ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $86.50, ServiceTitan, Inc. (TTAN) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~5.4 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TTAN
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | TTAN |
| Company | ServiceTitan, Inc. |
| Sector / Industry | Technology / Software |
| Current price | $86.51/sh |
| Composition | Subscription 74% / Usage 22% / Professional services and other 4% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | revenue-multiple |
| EV / sales paid | 7.8x |
| Steady-state operating margin assumed | 28.0% |
| Must persist for | 5.4y |
The company earns no operating profit yet; the inversion runs on the revenue multiple and an assumed steady-state margin.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.2% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.8 years.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| sustained it ~5.4 years at this level | 32% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 5.56x | 2 | expensive |
| Earnings | 5.12x | 1 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.01x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.23x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=8)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $54.96 | 1.57x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 24% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.1%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $85.39 | 1.01x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 8.0x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $16.43 | 5.27x | yes | Book value floor: BV/sh $16.43, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $14.78 | 5.85x | yes | Book value with convergence: BV/sh $16.43, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $108.29 | 0.80x | yes | Rev $1.0B, growth 24% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 6.5x / 8.1x / 9.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | $70.47 | 1.23x | yes | Margin ramp: -13% → 22% over 7yr, rev growth 24% (input: historical growth; tapered) |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $16.91 | 5.12x | yes | FCF $119.1M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $85.39 | 1.01x | yes | Revenue $1.01B × sector P/S 8.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceTitan (cloud software, whole company) | operating | enterprise | 0.8B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $316.7m |
| Interest coverage | -27.1x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 51.7% |
| Burning cash | no |
Operating profit is negative or near zero and the company has no demonstrated through-cycle (mid-cycle) operating margin to normalize against, so years-to-repay cannot be computed honestly.
Bullet Takeaways
- ServiceTitan runs the operating software for the trades, HVAC, plumbing, electrical, and other field-service contractors, and its 10-K notes these businesses "often lack large IT organizations required to stitch together narrow solutions, build software products in-house or customize horizontal technology" (accession 0000950170-25-048834), the gap the platform fills.
- The distinctive current dynamic is monetization beyond seat growth: the company is layering payments and AI automation (its Max suite) on top of subscriptions, capturing only about 1 percent of roughly $86 billion in customer transaction volume as revenue today.
- The risk is the price against the profits: the company still loses money at the operating line and trades at about 7 times sales, so watch the fiscal-2027 revenue guide of roughly $935 to $940 million and continued operating-margin improvement.
Bull Case
Consider the biggest risk first, because it is also the bull case turned inside out. The bear says ServiceTitan loses money and trades at a rich multiple of sales, and both are true. But look at what the losses are buying: revenue grew about 25 percent year over year to $268.8 million in the quarter ended April 30, 2026, gross margin runs about 72 percent, and the operating loss is narrowing fast, from roughly negative 17 percent of revenue to negative 9.6 percent in a single year, as the platform scales past its fixed cost base. This is not a business that cannot make money; it is one deliberately spending ahead of a large opportunity, and the operating leverage is now visibly arriving.
The moat is the one software investors prize most: a system of record that runs the whole business. ServiceTitan is where a contractor schedules jobs, dispatches technicians, invoices customers, and takes payment, and its 10-K frames the wedge precisely, trades businesses "often lack large IT organizations required to stitch together narrow solutions, build software products in-house or customize horizontal technology to fit their" needs (accession 0000950170-25-048834). Once a contractor runs on it, ripping it out means re-plumbing daily operations, which is why the customer base is sticky and expanding: the 10-K reports over 1,000 customers with annualized billings above $100,000 (accession 0000950170-25-048834), and net dollar retention has run above 110 percent, meaning existing customers spend more each year on their own. The company's own filing explains the mechanism, revenue scales as customers "process more GTV through our platform and add technicians" (accession 0000950170-25-085509), so growth compounds with the customer's own business without a new sale.
The next leg is monetization depth, and it is early. ServiceTitan captures only about 1 percent of roughly $86 billion in gross transaction volume flowing through its platform as revenue, and it is widening the take rate through payment processing and a growing set of consumption-based Pro products the 10-K describes as billed "monthly in arrears based on consumption" (accession 0000950170-25-048834). On top sits the AI layer: the Max automation suite, which the company frames as roughly a two-times subscription uplift, is doubling adoption sequentially and already automating more than 10 percent of jobs for ramped customers, with Piper Sandler estimating a $38 million-plus run rate exiting fiscal 2027. A net-cash balance sheet (current ratio 4.4) funds all of it without dilution pressure. A sticky system of record, monetizing a fraction of the transactions it already touches, with an AI upsell just beginning, is the classic vertical-software compounding setup, and the analyst base reflects it with a Buy consensus and targets above $110.
Bear Case
The narrative dependency to challenge is the one baked straight into the price: that a company still losing money at the operating line converts to durable, high-margin profitability on schedule. The inversion is explicit that this is an assumption, not a demonstrated fact, the price is set against sales while holding a 28 percent steady-state operating margin as an input, against roughly negative 14 percent today. That is a swing of more than 40 points of margin the business has never shown, and the 10-K does not sugarcoat the starting point: "We have incurred net losses in each year since our inception, and we may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future", adding that it expects costs to keep rising "as we expect to invest significant additional funds towards growing" (accession 0000950170-25-114005). Every dollar of the multiple rests on the belief that today's spending flips to margin later, and the filing itself declines to promise it will.
The growth quality is also more fragile than the headline suggests, because a chunk of it is tied to its customers' volumes rather than to new logos. The 10-K explains that usage-based revenue is "directly tied to the amount of GTV processed through our platform" (accession 0000950170-25-085509), which is a strength when the trades economy is busy and a liability when it slows. Contractors are exposed to housing turnover, repair-and-remodel spending, and interest rates; a downturn in residential activity would pull down the transaction volume that feeds ServiceTitan's payments and Pro-product revenue, precisely the higher-take-rate lines the bull case leans on. The company also concedes a "limited operating history at our current scale in an evolving industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects" (accession 0000950170-25-114005) as it pushes into commercial, construction, and new trades where its product fit is less proven.
The price then compounds the execution risk. The valuation methods split hard: relative-multiple and forward-growth lenses justify the price, but the asset-based and earnings-power methods read it at roughly five times what they support, because there is little book value and no current earnings to anchor to. Working backward, the price embeds about 22 percent annual revenue growth for several years alongside that 28 percent terminal margin, and only about 39 percent of comparable fast-growers sustained the growth half of that pair for even five years. The market has already repriced the stock down meaningfully over the past year as it discounts these odds, and analysts have been cutting targets even while keeping buy ratings. The bear case is not that ServiceTitan is a bad business, it is a good one, but that at 7 times sales the stock is priced for both sustained 20-percent-plus growth and a margin transformation, and if either the trades cycle softens or the margin ramp stalls, a stock with no earnings floor has a long way to fall.
Valuation
Because ServiceTitan does not yet earn a normal operating profit, the price is set against sales rather than earnings. At $77.67 (July 2026), the stock trades at about 7.2 times revenue, and inverting that multiple shows what the market is underwriting: revenue growth of roughly 22 percent a year for the next several years, plus an eventual operating margin near 28 percent. The margin figure is an input to the solve, not a level the company has demonstrated, it earns about negative 14 percent today, so the price is explicitly underwriting a turnaround from operating losses to software-grade profitability, not merely more growth. Against the historical record, only about 39 percent of comparable fast-growers sustained the growth half of that assumption for five years, which places the priced-in bet as plausible but far from conservative.
The valuation methods divide along exactly the line you would expect for a growth-software name. Relative-multiple and forward-growth methods justify the price by comparing ServiceTitan to other high-growth software and crediting the revenue ramp; the asset-based and earnings-power methods read the price at roughly five times what they support, because a company with little book value and no current profit gives those lenses almost nothing to anchor to. That spread is the premium, and it is the standard shape of an unprofitable compounder: the market is paying for a future income statement, not the present one. The enterprise-software peer set (Adobe at a 36.6 percent operating margin, Autodesk at 24.9 percent, Salesforce at 21.5 percent) shows the kind of mature margin the model assumes ServiceTitan grows into; the bet is that it reaches that neighborhood while still growing far faster than any of them.
Solvency is the one unambiguous positive and it belongs in the close. The balance sheet is net cash with a current ratio of 4.4, the company generated positive free cash flow in three of the last four quarters, and the share count is falling, so there is no financing clock forcing dilution while the margin story plays out. What has to be true at this price is a paired achievement: revenue compounding above 20 percent as the take rate on that roughly $86 billion of platform transaction volume widens through payments and AI, and the operating margin climbing from negative territory toward the high-20s the price assumes. The company is executing on both, operating margin improved 560 basis points year over year in the most recent quarter, so the trend is the right direction; the valuation question is simply whether it continues far enough, fast enough, to earn a multiple that already assumes it will.
Catalysts
The most recent report, for the fiscal first quarter ended April 30, 2026 and announced June 4, 2026, showed the model working in the right direction: revenue of $268.8 million, up about 25 percent year over year, with the net loss narrowing roughly 51 percent to $22.8 million and operating margin improving 560 basis points. Management guided full-year fiscal 2027 revenue to roughly $935 to $940 million with a shrinking net loss per share. Because usage-based revenue is tied to the customer's own transaction volume, and the 10-K notes sequential growth is historically strongest in the fiscal second quarter (accession 0000950170-25-085509), the next print is a seasonally important read on whether the trades demand backdrop is holding.
The strategic thread to watch is AI monetization. ServiceTitan's Max suite, a premium automation layer the company frames as roughly a two-times subscription uplift, is doubling adoption sequentially and automating more than 10 percent of jobs for ramped customers, with Piper Sandler modeling a $38 million-plus run rate exiting fiscal 2027. New products, Field Pro extending AI to technicians and the Atlas agentic command center, widen the surface the company can charge for. Each quarter's disclosure on Max adoption and net dollar retention (last above 110 percent) is the clearest signal of whether the take-rate expansion the valuation depends on is materializing.
Analyst posture is a split worth tracking: the consensus remains Buy with targets above $110 and Piper Sandler reiterating on AI growth, yet several firms have trimmed targets as the stock derated over the past year. The tension is between a broadening monetization story and a demanding multiple. The catalysts that resolve it are the fiscal-2027 revenue and margin trajectory against guidance, Max run-rate milestones, payments and Pro-product take-rate progress against the roughly 1-percent-of-GTV capture today, and any sign the trades cycle is softening in a way that would pressure the usage-based lines.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
ServiceTitan (cloud software, whole company) (reported)
- INTA (Intapp, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: $ 3,510 Pro forma financial information related to this acquisition has not been presented as the effects of the acquisition described above were not material to the Company's consolidated financial results. Revenue and net loss attributable to TDI included in the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the…
- FY2025 10-K: …delivers reliable performance and flexibility, enabling professionals to securely access critical applications and adapt to evolving business demands. Key capabilities of our cloud infrastructure include: • Multi-tenant architecture : Our multi-tenant architecture enables scalability, elasticity, high availability,…
- ALKT (ALKAMI TECHNOLOGY, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …We deliver this value proposition through the following 10 product categories, encompassing 36 products and more than 300 integrations as of December 31, 2025: • Onboard & Account Opening : Offers a unified omnichannel Platform that empowers banks and credit unions to open consumer and business deposit and loan…
- FY2025 10-K: …Revenue Recognition Description of the Matter As disclosed in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company provides subscription-based services to its customers through software-as-a-service ("SaaS") arrangements. The timing and amount of revenue recognized is dependent on multiple factors, including…
- HUBS (HubSpot, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …partitioning at the enterprise level for companies operating in or serving multiple countries. We focus on selling to mid-market business-to-business, or B2B, companies, which we define as companies that have between 2 and 2,000 employees. While our customer platform was built to grow with any company, we focus on…
- FY2025 10-K: …platform that helps marketing, sales, and customer service teams drive business growth. The Company delivers seamless connection for customer-facing teams with a unified platform that includes three layers: AI-powered agents and engagement hubs, a Smart CRM, and a connected ecosystem supporting the customer platform…
- BRZE (Braze, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …services such as customer data platforms or attribution providers. • Partner Data Integrations: Brands can sync user cohorts from partners such as Amplitude, Tealium, or Mixpanel to our platform. They can then use membership in these user cohorts as additional criteria in the Braze Classification layer. Retail brands…
- FY2025 10-K: …and Google Cloud; Customer Data Platforms such as Segment, mParticle and Tealium; and analytics providers such as Amplitude and Mixpanel. Braze Currents can also export data to generic web endpoints for maximum flexibility. Customers can use these integrations to leverage their Braze data elsewhere within their…
- MDB (MONGODB, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …applications. Our multi-cloud and global reach empowers applications to withstand regional outages while addressing the most demanding data security and privacy requirements. We Allow Customers to Run Any Application Anywhere. Our platform supports applications across a wide range of use cases and is easily…
- FY2025 10-K: …opportunities. Built for resilience, scale, and security, MongoDB Atlas is available in more than 115 regions worldwide across all three major cloud providers (Amazon Web Services (‘‘AWS''), Google Cloud Platform (‘‘GCP'') and Microsoft Azure), enabling our customers to leverage the benefits of different cloud…
- GTLB (GITLAB INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …a step change in how teams plan, develop, secure and deploy software. GitLab is built on a single codebase, unified data model, and user interface. GitLab offers customers flexible deployment options, including a self-managed offering, as well as multi-tenant and single tenant (GitLab Dedicated) SaaS solutions.…
- FY2025 10-K: …or CI/CD, pipelines. • Secure. GitLab's offering is differentiated with built in, end-to-end security capabilities. GitLab provides Advanced Static Application Security Testing, or SAST, Dynamic Application Security Testing, or DAST, Fuzz Testing, Container Scanning, and Dependency Scanning to help customers deliver…
- ESTC (Elastic N.V.)
- FY2025 10-K: Company, enables its customers to transform data into answers, actions, and outcomes with Search AI. Our platform combines the precision of search with the intelligence of AI to help our customers and community solve real-time business problems, unlock potential value, and achieve better outcomes. Our platform,…
- FY2025 10-K: …Subscriptions provide the right to use paid proprietary software features and access to support for our paid and unpaid software. Our subscription agreements are either term-based or consumption-based, with the vast majority of Elastic Cloud subscriptions being consumption-based. A portion of the revenue from…
- DDOG (Datadog, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Product Analytics, and Bits AI SRE. • Expand our customer base internationally . We believe there is a significant opportunity to continue to expand usage of our platform outside of the United States, as international markets have increased the shift of their IT spend to the cloud. Our Platform Our proprietary…
- FY2025 10-K: …application performance monitoring, log management, user experience monitoring, cloud security, service management, and many other capabilities to provide unified, real-time observability and security for our customers' entire technology stack. Datadog is used by organizations of all sizes and across a wide range of…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Seeking Alpha · Q1 FY2027 results · Investing.com; company · public.com · Kavout; TIKR · Q1 FY2027 results; StockTitan · Investing.com · public.com; Investing.com · Kavout