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $3.57 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$38.591.27xyesEPS $3.57 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

The issuer is a funded financial business. Debt, interest, and cash flows are operating inputs, so industrial EV, net-debt, WACC, and free-cash-flow lenses do not apply; value the common-equity claim with book, earnings, capital, and payout economics.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Community Bankingfinancialequity1.2B reported-currencywithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required

No unit-level total common-equity value is stated. Each financial unit requires supported standalone common equity, normalized earnings, capital adequacy, and payout capacity. Consolidated debt, interest, and cash are operating balances, not an enterprise-to-equity bridge; company-level book, earnings, capital, and payout lenses remain the coherent cross-checks.

Solvency

FieldValue
Share count CAGR (dilution)0.7%

Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The surprising number in United Bankshares is the gap between two return figures that should be close together. The bank reported a return on average shareholders' equity of 9.08% for Q1 2026, but a return on average tangible common equity of 14.40%. That spread is not noise; it is the signature of an acquisitive bank. The reported equity carries goodwill from years of buying other banks, which drags the headline ROE down, while the cash-generating engine underneath earns a genuinely strong return on the tangible capital actually at work. A reader who anchors on the 9% misses that the operating business is compounding closer to 14%.

The acquisition machine is the franchise. The 10-K details the Piedmont merger, accounted for under the acquisition method, with Piedmont bringing "$2,356,883,000 in total assets, $2,079,933,000 in loans" at the acquisition date, and the filing's purchase-accounting marks show United writing the acquired loans, securities, and deposits to fair value on day one. This is a bank that has built scale by buying community banks, marking their books conservatively, and integrating them onto a single platform. The recurring playbook is why the tangible return stays high even as the balance sheet grows.

The capital position lets management run the playbook on its own terms. United earned $124.2 million, or $0.89 per diluted share, in Q1 2026, up sharply from $0.59 a year earlier, with a net interest margin of 3.80% that compressed only modestly despite lower asset yields. Funding costs improved as the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits fell, lifting the interest-rate spread. The bank paid a $0.38 quarterly dividend and bought back about 1.7 million shares at an average $39.92. Dividends, buybacks, and acquisition capacity funded simultaneously is the mark of a bank with real capital headroom, and credit is pristine: non-performing assets at 0.34% of total assets and net charge-offs at an annualized 0.09%.

Bear Case

The structural truth a holder would rather not face is what the price is paying for the bank's profitability. United trades near twice its tangible book value, and the return that premium rests on is a 9.08% return on equity, around the cost of equity for a regional bank, not comfortably above it. A bank earning roughly its cost of equity does not obviously deserve a two-times-tangible-book multiple; that multiple is the market crediting the acquisition strategy and the 14.40% tangible return as the durable figure. If consolidation slows, integration stumbles, or the next deal is priced less favorably, the premium has little to defend it, and the price compresses toward the tangible-book-plus-modest-premium level the value methods point to.

The credit book carries the kind of concentration that looks benign until it does not. The 10-K describes commercial real estate nonowner-occupied loans where "cash flow to service debt is normally dependent on" the property's own performance rather than an operating business, the category most exposed in a commercial-real-estate downturn. United's current credit metrics are excellent, with the allowance held at 1.20% of loans and charge-offs minimal, but those are peak-of-cycle readings. A regional bank's earnings are a leveraged bet on its loan book, and the price assumes the current low-loss environment persists across the duration the premium requires.

Interest-rate risk runs underneath the whole model. The net interest margin held at 3.80% because deposit costs fell faster than asset yields, a favorable mix that depends on the rate environment cooperating. The filing's purchase-accounting marks also flag a subtler exposure: acquired loans and securities were marked to fair value, and a sharp move in rates re-prices both sides of the balance sheet. The bank earns its spread by funding longer assets with shorter deposits, and the bull case rests on that spread staying near 3.80%. The price does not appear to discount the possibility that margin compression and a normalizing credit cycle arrive together, which is exactly when a two-times-tangible-book multiple on a 9% ROE looks expensive.

Valuation

United Bankshares is read through the bank lens, where the question is what return on equity the price requires against what the bank earns. The price embeds an elevated return assumption, and the most concrete statement of it is the multiple: the stock trades near twice tangible book value. For that to be warranted, the bank needs to sustain a return on tangible common equity around the 14.40% it posted, well above the 9.08% headline return on equity that the goodwill-laden balance sheet produces. The premium is a bet on the tangible-return figure being the real one and staying there.

The methods we use to triangulate are split in the way a richly valued bank usually is. The price-to-tangible-book approach reads the stock as roughly double its tangible-book anchor, the clearest signal of the premium. The book-value-plus-profitability methods land near the price, crediting the excess return. The growth-adjusted earnings approaches sit below the price, because United's earnings growth, absent acquisitions, is modest. The pattern says this is a value-and-quality name carrying a premium for its returns and its acquisition franchise, not a cheap bank and not a growth bank.

The balance sheet, read the way a bank balance sheet should be, is a source of strength rather than risk here. The frame is not leverage or cash burn, which do not apply to a deposit-funded institution; it is capital-return capacity and credit. United funds a dividend and buybacks while retaining capacity for acquisitions, and its credit metrics, non-performing assets at 0.34% and net charge-offs at 0.09%, are about as clean as a regional bank's get. The decisive point for this name is therefore not solvency but durability: whether the high tangible return and the clean credit book both persist long enough to justify paying twice tangible book for them.

Catalysts

Q1 2026 was a strong quarter built on improving funding costs and clean credit. United earned $124.2 million, or $0.89 per diluted share, up from $0.59 a year earlier, with net interest income of $282.5 million and a net interest margin of 3.80%. The earnings improvement came partly from lower credit costs and partly from a deposit-cost decline that lifted the interest-rate spread by two basis points quarter over quarter. Returns were solid: 1.49% on average assets, 9.08% on average equity, and 14.40% on average tangible common equity.

Capital return continued at a steady pace. The bank paid a $0.38 per share dividend and repurchased about 1.7 million shares at an average $39.92 during the quarter. Credit quality stayed pristine, with non-performing assets at 0.34% of total assets, annualized net charge-offs at 0.09%, and the allowance held at 1.20% of loans.

The catalysts that matter for United are the bank-specific ones: the next acquisition and how it is priced, the trajectory of the net interest margin as deposit costs and asset yields move, and any inflection in credit, particularly in the commercial-real-estate book. Because the premium multiple rests on the acquisition strategy and the high tangible return, a well-priced deal or continued margin stability would support it, while a credit normalization or margin compression would be the readings that test it.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Community Banking (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

UBSI Q1 2026 results, April 23 2026

View the full interactive UBSI report on boothcheck