REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC. (RBCAA): what the price requires
At today's price, REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC. (RBCAA) is priced for 10.9% return on equity. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-14 · Exported: 2026-07-16 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/RBCAA
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | RBCAA |
| Company | REPUBLIC BANCORP, INC. |
| Current price | $88.78/sh |
| Composition | Traditional Banking 66% / Warehouse Lending 4% / Tax Refund Solutions 12% / Republic Payment Solutions 4% / Republic Credit Solutions 15% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | financials |
| Return on equity needed | 10.9% |
| Return on equity now | 11.9% |
| ROE gap | -1.0pp |
| Price-to-book | 1.55x |
Solve inputs: computed at a 8.5% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage, on common book equity (FY2026); each 1pp of cost of equity moves the implied ROE ~1.6pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.03σ |
| cohort percentile (of 119 peers) | 66 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 73% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based value, while relative-multiple lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.23x | 2 | expensive |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | 1.75x | 1 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.45x | 1 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset Families that call it expensive: Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=4)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Bank Fair Value (P/TBV) | — | $80.03 | 1.11x | yes | TBVPS $55.11 × 1.45x (ROE (TTM) 11.2% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption)) |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $50.69 | 1.75x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 2.5x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $69.03 | 1.29x | yes | BV/sh $57.16, ROE (TTM) 11.2%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $75.58 | 1.17x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $61.39 | 1.45x | yes | Rev $0.4B, growth 2% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.7x / 4.4x / 5.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -0.5% |
Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).
Bullet Takeaways
Read off price-to-book, the $85 price assumes Republic Bancorp sustains a return on equity near 10.7%, paying about 1.45 times book, against the roughly 11.9% it has recently earned. That is within reach, and the price sits close to where the methods land rather than above them.
The asset family supports the price; only the relative-multiple read calls it expensive.
The split inside the company is the story. The Core Bank is strengthening (net interest income up 12% and margin expanding to 3.96%), while the Republic Processing Group, which houses Tax Refund Solutions, saw income fall after the nonrenewal of a large customer contract. The bet is that the bank's core franchise carries the lost fee income.
Bull Case
Start with how far the price sits above the methods, and the answer is that it barely does. The bank fair-value model, which prices a bank off tangible book and the spread between its return on equity and its cost of equity, lands near $80 against an $85 price. Two-stage excess return lands near $76, simple excess return near $69, and the reasonable-value base near $83. Read as a price-to-book inversion, the quote assumes a sustained return on equity near 10.7%, paying about 1.45 times book, a return the bank has essentially already been earning at about 11.9%. The asset-based methods support the price; this is a value-and-asset-supported name, not a growth bet.
The Core Bank is the engine and it is accelerating. In the first quarter of 2026, Core Bank net interest income rose 12% to $63.2 million and net interest margin expanded from 3.70% to 3.96%, helped by lower deposit costs and higher yields on interest-earning assets. A community bank widening margin while growing net interest income is doing the two things that sustain a return on equity above its cost of equity, and that is the durable part of the franchise.
The differentiated fee businesses, even after a setback, are what separate Republic from a plain community bank. Alongside traditional banking, it runs Tax Refund Solutions, Warehouse Lending, Republic Payment Solutions, and Republic Credit Solutions, specialty lines that historically generated high-return fee income. The Tax Refund Solutions segment processed total refund-advance originations of $771 million in a recent year (FY2024 10-K, accession 0001558370-25-002370), a meaningful franchise in a niche few banks operate. Republic also pays a dividend yielding around 2% and has been holding its share count steady. For the bull, this is a well-capitalized, niche-diversified bank trading near the central estimate of its own asset-based methods, with a Core Bank that is getting stronger.
Bear Case
The competitive disruption is concrete and recent: Republic lost a large Tax Refund Solutions customer. The Republic Processing Group, which houses the specialty fee businesses, saw net income drop to $18.8 million from $29.9 million, mainly due to the previously disclosed nonrenewal of that contract. Tax Refund Solutions is a concentrated business where a handful of large tax-preparation and software partners drive the volume, so losing one is not a rounding error; it is a step-down in a high-margin fee stream that the bank cannot quickly replace. The competitors here are not other community banks but the platforms and fintechs that distribute refund products, and they can move their volume, which is exactly what happened.
The seasonality and regulatory exposure compound the risk. Tax Refund Solutions is intensely seasonal, concentrated in the first quarter, and the refund-advance and credit-solutions businesses sit in a part of consumer finance that draws regulatory scrutiny. A bank earning a premium return partly on specialty consumer-lending fees is exposed to both partner concentration and rule changes, neither of which it controls. The price assumes a return on equity near 10.7% sustained for years; only about 74% of banks earning at this level have held it for a decade, and the fee-income volatility makes Republic's path less smooth than a pure spread lender's.
The valuation leaves modest room. With the processing group's fee income now lower, the consolidated return on equity leans more heavily on the Core Bank, and any reversal in the recent margin expansion (a turn in deposit competition or asset yields) would pressure the very return the price is paying 1.45 times book to capture. A specialty bank trading above its tangible-book-derived fair value, just as its highest-return fee segment loses a major customer, is priced for the Core Bank to do all the heavy lifting.
Valuation
For a bank the right lens is price-to-book against the return on equity, not an operating multiple, because the balance sheet is deposit-funded rather than corporately levered. At $85 the price implies a sustained return on equity near 10.7%, paying about 1.45 times book, computed at an 8.5% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth. Each one-point move in the cost of equity shifts the implied return on equity about 1.5 points. The assumed return is within reach of the roughly 11.9% recently earned, so the priced-in assumption reads as within range.
The methods cluster near the price. Simple excess return lands near $69, two-stage excess return near $76, and the discounted-future-market-cap near $59. The blended central estimate is about $69, and the reasonable-value band runs from roughly $46 at the low to $83 at the base, with the high case near $102. The price sits just above the base of that band.
The reconciliation is straightforward: the asset-based methods support the price while the relative-multiple read says it is a touch expensive, which is the signature of a value-and-asset-supported financial. A note on the data: some earnings-based methods read as not-applicable or floored here because Republic's Tax Refund Solutions seasonality skews trailing earnings, so the tangible-book and excess-return methods are the reliable anchors. The relevant solvency frame is regulatory capital and payout capacity, not net debt; the open question is whether the Core Bank's strengthening margin offsets the lower processing-group fee income enough to hold the return the price embeds.
Catalysts
The most recent catalyst was the first-quarter 2026 report: net income of $42.6 million and diluted EPS of $2.18 (adjusted net income $39.9 million). The Core Bank was the bright spot, with net interest income up 12% to $63.2 million and net interest margin expanding from 3.70% to 3.96% on lower deposit costs and higher asset yields.
The key swing factor is the Republic Processing Group, where net income fell to $18.8 million from $29.9 million, mainly due to the nonrenewal of a large Tax Refund Solutions customer contract. Whether the bank can replace or offset that lost fee income, and how the seasonal first-quarter tax business performs in coming years, is the most important marker for the thesis. Because Tax Refund Solutions is concentrated in the first quarter, the early-year results carry outsized weight.
The other markers to watch are the durability of Core Bank margin expansion as deposit competition shifts, regulatory developments affecting the refund-advance and consumer-credit businesses, and continued dividend payments. The asset-based fair value sits near the price, so execution against the lost fee income is what determines whether the stock re-rates up or back toward tangible book.
Sources: Republic Bancorp Q1 2026 results (stocktitan.net, sec.gov 8-K), FY2024 10-K segment disclosures.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Traditional Banking (reported)
- TRMK (Trustmark Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FBP (FIRST BANCORP.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- OFG (OFG Bancorp)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PRK (PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- SYBT (STOCK YARDS BANCORP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- BANF (BancFirst Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CHCO (CITY HOLDING COMPANY)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- STBA (S&T BANCORP INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Warehouse Lending / Tax Refund Solutions (reported)
- TRMK (Trustmark Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FBP (FIRST BANCORP.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PRK (PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- OFG (OFG Bancorp)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- TCBK (TriCo Bancshares)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- STBA (S&T BANCORP INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FSUN (FIRSTSUN CAPITAL BANCORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- VLY (VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Republic Payment Solutions (reported)
- TBBK (TBBK)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CASH (PATHWARD FINANCIAL, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- DAVE (Dave Inc./DE)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Republic Credit Solutions (reported)
- ENVA (Enova International, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- OMF (ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CACC (CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- LC (LendingClub Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- UPST (Upstart Holdings, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.