Toast, Inc. (TOST): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $34.81, Toast, Inc. (TOST) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~15.2 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TOST
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | TOST |
| Company | Toast, Inc. |
| Sector / Industry | Technology / Software |
| Current price | $34.81/sh |
| Composition | Subscription services 15% / Financial technology solutions 82% / Hardware and professional services 3% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 7.7% |
| Operating margin today | 5.6% |
| Margin expansion (value-band) | +2.1pp |
| Must persist for | 15.2y |
| Multiple paid | 55x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 4: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 14.7% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 32% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.6 years.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~7.5 years; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: extreme
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| cohort percentile (of 187 peers) | 86 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 7% |
| implied end-window share | 1% |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 4.70x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 3.18x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.39x | 5 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.79x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $49.15 | 0.71x | yes | FCF base $0.8B, growth 23% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.2%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $44.01 | 0.79x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 52.0x / 54.0x / 56.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $25.54 | 1.36x | yes | P/E 35x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 28.4x / 35.0x / 41.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 33.69x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $7.40 | 4.70x | yes | BV/sh $3.31, ROE (TTM) 20.7%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $10.97 | 3.17x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $42.86 | 0.81x | yes | Rev $6.4B, growth 23% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.6x / 3.3x / 3.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $8.04 | 4.33x | yes | EPS $0.67, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=25.43 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | $10.50 | 3.32x | yes | BV $3.31 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 20.7% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $7.06 | 4.93x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $0.67 × BVPS $3.31) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $17.05 | 2.04x | yes | EBITDA $0.37B × sector EV/EBITDA 25.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $13.47 | 2.58x | yes | FCF $654.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $9.24 | 3.77x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.42B (FCF $0.65B − SBC $0.24B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $21.62 | 1.61x | yes | EPS $0.67 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $3.99 | 8.72x | yes | BV $3.31 × (ROIC 11.1% / WACC 9.2%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $85.66 | 0.41x | yes | Revenue $6.45B × sector P/S 8.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $25.13 | 1.39x | yes | EPS $0.67 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $7.24 | 4.81x | yes | EPS $0.67 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toast, Inc. (restaurant SaaS + fintech platform) | operating | enterprise | 6.2B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $1.8b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -5.13x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -4.93x (net cash) |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 4.4% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Toast has become the operating system for a widening slice of the restaurant industry, with annualized recurring run-rate up 26% to $2.2 billion at March 31, 2026, roughly 7,000 net new locations added in the quarter, and enterprise signings including Applebee's and Firehouse Subs, two of the largest in its history.
- The risk is duration, not direction: today's price pays about 52 times operating income, an assumption of growth near the company's self-funding ceiling for a very long horizon, the kind of run only about 10% of comparable fast-growers have sustained even ten years.
- Watch the Q2 print against guidance of $185 to $195 million of adjusted EBITDA, plus location adds and SaaS gross margin, which crossed 80% for the first time last quarter per the company's release; its FY2025 10-K frames the model as one where "Toast both drives and benefits from the success of" its restaurants.
Bull Case
Start with the bear's best line: Toast is a payments middleman wearing a software multiple, priced at 42.8x trailing earnings while most of its revenue is low-margin fintech pass-through. Then look at what the recent data actually shows, because the mix is migrating in exactly the direction that argument says it cannot. SaaS gross margin crossed 80% for the first time in the March 2026 quarter, expanding nearly 300 basis points, recurring gross profit grew 27%, and annualized recurring run-rate reached $2.2 billion, up 26% year over year. The software layer is compounding faster than the terminal-and-payments layer it rides on, which is how a blended-margin business earns its way into a software valuation rather than borrowing one.
The distribution engine underneath is the hard part to replicate. Toast added roughly 7,000 net new locations in a single quarter, and the wins are moving upmarket and abroad: Applebee's and Firehouse Subs represent two of the largest signings in company history, Topgolf extends the platform beyond classic restaurants, and the international footprint now spans Canada, the UK, Ireland, and Australia, with the Toast Go 3 handheld launched across all four in late April. The company's 10-K describes the flywheel without embellishment: as it scales it can "offer more products and services, and help our customers increase revenue while saving time and money" (accession 0001650164-26-000057). The newest product layer, the ToastIQ AI assistant, reached more than half of the installed base within months of launch with over 8 million queries, evidence the platform can ship software the base actually adopts.
And the model is now self-funding in a way the 2021 cohort of fintech IPOs mostly never achieved. Trailing free cash flow is $654M with all four quarters positive, net income is $0.41B, return on equity runs 20.7%, the balance sheet is net cash, and the share count is falling rather than diluting, unusual for a growth platform still expanding 26%. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance to $790 to $810 million of adjusted EBITDA. The bear's framing was right about what Toast was; the last four quarters describe what it is becoming.
Bear Case
Look at the capital structure of the price itself: book value is $3.31 a share against a $29.30 stock, so roughly ninety percent of the market value is a claim on growth that does not yet exist on the balance sheet. There is no leverage problem, the company is net cash, but there is also almost no asset anchor; the asset-based methods read the price at about 4.1x their mark and the earnings-power methods at 2.9x. When nearly all of a valuation is forward narrative, the equity behaves like a long-duration option on execution, and the 10.5% single-day drop after a quarter where revenue merely matched expectations showed exactly how that convexity trades.
The competitive structure justifies the market's twitchiness. Toast's own risk factors describe markets that are "intensely competitive", rivals with "substantially greater financial, technical, sales, and marketing, and other resources", and well-funded competitors that "may allow our competitors to continue to lower their prices" (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001650164-26-000057). Block, Shift4, and Fiserv's Clover all sell into the same restaurants; Shift4's 10-K explicitly targets volume expansion in restaurants and hospitality (accession 0001794669-26-000010). The customer base adds its own fragility: restaurants fail at high rates, and the filing concedes that if customers "were to cease operations, temporarily or permanently, or face financial distress", retention suffers. A recession in casual dining flows straight through Toast's transaction volumes, subscription counts, and credit exposure simultaneously.
Then there is the arithmetic of the premium. Two trailing operating-income bases are in play, roughly $317 million on the inversion record basis and $359 million on the EDGAR quarterly TTM basis, and against either the market is paying about 52 times, which resolves to growth held near the company's self-funding ceiling for on the order of two decades. Only about 10% of comparable fast-growers have sustained that kind of pace even ten years. The multiple stack corroborates the stretch: 42.8x trailing earnings against a 35x software median, 45.0x EV/EBITDA against 25x. If location growth decelerates, or payments take-rates compress under competition, the growth-dependent frames that currently justify the price stop reaching it, and the static frames waiting 3x to 4x below become the reference points.
Valuation
The bet in the price is long, not steep. At $29.30 (July 11, 2026), the market pays about 52 times company-wide operating income, which the framework resolves not as an outlandish near-term growth rate but as growth held near the business's self-funding ceiling for roughly 19 years. Historically, only about 10% of comparable fast-growers sustained such a pace even ten years. Interestingly, the price asks little of margins: the operating margin it requires within a few years, about 8.5%, is close to the 5.6% the business already earns. Everything rides on the top line compounding and the duration of that compounding.
The method families split exactly where a healthy growth story should. The forward-growth methods land above the price, reading it at about 0.8x their central estimate, and peer multiples roughly ratify it at 1.2x; the asset-value and earnings-power frames sit far below, at 4.1x and 2.9x, because $3.31 of book value and roughly $317 to $359 million of trailing operating income (inversion-record and EDGAR TTM bases respectively) cannot statically support a $17.64B capitalization. The demonstrated inputs are nonetheless substantial: $6.45B of trailing revenue, $0.41B of net income, and $654M of free cash flow converting 159% of earnings, with subscription economics improving as SaaS gross margin crossed 81% in the March quarter. Street coverage carries a mean price target around $34, sitting above today's price because the sell side extends credit to the raised 2026 gross-profit and EBITDA guidance that trailing multiples do not yet reflect.
Solvency is a non-issue and mildly a tailwind: net cash, a 2.44 current ratio, positive free cash flow in all four trailing quarters, and a declining share count, so the growth is not being purchased with dilution. What the buyer underwrites is singular: that a restaurant platform adding thousands of locations a quarter, per its filing built so that "Toast both drives and benefits from the success of" its customers (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001650164-26-000057), can keep compounding recurring gross profit at a pace few companies in history have held for as long as this price requires.
Catalysts
The first-quarter print on May 7 was strong on substance and poorly received on expectations: revenue of $1.63 billion was in line, net income reached $126 million, adjusted EBITDA hit $179 million, ARR grew 26% to $2.2 billion, and management raised full-year guidance to $2.29 to $2.32 billion of non-GAAP subscription and fintech gross profit and $790 to $810 million of adjusted EBITDA, yet the stock fell 10.5% on the day. That defines the setup for the second-quarter report: guidance sits at $565 to $575 million of gross profit and $185 to $195 million of adjusted EBITDA, and the market has shown it wants beats, not in-line quarters, at this multiple.
The enterprise and international pipelines carry the next legs of the story. Applebee's and Firehouse Subs, two of the largest signings in company history, need to convert into deployed locations over coming quarters, and the Topgolf win extends the platform into entertainment venues. Internationally, the Toast Go 3 handheld rolled out across Canada, the UK, Ireland, and Australia in late April, making location adds outside the U.S. a visible tracker for whether the four-market footprint is a growth engine or a cost center.
Product adoption metrics are the third stream: ToastIQ, the conversational AI assistant, reached more than half of the installed base with over 8 million cumulative queries within months of launch, and monetization of that engagement layer, alongside continued SaaS gross-margin expansion past the 81% reached in Q1, is the mechanism by which the software mix keeps improving. Analyst sentiment leans constructive, with a Buy consensus and mean targets in the mid-$30s, so the burden of proof each quarter is on growth durability rather than direction.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Toast, Inc. (restaurant SaaS + fintech platform) (reported)
- SQ (Block, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FOUR (SHIFT4 PAYMENTS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …growth has been fueled by a combination of focused strategic initiatives: Expanding Volume - We aim to accelerate growth by increasing the volume processed through our integrated platform across diverse verticals, including restaurants, hospitality, venues, specialty retail, and e-commerce. In addition to converting…
- FY2025 10-K: …invoices either the relevant merchant or the government for the full VAT amount, which is paid in full. The merchant then reclaims the VAT from the government and invoices the Company in turn for their portion of the commission. TFS revenue is recognized net, as the Company is considered an agent. TFS revenue is…
- JKHY (JACK HENRY & ASSOCIATES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …complement and accelerate our organic growth, and generate long-term profitable growth for our stockholders. While we seek to identify appropriate acquisition opportunities, we will continue to explore alternative ways to leverage our cash position and balance sheet to the benefit of our stockholders, such as…
- FY2025 10-K: …a contemporary, adaptable administrative portal. In addition to bill payment capabilities, we provide a 'pay a loan' feature, an 'open looped' real-time person-to-person ("P2P") solution, and account-to-account ("A2A") transfer features. The array of money movement options maintains consumer and business engagement…
- FISV (FISERV INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …service providers, retailers and consumer finance companies, to enable them to process credit card transactions on behalf of their customers. Depending on the needs of our client, we deliver these solutions through our proprietary processing platforms, software application licenses, or SaaS hosted in the cloud. Our…
- FY2025 10-K: …to accelerate the deployment of our Clover POS and business management platform across Europe. On March 2, 2025, we acquired Payfare, Inc. ("Payfare"), a provider of program management solutions powering instant access to earnings and banking solutions for workforces. Payfare is included within the Financial segment…
- GPN (GLOBAL PAYMENTS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …institutions, financial technology companies, traditional payment providers, new market entrants, and others, both large and small. The markets for the services we provide are highly fragmented and competitive. Many of these providers compete with us across our segment, markets and geographies. Some of these…
- FY2025 10-K: …Our value proposition is to provide differentiated, high-quality, responsive and secure services to all our customers. We also focus on providing distinctive customer service from the sales process, to onboarding, to ongoing support across our business. The majority of our revenue is generated by services priced as a…
- ADP (AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …Inputs and assumptions to the pricing model used by the independent pricing service are derived from market observable sources including: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and other market-related data. Since many fixed income securities do not…
- FY2025 10-K: …to (1) independently reperform management's client funds obligations reconciliation and (2) perform data analyses to identify and evaluate recurring and new adjustments to the data extracts in the current period. • For a selection of client funds obligations transactions, we evaluated whether the funds were impounded…
- CSGS (CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …across digital channels creating engagements that are personalized, predictive, and proactive. Our extensive customer analytics unlock critical insights from the trail of data footprints across websites, stores, billing systems, internal data warehouses, emails, texts, and other channels to power personalized…
- FY2025 10-K: , managing, generating, and optimizing the interactions and revenue associated with their customers. We generate a substantial percentage of our revenue from customers utilizing Advanced Convergent Platform ("ACP"), a private SaaS platform, and related solutions (e.g., service technician management, analytics,…
- DOX (AMDOCS LIMITED)
- FY2025 20-F: …SaaS solutions enables our customers to quickly deploy, simply operate and continuously benefit from our investment in portfolio platforms. • Continuous Updates . Ongoing delivery of software functionality enables customers to adopt the latest features and functions as they are made available, accelerating time to…
- FY2025 20-F: …and emerging markets. Our customers include some of the largest telecommunications companies in the world (including América Móvil, AT&T, Bell Canada, Singtel, Telstra, T-Mobile, Verizon Telefónica and Vodafone), as well as broadband, mobile and entertainment providers (including Charter Communications, Comcast,…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release, May 7, 2026 · Nasdaq and TIKR coverage, 2026 · TIKR earnings preview, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release · StockStory, May 7, 2026 · stockanalysis.com, July 2026 · Business Wire, May 7, 2026; StockStory · Nasdaq, TIKR, 2026 · stockanalysis.com; Nasdaq, July 2026