OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $48.07, OCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC (OII) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~5.3 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/OII

Headline

FieldValue
TickerOII
CompanyOCEANEERING INTERNATIONAL INC
Current price$48.07/sh
CompositionSubsea Robotics 31% / Manufactured Products 20% / Offshore Projects Group 22% / Integrity Management & Digital Solutions 10% / Aerospace and Defense Technologies 17%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)5.7%
Operating margin today10.4%
Margin compression (value-band)-4.7pp
Must persist for5.3y
Multiple paid16x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 11.7% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.6 years.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~10.4%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.59σ
cohort percentile (of 46 peers)61
sustained it ~5.3 years at this level32%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.28x5expensive
Earnings3.04x5expensive
Relative0.38x2justifies
Growth1.06x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$45.351.06xyesFCF base $0.2B, growth 4% (input: historical growth), terminal g 3.9%, WACC 8.0%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$45.381.06xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 9.0x / 14.0x / 19.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 7.5x / 10.0x / 12.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8.4x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$37.571.28xyesBV/sh $11.56, ROE (TTM) 30.1%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$69.940.69xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$35.431.36xyesRev $2.9B, growth 4% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.3x / 1.7x / 2.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$121.450.40xyesEPS $3.47, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.40 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$8.735.51xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.18B × (1−26%) / WACC 8.0% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$57.310.84xyesBV $11.56 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 30.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$30.041.60xyes√(22.5 × EPS $3.47 × BVPS $11.56) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.40B × sector EV/EBITDA 6.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$15.803.04xyesFCF $223.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$13.883.46xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.21B (FCF $0.22B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$111.970.43xyesEPS $3.47 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$4.7310.16xyesBV $11.56 × (ROIC 3.3% / WACC 8.0%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $2.87B × sector P/S 1.2x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$130.130.37xyesEPS $3.47 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$37.511.28xyesEPS $3.47 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Subsea Roboticsoperatingenterprise$855.2m$2.5b indicative EV subtotalindicative enterprise value
Manufactured Productsoperatingenterprise$569.0m$703.0m indicative EV subtotalindicative enterprise value
Offshore Projects Group (OPG)operatingenterprise$616.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Integrity Management & Digital Solutions (IMDS)operatingenterprise$284.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Aerospace and Defense Technologies (ADTech)operatingenterprise$459.9mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$205.6m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-0.93x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-0.69x (net cash)
Interest coverage8.3x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.2%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The trajectory is unmistakable, and it is the heart of the bull case. Oceaneering posted its sixth consecutive year of EBITDA growth in 2025, with adjusted consolidated EBITDA rising about 20% to $347 million. The engine is subsea robotics, the company's largest segment, where it operates the remotely operated vehicles that service offshore infrastructure. That segment ran a 32% operating margin in the fourth quarter, with full-year margins expanding toward the high 30s on better ROV pricing, higher utilization, and increased tooling volumes. Rising margins on rising volume is the signature of a services business with regained pricing power, and Oceaneering's installed ROV fleet and operational expertise are not easily replicated.

The diversification is what separates this from a pure oil-services cyclical. Beyond subsea, the aerospace and defense technologies segment won the largest initial contract in the company's history, a foundational award for its growth plans, and the manufactured-products and integrity-management businesses round out a portfolio with revenue streams that do not all move with the oil price. The defense arm in particular gives Oceaneering exposure to government spending cycles that are independent of energy, applying its underwater-engineering capabilities to a different, often counter-cyclical customer base.

The balance sheet lets the recovery compound. Oceaneering holds net cash of about $207 million, interest coverage near 8 times, and a high return on equity of roughly 31%, while generating positive free cash flow, guided to $100 million to $120 million for 2026. With $854 million of inbound orders booked, including about $180 million of Brazilian subsea contracts, the forward demand is visible, not hoped for. The bull case is a margin-expanding, cash-generative, diversified offshore-services leader at a price the asset, peer-multiple, and cash-flow methods all support.

Bear Case

The bull case rests on assumptions about the future, and the most fragile one is the durability of the offshore-energy upcycle. The margin expansion in subsea robotics and the strength of the order book are real, but they are products of a favorable offshore investment environment, and that environment is cyclical. Offshore exploration and production budgets rise and fall with oil prices and the majors' capital-allocation decisions, and the high ROV utilization and pricing driving today's margins can reverse when operators pull back. The 10-K is a reminder of how lumpy this revenue is, noting the company generates "a material amount of our consolidated revenue from contracts for services in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico in our OPG segment, which is usually more active in the secon"d and third quarters. A business this tied to offshore spending carries an inherent boom-bust rhythm the recent run of growth can obscure.

The second fragile assumption is the aerospace and defense growth story. The largest-ever contract win is foundational to the segment's plans, which means the segment's projected growth is concentrated in execution of major awards, a dependence that cuts both ways. Large government contracts can slip, get rescoped, or face funding delays, and a segment leaning on a single foundational award has less margin for error than a diversified book of small jobs. The bull narrative treats defense as a steady counterweight to the energy cycle; the bear notes it is a newer, contract-dependent business still proving it can scale.

The valuation reflects an elevated assumption about the company's best segment carrying the premium. The price embeds the manufactured-products and subsea franchises sustaining strong economics for years, an assumption the analysis flags as on the higher side of what such businesses typically hold. If the offshore cycle softens or the defense ramp stalls, the earnings-power lens, which already reads the stock as expensive against normalized profit, becomes the more relevant gravity. The balance sheet is genuinely strong, so this is not a solvency risk; it is a cyclical-timing and execution risk, the chance that a price paid near the top of an offshore upcycle proves too generous when the cycle turns.

Valuation

Oceaneering is a sum of segments, and the price is best understood that way rather than through a single company-wide number. The most demanding assumption sits in the manufactured-products franchise, where the price embeds the business sustaining strong economics for roughly five years, a duration the analysis characterizes as elevated. The diversified mix, subsea robotics, manufactured products, offshore projects, integrity solutions, and aerospace and defense, means a blended multiple would average five quite different businesses, so the segment view is the honest one.

The methods mostly support the price, with one clear exception. The asset-based methods land right around the price, reflecting a high return on equity of about 31% on a modest book value; the relative-multiple and growth-based methods land near it too. The earnings-power method is the outlier saying expensive, and it does so because the normalized operating-income figure it capitalizes is dragged down by the prior offshore-services downturn, when margins were far lower than today. That backward-looking normalization understates the company's current earning power, which is why the asset and forward methods, valuing the business as it operates now, dominate the read. The price embeds a within-range to slightly elevated bet, not a stretch.

The balance sheet is a genuine support rather than a risk. Net cash of about $207 million, interest coverage near 8 times, and positive free cash flow guided to $100 million to $120 million for 2026 mean Oceaneering has no solvency concern and the flexibility to invest or return capital through the cycle. Against its industrial and energy-services peers, the implied valuation is reasonable for a business with expanding margins and a visible order book. The decisive judgment is cyclical: the price is fair to modestly elevated if the offshore upcycle and the defense ramp hold, and the downside is timing, the risk of having paid up as the cycle matures.

Catalysts

The order book is the clearest forward catalyst. Oceaneering booked $854 million of total inbound orders across subsea robotics, aerospace and defense, and manufactured products, including roughly $180 million of subsea contracts through its Brazilian subsidiary with Petrobras. The conversion of that backlog into revenue, and the pace of new awards, are the direct read on whether the growth continues.

The 2026 guidance frames the expected trajectory. Management projected consolidated EBITDA of $390 million to $440 million and free cash flow of $100 million to $120 million for 2026, building on six consecutive years of EBITDA growth. Subsea robotics margins expanding toward the high 30s on ROV pricing and utilization is the segment trend most responsible for that guide, so continued pricing strength is the key operational signal.

The aerospace and defense ramp is the catalyst with the most asymmetry. The segment won the largest initial contract in the company's history, foundational to its growth plans, and execution of that award is what determines whether defense becomes a durable counterweight to the energy cycle. The external variable to monitor against all of it is offshore energy spending, which tracks oil prices and operator capital budgets, and any softening there would pressure the subsea and offshore-projects segments that still drive the bulk of revenue.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Subsea Robotics / Manufactured Products (reported)

Offshore Projects Group (OPG) (reported)

Integrity Management & Digital Solutions (IMDS) (reported)

Aerospace and Defense Technologies (ADTech) (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Oceaneering 2025 results

View the full interactive OII report on boothcheck