ONEOK INC /NEW/ (OKE): what the price requires
At today's price, ONEOK INC /NEW/ (OKE) is priced for -2.5% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-14 · Exported: 2026-07-17 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/OKE
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | OKE |
| Company | ONEOK INC /NEW/ |
| Current price | $92.31/sh |
| Composition | Liquids commodity sales 76% / Residue natural gas sales 10% / Exchange services and natural gas gathering and processing revenue 4% / Transportation and storage revenue 9% / Other revenue 0% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 5.5% |
| Operating margin today | 16.5% |
| Margin compression implied | -11.0pp |
| Implied growth | -2.5% |
| Multiple paid | 16x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 6, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~6.8pp.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~9.1%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.93σ |
| cohort percentile (of 70 peers) | 21 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.38x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.52x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.92x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.00x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=16)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $92.36 | 1.00x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 9.3x / 12.3x / 15.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $117.39 | 0.79x | yes | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.0x / 20.0x / 24.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $105.60 | 0.87x | yes | Stage 1: 11% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $60.44 | 1.53x | yes | BV/sh $35.40, ROE (TTM) 15.8%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $77.98 | 1.18x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $68.73 | 1.34x | yes | Rev $35.2B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.3x / 1.7x / 2.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $67.32 | 1.37x | yes | EPS $5.61, growth 11% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.50 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $14.38 | 6.42x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $4.19B × (1−24%) / WACC 6.2% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $79.44 | 1.16x | yes | BV $35.40 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 15.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $66.84 | 1.38x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $5.61 × BVPS $35.40) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $100.57 | 0.92x | yes | EBITDA $7.46B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 9231.00x | yes | FCF $2242.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $143.45 | 0.64x | yes | EPS $5.61 × (8.5 + 2×11.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $11.05 | 8.35x | yes | BV $35.40 × (ROIC 1.9% / WACC 6.2%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $139.34 | 0.66x | yes | Revenue $35.20B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $92.60 | 1.00x | yes | EPS $5.61 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 11.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 16.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $60.65 | 1.52x | yes | EPS $5.61 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $33.5b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 7.81x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 5.94x |
| Interest coverage | 3.2x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 8.9% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- ONEOK is a midstream energy company that moves and processes natural gas liquids, natural gas, and refined products for fees, with much of its revenue coming from contracted, volume-based services rather than commodity prices.
- The defining number is leverage: ONEOK carries about $33.5 billion of net debt, roughly 5.6 times operating income, taken on to fund the EnLink, Medallion, and Magellan acquisitions, and the deleveraging path is the whole story.
- What to watch is synergy capture and debt reduction: the company booked $475 million of cumulative acquisition synergies, paid down about $3.1 billion of debt in 2025, and targets debt-to-EBITDA near 3.5 times by 2026.
Bull Case
The single most decisive metric for ONEOK is the trajectory of its leverage, because that one variable, more than volumes or commodity prices, determines whether the equity compounds or stalls. The company took on enormous debt to acquire EnLink, Medallion, and earlier Magellan, building a continental midstream network, and the bull case is that the acquired cash flows pay that debt down fast. The early evidence is strong: ONEOK extinguished about $3.1 billion of long-term debt in 2025 and is targeting a debt-to-EBITDA ratio near 3.5 times by 2026. Every turn of deleveraging transfers value from creditors to shareholders, and ONEOK is executing on it.
The earnings engine behind the deleveraging is performing. Adjusted EBITDA rose 18% to $8.02 billion in 2025, with net income up 12% to $3.39 billion, driven by the acquisitions and by higher volumes. The volume growth is concrete: natural gas liquids raw-feed throughput rose 17% in the Rocky Mountain region and 6% in the Mid-Continent. Much of ONEOK's revenue is fee-based, earned on contracted, volume-driven services, including "stand-ready services" measured by the passage of time, which insulates the cash flow from commodity-price swings and makes the EBITDA more predictable than the energy label suggests.
The synergies are the accelerant. ONEOK captured $475 million of cumulative synergies from the EnLink and Medallion deals, ahead of its original expectations, with roughly $150 million more incremental synergies built into 2026 guidance. Those are cost and commercial savings that drop to EBITDA without needing new volume. Management guided 2026 adjusted EBITDA to a midpoint near $8.1 billion and raised the quarterly dividend 4% to $1.07. The bull case is a fee-based, scaled midstream network deleveraging quickly while capturing acquisition synergies, paying a growing dividend along the way.
Bear Case
The qualitative issue a bear leads with is that ONEOK has bought its growth with debt and dilution, and the price now assumes that strategy keeps working flawlessly for a very long time. The company funded a string of major acquisitions, EnLink, Medallion, Magellan, and the result is a balance sheet carrying about $33.5 billion of net debt against just $172 million of liquid assets, with the share count growing roughly 9% a year to help pay for the deals. That is growth assembled through the capital markets, and it works only as long as the acquired assets earn more than the debt and equity cost to acquire them. Integration risk is real: pulling the promised synergies out of multiple large acquisitions while keeping the combined network running is execution-heavy, and a stumble shows up directly in the leverage ratio the whole thesis depends on.
The priced-in assumption is the most aggressive part. The price embeds the company's pipeline franchise sustaining its premium economics for roughly sixteen years, a duration that sits at the very top of the midstream peer group. That is not a modest bet; it is an assumption that ONEOK's contracted, fee-based cash flows persist at their current level for the better part of two decades, through whatever happens to U.S. energy production, the energy transition, and the regulatory treatment of fossil-fuel infrastructure. If that duration assumption proves too long, the premium the market is paying compresses.
The leverage turns the cyclical and transition risks dangerous. Interest coverage of about 3.3 times is adequate but not comfortable for a company this indebted, and net debt at 5.6 times operating income leaves limited room if volumes soften or a major customer reduces drilling. Midstream demand ultimately depends on upstream production, which depends on commodity prices and producer capital budgets, none of which ONEOK controls. The 10-K's revenue mix includes "interruptible transportation contracts" that are not guaranteed volumes. The bear case is the leveraged-roll-up risk: a heavily indebted, serially acquisitive company priced for sixteen years of sustained premium cash flow, where the debt magnifies any shortfall in volumes, synergies, or the durability of the assets.
Valuation
ONEOK is a collection of midstream segments, and the price is best read through the one carrying the premium: the natural gas pipelines franchise, where the price embeds the business sustaining its economics for roughly sixteen years. That duration assumption sits at the top of the midstream peer group, which is the sharpest single statement of the bet. The price is not asking for rapid growth; it is asking for the contracted, fee-based cash flows to persist for an unusually long time.
The methods are broadly supportive, with the leverage caveat baked in. The relative-multiple and growth-based methods justify the price, landing near it; the asset-based methods sit a touch above, reflecting a healthy 15.8% return on equity; and no family reads the stock as outright expensive on current economics. The peer EV/EBITDA lens places ONEOK at a reasonable multiple against midstream comparables like Williams, Kinder Morgan, Targa, Enterprise Products, and Energy Transfer. The earnings-power lens is the one outlier saying expensive, dragged by a backward-looking normalization that predates the acquisitions; valued on its current, enlarged earnings base, the price is within range rather than stretched.
The decisive factor is the balance sheet, and it cuts both ways. Net debt of about $33.5 billion, roughly 5.6 times operating income with interest coverage near 3.3 times, is the structural fact that determines the equity's risk and return. The deleveraging toward 3.5 times debt-to-EBITDA is the value-creating engine if it stays on track; a slip in volumes or synergies would slow it and pressure the equity. The dividend, recently raised, rests on the fee-based cash flow that is genuinely more stable than commodity-driven energy earnings. The valuation comes down to a judgment on duration and deleveraging: the price is reasonable if the contracted cash flows hold and the debt comes down as planned, and the risk is that a sixteen-year premium assumption leaves little margin if either falters.
Catalysts
Synergy capture and deleveraging are the linked catalysts that define the next year. ONEOK booked $475 million of cumulative synergies from the EnLink and Medallion acquisitions, ahead of original expectations, paid down about $3.1 billion of long-term debt in 2025, and targets a debt-to-EBITDA ratio near 3.5 times by 2026. The pace of both, synergies realized and leverage reduced, is the clearest read on whether the acquisition strategy is creating value.
The 2026 guidance frames the expected earnings path. Management guided 2026 net income to $3.19 billion to $3.71 billion, or FY2026 EPS of $5.04 to $5.87, and an adjusted EBITDA midpoint near $8.1 billion, citing about $150 million of incremental commercial and cost synergies plus volume growth and asset integration. The board also raised the quarterly dividend 4% to $1.07 per share.
The volume backdrop is the operational signal to monitor. Natural gas liquids throughput grew 17% in the Rocky Mountain region and 6% in the Mid-Continent in 2025, the growth that supports the fee-based earnings. Because midstream demand ultimately tracks upstream production, the external variables to watch are commodity prices and producer drilling activity in ONEOK's basins, since a pullback there would slow volume growth and stretch the deleveraging timeline the valuation is counting on.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Natural Gas Gathering and Processing / Natural Gas Liquids +2 more (reported)
- WMB (WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- KMI (KINDER MORGAN, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- TRGP (TARGA RESOURCES CORP.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- ET (ENERGY TRANSFER LP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- EPD (ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PAA (PLAINS ALL AMERICAN PIPELINE LP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
ONEOK 2025 results · ONEOK 2026 guidance