Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $102.25, Tradeweb Markets Inc. (TW) is priced for +13.0% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TW
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | TW |
| Company | Tradeweb Markets Inc. |
| Sector / Industry | Financial Services / Financial Services |
| Current price | $102.26/sh |
| Composition | Transaction fees and commissions 83% / Subscription fees 11% / LSEG market data fees 5% / Other 1% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 10.3% |
| Operating margin today | 43.7% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -33.4pp |
| Implied growth | 13.0% |
| Multiple paid | 20x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 6: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 8.7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~7.1pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -1.40σ |
| cohort percentile (of 17 peers) | 53 |
| sustained it ~5 years at this level | 48% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.89x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.71x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.03x | 4 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.75x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $162.68 | 0.63x | yes | FCF base $1.3B, growth 14% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.0%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $136.34 | 0.75x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 14.7x / 16.7x / 18.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $75.37 | 1.36x | yes | P/E 15.67x (blended: static sector reference 12x + trailing (TTM) 24x), scenarios: 13.0x / 15.7x / 18.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $45.58 | 2.24x | yes | BV/sh $31.18, ROE (TTM) 13.5%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $54.60 | 1.87x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $80.02 | 1.28x | yes | Rev $2.2B, growth 14% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 6.6x / 8.0x / 9.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $146.65 | 0.70x | yes | EPS $4.19, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.69 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $32.12 | 3.18x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.63B × (1−24%) / WACC 9.0% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $56.51 | 1.81x | yes | BV $31.18 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 13.5% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $54.22 | 1.89x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $4.19 × BVPS $31.18) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $65.26 | 1.57x | yes | FCF $1144.8M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $59.71 | 1.71x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $1.04B (FCF $1.14B − SBC $0.11B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $135.20 | 0.76x | yes | EPS $4.19 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $12.65 | 8.08x | yes | BV $31.18 × (ROIC 3.7% / WACC 9.0%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $31.11 | 3.29x | yes | Revenue $2.21B × sector P/S 3.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $157.13 | 0.65x | yes | EPS $4.19 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $45.30 | 2.26x | yes | EPS $4.19 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tradeweb Markets (electronic trading, whole company) | operating | enterprise | 2.1B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $2.1b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -2.79x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -2.14x (net cash) |
| Interest coverage | 469.3x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.7% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Tradeweb runs an electronic marketplace for bonds, rates, and derivatives, and its economics are the network kind: Q1 2026 revenue rose 21.2% year over year to a record $617.8 million on record quarterly average daily volume of $3.3 trillion, at a 46.5% operating margin.
- The chief risk is client concentration on the dealer side, which the 10-K names directly, that consolidation "has resulted in concentration in markets by some of our largest dealer clients" and any disruption to them affects the platform (accession 0001758730-26-000015); a second risk is that most volume is transaction-based and rises and falls with market activity.
- The price already leans on durable growth, embedding about 13.8% annual operating growth for five years, so the numbers to watch are the monthly volume reports (June 2026 ADV was $3.2 trillion, up 29.5% year over year) and whether international revenue, now 44% of the total, keeps outpacing.
Bull Case
What the market is paying for here is a toll booth on the electronification of fixed income, and the toll receipts are accelerating rather than maturing. First-quarter 2026 revenue crossed $600 million for the first time in company history, up 21.2% year over year to $617.8 million, on record quarterly average daily volume of $3.3 trillion, with net income of $233.2 million and a 55% adjusted EBITDA margin. The company's own strategy statement in the 10-K names the flywheel: expanding "our network, increasing our market share, increasing electronification of our markets" (accession 0001758730-26-000015). Each new dealer and each new institutional client makes the platform more useful to the next one, which is why a business this size still grows volume at double digits.
The secular story is that a large share of bond and rates trading still happens by voice and manual processes, and Tradeweb is converting it. The filing describes pulling "trading business from electronic voice processing clients in our rates and credit asset classes" and serving clients "across all trade sizes, from odd-lot to block trades" (same accession). That conversion is a multi-decade runway that does not depend on markets being volatile, only on trading continuing to move onto screens. The breadth showed up in the first quarter: swaps and swaptions ADV rose 38.2%, European government bonds 32.6%, and mortgages 20.5% year over year, with international revenue up 29% and now 44% of the total. The growth is not one asset class getting lucky; it is the whole platform electrifying at once.
The financial profile is nearly ideal for compounding. Revenue derives primarily from "transaction fees, commissions" plus subscription and market-data fees (accession 0001758730-26-000015), a mix that blends variable trading revenue with recurring subscription and a fixed LSEG market-data stream. Operating margin has climbed each of the last four quarters to 46.5%, free cash flow of $1.16 billion converts at 134% of net income, the balance sheet is net cash, and management returned $263 million over the trailing year in dividends and buybacks while shares still shrank. On a growth-adjusted earnings basis the stock even screens as reasonable, with a PEG below 1 on its trailing growth rate. The bull case is a genuine network with pricing power, riding a structural shift, at a valuation that growth can outrun.
Bear Case
The capital-allocation and ownership picture is where a careful holder should start, because it complicates the clean-compounder story. The anchored filing data flags that Tradeweb pays preferred dividends on top of common, and that total cash-flow dividends divided by common shares would overstate the per-share payout by about 16%, a reminder that the equity a common holder owns sits beneath other claims and inside a complex up-C structure tied to its former parent. The company also carries a large LSEG market-data arrangement in its revenue, a related-party stream whose terms are set by contract rather than by an open market, which means a slice of the reported revenue is not the same competitively-won toll the rest of the platform earns. Capital return, at $263 million over the trailing year against $1.16 billion of free cash flow, is modest relative to the cash the business throws off, so the balance sheet accumulates rather than fully returns.
The operating dependency underneath is client concentration. The 10-K is blunt that "substantial consolidation of market share among companies in the financial services industry has resulted in concentration in markets by some of our largest dealer clients" and that the platform depends on them (accession 0001758730-26-000015). It also warns it does "not have long-term contractual arrangements with certain of our clients" (same accession). A network is only as strong as the dealers who make its markets, and a handful of them dominate. Layer on that most revenue is transaction-based and therefore tied to trading activity, which the filing acknowledges it tries to offset through electronification but cannot eliminate as a swing factor, and the growth that looks smooth on an annual chart is lumpier underneath.
Then there is the price. At about 21 times operating income, the stock embeds roughly 13.8% annual operating growth for five years; historically only about 47% of comparable fast-growers sustained that pace even five years, so the market is paying for the better-than-even outcome as though it were assured. The valuation methods split accordingly: the forward-growth and peer-multiple lenses justify the price, while the asset-value and earnings-power methods, which credit only what the business demonstrably earns rather than what it might, land well below it, at 2.4 and 1.7 times the price respectively. That is the signature of a durability premium: fine if the electronification runway is as long and as exclusively Tradeweb's as the bulls assume, expensive if a rival platform, a fee-compression cycle, or a quiet year in fixed-income trading interrupts the compounding the price already banks. The bear case is not decline; it is that a very good business is priced for an uninterrupted decade.
Valuation
At $97.85 (July 11, 2026), Tradeweb trades at about 21 times company-wide operating income, which embeds operating growth of roughly 13.8% a year for five years. The rate is within what the company has recently delivered, so the assumption is not heroic on its face; the framework labels it within range. The stretch is duration and consistency: only about 47% of comparable fast-growers held that pace even five years, so the price is paying for the coin landing heads. Notably, the price does not require margin expansion at all, it leans on growth and longevity while the business already earns a 42.5% operating margin, so the bet is entirely about how long the volume growth persists.
The method families divide along the usual growth-premium line. The forward-growth projections and the blended peer multiple reach the price, the latter helped by the stock's 24 times trailing earnings sitting against a financial-sector median of 12, a gap that reflects Tradeweb being an exchange-like network rather than a balance-sheet lender. The asset-value and earnings-power lenses land well below, at 2.4 and 1.7 times the price, because a business earning 12% on a large equity base looks expensive when you credit only its steady-state earnings and none of its growth. The signal in that spread is clean: the market is paying for compounding the static methods structurally cannot frame. The filing-sourced inputs behind the growth are the record ADV and the revenue mix, which the 10-K describes as derived primarily from "transaction fees, commissions" plus subscription and market-data fees (accession 0001758730-26-000015); the transaction share is the variable, volume-sensitive piece, and the subscription and LSEG data pieces are the steadier base.
Solvency is a non-issue: the balance sheet is net cash, with no debt pressure on the path to the priced-in outcome, and free cash flow of $1.16 billion converts at 134% of net income. One number needs its basis stated to stay coherent, the common dividend is $0.56 per share (a 0.6% yield and a 13.7% payout), and any figure that lumps in the preferred dividend would read about 16% higher, so the common-only number is the right one. What the buyer at $97.85 is underwriting is the length of the electronification runway: if fixed-income trading keeps migrating to screens and Tradeweb keeps taking share, the growth methods are right and the static ones are simply looking backward; if the migration slows or a competitor pressures fees, the price reverts toward what those static methods already show.
Catalysts
The April 29 first-quarter report was a record across the board. Revenue of $617.8 million rose 21.2% year over year (17.5% in constant currency), net income was $233.2 million, adjusted diluted EPS was $1.08, and adjusted EBITDA of $339.7 million ran at a 55.0% margin, the first time quarterly revenue topped $600 million. Quarterly average daily volume set a record at $3.3 trillion, with swaps and swaptions ADV up 38.2%, European government bonds up 32.6%, and mortgages up 20.5% year over year, and international revenue up 29% to 44% of the total.
Tradeweb reports trading volumes monthly, which gives the story a near-continuous data feed. June 2026 total volume was $69.7 trillion and ADV was $3.2 trillion, up 29.5% year over year, capping a second quarter with $194.2 trillion of total volume and $3.0 trillion ADV, up 18.2% year over year. Those releases are the leading indicators for each quarterly print; the next earnings report will land in late July or early August and convert the volume run into revenue. Analyst sentiment has turned more constructive, with Goldman Sachs upgrading the stock to Buy and raising its target to $146 from $128 on a view that revenue growth reaccelerates through 2028. That target sits above where trailing-earnings arithmetic lands, which is consistent with the stock trading on the durability of its volume growth rather than on its current multiple.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Tradeweb Markets (electronic trading, whole company) (reported)
- MKTX (MARKETAXESS HOLDINGS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …globally. Some of these market participants compete with us in a particular market, while select others compete against substantially all of our platforms and solutions. We primarily compete on the basis of our client network, the liquidity provided by our broker-dealer clients, the unique liquidity and the potential…
- FY2025 10-K: …managers and additional programs to enable leaders to foster accountability and clear communication in the teams they lead. We offer a range of live and on-demand technical, markets-related, product management and professional skills development to all employees globally to enable employees to develop a wide range of…
- ICE (Intercontinental Exchange Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …markets. Our benchmark contracts offer one of the most globally relevant price markers for these agricultural markets and provide our customers with the tools to manage price and counterparty risk and facilitate price discovery. • Financial Futures and Options: We offer a diverse suite of equity futures and options…
- FY2025 10-K: -trade analytics, an array of execution protocols, and post-trade services all designed to improve asset class transparency and bring efficiency to customers' workflows. In our Mortgage Technology segment, we provide customers with a comprehensive suite of technology offerings which we believe are critical to the…
- BGC (BGC Group, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …companies, market data and information vendors, securities and futures exchanges, electronic communications networks and trading platforms, crossing systems, software companies, financial trading consortia, as well as business-to-business marketplace infrastructure companies. We compete primarily with other…
- FY2025 10-K: …from OTC to exchange-traded, the underlying or related OTC market often continues to experience growth in line with the growth of the exchange-traded contract. For example, ICE operates both regulated exchanges and OTC execution services, and in the latter, it competes directly with inter-dealer and wholesale…
- CME (CME Group Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …attract and retain customer s. In 2025 , 93% of o ur overall contract volume was generated through electronic trading on our CME Globex electronic platform. We must continue to enhance our electronic trading platforms and other technology offerings to remain competitive. As a result, we will continue to be subject to…
- FY2025 10-K: …traders, financial institutions, individual and institutional investors, major corporations, manufacturers, producers, governments and central banks. Customers include both members of the exchange and non-members. We offer our customers the opportunity to trade futures contracts and options contracts on a range of…
- NDAQ (Nasdaq, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …MRX. These exchanges facilitate the trading of equity, ETF, index and foreign currency options. Our combined options market share in 2025 represented the largest share of the U.S. market for multi-listed equity options. Our options trading platforms provide trading opportunities to retail investors, algorithmic…
- FY2025 10-K: …solutions. Calypso is differentiated by Nasdaq's domain‑specific intelligence, proprietary algorithms and deep product integration, which are designed to support scalability and continued relevance as competitors increasingly adopt generic large‑language‑model‑based approaches. Our market technology business competes…
- CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and Asia Pacific. The Europe and Asia Pacific segment includes the pan-European derivatives transaction services, ETPs, including exchange traded funds, exchange traded notes, and exchange traded commodities, and international depository receipts that are hosted on MTFs operated by Cboe Europe Equities (Cboe Europe…
- FY2025 10-K: …from the licensing of proprietary market data and from access and capacity services. Futures. The Futures segment includes transaction services provided by CFE, a fully electronic futures exchange, which includes offerings for trading of VIX futures and other futures products, the licensing of proprietary market…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release, April 2026 · monthly activity report, July 7, 2026 · Goldman Sachs research note, 2026