SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING PLC (ST): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $47.62, SENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING PLC (ST) is priced for +13.4% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ST

Headline

FieldValue
TickerST
CompanySENSATA TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING PLC
Sector / IndustryTechnology
Current price$47.62/sh
CompositionAutomotive 57% / Industrials 21% / Aerospace, Defense, and Commercial Equipment 22% / Other 0%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)12.8%
Operating margin (mid-cycle)15.8%
Margin compression (value-band)-3.0pp
Trailing margin (depressed year)7.5%
Implied growth13.4%
Multiple paid16x mid-cycle operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 9.9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~6.3pp.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.05σ
cohort percentile (of 187 peers)19
sustained it ~5 years at this level48%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset7.18x5expensive
Earnings2.38x5expensive
Relative2.12x2expensive
Growth0.96x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$49.450.96xyesFCF base $0.6B, growth 1% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.9%, WACC 7.1%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$50.040.95xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 15.2x / 17.2x / 19.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 35.91x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 78x), scenarios: 30.3x / 35.9x / 41.5x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$6.637.18xyesBV/sh $20.18, ROE (TTM) 3.0%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$3.9612.03xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$31.701.50xyesRev $3.8B, growth 1% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.6x / 1.9x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$21.702.19xyesEPS $0.62, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=2.22 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$19.172.48xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.45B × (1−23%) / WACC 7.1% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$2.9516.14xyesBV $20.18 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 3.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 2.0%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$16.782.84xyes√(22.5 × EPS $0.62 × BVPS $20.18) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.52B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$28.901.65xyesFCF $579.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$26.871.77xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.55B (FCF $0.58B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$20.012.38xyesEPS $0.62 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$7.246.58xyesBV $20.18 × (ROIC 2.6% / WACC 7.1%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $3.78B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$23.252.05xyesEPS $0.62 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$6.707.11xyesEPS $0.62 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Automotiveoperatingenterprise$2.1bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Industrialsoperatingenterprise$787.8mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Aerospace, Defense, and Commercial Equipmentoperatingenterprise$805.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$2.5b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)5.37x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)4.14x
Interest coverage4.2x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-1.7%
Burning cashno

Leverage and coverage are computed on normalized mid-cycle operating income (mid-cycle margin 15.8%); the trailing year was depressed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Valuing a sensor company is really about content per unit, not units, and that is where Sensata is interesting. The 10-K explains that its end market has "historically been driven by three principal trends: growth in the number of vehicles produced globally and expansion in the number and" sophistication of the systems those vehicles carry. Sensata makes the small, mission-critical devices that "translate a physical parameter" such as pressure, temperature, or position into a signal a vehicle's electronics can act on, and every tightening of emissions, safety, and electrification rules adds more of them per car. So even when global auto production is flat or falling, Sensata's revenue per vehicle can rise, which is the whole bull case in one sentence.

The recent reorganization sharpens that story. Sensata dissolved its old segments and built three new ones, Automotive, Industrials, and Aerospace, Defense and Commercial Equipment, and the non-automotive pieces are now the growth and margin engine. In the first quarter of 2026, Aerospace, Defense and Commercial Equipment revenue reached about $226 million at a roughly 28% segment operating margin, and Industrials about $184 million at roughly 27%, both well above the automotive segment's still-healthy 23.5%. The 10-K notes the company aims to "leverage innovation from the automotive side of the business, ensuring scalability and reliability" across these markets. Double-digit organic growth in aerospace and defense is diversification that lifts the blended margin.

Management is running the business for margin protection and cash. First-quarter adjusted operating margin was about 18.6%, free cash flow of roughly $105 million represented 83% conversion, and net leverage fell as debt came down. The CFO put a floor under it, committing to a 19% annual margin even if automotive markets weaken, and the share count has fallen about 2% a year, evidence of real buyback deployment. A company with rising content per vehicle, a growing high-margin aerospace and industrial mix, and an explicit margin-floor commitment is defending its economics deliberately rather than hoping the cycle cooperates.

Bear Case

The moat-erosion question is where the bear starts, because Sensata's advantage is being chipped at from two sides. Its core has long been automotive sensing, and the 10-K itself flags that customers are "adopting specific environmental requirements, including renewable-energy commitments, emissions-reduction targets" that reshape vehicle architectures, while the shift to electric powertrains removes some of the combustion-related sensing content Sensata historically supplied even as it adds new content elsewhere. The company is betting the new content outweighs the lost content, but that is a bet, not a certainty, and the transition is where a supplier's position is most vulnerable to being designed out.

The near-term pressure is a shrinking end market and cost inflation. The IHS forecast calls for a roughly 2% decline in global auto production in 2026, and automotive is still Sensata's largest segment at about $525 million of quarterly revenue. On top of soft volumes, the company is absorbing precious-metal inflation running roughly 100% year over year, a direct hit to the cost of the materials inside its sensors. Management's 19% margin-floor commitment is itself an admission that margins are under threat; a floor is something you promise when the market fears the number could fall below it.

The valuation leaves no room for the moat to slip. At about $45.32 (July 10, 2026), no valuation family reaches the price. The asset methods are extreme because trailing return on equity collapsed to under 2% on recent charges, and the earnings-power and peer-multiple methods land well below the price. Even reading operating income on the healthier mid-cycle basis rather than the charge-depressed trailing basis, the price sits above what the methods support. Net debt of about $2.23 billion runs roughly 3.8 times pre-tax operating income at interest coverage near 4 times, manageable but not trivial for a cyclical supplier. The bet the price makes is that content-per-vehicle growth and the aerospace mix overcome falling auto volumes, metal inflation, and the electrification transition all at once, with little margin for any one of them to go wrong.

Valuation

Sensata is a case where reading the earnings base correctly is half the analysis. The trailing operating income in the raw EDGAR data is depressed by recent charges, showing a margin near 7%, while the business on a mid-cycle basis and on the recent GAAP quarterly result runs closer to 15% operating margin, and adjusted margin near 18.6%. The two bases differ by more than 10%, so they should be read as different measurement lenses, not one substituted for the other. On either basis, at $45.32 (July 10, 2026) no valuation family reaches the price: peer multiples land near $20 to $26, the earnings-power methods near $19 to $23, and the asset methods far lower because trailing return on equity fell under 2% on the charges. The price is a bet beyond what any standard trailing frame supports.

The most concrete way to see the bet is the margin the price needs versus what the business shows. To justify the current level, Sensata has to move its whole-company operating margin up toward the low-teens on a sustained basis, from a depressed trailing figure, while its largest end market shrinks. The recent segment margins, roughly 23% to 28% in aerospace, defense, and industrials, are the reason to believe that mix shift can carry it, but the automotive segment is the anchor, and IHS expects auto production down about 2% in 2026. The price works if the high-margin non-automotive segments keep growing double-digits and lift the blend; it does not if automotive weakness drags the average down faster than the mix improves.

Solvency bounds the downside but does not cushion the valuation. Net debt of about $2.23 billion runs roughly 3.8 times pre-tax operating income, interest coverage is near 4 times, and free cash flow of about $105 million in the quarter at 83% conversion is funding both debt reduction and buybacks that shrank the share count about 2% a year. The company is not burning cash, and the balance sheet is serviceable, but it carries enough leverage that a cyclical downturn in automotive would tighten the margin math. A buyer at today's price is underwriting a successful mix shift toward aerospace and industrial content, sustained content-per-vehicle gains, and margin recovery through metal inflation, with every trailing method sitting below the price as the measure of how much is riding on that transition.

Catalysts

The first-quarter 2026 print in late April set the frame: revenue of about $935 million, up 2.6% year over year with 4.2% organic growth, adjusted EPS up about 10% to $0.86, and adjusted operating margin near 18.6%. By segment, Automotive was about $525 million at a 23.5% margin, Aerospace, Defense and Commercial Equipment about $226 million at 28.1%, and Industrials about $184 million at 27.1%. For the second quarter, management guided revenue of $950 million to $980 million and adjusted EPS of $0.89 to $0.95, with adjusted operating margin expanding toward 19.2% to 19.4%.

The forces to watch are the ones management named. CEO Stephan Von Schuckmann pointed to demand risk from geopolitical events and oil prices, and the CFO reiterated a 19% annual margin-floor commitment with readiness to act if automotive markets deteriorate. The two swing factors into the back half of 2026 are the roughly 2% forecast decline in global auto production and precious-metal inflation running about 100% year over year, both of which press on the margin that the valuation depends on. The next quarterly report is the key checkpoint on whether the aerospace and industrial mix can keep lifting the blended result against those headwinds.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Automotive (reported)

Industrials (reported)

Aerospace, Defense, and Commercial Equipment (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

10-K, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release, April 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings release · Q1 2026 earnings call, April 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call

View the full interactive ST report on boothcheck