ORLA MINING LTD. (ORLA): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers ORLA MINING LTD. (ORLA) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ORLA

Headline

FieldValue
TickerORLA
CompanyORLA MINING LTD.
Current price$9.42/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)12.2%
Operating margin today58.5%
Margin compression (value-band)-46.3pp
Multiple paid5x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 4: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.2% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: n/a

ReferenceValue
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.12x5expensive
Earnings1.76x4expensive
Relative0.79x5justifies
Growth0.42x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=17)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$108.040.09xyesFCF base $0.8B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.5%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$22.600.42xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 4.8x / 9.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$11.870.79xyesP/E 18.79x (blended: static sector reference 14x + trailing (TTM) 30x), scenarios: 14.1x / 18.8x / 22.5x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$3.402.77xyesBV/sh $1.93, ROE (TTM) 16.3%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$4.452.12xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$13.670.69xyesRev $1.1B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.3x / 3.0x / 3.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$3.962.38xyesEPS $0.33, growth 1% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=22.59 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$2.753.43xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.17B × (1−40%) / WACC 7.5% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$4.512.09xyesBV $1.93 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 16.3% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$3.782.49xyes√(22.5 × EPS $0.33 × BVPS $1.93) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$16.590.57xyesEBITDA $0.76B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$23.030.41xyesFCF $768.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$10.650.88xyesEPS $0.33 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$8.511.11xyesBV $1.93 × (ROIC 32.9% / WACC 7.5%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$4.672.02xyesRevenue $1.06B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$12.380.76xyesEPS $0.33 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$3.572.64xyesEPS $0.33 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$65.0m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-0.26x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-0.11x (net cash)
Interest coverage27.4x
Share count CAGR (dilution)8.0%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Start with the single number that defines the bet: at $10.46 the price pays only about 6x company-wide operating income, a multiple so low it sits below what even a 5%-a-year decline in operating profit would warrant. That is the market pricing Orla as a melting ice cube. The recent operating record argues the reverse. In 2025 Orla produced more than 300,000 ounces of gold for the first time in its history, propelled by Musselwhite, which delivered 236,908 ounces for the full year with about 203,856 ounces attributable to Orla from the acquisition date, exceeding the top end of guidance (Orla 2025 production release, Newswire). A company growing into a record production year does not usually trade at a declining-business multiple.

The balance sheet supports the growth posture rather than constraining it. Orla carries net cash of roughly $65 million, with gross debt near $356 million against liquid assets of about $421 million, and interest coverage around 13x on trailing operating income of about $619 million. That is a producer with room to invest, and management is doing exactly that: 2026 guidance reflects sustained investment to accelerate growth at Musselwhite, South Carlin, and Camino Rojo (Orla Q4 2025 release, Orla). The forward-growth and relative-multiple families both reach the price comfortably, with DCF Exit Multiple at $24 and Relative Valuation at $12, which is what you would expect from a profitable miner the market is treating as a runoff asset.

The gold backdrop is the tailwind that turns a cheap producer into a re-rating candidate. Orla operates at an operating margin near 34%, so each dollar of realized gold price falls hard to the bottom line. With a multi-asset platform spanning Mexico, Canada, and the United States, the company has diversified the single-mine risk that used to define it, and the resumption of Camino Rojo plus reiterated 2026 guidance removes the most acute overhang. If production holds near guidance and gold prices stay firm, a 6x operating-income multiple is hard to defend and the gap to the mid-teens DCF and relative-multiple marks is the upside.

Bear Case

The structural fact a holder has to face first is jurisdiction risk, and Orla just lived through it. An illegal blockade shut Camino Rojo in Zacatecas, Mexico, and operations only resumed on June 5, 2026 (Orla resumption release, stocktitan). Mining in Mexico carries permitting, community, and security exposure that no spreadsheet fully captures, and the low multiple the market assigns is partly a rational discount for the chance that a flagship asset goes offline without warning. A producer whose cash flows can be interrupted by events outside its control deserves a lower multiple than its margins alone would suggest.

The second problem is that gold producers are price-takers, and the same operating leverage that helps on the way up cuts hard on the way down. Orla's roughly 34% operating margin is a function of a high gold price meeting its cost base. If gold retreats, the margin compresses quickly, and the asset and earnings-power models already say the stock is rich on those frames: Earnings Power Value lands at $2.79, Simple Excess Return at $3.51, and the Graham Number at $3.85, all far below the $10.46 price (June 27, 2026). Those are the methods that ignore the forward growth story and ask what the business is worth on current normalized earnings, and they describe a company that is being valued on the commodity cycle as much as on the mine plan.

The valuation is also unusually hard to anchor, which is its own risk. The reverse-DCF could not solve to a clean fair-value range and returned a below-floor reading, meaning the price already sits beneath the model's lower bound, and the inversion warns the implied figure is a bound rather than a solved point. Wide dispersion plus a recently disrupted flagship mine plus full commodity-price sensitivity is the combination that keeps a cheap-looking miner cheap. The bet only works if production and gold both cooperate, and the bear case is simply that one of them does not.

Valuation

Orla is a valuation puzzle because the families pull hard in opposite directions. The growth and relative methods sit above the $10.46 price (DCF Exit Multiple $24, Relative Valuation $12, EV/EBITDA Relative $17, FCF Yield $24), while the asset and earnings-power methods sit far below it (Earnings Power Value $2.79, Simple Excess Return $3.51, Graham Number $3.85).

Inverting the price is where the read gets interesting. At today's level the market is paying roughly 6x company-wide operating income, computed at a 9.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth, a multiple so low that the model flags it as below what even a 5%-a-year operating-profit decline would warrant. This is a bound, not a solved growth rate: the price is consistent with the business shrinking, not just stalling. The reverse-DCF returned a below-floor result with no reliable fair-value range, so the inversion should be read directionally rather than as a precise estimate. The honest summary is that the price embeds either a pessimistic view of production durability and jurisdiction risk, or a depressed gold-price assumption, or both. If neither pessimism is warranted, the cheap operating multiple is the opportunity; if either is, the asset-based floor near $4 is the reminder of how far a commodity producer can fall when the cycle turns.

Catalysts

The defining recent event is operational. An illegal blockade halted Orla's Camino Rojo mine in Zacatecas, Mexico, and operations resumed on June 5, 2026, after which the company reiterated 2026 gold production guidance of 110,000 to 120,000 ounces for that asset (Orla resumption release, stocktitan). Camino Rojo produced 18,221 ounces in Q1 2026, in line with plan, before the disruption. The bigger structural change was the Musselwhite acquisition, which contributed about 203,856 attributable ounces and pushed Orla above 300,000 ounces of total 2025 production for the first time (Orla 2025 production release, Newswire).

The forward calendar is catalyst-rich by management's own framing. Orla has positioned 2026 around accelerating growth at Musselwhite, South Carlin, and Camino Rojo, with sustained capital investment behind each (Orla Q4 2025 release, Orla). The items that move the stock from here are the quarterly production prints against guidance, any further interruption or normalization at Camino Rojo now that operations have restarted, development progress at South Carlin, and the realized gold price, which flows almost directly into a roughly 34% operating margin. Because Orla files as a foreign issuer on Form 6-K, watch those interim updates rather than US-style quarterly 10-Qs for the production and cost data.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive ORLA report on boothcheck