ORLA MINING LTD. (ORLA): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers ORLA MINING LTD. (ORLA) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ORLA
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | ORLA |
| Company | ORLA MINING LTD. |
| Current price | $9.42/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 12.2% |
| Operating margin today | 58.5% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -46.3pp |
| Multiple paid | 5x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 4: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 10.2% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: n/a
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.12x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.76x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.79x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.42x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $108.04 | 0.09x | yes | FCF base $0.8B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.5%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $22.60 | 0.42x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 4.8x / 9.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $11.87 | 0.79x | yes | P/E 18.79x (blended: static sector reference 14x + trailing (TTM) 30x), scenarios: 14.1x / 18.8x / 22.5x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $3.40 | 2.77x | yes | BV/sh $1.93, ROE (TTM) 16.3%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $4.45 | 2.12x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $13.67 | 0.69x | yes | Rev $1.1B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.3x / 3.0x / 3.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $3.96 | 2.38x | yes | EPS $0.33, growth 1% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=22.59 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $2.75 | 3.43x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.17B × (1−40%) / WACC 7.5% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $4.51 | 2.09x | yes | BV $1.93 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 16.3% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $3.78 | 2.49x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $0.33 × BVPS $1.93) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $16.59 | 0.57x | yes | EBITDA $0.76B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $23.03 | 0.41x | yes | FCF $768.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $10.65 | 0.88x | yes | EPS $0.33 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $8.51 | 1.11x | yes | BV $1.93 × (ROIC 32.9% / WACC 7.5%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $4.67 | 2.02x | yes | Revenue $1.06B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $12.38 | 0.76x | yes | EPS $0.33 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $3.57 | 2.64x | yes | EPS $0.33 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $65.0m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.26x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -0.11x (net cash) |
| Interest coverage | 27.4x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 8.0% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- At $10.46 the price pays only about 6x company-wide operating income, a multiple so low it sits below what even a 5%-a-year decline in operating profit would justify. The market is pricing Orla as if production is about to shrink, not grow.
- The data says the opposite. Orla cleared 300,000 ounces of gold for the first time in 2025, helped by the Musselwhite acquisition contributing about 204,000 attributable ounces, and the balance sheet carries net cash of roughly $65 million with interest coverage near 13x.
- The single biggest swing factor is jurisdiction risk. An illegal blockade halted Camino Rojo until operations resumed on June 5, 2026, and the company reiterated 110,000 to 120,000 ounces of 2026 guidance for that mine. The cheap multiple is partly the market pricing Mexico operating risk.
Bull Case
Start with the single number that defines the bet: at $10.46 the price pays only about 6x company-wide operating income, a multiple so low it sits below what even a 5%-a-year decline in operating profit would warrant. That is the market pricing Orla as a melting ice cube. The recent operating record argues the reverse. In 2025 Orla produced more than 300,000 ounces of gold for the first time in its history, propelled by Musselwhite, which delivered 236,908 ounces for the full year with about 203,856 ounces attributable to Orla from the acquisition date, exceeding the top end of guidance (Orla 2025 production release, Newswire). A company growing into a record production year does not usually trade at a declining-business multiple.
The balance sheet supports the growth posture rather than constraining it. Orla carries net cash of roughly $65 million, with gross debt near $356 million against liquid assets of about $421 million, and interest coverage around 13x on trailing operating income of about $619 million. That is a producer with room to invest, and management is doing exactly that: 2026 guidance reflects sustained investment to accelerate growth at Musselwhite, South Carlin, and Camino Rojo (Orla Q4 2025 release, Orla). The forward-growth and relative-multiple families both reach the price comfortably, with DCF Exit Multiple at $24 and Relative Valuation at $12, which is what you would expect from a profitable miner the market is treating as a runoff asset.
The gold backdrop is the tailwind that turns a cheap producer into a re-rating candidate. Orla operates at an operating margin near 34%, so each dollar of realized gold price falls hard to the bottom line. With a multi-asset platform spanning Mexico, Canada, and the United States, the company has diversified the single-mine risk that used to define it, and the resumption of Camino Rojo plus reiterated 2026 guidance removes the most acute overhang. If production holds near guidance and gold prices stay firm, a 6x operating-income multiple is hard to defend and the gap to the mid-teens DCF and relative-multiple marks is the upside.
Bear Case
The structural fact a holder has to face first is jurisdiction risk, and Orla just lived through it. An illegal blockade shut Camino Rojo in Zacatecas, Mexico, and operations only resumed on June 5, 2026 (Orla resumption release, stocktitan). Mining in Mexico carries permitting, community, and security exposure that no spreadsheet fully captures, and the low multiple the market assigns is partly a rational discount for the chance that a flagship asset goes offline without warning. A producer whose cash flows can be interrupted by events outside its control deserves a lower multiple than its margins alone would suggest.
The second problem is that gold producers are price-takers, and the same operating leverage that helps on the way up cuts hard on the way down. Orla's roughly 34% operating margin is a function of a high gold price meeting its cost base. If gold retreats, the margin compresses quickly, and the asset and earnings-power models already say the stock is rich on those frames: Earnings Power Value lands at $2.79, Simple Excess Return at $3.51, and the Graham Number at $3.85, all far below the $10.46 price (June 27, 2026). Those are the methods that ignore the forward growth story and ask what the business is worth on current normalized earnings, and they describe a company that is being valued on the commodity cycle as much as on the mine plan.
The valuation is also unusually hard to anchor, which is its own risk. The reverse-DCF could not solve to a clean fair-value range and returned a below-floor reading, meaning the price already sits beneath the model's lower bound, and the inversion warns the implied figure is a bound rather than a solved point. Wide dispersion plus a recently disrupted flagship mine plus full commodity-price sensitivity is the combination that keeps a cheap-looking miner cheap. The bet only works if production and gold both cooperate, and the bear case is simply that one of them does not.
Valuation
Orla is a valuation puzzle because the families pull hard in opposite directions. The growth and relative methods sit above the $10.46 price (DCF Exit Multiple $24, Relative Valuation $12, EV/EBITDA Relative $17, FCF Yield $24), while the asset and earnings-power methods sit far below it (Earnings Power Value $2.79, Simple Excess Return $3.51, Graham Number $3.85).
Inverting the price is where the read gets interesting. At today's level the market is paying roughly 6x company-wide operating income, computed at a 9.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth, a multiple so low that the model flags it as below what even a 5%-a-year operating-profit decline would warrant. This is a bound, not a solved growth rate: the price is consistent with the business shrinking, not just stalling. The reverse-DCF returned a below-floor result with no reliable fair-value range, so the inversion should be read directionally rather than as a precise estimate. The honest summary is that the price embeds either a pessimistic view of production durability and jurisdiction risk, or a depressed gold-price assumption, or both. If neither pessimism is warranted, the cheap operating multiple is the opportunity; if either is, the asset-based floor near $4 is the reminder of how far a commodity producer can fall when the cycle turns.
Catalysts
The defining recent event is operational. An illegal blockade halted Orla's Camino Rojo mine in Zacatecas, Mexico, and operations resumed on June 5, 2026, after which the company reiterated 2026 gold production guidance of 110,000 to 120,000 ounces for that asset (Orla resumption release, stocktitan). Camino Rojo produced 18,221 ounces in Q1 2026, in line with plan, before the disruption. The bigger structural change was the Musselwhite acquisition, which contributed about 203,856 attributable ounces and pushed Orla above 300,000 ounces of total 2025 production for the first time (Orla 2025 production release, Newswire).
The forward calendar is catalyst-rich by management's own framing. Orla has positioned 2026 around accelerating growth at Musselwhite, South Carlin, and Camino Rojo, with sustained capital investment behind each (Orla Q4 2025 release, Orla). The items that move the stock from here are the quarterly production prints against guidance, any further interruption or normalization at Camino Rojo now that operations have restarted, development progress at South Carlin, and the realized gold price, which flows almost directly into a roughly 34% operating margin. Because Orla files as a foreign issuer on Form 6-K, watch those interim updates rather than US-style quarterly 10-Qs for the production and cost data.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- CGAU (CGAU)
- FY2025 40-F: …and procedures regarding internal controls have not been specifically addressed in such charter. Quorum The NYSE suggests that the quorum for any meeting of holders of common stock of a listed company should not be less than a majority of the outstanding shares. The Company's by-laws set the quorum for the…
- FY2025 40-F: …conduct and ethics (the "Code"), by which it and all officers and employees of the Company, including the Company's principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer or controller, abide. There were no waivers granted in respect of the Code during the fiscal year ended December…
- BVN (BUENAVENTURA MINING CO INC)
- FY2025 20-F: …19.58 %, and other stakeholders own the remaining 4.34 %. The Company's legal address is Jacinto Ibañez Street N°315 - Parque Industrial, Arequipa in the city of Arequipa and the ore deposit is located 20 miles southwest of that city (Asiento Minero Cerro Verde S/N Uchumayo - Arequipa). (b) Business activity - The…
- FY2025 20-F: …financial performance. Management knows the conditions prevailing in the market and based on its knowledge and experience, manages the risks that are summarized below. The Company's Board of Directors reviews and approves the policies to manage each of these risks: (a) Market Risk - Commodity price risk - The…
- FSM (FSM)
- FY2025 40-F: …term is defined in Form 40-F) entitled the "Code of Conduct and Business Ethics" that applies to all of its directors, officers, employees, and consultants including its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, and persons performing similar functions. …
- FY2025 40-F: …submitted by Fortuna Mining Corp. (formerly called Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.) (the " Company ") under the Exchange Act is duly recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in rules and forms of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the " SEC "). Disclosure controls…
- ARIS (ARIS)
- FY2025 40-F: …The Company's share-based compensation plans are comprised of the following: Page | 17 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements Years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 (Tabular amounts expressed in thousands of US dollars unless otherwise noted) 3. Summary of Material Accounting Policy Information (cont.) a)…
- FY2025 40-F: …and operation of gold properties in Colombia and Guyana. Aris Mining operates the Segovia and Marmato Mines and the Soto Norte Project in Colombia. Aris Mining also owns the Toroparu Project in Guyana. 2. Basis of Presentation These consolidated financial statements, as approved by the Company's Board of Directors on…
- AG (AG)
- FY2025 40-F: …by posting such disclosure on the Company's website, which may be accessed at www.firstmajestic.com . PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES Deloitte LLP acted as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the financial year ended December 31, 2025. See page 145 of the AIF, which is attached…
- FY2025 40-F: …IFRS Accounting Standards as issued by the IASB. The Company's internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that: maintain records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company; provide reasonable assurance that…
- MARA (MARA Holdings Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, financial results, financial condition, business, prospects, growth strategy and liquidity. Accordingly, there are or will be important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those indicated in these…
- FY2025 10-K: …their long-term interests with our objectives as an organization. We also compare salary and wages against quantitative benchmarks and adjust monetary compensation to ensure wages are competitive and consistent with employee positions, skill levels, experience, and geographic location. We maintain a robust process…
- WOR (WORTHINGTON ENTERPRISES, INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …performance, competitive position, sales, volumes, cash flows, earnings, margins, balance sheet strengths, debt, financial condition or other financial measures; • pricing trends for raw materials and finished goods and the impact of pricing changes; • the ability to improve or maintain margins; • expected demand or…
- FY2025 10-K: …and UL Solutions. Building Products has one principal domestic competitor in the low-pressure LPG cylinder market, and a number of foreign competitors in the LPG cylinder, non-refillable refrigerant, and well water and expansion tank markets. We believe that this business has the largest market share in the domestic…
- ERO (ERO)
- FY2025 40-F: …The Company competes with other mining companies, many of which have greater resources and experience. Competition in the mining industry is primarily for: (i) properties which can be developed and can produce economically; (ii) the technical expertise to find, develop, and operate such properties; (iii) labour to…
- FY2025 40-F: …in the production process. The mining industry is competitive, particularly in the acquisition of additional Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources in all phases of operation, and the Company competes with many companies possessing similar or greater financial and technical resources. The Company also competes with…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.