NATIONAL STEEL CO (SID): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers NATIONAL STEEL CO (SID) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/SID
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | SID |
| Company | NATIONAL STEEL CO |
| Current price | $0.98/sh |
| Composition | Steel 49% / Mining 34% / Logistics - Port 1% / Logistics - Railroads 7% / Logistics - Road transport 2% / Energy 2% / Cement 11% / Corporate expenses/elimination -6% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 4.7% |
| Operating margin today | 9.8% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -5.1pp |
| Multiple paid | 8x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 4.4% sits below it).
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.32σ |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.45x | 2 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.08x | 2 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.10x | 3 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.34x | 4 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=11)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $18.68 | 0.05x | yes | FCF base $0.6B, growth 13% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.3%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $7.49 | 0.13x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 0.0x / 5.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $9.69 | 0.10x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 1.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $1.76 | 0.56x | yes | DPS $0.37, g=-9.9% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $-1.17 | — | no | Stage 1: -174% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $2.29 | 0.43x | yes | Reference only (book value floor): BV/sh $2.29, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $2.06 | 0.48x | yes | Reference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $2.29, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $1.19 | 0.83x | yes | Rev $8.6B, growth 13% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.1x / 0.2x / 0.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $18.60 | 0.05x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.70B × (1−21%) / WACC 9.3% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $8.50 | 0.12x | yes | EBITDA $0.84B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $8.49 | 0.12x | yes | FCF $618.9M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $9.69 | 0.10x | yes | Revenue $8.57B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $6.3b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 9.69x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 7.66x |
| Interest coverage | 0.6x |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Companhia Siderurgica Nacional is not a pure steelmaker; it is a Brazilian conglomerate spanning steel, iron ore mining, cement and logistics, and in the first quarter of 2026 the record cement and logistics performance carried adjusted EBITDA even as steel and mining sagged on seasonality.
- Leverage is the whole story: the group closed the first quarter of 2026 with net debt of R$40.5 billion and net debt at 3.36 times trailing EBITDA, against interest coverage of under two times, which is why the ADR trades near a dollar and why a 2026 asset-divestiture plan to cut leverage exists at all.
- What moves the stock next is execution on that deleveraging plan, with management targeting a roughly R$16 to R$18 billion reduction in 2026 through asset sales and a leverage target of 1.8 times, set against a mining business guided to 45 to 47 million tons of iron ore at a cash cost of $22.0 to $23.5 per ton.
Bull Case
Steel ADRs trading near a dollar invite a reflexive dismissal, but the way to read CSN is through what the conglomerate actually owns rather than the price tag on the depositary receipt. This is one of Brazil's largest steel producers, the country's second-largest iron ore exporter, and its second-largest cement player, with a logistics arm bolted on. The first quarter of 2026 is the clearest proof that the mix matters: net revenue came in at R$10.6 billion and the company posted a net loss of R$555 million, yet adjusted EBITDA still reached R$2.65 billion at a 23.9% margin, driven by record cement performance and strength in logistics even as mining and construction demand weakened seasonally. A pure steelmaker would have had no offset; the diversified base did.
The valuation math is where the asset support shows. At today's price the market is paying roughly 8 times company-wide operating income, a multiple so low that the price sits below what even a 5%-a-year decline in operating profit would warrant. This is a value and asset-supported name, not a growth bet: the asset-value, earnings-power, relative-multiple and even the cash-flow methods all land at or above the price, which is the opposite pattern from a stock priced on hope. The current operating margin near 20.7% is real cash generation, not a turnaround promise, and the iron ore and cement franchises are tangible assets with replacement value rather than goodwill.
The forward case rests entirely on the capital structure healing. Management launched a 2026 deleveraging plan to divest selected assets and cut leverage by roughly R$16 to R$18 billion, targeting net debt at 1.8 times EBITDA, and it framed a longer arc in which a renewed portfolio centered on high-return mining, logistics and energy could roughly double EBITDA over about eight years while holding leverage near one time. The mining guidance gives the lever a number: 45 to 47 million tons of iron ore at a C1 cash cost of $22.0 to $23.5 per ton, with the P15 project ramping. If the asset sales close and the balance sheet repairs, the equity is the most levered way to play it.
Bear Case
Steel and iron ore are cyclical, and the bear case starts with where CSN sits in the cycle rather than with the cheap multiple. The first quarter of 2026 showed the strain plainly: net revenue fell 7.0% sequentially and 2.8% year over year, and the company posted a net loss of R$555 million. The EBITDA that held up did so on cement and logistics; the steel and mining cash engines, the parts that define a steel ADR, are running into soft demand and seasonal weakness. Trailing operating profit can look healthy at the top of a cycle and evaporate at the bottom, and a 20.7% operating margin in a commodity business is not a margin to extrapolate.
The balance sheet is the dominant risk and it is severe. The group closed the first quarter of 2026 with net debt of R$40.5 billion and net debt at 3.36 times trailing EBITDA, a level that leaves little room if the cycle turns down. Interest coverage of under two times means a large share of operating profit goes to servicing debt before any of it reaches an equity holder, and the ADR fell 22.5% in the first quarter alone. The entire deleveraging plan, R$16 to R$18 billion of asset sales targeting 1.8 times leverage, is an admission that the current structure is unsustainable; a plan to sell assets in a soft commodity market is a plan that depends on buyers paying full value at exactly the wrong time. There is no dividend, so a holder is not paid to wait.
This is why a price below what even a declining-profit scenario would warrant is not automatically a bargain. The price is supported by asset and earnings-power value on paper, but that support assumes the assets are worth their carrying value and the debt gets refinanced on acceptable terms. For a highly leveraged Brazilian commodity producer, both assumptions carry real risk: refinancing depends on credit markets and the real-to-dollar exchange rate, and an asset-supported floor only holds if the company is not forced to sell into weakness. The equity at a dollar is a call on a successful deleveraging; if the asset sales stall or come in light, the debt sits ahead of the equity in line.
Valuation
The price is making an unusual bet for a stock this cheap: almost none. At today's level the market pays roughly 8 times company-wide operating income, a multiple so low that the price sits below what even a 5%-a-year decline in operating profit would warrant. That is the bound, not a solved growth rate. The market is not asking CSN to grow; it is pricing the equity as if the operating profit erodes from here, which is a posture of distress rather than expectation.
The valuation lenses agree the price is asset and earnings supported. The asset-value methods, which lean on book value and tangible plant, land above the price; the earnings-power methods, which capitalize current operating profit, land furthest above; peer multiples and the cash-flow methods both sit above as well. When every family reaches or exceeds the price, the question stops being whether the business is too expensive and becomes whether the asset and earnings figures the methods rest on are real and collectible.
Solvency is where the analysis has to end, because it dominates everything else here. Net debt of R$40.5 billion at 3.36 times trailing EBITDA and interest coverage under two times mean the capital structure, not the operating business, sets the value of the equity. The methods value the enterprise; the debt has the first claim on it, and what reaches the equity is the residual after a large, expensive debt load is served. The 2026 plan to cut leverage by R$16 to R$18 billion toward 1.8 times is the variable that decides whether the asset-supported floor is a floor at all. Until those sales close, the cheap multiple describes a distressed balance sheet, not a discounted business.
Catalysts
CSN reported first-quarter 2026 results on May 13, 2026, with net revenue of R$10.6 billion, down 7.0% sequentially and 2.8% year over year, and a net loss of R$555 million that was nonetheless an improvement over both the prior quarter and the year-ago period. Adjusted EBITDA of R$2.65 billion at a 23.9% margin came from record cement performance and logistics strength offsetting seasonal weakness in mining and construction. The ADR declined 22.5% over the quarter.
The deleveraging plan is the defining catalyst for 2026. Announced in January 2026, it aims to divest selected assets to cut leverage by roughly R$16 to R$18 billion and rebalance the capital structure toward a growth cycle in mining and infrastructure, with a target of 1.8 times net debt to EBITDA. Each asset sale and refinancing step through the year is a discrete event that moves the equity, because the equity value is so tightly bound to the debt outcome. The group closed the first quarter at 3.36 times leverage, so the gap to the target is large and the execution risk is real.
On operations, management narrowed its 2026 mining outlook on March 11, 2026, guiding combined iron ore production and third-party purchases to 45 to 47 million tons and setting a 2026 mining C1 cash cost range of $22.0 to $23.5 per ton. The longer-term framing management has offered is a portfolio centered on high-return mining, logistics and energy assets, with the stated potential to roughly double EBITDA over about eight years while holding leverage near one time as projects like the P15 iron ore ramp-up come online. Iron ore and steel prices, and the real-to-dollar exchange rate, sit underneath all of it.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- CMC (COMMERCIAL METALS COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …in metal margin compression compared to 2024. The impact of the decrease in steel and downstream products metal margins per ton was partially offset by improved steel products shipment volumes year-over-year. Emerging Businesses Group Year Ended August 31, (in thousands) 2025 2024 Net sales to external customers $…
- FY2025 10-K: …these are the two variables that typically have the greatest impact on our net sales for those reportable segments. Of the products evaluated by changes in average selling price per ton and tons shipped within the North America Steel Group and Europe Steel Group segments, raw materials include ferrous and nonferrous…
- CSTM (CONSTELLIUM SE)
- FY2025 10-K: …markets in regions with abundant natural resources, low-cost labor and energy, and lower environmental and other standards may pose a significant competitive threat to our business. Moreover, technological innovation is important to our customers who require us to lead or keep pace with new innovations to address…
- FY2025 10-K: …ability to maintain or raise prices in the future may be limited, including during periods of raw material and other cost increases. If we are forced to reduce or maintain prices or reduce volumes of production during periods of increased costs, or if we lose customers because of consolidation, pricing or other…
- VMC (VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …surrounding our operations in Freeport, Bahamas; British Columbia, Canada; and previously Puerto Cortés, Honduras and Quintana Roo, Mexico (see Note 12 , NAFTA Arbitration). Our primary focus is serving metropolitan markets in the United States that are expected to experience the most significant growth in…
- FY2025 10-K: …and Superior Ready Mix, L.P. (Superior), which solidified our position as the leading aggregates producer in Southern California. We also completed two bolt-on acquisitions during 2024 in Alabama and Texas, strengthening our position in two of our top 10 revenue states. From 2023 to 2025, we invested $2,310.6 million…
- TECK (TECK)
- FY2025 40-F: …the net assets of entities with functional currencies other than the Canadian dollar, and any offsetting exchange differences on debt used to hedge those assets, are recognized in a separate component of equity through other comprehensive income (loss). Revenue Our revenue consists of sales of copper, zinc and lead…
- FY2025 40-F: …Operations, with an option to extend for a further 10 years. This arrangement requires payments of approximately $ 75 million per year, escalating at 2 % per year. 31. Segmented Information Based on the primary products we produce, we have two reportable segments that we report to our President and Chief Executive…
- AU (AU)
- FY2025 20-F: …predicted outcome in the discounted cash flow calculation, being that the project cannot be developed and future cash flows are zero . This is a level 3 fair value measurement. The impairment loss in 2025 was recognised and included in the Projects segment. F - 35 Table of Contents NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL…
- FY2025 20-F: …flows, dividends received from joint ventures are included in operating activities as the Group has joint control over the strategic, financial and operating policy decisions. Dividends received from associates are included in investing activities as the Group only exercises significant influence over the financial…
- KGC (KINROSS GOLD CORP)
- FY2025 40-F: …report on Form 40-F, include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to our guidance for production, cost guidance, including production costs of sales, all-in sustaining cost of sales, and capital expenditures; anticipated returns of capital to shareholders, including the declaration, payment, increase and…
- FY2025 40-F: . Emerging Growth Company ☐ If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to…
- MLM (MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …the conduct of the Company's business as a whole. Customers The Company's products are sold principally to commercial customers in private industry. Although large amounts of construction materials are used in public works projects, relatively insignificant sales are made directly to federal, state, county or…
- FY2025 10-K: …for 76% of the Building Materials business' revenues from continuing operations in 2025. The Building Materials business is accordingly affected from time to time by the economies in these regions and has been adversely affected in part by episodic recessions and weaknesses in these economies and may be affected by…
- AEM (AGNICO EAGLE MINES LIMITED)
- FY2025 40-F: …are incurred by the Company; ● estimates of future capital expenditures, exploration expenditures, development expenditures and other cash needs, and expectations as to the funding thereof; ● estimated timing and conclusions of studies, analyses and evaluations undertaken by the Company or others; ● statements…
- FY2025 40-F: For a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable financial information presented in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS, and for an explanation of how management uses these measures and why management believes them to be useful to investors, please see the…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
CSN 1Q26 results, May 13 2026 · CSN deleveraging plan, January 2026 · CSN material fact, March 11 2026