STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. (SHOO): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $49.02, STEVEN MADDEN, LTD. (SHOO) is priced for +22.4% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/SHOO

Headline

FieldValue
TickerSHOO
CompanySTEVEN MADDEN, LTD.
Current price$49.03/sh
CompositionNet sales 100% / Commission and licensing fee income 1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)4.7%
Operating margin today7.5%
Margin compression (value-band)-2.8pp
Implied growth22.4%
Multiple paid19x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.4% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~6.8pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~14.4%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history+1.13σ
cohort percentile (of 214 peers)55
sustained it ~5 years at this level39%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.02x5expensive
Earnings2.06x5expensive
Relative0.68x2justifies
Growth0.71x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$101.850.48xyesFCF base $0.3B, growth 18% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.7%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$69.150.71xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 14.1x / 16.1x / 18.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.3x / 20.0x / 23.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$21.872.24xyesBV/sh $13.02, ROE (TTM) 15.5%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$28.001.75xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$50.550.97xyesRev $2.7B, growth 18% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.1x / 1.3x / 1.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$70.000.70xyesEPS $2.00, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.69 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$20.662.37xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.23B × (1−27%) / WACC 8.7% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$28.591.71xyesBV $13.02 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 15.5% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$24.212.02xyes√(22.5 × EPS $2.00 × BVPS $13.02) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.24B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$28.371.73xyesFCF $224.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$23.782.06xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.19B (FCF $0.22B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$64.530.76xyesEPS $2.00 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$3.2714.99xyesBV $13.02 × (ROIC 2.2% / WACC 8.7%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $2.74B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$75.000.65xyesEPS $2.00 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$21.622.27xyesEPS $2.00 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Wholesale Footwearoperatingenterprise1.0B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value
Wholesale Accessories/Appareloperatingenterprise0.6B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value
Direct-to- Consumeroperatingenterprise0.8B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value
Licensingoperatingenterprise0.0B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$12.4m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)0.08x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.06x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-2.1%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The number that decides Steven Madden right now is the gross margin, and in the first quarter of 2026 it expanded to 46.3%, lifted by higher average selling prices and the mix shift from the Kurt Geiger acquisition. That single line is the whole turnaround thesis. The trailing operating margin had compressed under tariff and integration costs, which is why the static valuation methods read the stock as expensive, but the gross-margin expansion and the through-cycle operating margin near 12% say the depressed trailing year is the bottom, not the baseline. When the most important metric is moving up while the methods anchor on the compressed trailing figure, the gap is the opportunity.

The growth engine has shifted into a higher gear. First-quarter revenue jumped to $653.1 million from $553.5 million, and diluted EPS nearly doubled to $1.00 from $0.57, helped by a tariff refund and broad-based growth across wholesale, accessories and apparel, and direct-to-consumer. Kurt Geiger, the recent acquisition, grew 23% on a pro forma basis, and management upgraded its full-year revenue outlook for the brand to the low $600 millions. Steven Madden is using a fast-fashion design and sourcing model to extend a single footwear brand into a multi-brand, multi-category platform with international reach.

The balance sheet makes the platform durable. Net debt is only about $180 million, a fraction of a year's operating income, and the company has bought back stock at roughly 2.5% of shares a year. That conservative capital position lets Steven Madden absorb tariff shocks and fund the Kurt Geiger integration without strain. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance to 10% to 12% revenue growth with EPS of $2.00 to $2.10. The bull case is a brand operator with a proven design engine, a margin-accretive acquisition, and a clean balance sheet, priced as if the tariff-compressed trailing margin were permanent.

Bear Case

Steven Madden is a fashion company, and fashion is a hit-driven business that the market is paying a full price for at exactly the moment its costs are rising. The price already discounts a recovery and then some, which is the disconnect a buyer has to confront. The static valuation methods do not reach the price on any frame: the asset, earnings-power, peer-multiple, and even forward-growth lenses all read the stock as richly valued against the trailing fundamentals. When no standard method supports the price, the market is paying for a margin and growth recovery that has to actually arrive.

The cost backdrop is the reason that recovery is not assured. Tariffs are a direct hit to a company that sources heavily overseas: management is building in Section 122 tariffs of 10% through July, rising to 15% thereafter, plus ocean and air-freight pressure. The first-quarter EPS was flattered by a tariff refund, a one-time item that will not repeat. Demand is uneven too: the company flagged its Gulf region business trending down close to 40% and cut its regional revenue guidance by $9 million to $10 million. Steven Madden's own filing names the broader pressure, noting that macro conditions "have impacted consumer spending patterns and overall demand for our product" across both wholesale and direct-to-consumer channels.

The Kurt Geiger integration adds execution risk on top of the cyclical risk. Acquisitions that lift gross margin through mix can also raise operating costs through integration, and the early quarters carry that drag. The valuation leaves no cushion for a stumble: with the trailing operating margin compressed to the mid single digits and the stock priced above what any static method supports, the entire case rests on the margin recovering to its through-cycle level while tariffs rise and fashion demand stays choppy. The balance sheet is clean, so this is not a solvency risk; it is a multiple risk on a discretionary brand operator whose price has run ahead of its currently-earning fundamentals and into a tariff headwind.

Valuation

Steven Madden is priced for a margin recovery that the trailing numbers have not yet delivered, and that is the crux of the valuation. The trailing operating margin compressed to about 4.8% under tariff and integration costs, while the through-cycle margin runs closer to 12%. Inverted on a normalized basis, the price requires the business to grow modestly and recover that margin, an assumption the model places within the range its history supports once normalized, even though the static frames read the compressed trailing year as expensive.

The method spread is unusual in that no family reaches the price on the trailing figures. The asset-based reads land well below the price against a book value of $12.70 per share, the earnings-power lens lands far below on the depressed trailing profit, and the peer-multiple and forward-growth reads also sit below the price. That pattern, where every static frame says expensive, is the market pricing in the margin recovery the methods do not credit. The honest read is that the price is a bet on normalization: if the operating margin returns toward its through-cycle 12%, the methods re-rate; if it stays compressed by tariffs, the price has no static support. The peer cohort here is mis-routed toward business-services names rather than direct footwear and apparel competitors, so the peer-multiple read is best treated as directional rather than precise.

Solvency is a clear strength that frames the downside. Net debt of about $180 million is roughly half a year of operating income, leaving ample room to absorb tariff costs and fund the Kurt Geiger integration, and the falling share count shows capital returning to owners. The risk is not the balance sheet; it is the margin and the demand. The first-quarter gross-margin expansion to 46.3% is the early evidence that normalization is underway, but the tariff schedule rising to 15% and the soft Gulf-region demand are the headwinds against it. What the buyer underwrites at this price is that the through-cycle margin reasserts itself faster than the cost pressures erode it.

Catalysts

Steven Madden's first quarter of 2026 showed strong growth alongside a rising cost burden. Revenue climbed to $653.1 million from $553.5 million, and diluted EPS nearly doubled to $1.00 from $0.57, helped by growth across wholesale, accessories and apparel, and direct-to-consumer, plus a tariff refund. Gross margin expanded to 46.3% on higher average selling prices and the Kurt Geiger mix, and the acquired brand grew 23% on a pro forma basis, prompting management to raise its full-year Kurt Geiger outlook to the low $600 millions.

The headwinds are tariffs and uneven regional demand. Guidance assumes Section 122 tariffs of 10% through July rising to 15% thereafter, plus ocean and air-freight pressure, and the company flagged Gulf-region business trending down close to 40%, cutting regional revenue guidance by $9 million to $10 million. Despite that, management raised full-year 2026 guidance to 10% to 12% revenue growth and introduced EPS guidance of $2.00 to $2.10, citing stronger outlooks for Kurt Geiger, Steven Madden, and Dolce Vita. The events to track are the operating-margin trajectory as the tariff step-up takes effect and the pace of the Kurt Geiger integration, since the valuation depends on the through-cycle margin recovering against the cost pressure.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Wholesale Footwear (reported)

Wholesale Accessories/Apparel (reported)

Direct-to- Consumer (reported)

Licensing (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings, May 2026 · Q1 2026 guidance, May 2026

View the full interactive SHOO report on boothcheck