RIO TINTO PLC (RIO): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $101.50, RIO TINTO PLC (RIO) is priced for -1.2% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/RIO
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | RIO |
| Company | RIO TINTO PLC |
| Current price | $101.51/sh |
| Composition | Iron ore 49% / Aluminium, alumina and bauxite 27% / Copper 12% / Industrial minerals (titanium dioxide slag, borates and salt) 4% / Gold 3% / Lithium 2% / Other products and freight services 3% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 12.9% |
| Operating margin today | 25.9% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -13.0pp |
| Implied growth | -1.2% |
| Multiple paid | 11x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.2% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~5.4pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.53σ |
| cohort percentile (of 77 peers) | 17 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.34x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.36x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.91x | 3 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.31x | 4 | expensive |
Families that call it expensive: Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=16)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $110.18 | 0.92x | yes | FCF base $16.8B, growth -2% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.6%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $113.76 | 0.89x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 8.5x / 13.5x / 18.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $75.91 | 1.34x | yes | P/E 14x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.5x / 14.0x / 16.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 9.66x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $30.40 | 3.34x | yes | Stage 1: -15% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $68.23 | 1.49x | yes | BV/sh $41.27, ROE (TTM) 15.3%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $86.66 | 1.17x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $59.79 | 1.70x | yes | Rev $57.6B, growth -2% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.1x / 2.9x / 3.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $85.81 | 1.18x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $19.03B × (1−30%) / WACC 7.6% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $88.68 | 1.14x | yes | BV $41.27 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 15.3% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $75.49 | 1.34x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $6.14 × BVPS $41.27) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $50.62 | 2.01x | yes | EBITDA $14.94B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $89.10 | 1.14x | yes | FCF $16832.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $5.14 | 19.75x | yes | EPS $6.14 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $54.85 | 1.85x | yes | BV $41.27 × (ROIC 10.1% / WACC 7.6%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $53.24 | 1.91x | yes | Revenue $57.64B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $66.35 | 1.53x | yes | EPS $6.14 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $12.5b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 1.19x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 0.84x |
| Interest coverage | 14.1x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Rio Tinto is one of the world's largest diversified miners, with iron ore close to half of the business and aluminium, copper, and a growing lithium arm filling out the rest, so its earnings track global commodity prices and volumes more than any single project.
- The defining risk is the commodity cycle itself: the price implies roughly flat-to-declining company-wide operating profit, and a genuine iron-ore or copper downcycle would push results below even that modest bar, with peer BHP's iron-ore revenue already falling to $22.9 billion in FY2025 from $28.0 billion a year earlier.
- Watch the copper and lithium growth pipeline, including Oyu Tolgoi and the lithium projects added through the Arcadium acquisition, against a company target of roughly 20% copper-equivalent production growth from 2024 to 2030; delivery there is what could move the business beyond its iron-ore base.
Bull Case
Valuing a diversified miner is mostly an argument about where in the cycle you are standing, because the same assets throw off very different numbers at different commodity prices. Rio Tinto's recent results sit on the strong side of that cycle. Net cash from operating activities reached $16.8 billion, underlying EBITDA was $25.4 billion, and the company paid an ordinary dividend of $6.5 billion at a 60 percent payout, a level it has held at the top of its range for a decade. Return on equity ran above 15 percent, and the balance sheet is conservative for a miner: net debt is only about $12.5 billion against operating profit many times that, with interest covered roughly 20 times. This is a company generating cash through the cycle and returning most of it, not stretching to fund itself.
The growth case is in the metals the energy transition needs, layered on top of the iron-ore engine. Production is moving the right way: copper rose 9 percent and Pilbara iron ore climbed 13 percent in the most recent quarter, and the company targets roughly 20 percent copper-equivalent production growth from 2024 to 2030. The copper pipeline is concrete rather than promotional, anchored by major operations such as Oyu Tolgoi, which the 20-F describes as "a series of deposits containing copper, gold" in Mongolia, and the Simandou iron-ore project in Guinea that the filing shows Rio actively funding. The Arcadium acquisition, completed in early 2026, adds a lithium platform targeting 200,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent capacity by 2028, giving Rio a third growth leg beyond iron ore and aluminium.
The diversification is itself the durable advantage. When iron-ore prices soften, copper, aluminium, or lithium can carry the result, which is why a single sector multiple understates a business spanning seven product lines. The cash-flow methods that average across these streams land close to the price, and on demonstrated economics, book value plus a 15 percent return on equity, the asset and earnings-power methods sit only modestly below it. A miner that funds a real growth pipeline from operating cash, carries little debt, and returns the majority of profit to holders is the version of the sector built to compound through more than one price cycle.
Bear Case
Read the valuation methods together and the bear case is the disagreement among them. The relative-multiple lens, the most cycle-honest read because it benchmarks Rio against where the market prices mining today, says the price is rich: on sector EV/EBITDA of about 8 times and sector price-to-sales, the methods land well below the current price. The conservative methods anchored on demonstrated value also sit under the price. The only methods that reach it are the discounted cash-flow models, and they get there by capitalizing today's elevated cash flows as if the current point in the cycle were the baseline. When the static, demonstrated-value methods say expensive and only the cycle-extrapolating ones say fair, the honest reading is that the price is leaning on commodity prices staying near present levels.
That assumption is exactly what a diversified miner cannot control. The price already implies company-wide operating profit roughly flat to modestly declining, which sounds conservative until you see what a real downcycle does to the underlying. Peer disclosure makes the point concretely: BHP's FY2025 20-F shows its iron-ore revenue falling to $22,919 million from $27,952 million the year before, with underlying EBITDA dropping to $14,396 million from $18,913 million, a roughly one-fifth decline in a single year from price and volume moves outside the company's hands. Iron ore is close to half of Rio's business, so the same swing reshapes the whole result. A flat priced-in assumption offers no cushion if the cycle turns the way it turned for BHP.
The growth pipeline carries its own risks that the bull case tends to round off. Large copper and lithium projects are capital-heavy, slow, and exposed to jurisdiction and approval risk; the 20-F flags that the lithium projects in Chile remain "subject to regulatory approval and final execution", and several legacy businesses sit under strategic review. Lithium itself has been a volatile, oversupplied market, so the third growth leg may dilute returns before it adds to them. None of this makes Rio fragile; the balance sheet is too strong for that. It makes the equity a leveraged bet on commodity prices dressed as a diversified compounder, priced as though the favorable part of the cycle is the permanent state of the world.
Valuation
What the price is really betting is that the current commodity environment roughly persists. At about 11 times company-wide operating income, the price implies operating profit grows around minus 4 percent a year over five years, a gently declining path rather than a demanding one. For a diversified miner near a strong point in the cycle, a modest-decline assumption is itself a statement that today's prices and volumes are close to the baseline.
The methods split along the line between demonstrated value and extrapolated cash flow. The relative-multiple methods, benchmarking Rio to current sector EV/EBITDA near 8 times and sector price-to-sales, read the price as expensive, and the asset and earnings-power methods, built on book value of about $41 a share and a return on equity above 15 percent, land modestly below it. The discounted cash-flow methods are the ones that reach the price, capitalizing the recent $16.8 billion of operating cash flow. The pattern is the cyclical question made explicit: average across the cycle and the price looks full; assume the present cash flows continue and it looks fair.
Solvency is the part of the picture that is unambiguous and favorable. Net debt is only about $12.5 billion, interest is covered roughly 20 times, and the company funds a real growth pipeline, copper at Oyu Tolgoi, iron ore at Simandou, lithium through Arcadium, while still paying out 60 percent of earnings. A miner this well capitalized does not face the balance-sheet risk that sinks weaker peers in a downturn; the risk lives entirely in the commodity prices the methods disagree about. The price is underwriting those prices holding, with the dividend and the pipeline as the reasons to be paid while waiting to find out.
Catalysts
Production momentum is running ahead of the priced-in path. The most recent quarter showed global iron ore production of 82.8 Mt, up 12 percent, Pilbara iron ore up 13 percent to 78.8 Mt, copper up 9 percent to 229 kt, and lithium carbonate equivalent of 12.7 kt. Full-year guidance points to global iron ore sales of 343 to 366 Mt and copper production of 800 to 870 kt, with the company targeting roughly 20 percent copper-equivalent production growth from 2024 to 2030 and 40 to 50 percent EBITDA growth over that span.
The strategic catalysts cluster around the metals transition. Rio completed its Arcadium acquisition in March 2026, building a lithium platform aimed at 200,000 tonnes of lithium carbonate equivalent capacity by 2028 across Argentina and Canada. Capital returns remain a steady feature, with the FY2025 ordinary dividend of $6.5 billion at a 60 percent payout. The swing factors from here are iron-ore price realization, the ramp of the copper pipeline, and whether the lithium expansion adds to returns rather than diluting them as that market finds balance.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- BHP (BHP GROUP LIMITED)
- FY2025 20-F: Allocation Framework Exceptional performance Operating excellence Enabled by BOS, operational excellence underpins strong returns and investment growth. FY2025 was a standout year for BHP, marked by record production, continued sector-leading margins and disciplined capital allocation. We are the world's lowest-cost…
- FY2025 20-F: Sheet to be restated for comparative periods. 3. Net operating cash flows are after dividends received, net interest paid, proceeds and settlements of cash management related instruments, net taxation paid and includes Net operating cash flows from Discontinued operations. 4. Capital and exploration and evaluation…
- FCX (Freeport-McMoRan Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of each business segment, commodity prices, costs and other factors. BUSINESS DIVISIONS AND SEGMENTS We have organized our mining operations into four primary divisions - U.S. copper mines, South America operations, Indonesia operations and Molybdenum mines. Refer to "Operations" below for discussion of our mining…
- FY2025 10-K: …maker (CODM) under segment reporting guidance. Operating income (loss) is the financial measure of profit or loss used by the CODM to review segment results, and the significant segment expenses reviewed by the CODM are consistent with the operating expense line items presented in FCX's consolidated statements of…
- SCCO (SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: EPORTING SEGMENTS: Our management divides Southern Copper into three reportable segments and manages each as a separate segment. The three segments identified are groups of individual mines, each of which constitutes an operating segment with similar economic characteristics, product types, processes and support…
- FY2025 10-K: …recorded as revenue of our Mexican mines. The Mexican open-pit operations produce copper and zinc, with production of by-products of molybdenum, silver and other materials. 3. Mexican underground mining operations, which include five underground mines that produce zinc, copper, lead, silver and gold; and a zinc…
- CLF (CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and amortization (EBITDA), discount rates and market multiples. The fair value of all reporting units exceeded their carrying value as of the measurement date and, therefore, no impairment was recognized. Given the nature of operations for one reporting unit within the Steelmaking segment, the sensitivity of this…
- FY2025 10-K: …affect our continuity of operations, current and prospective business relationships, and ability to foster growth projects. 27 | CLF 2025 FORM 10-K Table of Contents We rely on estimates of our recoverable mineral reserves, which are complex due to geological characteristics of the properties and the number of…
- NEXA (NEXA RESOURCES S.A.)
- FY2025 20-F: …corresponding intercompany purchases; both are calculated on an arm's length basis to evaluate each segment's performance individually and are eliminated in consolidation. The profitability of our mining segment depends primarily on prevailing world prices for the metals we produce and on our unit cost to produce…
- FY2025 20-F: …by the United States or from the potential imposition of import tariffs on zinc or copper. The primary impact observed continues to be exchange rate volatility, driven by U.S. economic policy announcements and ongoing geopolitical tensions. 2 Information by business segment Business segment definition The Company's…
- NEM (NEWMONT CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …obstacles to our ability to conduct our operations and develop our projects, which may result in a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations, and growth prospects. Further, the interest rate of Newmont's $1 billion aggregate principal amount of 2.6% Sustainability-Linked…
- FY2025 10-K: …or renewing collective bargaining or certain labor agreements, workforce unionization, or demand for profit sharing; • Disadvantages of competing against companies from countries that are not subject to the rigorous laws and regulations of the U.S. or other jurisdictions, including without limitation, the U.S.…
- B (BARRICK MINING CORP)
- FY2025 40-F: …the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No ¨ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Emerging growth company ¨ If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate…
- FY2025 40-F: …entitled "Ratings" in Exhibit 99.1) is incorporated by reference into Barrick's Registration Statements on Form F-3 (File No. 333-206417), Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-121500, 333-131715, 333-135769, 333-224560) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-287021). SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the…
- KGC (KINROSS GOLD CORP)
- FY2025 40-F: …report on Form 40-F, include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to our guidance for production, cost guidance, including production costs of sales, all-in sustaining cost of sales, and capital expenditures; anticipated returns of capital to shareholders, including the declaration, payment, increase and…
- FY2025 40-F: . Emerging Growth Company ☐ If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards† provided pursuant to…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Rio Tinto Q1 2026 production report · Rio Tinto 2026 guidance · Rio Tinto Arcadium acquisition announcement, March 2026 · Rio Tinto FY2025 results