Travel & Leisure Co. (TNL): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $77.90, Travel & Leisure Co. (TNL) is priced for +1.7% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TNL

Headline

FieldValue
TickerTNL
CompanyTravel & Leisure Co.
Sector / IndustryConsumer Cyclical / Hotels & Resorts
Current price$77.90/sh
CompositionVacation Ownership - Vacation ownership interest sales 46% / Vacation Ownership - Property management fees and reimbursable revenues 22% / Vacation Ownership - Consumer financing 11% / Vacation Ownership - Fee-for-Service commissions 2% / Vacation Ownership - Ancillary revenues 3% / Travel and Membership - Transaction revenues 12% / Travel and Membership - Subscription revenues 4% / Travel and Membership - Ancillary revenues 1% / Corporate and other - Ancillary revenues 0% / Corporate and other - Eliminations 0%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)6.7%
Operating margin today13.7%
Margin compression (value-band)-7.0pp
Implied growth1.7%
Multiple paid18x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~7.3pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~13.5%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.14σ
cohort percentile (of 214 peers)53
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0
Earnings0
Relative0
Growth5.89x2expensive

Families that call it expensive: Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 4.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=2)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$102.070.76xnoExit EV/EBITDA: 13.1x / 15.1x / 17.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.1x / 18.0x / 20.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowth$25.243.09xyesDPS $2.33, g=0.0% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3%
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$8.968.69xyesStage 1: -28% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAssetno
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAssetno
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$57.031.37xnoRev $4.1B, growth 5% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.0x / 1.2x / 1.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$77.971.00xnoNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.70B × (1−30%) / WACC 4.7% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAssetno
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.69B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$0.017790.00xyesFCF $442.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median)
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$0.017790.00xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.38B (FCF $0.44B − SBC $0.06B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median)
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$3.0925.21xyesEPS $3.69 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $4.09B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$39.891.95xnoEPS $3.69 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Vacation Ownershipoperatingenterprise$3.4bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Travel and Membershipoperatingenterprise$658.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$5.4b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)13.74x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)9.66x
Interest coverage2.4x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-7.3%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The counterintuitive fact sits right on the cash flow statement: a company whose book equity is negative and whose balance sheet carries debt at more than five times its equity base generated positive free cash flow in all four trailing quarters, $442M in total, converting 187% of net income into cash. That is not an accounting trick; it is the timeshare model working as designed. Owners prepay for decades of vacations, then pay recurring management fees and financing interest on top, and the FY2025 10-K describes the strategy as broadening "the strength of our cornerstone timeshare business through a multi-brand expansion strategy, and our exchange businesses by creating depth of leisure travel products and services through growth of our travel clubs" (accession 0001361658-26-000009). The negative equity is the residue of years of buybacks, not accumulated losses.

The operating momentum is real and accelerating into 2026. First-quarter net revenues reached $961 million with net income of $79 million, adjusted EBITDA up 11% to $225 million, and adjusted diluted EPS up 31% to $1.45; gross vacation ownership interest sales rose 7% to $549 million and the vacation ownership segment's EBITDA jumped 20% to $191 million. The brand engine is widening the customer funnel: newer brands are approaching 10% of VOI sales, with Margaritaville near $150 million and the Accor and Eddie Bauer lines gaining traction. Domestically the base is compounding too, with the United States, 78% of revenue, growing 28.2% over roughly three years.

Management behaves like the cash is durable. Over the trailing year the company paid $149.0M of dividends, an annualized $2.40 per common share yielding 3.2%, and repurchased $318.0M of stock, 134.7% of net income, while reporting leverage just under 3.2x on its own net-leverage basis at quarter-end. Reaffirmed full-year guidance of $2.5 to $2.6 billion in gross VOI sales and $1.03 to $1.055 billion of adjusted EBITDA gives the return program a funded runway. At a 9.3% free cash flow yield, the market is pricing this cash machine like it might break; the bull case is simply that it keeps running.

Bear Case

Timeshare is a leveraged bet on the bottom half of the consumer cycle, and this point in the cycle is where the cracks show first. The business sells a discretionary product, then lends its own customers the money to buy it; both legs sag together in a downturn. The company's 10-K concedes the first leg is already under strain: "we are experiencing some pressure on our loan portfolio primarily due to delinquencies remaining elevated over historical levels" (accession 0001361658-26-000009). The allowance for loan losses is prominent enough in the financials that the auditor flagged it as a critical audit matter. When a company's growth engine requires underwriting its own demand, elevated delinquency is not a footnote; it is the demand signal.

The capital structure amplifies whatever the consumer does. Operating income covers interest only about 2.4 times, debt stands at 5.6 times a shrinking equity base that has gone negative, and the funding model leans on securitizing customer receivables, pools the 10-K notes were all "in compliance with applicable contractual triggers" as of December 31, 2025, a sentence that exists because non-compliance would divert cash from the parent. In a travel recession, VOI sales fall, defaults rise, securitization economics tighten, and the fixed interest bill stays. The equity, as the thin slice atop that stack, moves violently in both directions.

Competition for the next owner is not getting cheaper either. The filing describes fighting for "new owner tours from different marketing channels" against overlapping loyalty programs, and the branded rivals it competes with, Marriott Vacations at $4.8 billion of vacation ownership segment revenue and Hilton Grand Vacations, per their own 10-Ks, carry hotel-system flags that feed them tour flow. Meanwhile the price is not obviously cheap for the risk: 20.2x trailing earnings sits above the 18x sector median and 15.1x EV/EBITDA above the 12x median, and peer-multiple methods read the price at about 1.6x what they would defend. A consumer-credit-sensitive, negative-equity borrower trading at a premium to its sector is a bet that the cycle stays kind.

Valuation

Two honest readings of this price disagree, and the disagreement is the analysis. Read on operating income, the price is undemanding: at $74.17 (July 11, 2026) the market pays about 14 times company-wide operating income, low enough to sit below what even a 5%-per-year operating-profit decline path would warrant, and the long-run margin the price requires, about 10.6%, is below the roughly 13.7% the business earns today. Read on the equity methods, the price looks rich: peer multiples put it around 1.6x their central estimate, with the trailing P/E at 20.2x against an 18x sector median and EV/EBITDA at 15.1x against 12x, and the cash-flow-to-equity frames sit far below the price. The bridge between the readings is the debt: on an enterprise basis the operating business is cheap relative to its income, but interest coverage of roughly 2.4 times means a large share of that income is spoken for before equity holders see it, so equity-anchored methods discount it heavily. A note on measurement: trailing operating income reads about $735 million on the fuller-year record basis and about $556 million on the most recent EDGAR quarterly TTM basis; the multiple above uses the former, and the gap between the two bases is itself a signal of how much quarter-to-quarter swing this P&L carries.

What the price concretely needs is continuation, not acceleration. Management's reaffirmed 2026 guidance, $2.5 to $2.6 billion of gross VOI sales and $1.03 to $1.055 billion of adjusted EBITDA, funds the current capital-return pace of $467M a year if delivered. The revenue mix documented in the filing, VOI sales plus recurring property-management fees, consumer-financing interest, and travel-club subscriptions (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001361658-26-000009), is what gives the cash flow its resilience, with $442M of trailing free cash flow off $4.05B of revenue.

The downside is not padded. Book equity is negative, leverage is the defining balance-sheet fact, and the solvency question runs through consumer credit performance rather than corporate liquidity. For a buyer, the calculus is a 9.3% free cash flow yield and a 3.2% growing dividend against an equity that sits last in line behind a 2.4x-covered interest bill. The multiple on operating income says the market has already priced in some deterioration; the equity stack determines how forgiving that discount actually is.

Catalysts

The next print is the second quarter, guided to adjusted EBITDA of $260 million to $270 million, against a first quarter that beat expectations with $225 million, up 11% year over year. The two numbers to pull from it are gross VOI sales, which grew 7% to $549 million in Q1 and need to track the reaffirmed $2.5 to $2.6 billion full-year range, and volume per guest alongside the delinquency trend in the financing book, since elevated delinquency is the one pressure the company itself has flagged in its FY2025 annual filing.

The brand expansion carries the medium-term story. Newer brands were approaching 10% of VOI sales as of the first quarter, with Margaritaville near a $150 million run rate and the Accor Vacation Club and Eddie Bauer lines building. Each quarter of mix shift toward these brands widens the tour funnel beyond the legacy Wyndham system and tests whether the multi-brand strategy the 10-K describes converts marketing spend into owners at attractive cost.

Capital allocation is its own catalyst stream. The company returned $467M over the trailing year between $318M of buybacks and $149M of dividends, with quarter-end leverage just under 3.2x on management's net measure; sustaining that pace through 2026 depends on adjusted EBITDA landing within the $1.03 to $1.055 billion guided range and on securitization markets staying open on favorable terms. Any commentary on consumer health, close rates on tours, or provisioning for loan losses will move the stock more than the headline EPS number, because the credit book is where this cycle's question lives.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Vacation Ownership (reported)

Travel and Membership (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings call, April 22, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release and call, April 22, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call · Q1 2026 earnings release, April 22, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call; Yahoo Finance earnings recap, April 2026

View the full interactive TNL report on boothcheck