Seaboard Corporation (SEB): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers Seaboard Corporation (SEB) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/SEB
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | SEB |
| Company | Seaboard Corporation |
| Current price | $4335.40/sh |
| Composition | Products 80% / Transportation 17% / Energy 2% / Other 1% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 0.8% |
| Operating margin today | 3.0% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -2.2pp |
| Multiple paid | 16x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 6.5% sits below it).
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~9%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.50σ |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.60x | 5 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.66x | 3 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.56x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.65x | 2 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=15)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $20382.70 | 0.21x | yes | Reference only (OCF-based, capex excluded): OCF $0.5B |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $7714.04 | 0.56x | yes | P/E 13.62x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 7x), scenarios: 11.4x / 13.6x / 15.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $6648.16 | 0.65x | yes | BV/sh $5571.14, ROE (TTM) 11.0%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $7237.53 | 0.60x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $3973.16 | 1.09x | yes | Rev $9.8B, growth 7% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.4x / 0.4x / 0.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $7269.00 | 0.60x | yes | EPS $605.75, growth 1% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=4.83 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $2511.60 | 1.73x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.29B × (1−16%) / WACC 7.1% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $7351.06 | 0.59x | yes | BV $5571.14 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 11.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 7.2%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $8713.84 | 0.50x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $605.75 × BVPS $5571.14) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $6476.34 | 0.67x | yes | EBITDA $0.62B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $19545.53 | 0.22x | yes | EPS $605.75 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $956.89 | 4.53x | yes | BV $5571.14 × (ROIC 1.2% / WACC 7.1%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $25657.92 | 0.17x | yes | Revenue $9.83B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $22715.63 | 0.19x | yes | EPS $605.75 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $6548.65 | 0.66x | yes | EPS $605.75 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $93.0m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.37x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -0.31x (net cash) |
| Interest coverage | 4.2x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -4.7% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Seaboard is a diversified commodity operator spanning pork, grain trading and milling, marine cargo, liquid fuels, power, and a Butterball turkey stake, trading at $4,937 against a book value of $5,571 per share.
- The core risk is earnings volatility: trailing operating margin near 3% means a single adverse swing in hog prices, feed costs, or freight can erase a year of profit, which is why the price sits below book.
- Q1 2026 marked a broad recovery (net earnings of $119 million versus $32 million a year earlier); the question for the next prints is whether lower feed costs and renewable-fuel credits persist or revert.
Bull Case
The first worry a buyer raises about Seaboard is that it is a commodity processor whose earnings whip around with hog prices, feed costs, and freight rates, and that the trailing numbers look thin. The first quarter of 2026 is the rebuttal. Net earnings attributable to Seaboard jumped to $119 million from $32 million a year earlier, on EPS of $124.24 against $32.95, and operating income more than doubled to $96 million from $38 million. The recovery was broad, not a single lucky segment: Pork swung to $7 million of operating income on $19 million of lower feed costs, Liquid Fuels swung to $37 million from a $26 million loss on higher renewable-fuel volumes and production tax credits, and the Butterball turkey affiliate contributed $24 million of equity income. The thin trailing year was the cyclical trough, not the run rate.
Underneath the cyclicality sits a balance sheet that lets the company wait out bad years. Seaboard holds about $1.16 billion of liquid assets against $1.07 billion of gross debt, leaving it in a net cash position of roughly $93 million, with interest coverage above 4 times. That is the structure of a company that owns its volatility rather than being owned by it. The share count has fallen about 4.7% a year, direct evidence of buyback deployment in a name with one of the smaller public floats in the market.
And the price pays for almost none of this. Every family of valuation method lands above today's price. Book value per share is $5,571 against a price of $4,937, so the stock trades below the accounting value of its own assets. The peer-multiple lens reads the price at roughly two-thirds of where comparable agribusiness and commodity-trading names trade. The earnings-power and asset lenses agree. This is a diversified, self-funding operator priced as if its trough year were permanent, with equity-method stakes worth several hundred million dollars sitting on top of the operating businesses as a separate store of value.
Bear Case
The structural fact a Seaboard holder should sit with is that the balance sheet's strength is also its exposure. The company carries about $1.07 billion of gross debt and runs large inventories of agricultural commodities, and a commodity trader's liquidity can be drained quickly by the same market moves that look favorable on paper. The direct peer states the mechanism in its own filing: The Andersons warns that when there are "large movements in commodity markets, we could be required to post significant levels of margin deposits, which would impact our liquidity". Seaboard runs the same kind of book. Net cash of $93 million is comfortable in a calm market and thinner than it looks in a volatile one.
The earnings are the deeper issue. The first quarter was a strong recovery, but the recovery leaned on lower feed costs, renewable-fuel tax credits, and turkey pricing, none of which Seaboard controls. The Andersons names the broader version of the risk: weather and other factors "beyond our control, can affect the supply and demand of these commodities". Pork made $7 million in a good quarter, which is a slim margin for a segment of its size, and feed costs that fell can rise again. The trailing operating margin sits around 3%, and a single bad turn in hog prices or freight rates can erase a year's profit. This is why the price trades below book: the market is not mispricing a steady compounder, it is discounting a genuinely volatile earnings stream.
The valuation read has to be held honestly. The lone method that calls the price expensive is the earnings-power lens, which values a normalized profit averaged over five years that includes the trough and lands well below the price. That tension is the bear case in one line: the asset value supports the price, but the through-cycle earnings, when you smooth out the recovery quarters, do not yet. A buyer at this price is betting the recent improvement holds rather than reverts, and Seaboard's own history of cyclical swings says reversion is the base case, not the exception. The tiny float adds its own risk: thin trading can move the price far on little volume, in either direction.
Valuation
Seaboard is the rare case where the price sits below where every family of method lands. Book value per share is $5,571 against a price of $4,937, so the asset lens alone reads the stock as trading under the accounting value of what it owns. The peer-multiple lens places it at roughly two-thirds of where comparable agribusiness and commodity names trade. The growth-DCF and earnings-yield reads land in the same neighborhood. Inverted, today's price embeds essentially no growth, a small required operating margin against the kind of economics the company has shown. The priced-in assumption sits within the range its own history supports, which is the market's way of saying it expects a cyclical, not a compounder.
The single dissenting method is worth naming because it carries the bear. The earnings-power lens values normalized operating profit averaged over five years and lands well below the price, because that five-year average includes the recent trough. It is reference-only here, a floor that assumes no growth and smooths away the recovery quarters. The other methods credit the asset base and the recovering earnings; the earnings-power read credits only the smoothed-down trailing profit. The gap between them is exactly the cyclical question: is the trailing year the trough or the trend.
Solvency frames the downside cleanly. Net cash of about $93 million, interest coverage above 4 times, and a falling share count describe a company that can fund itself through a weak year and return capital in a strong one. Sitting outside the operating segments are equity-method stakes carried at several hundred million dollars, a separate store of value the operating multiples do not capture. The risk is not insolvency; it is that the earnings stream is genuinely lumpy and the float is thin enough to move the price on modest volume. What a buyer underwrites here is patience: a discount to book and to peers, in exchange for living with the swings.
Catalysts
Seaboard's first quarter of 2026, for the period ended April 4, was a sharp recovery across the portfolio. Net sales rose to $2,400 million from $2,316 million, operating income more than doubled to $96 million from $38 million, and net earnings attributable to Seaboard climbed to $119 million from $32 million, lifting EPS to $124.24 from $32.95. The improvement was diversified rather than concentrated. Pork moved from a loss to $7 million of operating income, helped by $19 million of lower feed costs and reduced legal-claims expense. Liquid Fuels swung to $37 million of operating income from a $26 million loss on higher renewable-fuel volumes, better pricing, and more production tax credits. The Butterball turkey affiliate added $24 million of equity income as turkey prices and volumes improved.
The through-line is input costs and tax incentives, both of which can reverse. The Pork turnaround was driven by feed deflation more than by stronger hog prices, and the Liquid Fuels swing leaned on renewable-fuel credits. The next quarterly print is the test of durability: whether the feed-cost relief and the credit-driven fuel margins hold, or whether the recovery proves to be a single favorable quarter in a cyclical year. With one of the smaller public floats among listed operators of its size, Seaboard draws limited continuous sell-side coverage, so the earnings releases themselves are the primary information events.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- ANDE (ANDERSONS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …moved between the Agribusiness and Renewables segments. All prior period segment information has been recast to conform to the current year presentation. The agricultural commodity-based business is one in which changes in selling prices generally move in relationship to changes in purchase prices. Therefore,…
- FY2025 10-K: …fuels company. Founded in Maumee, Ohio in 1947, the Company is a significant player in the North American agricultural and renewable fuels supply chains. Segment Descriptions The Company's operations are classified into two reportable business segments: Agribusiness and Renewables. Both of these segments are…
- ADM (ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …ethanol volumes and margins. In the Nutrition segment, segment operating profit increased 8%. Human Nutrition subsegment results were lower than the prior year. Flavors results were higher compared to the prior year, driven by higher volumes and margins in North America due to an increase in sales among existing key…
- FY2025 10-K: …highly effective at offsetting changes in price movements of the hedged item. Gains and losses arising from open and closed designated hedging transactions are deferred in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes, and recognized as a component of cost of products sold or revenues in the statement of…
- BG (BUNGE GLOBAL SA)
- FY2025 10-K: …freight vessels. Typically, we either lease the transportation assets or contract with third parties for these services. To better serve our customer base and develop our global distribution and logistics capabilities, we own or operate, either directly including through leases or through joint venture arrangements,…
- FY2025 10-K: …initiatives, developing and offering products that meet customer needs, optimizing our geographic presence in key markets, developing and maintaining appropriate market share and customer relationships, supporting socially responsible and sustainable corporate and business practices, and promoting our environmental…
- TSN (TYSON FOODS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest. Fiscal years ended 2025 and 2023 did not include any Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. NOTE 17: SEGMENT REPORTING We operate in four reportable segments: Beef, Pork, Chicken, and Prepared Foods. We measure segment profit as operating…
- FY2025 10-K: …of our marketing strategy, consumer insights, strong analytics to optimize efforts and supported by our distribution systems. The principal competitive elements are advertising, consumer and trade promotions, price, product safety and quality, brand identification, innovation, breadth and depth of product offerings,…
- PPC (PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …Both the chicken and pork industries are highly competitive. In the U.S., Mexico, the U.K., the Republic of Ireland, and continental Europe, we primarily compete with other vertically integrated chicken and pork companies. In general, the competitive factors in these industries include price, product quality, product…
- FY2025 10-K: …carrying amounts using an income approach (discounted cash flow method). We develop projections for cash flows over a 5-year period based on assumptions about revenue growth and margin changes using internally-developed economic projections and industry data obtained from government authorities such as the U.S.…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release, May 5 2026