STOCK YARDS BANCORP, INC. (SYBT): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $84.92, STOCK YARDS BANCORP, INC. (SYBT) is priced for more than 15.8% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/SYBT

Headline

FieldValue
TickerSYBT
CompanySTOCK YARDS BANCORP, INC.
Sector / IndustryFinancial Services
Current price$84.92/sh
CompositionCommercial Banking 89% / WM&T (Wealth Management & Trust) 11%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basisfinancials
Price-to-book2.27x
Return on equity now13.0%

The implied return on book is non-physical at this price-to-book and is suppressed as misleading. The price sits beyond a 12.6% return on equity sustained for 40 years and is not resolvable as a sustainable-ROE point. The rarity read below is the honest signal.

Solve inputs: computed at a 9.2% cost of equity; ROE searched up to the 12.6% ROE ceiling.

How unusual the bet is: n/a

ReferenceValue
cohort percentile (of 166 peers)92
sustained it ~10 years at this level58%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.37x3expensive
Earnings1.62x1expensive
Relative0
Growth0

Families that call it expensive: Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=4)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
Bank Fair Value (P/TBV)$54.171.57xyesTBVPS $30.42 × 1.78x (ROE (TTM) 13.0% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), credit 1.31% allowance/loans → ×0.94)
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 12.24x (blended: static sector reference 10x + trailing (TTM) 17x), scenarios: 10.1x / 12.2x / 14.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$52.581.62xyesBV/sh $37.39, ROE (TTM) 13.0%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$61.831.37xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowthnoRev $0.3B, growth 15% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 6.7x / 8.1x / 9.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $4.86, growth 18% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.98 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAssetno
Graham NumberAsset$63.941.33xyes√(22.5 × EPS $4.86 × BVPS $37.39) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativeno
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarningsnoEPS $4.86 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelativeno
PEG Fair ValueRelativenoEPS $4.86 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 17.7% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 26.6x
Earnings YieldEarnings$52.541.62xyesEPS $4.86 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

The issuer is a funded financial business. Debt, interest, and cash flows are operating inputs, so industrial EV, net-debt, WACC, and free-cash-flow lenses do not apply; value the common-equity claim with book, earnings, capital, and payout economics.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Commercial Bankingfinancialequity0.4B reported-currencywithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required
WM&T (Wealth Management & Trust)financialequity0.0B reported-currencywithheldunresolved standalone equity facts required

No unit-level total common-equity value is stated. Each financial unit requires supported standalone common equity, normalized earnings, capital adequacy, and payout capacity. Consolidated debt, interest, and cash are operating balances, not an enterprise-to-equity bridge; company-level book, earnings, capital, and payout lenses remain the coherent cross-checks.

Solvency

FieldValue
Share count CAGR (dilution)1.8%

Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Stock Yards is that unusual thing in community banking: a growth-stage franchise wearing a mature bank's risk profile, and reading it as a sleepy regional misses the story. The numbers move like a growth company's. First-quarter net income rose to $36.6 million, or $1.24 per diluted share, from $1.13 a year earlier, beating the $1.17 consensus, with loans up 9% year over year and deposits up 6%. Growth is coming from both sides of the franchise at once: net interest income reached $78.4 million on margin expansion and loan growth, while non-interest income hit $24.6 million on higher wealth management, card, and treasury fees, with the Wealth Management & Trust group generating record net new business in the quarter.

The wealth business is the structural differentiator. The 10-K describes WM&T's economics plainly: it "provides customers fiduciary and investment management services as agreed upon in asset management contracts" with fees earned across a series of distinct services (accession 0001437749-26-005830), which is fee revenue that compounds with markets and referrals rather than with the rate cycle. Few banks of this size own a trust franchise meaningful enough to headline the quarter. On the lending side, demand indicators are improving from within the existing book: the filing notes line utilization "ending at 48.0% as of December 31, 2025 compared to 45.9% at December 31, 2024", with C&I utilization up to 37.0% from 33.7% (same accession), meaning growth is arriving without reaching down the credit spectrum, supplemented by the Field & Main acquisition the filing targets for full customer and employee retention.

The capital math supports the ambition. The CET1 ratio stands at about 12% as of March 2026, comfortably above requirements, while only about 28% of earnings went out as dividends and buybacks last fiscal year, leaving roughly 70% of a 13% return on equity retained to compound book value. A bank earning elite returns, retaining most of them, growing loans at 9%, and building a fee engine beside the spread business is the profile the market's premium multiple is describing. The bull case is that the premium is earned and the compounding has years to run.

Bear Case

Two external variables own this thesis, and the bank controls neither. The first is the rate cycle. First-quarter results were powered by net interest margin expansion, and margin-driven earnings are borrowed strength: when the Fed eases, the spread between what Stock Yards earns on its $7.23 billion loan book and pays on $7.76 billion of deposits compresses, and the earnings growth the market is capitalizing at 2 times book decelerates on a schedule set in Washington. The second is a line on a regulatory map: the $10 billion asset threshold. Total assets reached $9.47 billion in March, and the 10-K devotes strategic priority to it, holding elevated cash "in preparation for approaching the $10 billion regulatory threshold for total assets" and naming balance-sheet management around the crossing "a major priority" (accession 0001437749-26-005830). Crossing brings heavier compliance costs and changes the economics of the fee lines; managing to stay under it means deliberately braking the very growth the multiple assumes. Either path taxes the story.

The price itself is the third problem. At about 2 times book, the top of the peer group, the market assumes elite returns on equity persist for decades; historically, only about 61% of banks earning at this level sustained it even ten years. The bank earns about 13% on equity now, so nothing needs to improve, but nothing can slip either: the peer-multiple read on blended earnings sits modestly above the price, while the book-value-based reads land 20% to 30% below it, and a tangible-book framing lands lower still. A premium bank that stops being premium does not fall to fair; it falls through it, because the multiple and the earnings de-rate together.

Credit is the quiet cyclical exposure underneath. The filing's own loss-pool taxonomy leads with "Commercial Real Estate - Non-Owner Occupied - Includes investment real estate loans secured by a variety of commercial property" (accession 0001437749-26-005830), the category regional-bank credit cycles are made of, and the bank uses participation agreements with other banks to spread that concentration. Loss rates have been benign, which is exactly the point: a 9% loan growth rate underwritten at the top of a benign credit cycle in Kentucky-area CRE is untested by definition, and the share count creeping up 1.8% a year through acquisitions means holders are diluted while they wait to find out.

Valuation

A bank is worth the return it earns on its capital, so the read starts at price-to-book: about 2 times, at the very top of the peer group. What that buys is an assumption that Stock Yards keeps earning a roughly 12.6% return on equity, the elite tier of the panel, for something like 35 years before normalizing, equivalent to holding about 14.7% in perpetuity. Against that requirement the bank currently earns about 13%, so the price asks for continuation, not improvement, though historically only about 61% of banks earning at this level sustained it a decade. The method families split along exactly that line: earnings-based reads and peer multiples land at or slightly above the price (the blended earnings multiple runs 11.7 times against a sector 10), while book-anchored approaches land 20% to 30% below it and a tangible-book framing at $30.42 per share lands lower still. The spread between the earnings reads and the book reads is the durability premium, priced explicitly.

The balance-sheet frame for a bank is capital and payout rather than leverage: deposits fund the book, the CET1 ratio stands at about 12% as filed for March 2026, and the company returned about 28% of earnings as dividends and buybacks in the latest fiscal year, retaining the rest to fund 9% loan growth. Two filing-sourced facts shape the forward arithmetic. First, the fee engine: WM&T earns contractual fiduciary and investment management fees "as agreed upon in asset management contracts" (accession 0001437749-26-005830), a revenue line the rate cycle does not own. Second, the ceiling: the same filing describes elevated cash held "in preparation for approaching the $10 billion regulatory threshold" (same accession), which means near-term growth is being deliberately shaped around a regulatory line the bank will cross on its own terms. The decisive question the 2-times-book price poses is single: how long elite returns last. Everything in the current prints says they are intact today; the multiple has prepaid for a long tomorrow.

Catalysts

The quarterly earnings cadence is the main event track, with the second-quarter report due on the company's usual late-July schedule. The first quarter set a high bar: $36.6 million of net income, $1.24 per diluted share against a $1.17 consensus, net interest income of $78.4 million on margin expansion, and record net new business in Wealth Management & Trust driving non-interest income to $24.6 million. The items that move the stock from here are the margin trajectory as the rate environment shifts, whether loan growth holds near the 9% year-over-year pace, and whether the WM&T new-business record converts into a visibly compounding fee line.

The structural event on the horizon is the $10 billion crossing. Total assets stood at $9.47 billion at the end of March, and the February 10-K frames balance-sheet management around the threshold as a stated priority, with elevated cash positioning already in place (accession 0001437749-26-005830). Watch for management commentary on timing and on the Field & Main integration, where the filing targets customer and employee retention as the measure of success. Capital deployment is the other lever: with CET1 around 12% and just 28% of earnings currently paid out, the bank has room to raise the dividend, buy back stock, or fund another fill-in acquisition, and which lever management pulls will say a great deal about how it weighs the growth-versus-threshold tradeoff over the next several quarters.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Commercial Banking (reported)

WM&T (Wealth Management & Trust) (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings release, April 2026

View the full interactive SYBT report on boothcheck