TITAN AMERICA SA (TTAM): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $16.07, TITAN AMERICA SA (TTAM) is priced for +12.9% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TTAM
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | TTAM |
| Company | TITAN AMERICA SA |
| Sector / Industry | Basic Materials / Mining |
| Current price | $16.07/sh |
| Composition | Cement 38% / Aggregates 7% / Ready-mix concrete 45% / Concrete block 9% / Fly ash 2% / Other goods and services 0% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 8.3% |
| Operating margin today | 16.1% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -7.8pp |
| Implied growth | 12.9% |
| Multiple paid | 12x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~5.6pp.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~0.7%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| cohort percentile (of 77 peers) | 20 |
| sustained it ~5 years at this level | 55% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.42x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.69x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.44x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.95x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=14)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $17.28 | 0.93x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 7% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.0%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $16.88 | 0.95x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 9.0x / 14.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 14x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.5x / 14.0x / 16.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $10.93 | 1.47x | yes | BV/sh $5.64, ROE (TTM) 17.9%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $15.03 | 1.07x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $13.04 | 1.23x | yes | Rev $1.7B, growth 7% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.3x / 1.8x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $35.35 | 0.45x | yes | EPS $1.01, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.45 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $8.39 | 1.91x | yes | Normalized EBIT (4y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.21B × (1−24%) / WACC 8.0% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $14.95 | 1.07x | yes | BV $5.64 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $11.32 | 1.42x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $1.01 × BVPS $5.64) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $0.38B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $5.52 | 2.91x | yes | FCF $134.9M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $32.59 | 0.49x | yes | EPS $1.01 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $9.63 | 1.67x | yes | BV $5.64 × (ROIC 13.7% / WACC 8.0%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $1.66B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $37.88 | 0.42x | yes | EPS $1.01 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $10.92 | 1.47x | yes | EPS $1.01 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Segment external revenue | operating | enterprise | 1024.4B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Cement | operating | enterprise | 414.5B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Aggregates | operating | enterprise | 195.7B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Ready-mix concrete | operating | enterprise | 469.7B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Concrete block | operating | enterprise | 147.7B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Fly ash | operating | enterprise | 22.3B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Other goods and services | operating | enterprise | 5.2B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $184.1m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 0.91x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.69x |
| Interest coverage | 11.9x |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Titan America is a vertically integrated, regionally concentrated building-materials maker, cement, aggregates, ready-mix, block, and fly ash, anchored in Florida and the Mid-Atlantic, that came public in 2025 and grew revenue to $1.66 billion with a 16.1 percent operating margin.
- The distinctive dynamic right now is a demand split: Florida infrastructure and private nonresidential construction are carrying volumes while residential stays soft, a mix management expects to persist through 2026.
- Watch the integration of Keystone Cement, acquired May 1, 2026, which adds 990,000 short tons of annual clinker capacity in the Mid-Atlantic and sits outside the reiterated low-single-digit 2026 revenue guide.
Bull Case
Building materials is a local monopoly business dressed as a commodity, and Titan America sits in two of the best local markets in the country. Cement and aggregates are heavy, low-value-per-ton products that cannot travel far economically, so whoever owns the plant and the quarry near a growing metro owns the supply. Titan's footprint is Florida and the Mid-Atlantic, and its vertical integration, cement into aggregates into ready-mix, block, and fly ash, means it captures margin at each step of the same ton rather than reselling someone else's. That structure shows up in the numbers: gross margin climbed from 16.2 percent in 2022 to 26.1 percent in 2025, and operating margin more than doubled over the same span from 7.1 percent to 16.1 percent, the kind of steady, non-commodity margin expansion that reflects pricing power in constrained local markets rather than a swing in an underlying commodity.
The demand backdrop is durable where it counts. Florida infrastructure and private nonresidential construction drove Q1 2026 revenue of $398 million, with the company's Florida external revenue at $253 million and aggregates, block, and fly ash offsetting a softer residential and ready-mix contribution. Infrastructure spending is the least cyclical end market a materials company can have, funded by multi-year public budgets rather than mortgage rates, and Florida's population growth keeps a structural bid under it. Adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 40 basis points to 20.7 percent even in a quarter with weather disruption and residential weakness, evidence the business can hold margin through a mixed demand environment.
The balance sheet and the growth path both support the case. Leverage is moderate and well covered, the current ratio is 3.0, free cash flow was positive in all four trailing quarters, and the company converts cash steadily (73 percent of net income). On top of the organic base, the May 1, 2026 Keystone Cement acquisition adds 990,000 short tons of annual clinker capacity plus mineral reserves supporting more than 50 years of production, deepening the Mid-Atlantic position, and management framed the deal as upside on top of its reiterated 2026 outlook for low-single-digit revenue growth and margin expansion. A vertically integrated materials producer in two structurally advantaged regions, expanding capacity while generating cash, is the kind of steady compounder the market often underrates in its first year public.
Bear Case
The advantage here is geographic, and geography cuts both ways: a company this concentrated has no diversification when its two regions turn together. Titan America's fortunes ride on Florida and the Mid-Atlantic construction cycles, and one leg of that demand is already weakening. Residential construction has been soft and management expects the softness to persist through all of 2026, which matters because residential is the volume swing factor for cement and ready-mix. Right now infrastructure and private nonresidential are offsetting it, but those are the same end markets every regional competitor is chasing, and the offset is a balance that can tip: if public infrastructure funding slows or a higher-rate environment stalls nonresidential projects, there is no third region and no counter-cyclical product line to pick up the slack.
The cyclicality is structural and the recent history flatters it. The margin expansion from 16 percent to 26 percent gross over 2022 to 2025 came during a strong construction pricing cycle, and cement and aggregates margins mean-revert when construction volumes roll over, because the fixed-cost-heavy plants that print high margins at high utilization print low ones when volumes fall. The company is still a cyclical building-materials producer, and its trailing earnings sit near a cycle-favorable point. Weather is a recurring wildcard the company named directly, with winter disruption hitting Mid-Atlantic volumes in the first quarter, and the residential weakness compounds it. The market noticed the softening setup: HSBC downgraded the stock to Hold from Buy with an $18.50 target after the Q1 print.
The price does not leave much room for the cycle to disappoint. At $17.37, working backward, the market pays about 13 times operating income and is embedding roughly 15 percent annual operating growth for five years, a pace only about half of comparable fast-growers have sustained that long. On the valuation methods, the price is justified only by the relative-multiple lens; the asset-based and earnings-power methods both read it as expensive, meaning the stock leans on peer comparison rather than on what its own assets or normalized earnings support. Layer on the ownership structure, Titan America is a subsidiary of Titan Cement Group, so public holders are minority owners alongside a controlling parent whose interests set the agenda, and the free float and governance leverage are correspondingly limited. A concentrated cyclical, priced for mid-teens growth, with a residential drag management expects to last all year and a controlling parent above the public float, is a narrower bet than the steady-compounder framing suggests.
Valuation
Working backward from the $17.37 price (July 2026), the market pays about 13 times company-wide operating income, which implies operating growth of roughly 15 percent a year for five years. For a regional building-materials producer, that is a real assumption to underwrite: only about half of comparable fast-growers have sustained that pace over five years, so the priced-in growth reads as plausible but not conservative, broadly within range rather than a bargain. The recent trajectory has supported it, operating income grew year over year and margins expanded, but the base is a strong construction cycle, which is exactly the condition that makes extrapolating the rate risky.
The valuation methods split along a revealing line. The price is justified by the relative-multiple lens, which compares Titan to sector peers, while the asset-based and earnings-power methods both read it as expensive. That pattern says the stock is priced on peer comparison and forward growth rather than on the replacement value of its plants and quarries or its normalized earning power. The trailing multiples are moderate on their face, about 17 times earnings against a sector median of 14 and roughly 10 times EBITDA against a median of 8, a slight premium that the market is paying for the Florida-and-Mid-Atlantic growth mix and the vertical integration, not a screaming discount and not an obvious overpay.
What grounds the downside is the balance sheet and the cash generation. Leverage is moderate and well covered, the current ratio is 3.0, and free cash flow was positive in every trailing quarter at 73 percent conversion, so there is no solvency pressure while the cycle plays out. The concrete bet at this price is that infrastructure and nonresidential demand keep offsetting residential softness long enough for volumes and pricing to deliver the mid-teens operating growth the price embeds, and that the Keystone acquisition adds capacity that converts to earnings rather than integration cost. If construction pricing normalizes or the residential drag broadens into the other end markets, the earnings-power methods that already call the price expensive become the operative read, and a cyclical trading near a cycle-favorable multiple has limited cushion.
Catalysts
The recent catalyst was the Q1 2026 report on May 5, which came in mixed against forecasts: revenue of $398.4 million, up 1.5 percent, net income of $33.0 million, and adjusted EBITDA of $82.5 million, up 3.4 percent, with the EBITDA margin expanding 40 basis points to 20.7 percent. The quarter missed some analyst EPS and revenue estimates while still growing, and the mix told the story: Florida infrastructure and private nonresidential construction carried the top line, aggregates, block, and fly ash offset weaker residential and ready-mix, and winter weather disrupted Mid-Atlantic volumes. Management reiterated its 2026 outlook for low-single-digit revenue growth and margin expansion, explicitly excluding potential Keystone upside.
The defining strategic event is the Keystone Cement acquisition, completed May 1, 2026, which adds 990,000 short tons of annual clinker capacity and mineral reserves supporting more than 50 years of production in the Mid-Atlantic, with integration teams already pursuing operational and commercial synergies. Because Keystone sits outside the reiterated guide, its contribution and synergy realization are the swing factor to watch across the back half of 2026; upcoming quarters will show whether the acquired capacity converts to earnings on schedule.
The demand signals to track are straightforward: whether Florida infrastructure funding and private nonresidential activity keep offsetting the residential softness management expects to persist through 2026, and whether cement pricing holds as volumes stay broadly flat. Analyst posture has turned more cautious, HSBC moved to Hold from Buy with an $18.50 target after Q1, so the near-term setup is one where beating the modest guide, or showing Keystone accretion early, would be the positive surprise, while a broadening of residential weakness into infrastructure would be the negative one.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- HL (HECLA MINING COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected if one or more of our long-term customers were to decide to interrupt or curtail their activities, terminate their contracts with us or fail to renew existing contracts. Additionally, if spot market conditions deteriorate…
- FY2025 10-K: …losses, respectively, as part of the line item fair value adjustments, net on our statement of consolidated operations and comprehensive income (loss). Note 4: Business Segments, Sales of Products and Significant Customers F- 13 We discover, acquire and develop mines and other mineral interests and produce and market…
- MDU (MDU RESOURCES GROUP, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …have moderated, but costs for raw material and contract services remain high. For additional discussion regarding risks and uncertainties, see Item 1A - Risk Factors. The segment focuses on the recruitment and retention of a skilled workforce to remain competitive and provide services to its customers. The industry…
- FY2025 10-K: …used by the Company's chief executive officer. The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiary, MDU Energy Capital, owns Montana-Dakota, Cascade and Intermountain. The electric segment is comprised of Montana-Dakota while the natural gas distribution segment is comprised of Montana-Dakota, Cascade and Intermountain.…
- EQX (EQX)
- FY2025 40-F: 63 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise noted) 28. SEGMENT INFORMATION Operating results of operating segments are regularly reviewed by the Company's chief operating decision maker…
- FY2025 40-F: …(note 10) and include a decrease in accrued expenditures of $ 41.5 million (2024 - $ 27.6 million). (2) The above segment information for the current and comparative periods reflects the presentation of the Brazil Operations as discontinued operations (note 9). The following table presents the Company's non-current…
- EGO (EGO)
- FY2025 40-F: …of the fair value of mineral properties beyond proven and probable reserves. Metal pricing assumptions were based on consensus forecast pricing and discount rates were based on a weighted average cost of capital, adjusted for country and other risks specific to the CGU. For the portion of incremental inferred…
- FY2025 40-F: …attributable to the issue of common shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of any tax effects. Common shares held by the Company are classified as treasury stock and recorded as a reduction of shareholders' equity. 3.18 Revenue recognition Revenue is generated from the production and…
- HCC (Warrior Met Coal, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …among the highest quality steelmaking coals in the world and is preferred as a base steelmaking coal in our customers' blends. Our marketing strategy is to focus on international markets mostly in Europe and 11 South America where we have a shipping time and distance advantage. In recent years, due to a combination…
- FY2025 10-K: …customer base of blast furnace steel producers, primarily located in Europe, South America and Asia. We have a shipping time and distance advantage serving customers throughout the Atlantic Basin relative to competitors located in Australia and Western Canada. Our strategic location is enhanced by our long-tenured,…
- WOR (WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …performance, competitive position, sales, volumes, cash flows, earnings, margins, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures; • pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes; • the ability to improve or maintain margins; • expected demand or…
- FY2025 10-K: …and UL Solutions. Building Products has one principal domestic competitor in the low-pressure LPG cylinder market, and a number of foreign competitors in the LPG cylinder, non-refillable refrigerant, and well water and expansion tank markets. We believe that this business has the largest market share in the domestic…
- AMR (AMR)
- FY2025 10-K: …which such coal is to be sold. Market pricing may vary according to region and lead to different discounts or premiums to the most directly comparable benchmark price for such coal product. Costs. Our results of operations are dependent upon our ability to maximize productivity and control costs. Our primary expenses…
- FY2025 10-K: …deep and surface mines for sale to steel and coke producers, industrial customers, and electric utilities. The Company conducts mining operations only in the United States with mines in Central Appalachia. Refer to Note 22 for the Company's segment information. The Company has disaggregated revenue between met coal…
- ARLP (ALLIANCE RESOURCE PARTNERS LP)
- FY2025 10-K: …"Item 1A. Risk Factors". Business Strategy Our primary business strategy is to create sustainable, capital-efficient growth in available cash to maximize unitholder returns by: ● expanding our coal operations by adding and developing mines and coal mineral reserves and resources in existing, adjacent or…
- FY2025 10-K: …volatility, and other attributes. Failure to meet these requirements may result in price adjustments, rejection of shipments, or contract termination. Contracted coal may be sourced from specific approved seams or multiple mines, depending on customer requirements and our operational flexibility. We also…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release · Q1 2026 results; StockTitan · Q1 2026 results · TipRanks · Investing.com