TARGET CORPORATION (TGT): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $163.20, TARGET CORPORATION (TGT) is priced for +8.8% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TGT

Headline

FieldValue
TickerTGT
CompanyTARGET CORPORATION
Sector / IndustryConsumer Defensive
Current price$163.20/sh
CompositionApparel & accessories 15% / Beauty 13% / Food & beverage 23% / Hardlines 15% / Home furnishings & décor 15% / Household essentials 17% / Other merchandise sales 0% / Advertising revenue 1% / Credit card profit sharing 1% / Other 1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)2.9%
Operating margin today4.5%
Margin compression (value-band)-1.6pp
Implied growth8.8%
Multiple paid19x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 8.4% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.06σ
cohort percentile (of 69 peers)48

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple; asset-based/earnings-power/growth-DCF land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.99x5expensive
Earnings2.99x4expensive
Relative0.76x3justifies
Growth1.74x4expensive

Families that justify the price: Relative Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=16)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$75.342.17xyesFCF base $3.0B, growth 1% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.7%, WACC 7.6%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$163.141.00xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 9.1x / 11.1x / 13.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$190.930.85xyesP/E 22x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 18.6x / 22.0x / 25.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$31.505.18xyesStage 1: -17% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$82.141.99xyesBV/sh $36.10, ROE (TTM) 21.0%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$122.921.33xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$123.341.32xyesRev $106.4B, growth 1% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.6x / 0.7x / 0.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$106.141.54xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $5.62B × (1−24%) / WACC 7.6% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$117.081.39xyesBV $36.10 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 21.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$78.412.08xyes√(22.5 × EPS $7.57 × BVPS $36.10) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$213.560.76xyesEBITDA $7.94B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$40.963.98xyesFCF $3031.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$34.604.72xyesSBC-adj FCF $2.76B (FCF $3.03B − SBC $0.27B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$6.3425.74xyesEPS $7.57 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$13.4012.18xyesBV $36.10 × (ROIC 2.8% / WACC 7.6%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$468.420.35xyesRevenue $106.38B × sector P/S 2.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$81.841.99xyesEPS $7.57 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Target (single segment)operatingenterprise106.6B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$8.4b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)2.31x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)1.75x
Interest coverage10.7x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.6%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Big-box retail is valued on a simple contract: razor-thin margins, forgiven because scale makes them durable and traffic makes them compound. Target currently offers the sector contract at a discount. Its shares trade at roughly 18 times trailing earnings against a sector median near 22, and at about 16 times operating income the price asks for only 3.5 percent annual operating growth for five years, a pace within what the business has recently delivered. What the discount buys is a business earning a 21 percent return on equity on a 4.5 percent operating margin, the signature of a retailer that turns its assets hard rather than marking up its goods.

The first quarter gave the turnaround its first hard evidence. Comparable sales rose 5.6 percent, the first increase in five quarters, on 4.4 percent traffic growth, 8.9 percent digital comps, and same-day delivery volume up more than 27 percent; net sales of $25.44 billion grew 6.7 percent, and management raised full-year sales guidance by two points to roughly 4 percent growth. CEO Michael Fiddelke called the results stronger than expected and credited a clarified strategy driving broad-based growth. The mechanics behind that are the ones the 10-K describes as the differentiation engine: "a steady flow of exclusive products and designer collaborations" across the assortment, plus revenue streams beyond the register, since net sales include "advertising revenue and credit card" income that carries software-like margins relative to merchandise.

The capital story is quietly steady. Net debt of $11.9 billion sits against interest coverage of 10.7 times, the company is not burning cash, and the share count has drifted down about 0.6 percent a year over four years while the dividend continued. Target opened its 2,000th store in the quarter and plans more than 30 openings this year, reinvestment behavior from a management team that believes the traffic inflection is real. If comps merely stay positive, the sector-discount multiple and the raised guidance do the rest of the work without requiring any heroics from margins.

Bear Case

The advantage Target spent two decades building was a reason to drive past a Walmart, and that reason has been eroding. The 10-K names the terms of the fight with unusual candor: competitive position rests on "guest perceptions regarding our shopping experience, the safety and cleanliness of our stores, our ability to offer products at affordable prices, the desirability and exclusivity of our offerings, our in-stock levels, the effectiveness of our digital channels and fulfillment", against a field the filing defines as everything from "drug stores, supermarkets, direct-to-consumer brands, and other forms of retail commerce". Five consecutive quarters of comparable sales declines before this spring's rebound recorded what that erosion looked like in the ledger. One quarter of 5.6 percent comps, earned partly against a prior-year quarter in which comps fell 3.8 percent, is a data point, not a trend.

The earnings base under the multiple is softer than the headline suggests. First quarter GAAP EPS of $1.71 was below the prior year's GAAP $2.27, even as it beat the prior year's adjusted $1.30, two bases worth keeping separate. Trailing free cash flow of about $3.0 billion runs well below trailing operating income of $4.8 billion, with the 10-K attributing inventory growth to earlier receipts and "inventory investments in select merchandise categories to support sales growth", and the turnaround itself costs money: 30-plus store openings and supply-chain investment are being funded while comps have only just turned positive. The cash-flow-based reads sit far below today's price for exactly this reason; the price capitalizes earnings the cash statement has not yet confirmed.

What the price requires is modest, which is the point: about 3.5 percent annual operating growth for five years is roughly the sector's ordinary expectation, so the bear case is not an extreme assumption but a fragile one. If holiday execution stumbles or price investment is needed to hold the recovered traffic, the operating income the 16 times multiple rests on shrinks, and the intrinsic lenses that already sit below the price, book-plus-profitability around 40 percent below, no-growth earnings power about 20 percent below, mark where the compression lands. A turnaround priced as a resumption of normal has little cushion for a second stall.

Valuation

The sector lens and the intrinsic lenses disagree about Target, and the disagreement is the valuation story. At $135.10 (July 10, 2026), the price sits roughly 30 to 40 percent below what sector peer multiples would defend, on both earnings and EBITDA bases; the company's own trailing multiple near 18 times earnings runs under the sector median of 22 times. Point the other lenses at it and the picture inverts: the price sits about 20 percent above the no-growth earnings-power read, about 65 percent above the book-value-plus-profitability read, and more than three times the trailing free-cash-flow read. That last gap is the informative one. Trailing free cash flow of roughly $3.0 billion sits well below the $4.8 billion of trailing operating income because of inventory and capital investment, which the 10-K ties to earlier receipts and merchandising support, so the cash-based lenses are pricing an investment year as if it were the permanent state.

What the price actually asks is mild. Inverted, $135.10 pays about 16 times trailing operating income and requires roughly 3.5 percent annual operating growth for five years, a pace within the company's own recent delivery and in the lower half of the peer multiple range. The raised fiscal 2026 guidance, sales growth of about 4 percent with EPS expected near the high end of $7.50 to $8.50, sits slightly above that required pace, which is what a within-range label looks like in practice: guidance and requirement nearly touching, with execution as the spread.

The balance sheet holds the downside. Net debt of $11.9 billion is about two and a half years of operating income on a pre-tax basis, interest is covered 10.7 times, the company is not burning cash, and the share count has edged down about 0.6 percent a year over four years. Nothing in the solvency picture forces an outcome; the valuation resolves on whether the first positive comp in five quarters, 5.6 percent on 4.4 percent traffic growth, was the start of the trend the guidance now assumes.

Catalysts

The May 20 print reset the year. First quarter net sales of $25.44 billion rose 6.7 percent, comparable sales grew 5.6 percent after a 3.8 percent decline a year earlier, traffic rose 4.4 percent, digital comps grew 8.9 percent, and same-day delivery expanded more than 27 percent; GAAP and adjusted EPS both landed at $1.71. On the strength of the quarter, management raised full-year sales growth guidance to about 4 percent, two points above the prior range, and pointed EPS toward the high end of the existing $7.50 to $8.50 band. The shares nevertheless fell about 4 percent on the day as investors weighed whether the rest of the year can match the first quarter, which frames the next two quarterly reports as the confirmation events: a second consecutive positive comp would convert one good quarter into a trend, and a stall would reopen the turnaround question under a new CEO.

The execution calendar beneath the prints: more than 30 store openings planned this year after seven in the first quarter, including the chain's 2,000th location, and continued scaling of same-day fulfillment, the channel growing fastest. Michael Fiddelke's clarified strategy, his phrase for the merchandising and operations reset, is the narrative under test; early signs he cited as encouraging become measurable in traffic and holiday-quarter market share. The guidance math leaves modest room for disappointment, so category-level commentary on discretionary demand and any price-investment signals in the back half are the tells worth reading.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Target (single segment) (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings release, May 20, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release, May 2026 · CNBC, May 2026

View the full interactive TGT report on boothcheck