Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/REZI
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | REZI |
| Company | Resideo Technologies, Inc. |
| Current price | $26.24/sh |
| Composition | Products and Solutions - Safety and Security 13% / Products and Solutions - Air 11% / Products and Solutions - Energy 8% / Products and Solutions - Water 4% / ADI Global Distribution - Americas 56% / ADI Global Distribution - International 8% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 4.5% |
| Operating margin today | 7.5% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -3.0pp |
| Multiple paid | 12x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7.4% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~1.7%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.52σ |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value, while asset-based lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.51x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | 0.90x | 1 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.21x | 3 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.18x | 1 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=8)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF — equity value floored at $0 |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $125.70 | 0.21x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 2.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $19.30 | 1.36x | yes | Reference only (book value floor): BV/sh $19.30, ROE negative |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $17.37 | 1.51x | yes | Reference only (book value with convergence): BV/sh $19.30, ROE converges to ke |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $22.21 | 1.18x | yes | Rev $7.6B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.4x / 0.5x / 0.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $29.27 | 0.90x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.58B × (1−31%) / WACC 5.3% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $28.72 | 0.91x | yes | EBITDA $0.62B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $4.23 | 6.20x | yes | BV $19.30 × (ROIC 1.2% / WACC 5.3%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $125.70 | 0.21x | yes | Revenue $7.61B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $2.8b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 7.04x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 4.87x |
| Interest coverage | 3.6x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 1.0% |
| Burning cash | yes |
Bullet Takeaways
Resideo trades at $31.90 with the price held up by relative-multiple and growth-DCF value while the asset methods say expensive. The implied growth baked into the price is slightly negative, so the market is paying for a business it expects to barely grow as-is.
The defining event is structural: Resideo is splitting in two, spinning off its ADI Global Distribution arm tax-free in the second half of 2026, leaving a higher-margin Products and Solutions company behind. The Form 10 is filed.
The balance sheet is the swing factor. Resideo carries roughly $2.8 billion of net debt against interest coverage near 3.6 times, and the company recently terminated a costly legacy Honeywell agreement. How the debt and Honeywell liabilities are allocated across the two companies will shape what each is worth.
Bull Case
Start with the balance sheet, because the moves on it reveal what management actually believes. Resideo carries roughly $2.8 billion of net debt, and rather than sit on it, the company is reshaping the entire enterprise: it is spinning off ADI Global Distribution as a separate public company in the second half of 2026 and it has terminated a costly legacy reimbursement agreement with Honeywell that for years siphoned cash to its former parent. Ending the Honeywell payment stream and separating the two businesses are the actions of a management team confident it can unlock value that the conglomerate structure has buried. A company that takes hard, irreversible structural steps is signaling it believes the parts are worth more than the whole.
The operating results are recovering underneath that restructuring. First-quarter 2026 net revenue rose 8 percent to $1.91 billion on favorable pricing and mix, with adjusted EBITDA of $215 million and adjusted EPS of $0.65. Net income rose to $38 million from $6 million a year earlier, and diluted EPS swung to a positive $0.17 from a small loss, even after absorbing $24 million of ADI spin-off separation costs. Gross margin held near 28.8 percent. Strip out the one-time separation expense and the underlying business is growing revenue and expanding profitability, which is exactly what you want to see heading into a value-unlocking split.
The sum-of-the-parts logic is the core of the bull case. Today the market values Resideo as a single industrial entity, but the two businesses are very different: Products and Solutions is a higher-margin branded business spanning HVAC, safety, and security with the Honeywell Home brand, while ADI is a large, lower-margin but cash-generative distribution platform. Separated, each can be valued on its own merits and pursue its own capital allocation, and the relative-valuation method already lands far above the price because the distribution revenue is being valued at a single low multiple today.
Bear Case
The structural truth a holder has to face is that Resideo is a leveraged industrial whose stock barely works without the spin-off going right. The price embeds slightly negative implied growth, which is the market saying it does not expect the current business to grow on its own. The entire bull thesis rests on a corporate event, the ADI separation, that has not happened yet and that carries its own execution risk: separation costs already hit $24 million in the first quarter, income from operations actually fell to $102 million from $136 million as those costs and higher SG&A and R&D outweighed gross-profit gains, and a split can destroy as much value as it unlocks if the two companies end up sub-scale or saddled with stranded costs.
The leverage is the second hard fact. Resideo carries about $2.8 billion of net debt against roughly $3.2 billion gross, with interest coverage near 3.6 times. Splitting the company forces a decision about how that debt is divided, and a leveraged spin can leave one or both entities carrying more debt than its cash flow comfortably supports. On top of the financial debt sit legacy obligations: under the original Honeywell spin-off, Resideo assumed liabilities for hazardous-exposure and toxic-tort claims at specified Honeywell properties (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001740332-26-000005). Even with the reimbursement agreement terminated, environmental and indemnification tails do not simply disappear, and they complicate how cleanly the two businesses can be separated.
Third, the valuation is more fragile than the relative method suggests. That method lands near $122 only because it values ADI's large, low-margin distribution revenue at a sector price-to-sales multiple, which overstates the worth of thin-margin distribution dollars. The methods that capitalize actual earnings tell a soberer story: earnings-power value lands near $24.77, the two-stage excess-return near $16.97, and the blended X-ray central estimate sits near $18.85, well below the $31.90 price (June 28, 2026). The current operating margin is only 7.5 percent. If the spin-off disappoints, the integration of acquired businesses like Snap One drags, or the debt allocation leaves the remaining company stretched, the stock falls toward the high-teens-to-mid-$20s the earnings methods support rather than the analyst targets near $49.
Valuation
Resideo is valued as a single industrial today, but it is about to become two companies, and that pending split is the key to reading the methods. At $31.90 the price is justified by the relative-multiple and growth-DCF families while the asset-based methods say expensive, with a slightly negative implied growth rate that tells you the market expects little organic growth from the business as currently structured.
The methods diverge sharply, and the divergence is informative. The relative-valuation and price-to-sales methods land near $122.81, but that figure is distorted: it values ADI Global Distribution's large, low-margin revenue at a sector multiple, which overstates the worth of thin-margin distribution dollars. The methods that capitalize earnings are far more grounded: earnings-power value near $24.77, the discounted-future-market-cap near $27.01, EV/EBITDA relative near $28.06, and the two-stage excess-return near $16.97. The blended X-ray central estimate sits near $18.85, below the price.
The honest framing is that Resideo is roughly fairly valued on the methods that count, and the upside case rests almost entirely on the ADI spin-off unlocking a sum-of-the-parts premium: a higher-margin Products and Solutions company and a separately-valued distribution business could each command a better multiple apart than together. The risk is the mirror image: the earnings methods near $17 to $28 are the floor if the split disappoints or the debt allocation leaves the pieces stretched. The number to weigh is the operating margin of 7.5 percent and the $2.8 billion debt load, because the spin only creates value if both resulting companies can carry their share and earn a better multiple on their own.
Catalysts
First-quarter 2026 results, reported in mid-May, beat the company's own expectations. Net revenue rose 8.0 percent year over year to $1.91 billion on favorable pricing, mix, extra selling days, and modest volume growth, with adjusted EBITDA of $215 million and adjusted EPS of $0.65. Net income rose to $38 million from $6 million a year earlier, and diluted EPS improved to a positive $0.17 from a small loss. Income from operations fell to $102 million from $136 million, however, as higher SG&A, R&D, restructuring, and $24 million of ADI spin-off separation costs outweighed gross-profit gains. Gross margin held near 28.8 percent.
The defining catalyst is the ADI Global Distribution spin-off, expected between mid-third and mid-fourth quarter of 2026, with the Form 10 already filed. The split will create two independent public companies: Products and Solutions, the higher-margin branded business, and ADI, the distribution platform. Management also highlighted the termination of a costly legacy Honeywell reimbursement agreement and continued product innovation across HVAC, safety, and security.
Near-term catalysts to watch: the timing and terms of the ADI spin-off, especially how debt and legacy Honeywell liabilities are allocated between the two companies, the level of stranded or separation costs, the integration of acquired businesses, and whether each entity earns a re-rating once separated. Management targets mid-single-digit revenue growth for 2026, and analyst sentiment is a Moderate Buy with price targets near $49.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- WCC (WESCO International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …condition could be adversely affected. We may consider outsourcing additional functions in the future, further heightening these risks. An increase in competition could decrease sales, profit margins, and earnings. We operate in a highly competitive industry and compete directly with global, national, regional and…
- FY2025 10-K: …We may be unable to pass through incremental costs to customers in a timely manner or at all without adversely affecting our price competitiveness or margins. If we are unable to adjust pricing, sourcing or inventory strategies effectively, or if customers reduce or defer purchases (including due to demand…
- GPC (GENUINE PARTS CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …by mutual consent. COMPETITION Our Global Automotive and Industrial businesses operate in highly competitive markets, with a wide range of national, regional and local businesses. In our Automotive segments, competition comes from specialty parts chains, automobile manufacturers (including those selling parts for…
- FY2025 10-K: …we may be forced to reduce our prices if our competitors reduce their prices or increase promotional spending, which could result in a material decline in our revenues and earnings. Increased competition among distributors of automotive and industrial parts, including increased availability among digital and…
- DXPE (DXP Enterprises, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …purchasing large quantities of product are able to outsource all or most of those needs to us. For customers with smaller supply needs, we are able to combine our traditional distribution capabilities with our broad product categories and advanced ordering systems to allow the customer to engage in one-stop sourcing…
- FY2025 10-K: …be the successor to SEPCO Industries, Inc. Since our predecessor company was founded, we have primarily been engaged in the business of distributing maintenance, repair and operating ("MRO") products, equipment and service to customers in a variety of end markets including the general industrial, energy, food &…
- AIT (APPLIED INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …production equipment and processes, a greater focus on plant floor optimization, and compliance and regulatory requirements. INDUSTRY AND COMPETITION We primarily compete within North America which we believe offers significant growth potential given our industry position, established distribution and sales network,…
- FY2025 10-K: …and competitive advantage is attributable to the comprehensive set of services and solutions we provide, which we view as critical given the technical nature and application of our core product offering of motion, power, control, and automation technologies. The foundation of our service capabilities lies with our…
- MSM (MSC INDUSTRIAL DIRECT CO., INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …for our products. Further, our business is highly related to the manufacturing sector. As various sectors of our manufacturing customer base face increased foreign competition, and in fact lose business to foreign competitors or shift their operations overseas in an effort to reduce expenses, we may face increased…
- FY2025 10-K: …distribution space that competes with price transparency. Increased competition from online retailers (particularly those major internet providers who can offer a wide range of products and rapid delivery), and the adoption by competitors of aggressive pricing strategies or sales methods, could cause us to lose…
- FERG (Ferguson Enterprises Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …network across North America, including three import centers, 11 regional distribution centers and 1,746 branch locations as of July 31, 2025. Our network also includes six MDCs which provide greater access to key strategic markets and allows us to bring our products closer to our customers. These MDCs include…
- FY2025 10-K: …changes in demand may heighten the risks described in the risk factor titled "We may not rapidly identify or effectively respond to direct and/or end customers' wants, expectations or trends, which could adversely affect our relationship with customers, our reputation, the demand for our products and our market…
- WSO (WATSCO INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …most of the markets we serve tends to be fairly evenly distributed throughout the year and depends largely on housing completions and related weather and economic conditions. 12 Table of Contents Competition We operate in highly competitive environments. We compete with a number of distributors and also with several…
- FY2025 10-K: …parts, and supplies to enable a contractor to install or repair a central air conditioner, furnace, or refrigeration system; (ii) maintaining a strong density of warehouse locations for increased customer convenience; (iii) maintaining well-stocked inventories to ensure that customer orders are filled in a timely…
- SITE (SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …in the notes to the consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding significant segment expenses. 41 Table of Contents Gross profit and gross margin Gross profit for the 2025 Fiscal Year increased 5% to $1,635.2 million as compared to $1,560.1 million for the 2024 Fiscal Year. Gross profit…
- FY2025 10-K: …fleet utilization and cost improvements. • Sales force initiatives, including optimizing our commercial sales strategies, leads, and opportunities, while improving the skills and performance of the team. • Marketing initiatives, including customer analytics and lifecycle marketing, product and private brand…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.