Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $95.33, Qorvo, Inc. (QRVO) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~6.3 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/QRVO

Headline

FieldValue
TickerQRVO
CompanyQorvo, Inc.
Current price$95.33/sh
CompositionHPA (High Performance Analog) 19% / CSG (Connectivity and Sensors Group) 11% / ACG (Advanced Cellular Group) 69%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)14.4%
Operating margin today11.2%
Margin expansion (value-band)+3.2pp
Must persist for6.3y
Multiple paid21x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 11% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.7 years.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~18.2%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.50σ
cohort percentile (of 187 peers)32
sustained it ~6.3 years at this level26%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.18x4expensive
Earnings1.53x5expensive
Relative1.45x2expensive
Growth0.84x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=14)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$113.820.84xyesFCF base $0.7B, growth -1% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.9%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$122.840.78xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 17.5x / 19.5x / 21.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 22x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 18.7x / 22.0x / 25.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 16x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$41.642.29xyesBV/sh $38.00, ROE (TTM) 10.1%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$43.532.19xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$70.801.35xyesRev $3.7B, growth -1% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.9x / 2.3x / 2.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$43.442.19xyesEPS $3.62, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=12.38 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$57.861.65xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.46B × (1−21%) / WACC 7.9% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$43.882.17xyesBV $38.00 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 6.6%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$55.631.71xyes√(22.5 × EPS $3.62 × BVPS $38.00) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.45B × sector EV/EBITDA 16.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$79.071.21xyesFCF $679.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$62.361.53xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.54B (FCF $0.68B − SBC $0.14B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$116.810.82xyesEPS $3.62 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$3.2129.70xyesBV $38.00 × (ROIC 0.7% / WACC 7.9%) (excluded from median)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $3.68B × sector P/S 5.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$135.750.70xyesEPS $3.62 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$39.142.44xyesEPS $3.62 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
HPAoperatingenterprise$705.7mwithheldunresolved no unit value
CSGoperatingenterprise$421.7mwithheldunresolved no unit value
ACGoperatingenterprise$2.6bwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$330.2m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)1.02x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.80x
Interest coverage5.6x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-4.2%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

At $98.40 the price is a bet on margin, not volume. Inverted, it pays about 21 times company-wide operating income and embeds operating margin expanding from roughly 11% today toward 16% and holding there for about six to seven years. The starting rate is reachable; the demand is on how long the improvement persists.

The valuation methods disagree sharply, and the disagreement is the signal. Only the growth-DCF family reaches the price (perpetual DCF near $106, exit-multiple near $123). The asset, earnings-power, and most peer-multiple methods sit far below: earnings power near $52, simple excess return near $39, Graham number near $54. The price is paying a durability premium the static frames cannot capture.

The setup has a live catalyst. Starboard Value is the largest holder and placed Peter Feld on the board, while fiscal 2026 gross margin expanded 370 basis points on a mix shift toward flagship smartphone and defense content. The bet is that activist-driven margin discipline makes the implied expansion stick, against the offset that Apple is roughly half of revenue.

Bull Case

What the standard valuation methods miss about Qorvo is that the price is not paying for the business as it looks today; it is paying for a margin structure that is actively being rebuilt. On a snapshot of current earnings the stock looks expensive: trailing return on equity near 10%, operating margin near 11%, and most of the asset and earnings-power methods land between $39 and $54. But that snapshot is exactly the thing in motion. Full-year fiscal 2026 non-GAAP gross margin expanded 370 basis points versus the prior year, driven by a deliberate mix shift away from low-content mass-market Android toward flagship and premium smartphone content, plus growth in higher-margin defense and infrastructure. The methods that anchor to a static margin cannot price a company mid-transformation, which is why only the growth-DCF reaches the price.

The transformation has a name and a board seat behind it. Starboard Value disclosed Qorvo as its single largest investment, around 13% of a roughly $4.57 billion portfolio, and Qorvo expanded its board to add Starboard's Peter Feld. Activist involvement of that scale and conviction tends to drive exactly the levers the inversion is pricing: cost discipline, portfolio rationalization, and margin expansion. The company has already been doing the work, completing divestitures of its silicon-carbide power and MEMS sensing businesses and consolidating filter production, all moves that lift the margin mix.

The segment data shows where the durable value sits. The High Performance Analog segment grew about 11% in fiscal 2026 on defense demand, DOCSIS 4.0, and base-station activity, the kind of diversified, higher-margin revenue that reduces dependence on the handset cycle. The balance sheet supports the patience the thesis requires: net debt near $330 million against trailing operating income that covers interest more than five times, and the company has shrunk its share count more than 4% a year. For the bull, the case is that the durability premium the static methods cannot see is real, anchored by an activist with a board seat and margin gains already on the scoreboard.

Bear Case

The honest read on the model disagreement is that the conservative methods are pricing the business that exists and the optimistic one is pricing the business the market hopes for. Strip out the single growth-DCF that reaches the price and the picture is uniform: earnings power value near $52, simple excess return near $39, two-stage excess return near $41, residual income near $41, Graham number near $54, and earnings yield near $39. The blended central estimate is about $60, and the model's reasonable-value band runs from roughly $56 at the low to $62 at the base, both well below the $98 price (June 28, 2026). When asset, earnings-power, and most peer-multiple frames all cluster around $40 to $60 and only one forward method touches the quote, the burden of proof sits entirely on a margin recovery that has not yet been sustained.

The customer concentration is the structural exposure that no margin program can offset. Apple is roughly half of revenue and Samsung about 10%, and the 10-K is explicit that the two largest customers accounted for approximately 57%, 58%, and 49% of revenue in the last three fiscal years (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001604778-25-000041). The same filing shows how fast that bites: a $152.8 million ACG revenue decline driven by a mix shift among smartphone customers to lower RF content (same filing), with ACG operating margin as a percent of revenue falling from 26.4% to 23.1%. A company whose biggest customer can move RF content per phone, or move it to a competitor, does not control its own top line, and the price is asking for six-plus years of margin durability from a revenue base that one customer can reset in a single product cycle.

The growth backdrop makes the duration bet harder. Full-year fiscal 2026 revenue actually declined about 1%, with ACG and the connectivity segment down even as HPA grew. The price implies margin holding at an elevated level for about 6.5 years, and only about a quarter of comparable companies have sustained such a run. The activist catalyst is real, but activism accelerates margin self-help; it does not create end-market demand or reduce the structural reliance on a single handset customer. If the next handset cycle disappoints or Apple's RF sourcing shifts, the durability premium the price depends on evaporates, and the methods clustered near $60 become the relevant anchor.

Valuation

The inversion is in duration mode, which is the right frame for a margin-recovery story. At $98.40 the price pays about 21 times company-wide operating income and solves not to a growth rate but to an operating margin lifting from roughly 11% today toward 16% and holding there for about 6.5 to 7 years, computed at an 11.2% cost of capital. Each one-point change in the cost of capital moves the implied horizon about 1.7 years. The near-term margin level is within recent reach; the priced-in assumption is elevated because of how long the improvement must persist, and only about a quarter of comparable companies have sustained such a run.

The method families make the bet explicit. Only the growth-DCF reaches the price: perpetual-growth DCF near $106, exit-multiple DCF near $123. The relative family is mixed (EV/EBITDA near $73, sector P/E near $76, but price-to-sales near $197). The asset and earnings-power families sit far below: earnings power value near $52, simple excess return near $39, residual income near $41, Graham number near $54. The blended central estimate is about $60, and the reasonable-growth band runs from about $56 low to $62 base, with the high case near $90.

The reconciliation is what the characterization names directly: asset, earnings-power, and peer-multiple models all say richly valued, and only the growth-DCF reaches the price, so the price is a bet on durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price, a margin and durability premium. One measurement note: the trailing operating-income figure used in the inversion and the EDGAR quarterly measure diverge here, so treat the 21x multiple as approximate and weight the qualitative family split. The balance sheet is not the constraint, with net debt near $330 million and interest coverage near 5.6 times; whether the margin transformation is durable is the entire question.

Catalysts

The dominant catalyst is the activist situation. Starboard Value disclosed Qorvo as its largest holding (around 13% of a roughly $4.57 billion portfolio in its May 2026 filing), and the company expanded its board from nine to ten directors to add Starboard's Peter Feld. The pace and substance of margin and portfolio actions the board pursues from here is the single biggest swing factor for whether the implied margin expansion sticks.

The operating catalysts are the margin trajectory and the segment mix. Full-year fiscal 2026 non-GAAP gross margin expanded 370 basis points on a shift toward flagship smartphone and defense content, and the High Performance Analog segment grew about 11% on defense, DOCSIS 4.0, and base-station demand. Each quarter's read on gross margin and on HPA growth relative to the declining handset segments is the key marker. Recent strategic moves (divesting silicon-carbide power and MEMS sensing, consolidating filter production) feed the same margin story.

The overriding risk to monitor is customer concentration: Apple is roughly half of revenue and Samsung about 10%, so any change in RF content per device or sourcing at either customer would matter more than any single internal initiative. Full-year revenue declined about 1% in fiscal 2026, so the next handset cycle's demand is the demand-side catalyst to watch.

Sources: Qorvo fiscal 2026 results (Qorvo newsroom, stocktitan.net, TradingView), Starboard Value disclosures (gurufocus.com, MarketScreener), Morgan Stanley upgrade.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

HPA (reported)

CSG (reported)

ACG (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive QRVO report on boothcheck