Spire Inc. (SR): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers Spire Inc. (SR) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/SR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerSR
CompanySpire Inc.
Sector / IndustryUtilities
Current price$80.84/sh
CompositionGas Utility operating revenues 89% / Gas Marketing 6% / Midstream 6% / Other 1% / Intercompany eliminations -3%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Multiple paid26x operating income

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 5.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 5.5% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 3.8% sits below it).

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~25%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.63σ
cohort percentile (of 72 peers)82
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based value, while earnings-power lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.24x5expensive
Earnings2.79x2expensive
Relative0
Growth1.46x1expensive

Families that justify the price: Asset Families that call it expensive: Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 3.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=8)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthnoReference only (OCF-based, capex excluded): OCF $0.6B
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$0.00noNegative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.7x / 20.0x / 23.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$0.62130.39xyesStage 1: -83% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual (excluded from median)
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$65.431.24xyesBV/sh $57.73, ROE (TTM) 10.5%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$69.511.16xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$55.251.46xyesRev $2.5B, growth 7% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.6x / 1.9x / 2.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$38.932.08xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.51B × (1−19%) / WACC 3.9% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$70.271.15xyesBV $57.73 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.5% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 6.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$52.721.53xyes√(22.5 × EPS $2.14 × BVPS $57.73) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.86B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x
FCF YieldEarningsno
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$1.7945.16xyesEPS $2.14 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$32.272.51xyesBV $57.73 × (ROIC 2.2% / WACC 3.9%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $2.54B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$23.143.49xyesEPS $2.14 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Gas Utilityoperatingenterprise$2.2b$3.7b indicative EV subtotalindicative enterprise value
Gas Marketingoperatingenterprise$157.2mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Midstreamoperatingenterprise$155.5m$867.0m indicative EV subtotalindicative enterprise value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$10.1b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)21.87x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)17.61x
Interest coverage2.5x
Share count CAGR (dilution)3.3%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Start with where the price sits against the methods, because for a regulated utility that is the whole conversation: peer-multiple comparisons land about a third above today's $80.71, asset-based and dividend-growth arithmetic sit essentially at it, and only the earnings-power lens reads the price as somewhat rich. A utility priced below its peer group with its asset value fully backing the price is the cheap end of a sector that rarely gets cheap, and the yield does the rest of the argument: the dividend was raised for the twenty-third consecutive year to $3.30 per share annualized, about a 4% yield at today's price, still covered by the $5.40 to $5.60 of guided fiscal 2026 adjusted EPS.

The growth engine is the rate base, and it just got materially bigger. Spire closed the $2.48 billion acquisition of Duke Energy's Tennessee Piedmont gas business on March 31, 2026, adding more than 200,000 customers and nearly 3,800 miles of pipeline in one of the fastest-growing regions in the country. That sits on top of a 10-year, $11.2 billion capital plan management expects to drive 5 to 7% long-term adjusted EPS growth, and the regulatory machinery to convert spend into revenue is functioning: the latest Missouri rate agreement produced "a net base rate increase of $137.4" million on top of infrastructure-surcharge recoveries [FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-25-282583]. Regulated capex that earns an allowed return with a decades-long runway is, frankly, just how utilities compound.

The commodity risk most investors fear in a gas name is largely passed through, not borne: the utilities' tariffs contain purchased-gas adjustment clauses that "permit the Utilities to file for rate adjustments to recover the cost of purchased gas" [FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-25-282583], so gas prices flow to customers while Spire earns on the pipes. With guidance just raised, the Tennessee earnings contribution arriving, the preferred stock redeemed in February, and a below-peer multiple, the setup is a dividend compounder priced as if its growth plan were ordinary.

Bear Case

The competitor that matters for a gas distributor is not another gas company; it is the electric utility next door and the policy current behind it. Every heat pump installed in St. Louis, Kansas City, or Nashville is a customer whose winter therms shrink, and electrification is a one-way ratchet backed by building codes and federal incentives. Spire's own recent operating problem previews the demand risk in miniature: weather-driven usage patterns produced a margin shortfall large enough that the company filed for an Accounting Authority Order in Missouri just to create a regulatory asset for it. A business that needs regulatory accounting relief after a warm winter is a business whose volumes are structurally hostage to both the thermometer and the energy transition, and the transition only points one direction.

The balance sheet amplifies whatever the demand curve does. Even before the Tennessee deal, the fiscal 2025 10-K showed $3,879.1 million of long-term debt principal with $487.5 million due in fiscal 2026 [FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-25-282583]; the $2.48 billion acquisition then layered on a financing mix of debt, equity, and hybrid securities, and trailing interest coverage now runs about 2.4 times operating income. The equity piece of that mix is the quiet cost: the share count has grown about 3.3% a year for four years, so each new dollar of rate-base earnings is split across more owners, and the 5 to 7% EPS growth target is what remains after dilution only if regulators keep granting timely recovery. Missouri's sharing mechanisms (off-system sales split 75/25 in customers' favor [FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-25-282583]) illustrate the asymmetry of regulated economics: upside is shared, cost overruns are litigated.

And the price, while below peer multiples, is not below what the business earns today: the earnings-power lens sits about a third under the price, meaning the market is already crediting the growth plan. Worked through at even a floor-level cost of capital, the premium the price assigns to the gas utility segment requires growth persisting near its feasible ceiling for about six years, and only about a third of comparable growers have sustained that. For an interest-rate-sensitive, weather-exposed, freshly re-levered utility whose end product faces managed decline in its home markets, the cheap-versus-peers reading may simply be the market ranking gas utilities last in a sector it already owns for safety.

Valuation

The premium in Spire's price sits on the Gas Utility segment: decomposed at a 7% cost of capital (a floor rate; the CAPM rate for a utility this stable sits below it), today's price implies the utility's operating growth holding near its self-funding ceiling for roughly six years, a persistence about a third of comparable growers have historically delivered. Keep that as an approximation rather than a solved fact; the practical version is that the market is paying for the $11.2 billion capital plan and the Tennessee expansion to convert into allowed returns on schedule. The regulatory record supports part of it: the most recent Missouri rate agreement added $137.4 million of net base rates [FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-25-282583], and fiscal 2026 adjusted EPS guidance was raised to $5.40 to $5.60 with the acquisition contributing.

Across the methods the price sits in unusually tight formation: peer-multiple comparisons land about a third above it (the one clear support), asset-value and dividend-discount arithmetic land within a few percent of it, and capitalized current earnings sit about a quarter to a third below it. The pattern says the market prices Spire as a fair-value utility with a below-average multiple, discounting neither disaster nor much of the growth plan. What separates the readings is the growth conversion: the earnings-power lens sees only today's profit; the peer lens sees a sector where rate-base growth is routinely paid for in advance.

Leverage is the governing constraint. Pre-acquisition long-term debt stood at $3,879.1 million of principal with $487.5 million maturing in fiscal 2026 [FY2025 10-K, accession 0001193125-25-282583]; the $2.48 billion Tennessee purchase added a financing mix of debt, equity, and hybrids, and trailing interest coverage runs about 2.4 times operating income, thin in absolute terms and normal only by the standards of rate-base-funded utilities. The share count grows about 3.3% a year as equity funds the capex, and the $3.30 annualized dividend (raised a twenty-third straight year) consumes most of the guided EPS midpoint. The price needs three things to hold at once: regulators granting timely recovery (including the pending weather AAO), Tennessee integrating on plan, and rates staying benign enough that 2.4 times coverage never becomes the story.

Catalysts

Spire Tennessee is the live integration story: the $2.48 billion acquisition of Duke Energy's Piedmont Tennessee gas business closed March 31, 2026, bringing 200,000-plus customers and nearly 3,800 miles of pipe. Each quarterly print through fiscal 2026 shows the first clean reads on its earnings contribution, financing costs, and any purchase-accounting noise; management's raised fiscal 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $5.40 to $5.60 already leans on it.

Regulatory items carry the medium term. The Missouri Accounting Authority Order request, seeking a regulatory asset for the weather-driven margin shortfall, is a direct test of how much weather risk regulators will let Spire defease; the outcome reads through to every future warm winter. Rate-case cadence across Missouri, Alabama, and now Tennessee converts the $11.2 billion ten-year capital plan into allowed revenues, and the permanent financing mix for the acquisition (debt, equity, hybrids) determines how much of the accretion survives to the per-share line.

Income investors have their own calendar: the quarterly dividend of $0.825 (annualized $3.30, the twenty-third consecutive annual increase) and the February 13, 2026 redemption of the 5.90% Series A preferred simplify the capital stack ahead of the heavier financing year. The fiscal Q3 print, on the usual early-August cadence, is the next scheduled event.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Gas Utility (reported)

Gas Marketing (reported)

Midstream (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Spire press release, March 2026 · Q2 FY2026 disclosures, 2026 · Q2 FY2026 earnings call, May 2026 · Spire dividend declaration, 2026 · company guidance, 2026 · Simply Wall St, 2026

View the full interactive SR report on boothcheck