TELUS CORP (TU): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $9.81, TELUS CORP (TU) is priced for +3.3% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TU
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | TU |
| Company | TELUS CORP |
| Sector / Industry | Communication Services / Telecom |
| Current price | $9.81/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 50.3% |
| Operating margin today | 101.2% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -50.9pp |
| Implied growth | 3.3% |
| Multiple paid | 23x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~8.5pp (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 5% sits below it).
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~20.6%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.06σ |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.43x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 3.11x | 2 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.10x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.95x | 4 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $13.24 | 0.74x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 19.6x / 21.6x / 23.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $6.35 | 1.54x | yes | P/E 16.29x (blended: static sector reference 12x + trailing (TTM) 26x), scenarios: 13.6x / 16.3x / 19.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 11.39x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $17.94 | 0.55x | yes | DPS $0.78, g=4.7% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $8.44 | 1.16x | yes | Stage 1: -8% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $4.03 | 2.43x | yes | BV/sh $7.96, ROE (TTM) 4.7%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $2.70 | 3.63x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $7.36 | 1.33x | yes | Rev $15.1B, growth 4% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.8x / 1.0x / 1.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $2.17 | 4.52x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.99B × (1−35%) / WACC 5.0% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $2.46 | 3.99x | yes | BV $7.96 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 4.7% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 3.0%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $9.81 | 1.00x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $0.54 × BVPS $7.96) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $0.01 | 981.00x | yes | EBITDA $1.74B × sector EV/EBITDA 7.0x (excluded from median) |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 981.00x | yes | FCF $1572.1M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $0.45 | 21.80x | yes | EPS $0.54 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $5.17 | 1.90x | yes | BV $7.96 × (ROIC 3.2% / WACC 5.0%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $14.77 | 0.66x | yes | Revenue $15.08B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $5.80 | 1.69x | yes | EPS $0.54 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $20.3b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 18.88x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 12.20x |
| Interest coverage | 2.0x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 3.3% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- TELUS is a Canadian telecom whose reported earnings chronically understate its cash engine: trailing free cash flow of $1.57 billion converts at over 275% of the $570 million in net income, because heavy depreciation on the fiber and wireless build flows through the income statement long after the cash went out.
- The load-bearing risk is the balance sheet: operating income covers interest only about 2.2 times, the equity is levered 3.6 times over assets that earn a 1.3% return, and the dividend program has leaned on discounted share issuance that management is only now phasing out.
- Watch the pace of asset monetization, including the sale of a 49.9% stake in roughly 3,000 towers for C$1.26 billion earmarked for debt reduction, and the June-quarter report for whether operating margin stabilizes after falling from 13.8% to 11.5% last year.
Bull Case
What a price-to-earnings screen sees here is misleading in a specific, checkable way. At 28 times trailing earnings against a telecom-sector median of 12, TELUS looks like the most expensive slow-growth carrier on the board. But the earnings line is the wrong lens for a company that just finished a decade-long fiber and 5G build: depreciation from that spending crushes net margin to 3.8% while the cash keeps arriving. Operating cash flow ran $3.58 billion last fiscal year, free cash flow $1.57 billion, a 9.8% free-cash-flow yield on the market cap, with every one of the last four periods cash-positive. The business also passes the quality checks that matter for a leveraged utility-like operator: profitable, cash flow well above net income, debt coming down, gross margin and asset turnover both improving.
The subscriber machine underneath is intact. TELUS added 262,000 total mobile and fixed customers in the first quarter of 2026, including 12,000 mobile phone and 21,000 internet additions, and management reaffirmed its 2026 financial targets. What the traditional carrier framing misses entirely is the non-carrier layer: TELUS Health and TELUS Digital drove double-digit growth in the quarter, the digital arm sells data annotation and generative-AI model support into the AI buildout, and the company is expanding sovereign AI computing facilities in Canada. None of that earns a telecom multiple if it keeps compounding.
Management is also converting buried assets into balance-sheet repair. The sale of a 49.9% stake in roughly 3,000 wireless towers for C$1.26 billion, with TELUS retaining operational control and the proceeds earmarked for debt paydown, is the template: monetize passive infrastructure at infrastructure multiples, keep the network. The dividend, growing and central to the story, is being put on firmer footing at the same time, with the discounted dividend-reinvestment program being wound down by 2027 as monetization proceeds land. The bull case is a cash machine priced on its accounting earnings, with a debt problem management is visibly working down and two growth businesses the multiple ignores.
Bear Case
Listen to which valuation methods approve of this price and which do not, because the split is telling. The methods that reach $10.44 are the ones that borrow optimism: forward-looking cash-flow projections that credit growth not yet delivered, and comparisons to sector multiples. The methods that ask only what the business demonstrably earns, on its assets and on its trailing profits, land at less than half the price. Those conservative reads are usually the more honest ones for a mature carrier, and here they are pointing at the same facts: return on equity of 4.7%, return on assets of 1.3%, and an operating margin that has slid from 16.0% three years ago to 11.5% in the latest fiscal year.
The price, meanwhile, requires improvement, not stability. At about 25 times operating income, today's price embeds operating growth of roughly 5.8% a year for five years. The company just posted a year in which operating income fell 15.7%. That gap between the requirement and the delivery is the bear case in one sentence: a business whose operating profit is shrinking is priced for half a decade of steady growth, and if the growth does not come, the multiple compresses toward what the earnings-power methods already say, which is a price far below this one.
The balance sheet is what makes the miss expensive rather than merely disappointing. Operating income covers interest only about 2.2 times, the equity multiplier runs 3.6 times, and the current ratio of 0.86 means near-term obligations exceed the assets that can be quickly converted to meet them. The dividend sits on top of that structure: growing, popular, and heavy relative to the free cash flow that funds it, which is why the company has been partly paying it in discounted stock through its reinvestment plan, a crutch management has promised to remove only by 2027, conditional on selling assets. Canadian carriers also cannot look abroad for relief the way the U.S. majors can: AT&T and Verizon earn operating margins of 19.2% and 21.2% on their much larger home market, roughly double TELUS's 11.5%, a scale gap the Canadian market cannot close. A high yield attached to declining operating margins and 2.2 times interest coverage is the classic shape of income that looks safest right before it is cut.
Valuation
The price embeds a turnaround it does not name. At $10.44 (July 11, 2026), the market pays about 25 times company-wide operating income, which implies operating growth of roughly 5.8% a year for five years. The framework labels that assumption within range for the sector, and it is, as a rate; the friction is that TELUS's operating income declined 15.7% in the latest fiscal year, so the price is paying for a resumption of growth the trailing statements have not yet shown.
The method families split into a recognizable telecom pattern. The forward cash-flow projections roughly reach the price, and the sector-multiple comparison sits close, about 20% below today's level. The asset-value and earnings-power lenses read the price at 2.4 and 2.7 times what they support, which is what happens when $16 billion of equity sits on assets returning 1.3%. The signal in the spread: the market is pricing the cash flows and the sector norm, not the demonstrated returns on capital. The cash-flow case is genuinely stronger than the earnings case here, since free cash flow of $1.57 billion runs at nearly three times net income, an artifact of depreciation on a completed network build rather than of weak operations, and gives the stock a 9.8% free-cash-flow yield.
Solvency is where the reader should linger. Operating income covers interest only about 2.2 times, leverage the framework flags as meaningful and the equity price is not dwelling on. The current ratio of 0.86 leaves short-term bills ahead of quickly available assets, and the whole capital structure carries a distress-zone score on the standard solvency screen, which for an infrastructure operator mostly measures how much debt sits against slow-turning assets rather than imminent trouble, but measures it accurately. Set against that: dividends are growing, the tower monetization directs C$1.26 billion toward debt, and first-quarter results reaffirmed 2026 targets with net income of C$144 million on C$5.0 billion of revenue. The decisive number for this price is the direction of operating margin from 11.5%; the five-year growth assumption starts working only if that line stops falling first.
Catalysts
First-quarter 2026 results, reported in May, were steady rather than inspiring: total operating revenues of C$5,013 million slipped about 1% year over year, Q1 2026 adjusted EPS came in at C$0.23 versus C$0.26 a year earlier, and GAAP net income was C$144 million. The operational offset was customer growth of 262,000 total mobile and fixed additions, and company materials pointed to free cash flow up 19% year over year with TELUS Health and TELUS Digital growing double digits. Management reaffirmed its 2026 financial targets and declared a quarterly dividend of C$0.4184 per share, paid July 2, 2026.
The forward story runs through the balance sheet. The dividend-reinvestment discount was cut to 1.75% in the first quarter, with further reductions planned through 2026 and full removal expected by the end of 2027, explicitly tied to how quickly asset monetization proceeds arrive. The tower transaction, a 49.9% stake in roughly 3,000 towers sold for C$1.26 billion with the assets moving into a new Montreal-based operator and proceeds directed at deleveraging, is the model for further infrastructure monetization, and the company continues to expand sovereign AI computing facilities in Canada. The next quarterly report, covering the June quarter, is the near-term checkpoint on margin direction and deleveraging pace. Street sentiment is unenthusiastic in the way mature telecoms usually are, with the consensus at Hold across covering analysts, which leaves the stock trading on its yield, its debt math, and the credibility of the monetization plan rather than on any expected growth surprise.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- WHR (WHIRLPOOL CORP /DE/)
- FY2025 10-K: …may place us at a competitive disadvantage to foreign companies that are not subject to similar regulations. Our internal controls may not always protect us from the improper conduct of our employees, suppliers, sub-suppliers or other contract parties, agents and business partners. Additionally, any suspicion or…
- FY2025 10-K: …includes large, sophisticated trade customers who have many choices and demand competitive products, services and prices, and many of whom have their own brands which compete with our products. We believe that we can best compete in the current environment by focusing on introducing new and innovative products,…
- CSX (CSX CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …future business operations and future profitability. These non-GAAP measures provide meaningful supplemental information regarding operating results because they exclude non-cash impairment of Quality Carriers' goodwill, which was fully impaired as of September 30, 2025. This is a significant item that is not…
- FY2025 10-K: …railroads and motor carriers that operate similar routes across its service area and, to a less significant extent, barges, ships and pipelines. Other transportation providers generally use public rights-of-way that are built and maintained by governmental entities, while CSXT and other railroads must build and…
- ALK (ALASKA AIR GROUP, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of operations. COMPETITION AND STRATEGY The airline industry is highly competitive and susceptible to price discounting and changes in capacity, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. If we cannot successfully compete in the marketplace, our business, financial condition, and operating results…
- FY2025 10-K: …and operating fluctuations may have a significant impact on operating results in an interim or annual period, and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. In a typical year, in addition to passenger loads, factors that could cause our operating results to vary include: • pricing initiatives by us…
- URI (United Rentals, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …that the terms we negotiate are competitive and that there is sufficient product available to meet anticipated customer demand. We utilize a comprehensive selection process to determine our equipment vendors. We consider product capabilities and industry position, the terms being offered, product liability history,…
- FY2025 10-K: …H&E merger termination benefit discussed above. Net income margin decreased 130 basis points to 15.5 percent, primarily driven by decreased gross margin from equipment rentals, particularly for the specialty segment, as discussed below (see "Results of Operations-Segment Equipment Rentals Gross Profit"), partially…
- DVA (DAVITA INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …operating income and adjusted operating income for the year ended December 31, 2024 includes foreign currency gains embedded in equity method income recognized from our Asia Pacific (APAC) joint venture, which was consolidated in the fourth quarter of 2024, of approximately $0.6 million. (2) For a reconciliation of…
- FY2025 10-K: …and credit default swap pricing. The Company does not believe the ultimate amount that could be realized upon settlement of these interest rate cap agreements would be materially different from the fair value estimates currently reported. See Note 12 for further discussion. As of December 31, 2025, the Company had…
- CHRW (C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …freight rates charged to our customers, the resulting increase in revenues may increase our working capital needs due to our business model, which generally has a higher length of days sales outstanding than days payables outstanding. Adjusted gross profit margin is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as adjusted…
- FY2025 10-K: …done with each customer by providing them with a full range of logistics services and people on whom they can rely. During 2025, we served 75,000 customers worldwide, ranging from Fortune 100 companies to small businesses in a wide variety of industries. During 2025, our largest customer accounted for approximately…
- SKM (SKM)
- FY2025 20-F: …We may also be designated as a "market-dominating business entity" by the relevant authorities under the Fair Trade Act, based on a case-by-case assessment of factors such as our market share, barriers to entry and the relative scale of competitors. If so designated, we would be subject to additional regulations,…
- FY2025 20-F: • Cellular services: The segment operating profit of our cellular services segment increased by 8.4% to Won 1,571.9 billion in 2024 from Won 1,450.1 billion in 2023, due to the greater increase in segment operating revenue as compared to the increase in segment operating expenses, for the various reasons described…
- MPLX (MPLX LP)
- FY2025 10-K: …the shortfall payment if it does not deliver the minimum volumes), which could decrease our revenues. In our Natural Gas and NGL Services segment, we face competition for natural gas gathering and in obtaining natural gas supplies for our processing and related services; in obtaining unprocessed NGLs for…
- FY2025 10-K: …fixed, a reduction in delivered volumes lowers revenue, net income and cash flow. We may not be able to retain existing customers, or acquire new customers, which would reduce our revenues and limit our future profitability. A significant portion of our business comes from a limited number of key customers. The…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
company announcement, 2025 · Q1 2026 earnings release, May 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings coverage, May 2026 · Q1 2026 report, May 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release and 6-K, May 2026 · Q1 2026 investor presentation, May 2026 · analyst consensus, June 2026