Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $84.51, Tutor Perini Corporation (TPC) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~7.3 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TPC

Headline

FieldValue
TickerTPC
CompanyTutor Perini Corporation
Sector / IndustryConsumer Cyclical / Homebuilders
Current price$84.51/sh
CompositionCivil 51% / Building 33% / Specialty Contractors 15%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)2.5%
Operating margin today4.0%
Margin compression (value-band)-1.5pp
Must persist for7.3y
Multiple paid18x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 12.4% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.7 years.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~13.6%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.93σ
cohort percentile (of 214 peers)53
sustained it ~7.3 years at this level21%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset6.42x5expensive
Earnings1.79x5expensive
Relative3.18x2expensive
Growth0.41x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$722.380.12xyesFCF base $0.9B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.5%, 7yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$207.490.41xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 13.0x / 15.0x / 17.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 29.67x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 57x), scenarios: 23.9x / 29.7x / 35.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$16.065.26xyesBV/sh $23.08, ROE (TTM) 6.4%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$13.176.42xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$106.410.79xyesRev $5.7B, growth 26% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.6x / 0.8x / 0.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$17.524.82xyesEPS $1.46, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=28.45 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$7.2811.61xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.01B × (1−30%) / WACC 8.5% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$12.786.61xyesBV $23.08 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 6.4% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 4.2%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$27.533.07xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.46 × BVPS $23.08) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.27B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$150.760.56xyesFCF $703.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$115.110.73xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.53B (FCF $0.70B − SBC $0.17B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$47.111.79xyesEPS $1.46 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$12.626.70xyesBV $23.08 × (ROIC 4.7% / WACC 8.5%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $5.69B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$54.751.54xyesEPS $1.46 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$15.785.36xyesEPS $1.46 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Civiloperatingenterprise$2.8bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Buildingoperatingenterprise$1.9bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Specialty Contractorsoperatingenterprise$844.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$396.0m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-2.51x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-1.75x (net cash)
Interest coverage4.2x
Share count CAGR (dilution)1.3%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The balance sheet tells you what stage of the story this is. Tutor Perini, a company whose name was long synonymous with cash locked up in construction disputes, now sits on a net cash position, and the cash is pouring in ahead of the income statement: $0.87B of trailing operating cash flow against $0.08B of trailing net income, with first-quarter 2026 operating cash flow of $146.9 million setting a first-quarter record, up 542% year over year. In contracting, cash leads earnings when disputes settle and new work is billed on healthier terms; the FY2025 10-K shows the last big legacy drag clearing, a $54.7 million unfavorable settlement on "a legacy dispute related to a tunneling project in Canada", even as the Civil segment's "Operating margin was 13.7% for 2025 compared to 6.5% in 2024" (accession 0000077543-26-000028).

The order book is the second act. Backlog stood at $19.8 billion at the end of the first quarter, about three and a half years of trailing revenue, and the filing notes roughly $6 billion of the year-end backlog converts to revenue within the coming year. This is mostly large civil work, mass transit, tunnels, bridges, where the bidder lists are short and the margins run structurally higher than commodity building. First-quarter revenue grew 11% to $1.4 billion with adjusted EPS up 58% to $1.03, and management affirmed 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.90 to $5.30 while stating that 2027 should come in significantly above the top of that range on backlog visibility alone.

Against those forward numbers the stock is cheap in a way the trailing P/E disguises. At $75.91, the midpoint of this year's adjusted EPS guidance implies a mid-teens multiple on current-year earnings, the market pays 0.72x sales, and the 17.2% trailing free cash flow yield means the market value could be repurchased from cash generation in roughly six years at the current pace. The growth-anchored valuation methods sit far above today's price. For a company with no net debt, record cash flow, a record profitable backlog, and federal-and-state infrastructure funding behind its end markets, the bull case is that the earnings simply catch up to the cash that has already arrived.

Bear Case

The structural truth: the multiple is pricing earnings that have not happened yet. Trailing GAAP net income is $0.08B, a 1.4% net margin, and the stock costs 52.2x those earnings against an 18x sector median. Everything above that is a promise, a $19.8 billion backlog that must convert at bid margins, guidance of $4.90 to $5.30 in adjusted EPS, and a 2027 that management says will be better still. The framework's read of the price is blunt: it embeds operating growth held at the company's self-funding ceiling for about six years, an assumption it labels elevated, and historically only about 27% of comparable fast-growers sustained that pace even five to six years. Only the forward-growth methods reach today's price; the asset, earnings-power, and peer-multiple frames sit meaningfully below it.

The conversion risk is not hypothetical in this industry or at this company. The 10-K's own accounting discussion explains that contract estimates are "highly detailed and many factors change during a contract performance period that result in a change to contract profitability", and that the company "recognizes revenue for claims as variable consideration" (accession 0000077543-26-000028), meaning some recognized profit rests on the assumed outcome of future negotiations and disputes. The 2025 results themselves carried a $54.7 million unfavorable settlement from a legacy tunneling dispute. Mega-project contracting has a long institutional memory of margins that looked fine until year three of a fixed-price job; a 13.7% Civil segment operating margin in 2025, roughly double the prior year's 6.5%, is as much a warning about variance as a trophy.

The capital-structure picture is better than history but not pristine: the solvency read sits in the grey zone on the classic screen, the equity base is thin relative to a $5.7 billion revenue machine (equity multiplier above 4x), and working-capital swings of the size that produced this year's record inflows can reverse just as violently when big jobs roll off. Management itself cautioned that backlog may decline modestly in the near term as revenue outruns new awards. If awards pause, margins revert toward the trailing 4% operating level, or a major claim resolves badly, the stock's support at 52x trailing earnings is the first thing to go.

Valuation

The disagreement among the methods is as wide as it gets, and the pattern is informative. At $75.91 (July 11, 2026), only the forward-growth family reaches the price, and in fact the price sits at roughly 0.4x its central estimate, far below what growth-anchored cash-flow math would pay. Meanwhile the asset-based frame reads the price at 7.4x its mark, earnings power at 1.6x, and peer multiples at 1.3x. Translated: on what Tutor Perini has already booked to its income statement, the stock is expensive at 52.2x trailing earnings versus an 18x sector median; on what its cash flow and backlog say is coming, it is cheap. There is no middle reading, which is why the stock behaves like a referendum on backlog conversion.

What the price requires is duration rather than margin. The market pays about 15 times company-wide operating income, resolving to operating growth held near the self-funding ceiling for about six years, a pace only about 27% of comparable fast-growers sustained that long, and an assumption the framework labels elevated. Notably, no margin heroics are demanded: the long-run operating margin the price needs, around 2.3%, is below the roughly 4% earned today. The demonstrated inputs behind the forward case are concrete: $19.8 billion of backlog, with the 10-K estimating "approximately $6 billion, or approximately 29%, of our backlog as of December 31, 2025" converting to revenue in the near term, and a Civil segment whose "Operating margin was 13.7% for 2025 compared to 6.5% in 2024" (accession 0000077543-26-000028).

The cash flow statement is currently the strongest exhibit: $703M of trailing free cash flow, positive in all four quarters, a 17.2% yield on the equity, generated while net income was still digesting legacy items. The balance sheet is net cash, so none of the forward bet is leveraged. The number that reconciles everything is 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.90 to $5.30: delivered, it collapses the trailing-multiple problem on its own; missed, it hands the argument back to the static frames sitting well below today's price.

Catalysts

Guidance execution is the through-line for 2026. Management affirmed adjusted EPS guidance of $4.90 to $5.30 with the first-quarter report, after delivering $1.03 of adjusted EPS (up 58%) on revenue of $1.4 billion (up 11%). Each remaining quarterly print is a checkpoint on whether the backlog is converting at the margins management bid, and the company has pre-committed to an aggressive 2027 marker: adjusted EPS significantly above the top of the 2026 range, on existing backlog visibility.

The awards pipeline is the second stream. Backlog stood at $19.8 billion at quarter-end, and management cautioned it may decline modestly in the near term as revenue recognition outpaces new awards before growth resumes. Large civil pursuits in mass transit and other public infrastructure, the segments where the company's 2025 filing shows its highest operating margins, are the awards to watch; a headline mega-project win would extend the visibility that underpins the 2027 claim, while a dry spell would validate the backlog-peak concern.

Cash and claims round out the calendar. First-quarter operating cash flow of $146.9 million was a Q1 record, up 542% year over year, and continued conversion, or its reversal as working capital normalizes, will show whether the trailing $703M free cash flow run is structural or a settlement-driven spike. Resolution of remaining legacy disputes cuts both ways, as 2025's $54.7 million unfavorable tunneling settlement demonstrated; the filing's claims-as-variable-consideration accounting means dispute outcomes flow directly through recognized profit. With net cash on the balance sheet, any move toward larger buybacks or dividend growth beyond the token $0.24 annual rate would signal management's own read on the durability of the cash.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Civil (reported)

Building (reported)

Specialty Contractors (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings release, May 6, 2026 · company press release, May 2026 · company press release and earnings call, May 6, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call, May 6, 2026 · company press release, May 6, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call · TipRanks earnings coverage, May 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release

View the full interactive TPC report on boothcheck