NUTRIEN LTD. (NTR): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers NUTRIEN LTD. (NTR) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/NTR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerNTR
CompanyNUTRIEN LTD.
Current price$66.92/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)4.1%
Operating margin today13.9%
Margin compression (value-band)-9.8pp
Multiple paid12x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 10: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.4% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~0%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.74σ
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.32x5expensive
Earnings1.15x4expensive
Relative0.81x5justifies
Growth1.09x5expensive

Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.4%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=19)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$43.971.52xyesFCF base $2.1B, growth 2% (input: historical growth), terminal g 1.6%, WACC 7.4%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$61.291.09xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 5.8x / 7.8x / 9.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$68.190.98xyesP/E 14x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 11.7x / 14.0x / 16.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x
Simple DDMGrowth$1225.030.05xyesDPS $2.18, g=9.1% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3%
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$77.370.86xyesStage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$51.061.31xyesBV/sh $52.16, ROE (TTM) 9.1%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$50.531.32xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$45.541.47xyesRev $26.9B, growth 2% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.0x / 1.2x / 1.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$163.100.41xyesEPS $4.66, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.40 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$69.270.97xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $4.79B × (1−25%) / WACC 7.4% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$50.441.33xyesBV $52.16 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 9.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 5.9%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$73.950.90xyes√(22.5 × EPS $4.66 × BVPS $52.16) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$69.180.97xyesEBITDA $6.11B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$16.004.18xyesFCF $2125.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$150.360.45xyesEPS $4.66 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$49.081.36xyesBV $52.16 × (ROIC 6.9% / WACC 7.4%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$82.920.81xyesRevenue $26.89B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$174.750.38xyesEPS $4.66 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$50.381.33xyesEPS $4.66 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$10.0b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)3.57x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)2.69x
Interest coverage5.0x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-3.9%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

What a simple earnings multiple misses about Nutrien is that it is two different businesses bolted together, and the market tends to price the whole thing as if it were only the cyclical commodity half. One half mines potash and manufactures nitrogen, the irreplaceable inputs that feed the world's crops, where Nutrien sits at the low end of the global cost curve with some of the best ore bodies and gas-advantaged plants. The other half is the largest agricultural retail network on the planet, selling seed, crop protection, and advisory services directly to farmers through thousands of locations. That retail arm earns steadier, fee-and-margin-based money that smooths the commodity cycle, and management guides it to $1.75 billion to $1.95 billion of EBITDA for the year with high-single-digit growth in proprietary-product margins.

The first quarter showed the commodity half firing. Potash adjusted EBITDA rose to $578 million on higher global benchmarks and record sales volumes, and nitrogen adjusted EBITDA rose to $482 million, lifting total adjusted EBITDA to $1.11 billion. Record potash volumes matter because Nutrien's low-cost mines mean each incremental tonne carries high incremental margin, and the company can flex production to meet demand better than higher-cost competitors. Global food demand grows steadily while arable land does not, which is the long-run tailwind under the whole business.

The capital return is the tangible payoff and the evidence the assets generate real cash. Nutrien returned $409 million to shareholders in the quarter through its dividend, which yields around 3.1%, and buybacks, and the share count has fallen about 3.9% a year. A cyclical that shrinks its share base meaningfully through the cycle compounds per-share value even when prices are only average. Every valuation method, asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and growth-discounted cash flow, supports today's price, which is the market acknowledging the business is reasonably valued rather than stretched. The bull case is that Nutrien is a low-cost, irreplaceable-input franchise with a stabilizing retail arm, trading at a low-double-digit multiple while returning cash.

Bear Case

The valuation methods all support Nutrien's price, and for a commodity producer that unanimous support is the warning, not the reassurance. The methods are reading the current, elevated fertilizer earnings as if they were the run rate, and the iron rule of cyclicals is that peak earnings are not sustainable earnings. Potash and nitrogen prices are set by global supply and demand, not by Nutrien, and the first-quarter strength came specifically from higher global benchmarks. Benchmarks that rise can fall: new low-cost supply, a strong harvest that depresses crop prices and farmer spending, or a shift in global trade flows can all push fertilizer prices down, and Nutrien's earnings fall with them. A multiple that looks cheap on peak earnings looks expensive on trough earnings, and the static methods cannot tell the difference.

The nitrogen business adds a specific exposure: natural gas. Gas is the primary feedstock for making nitrogen fertilizer, so a spike in gas prices, particularly in regions where Nutrien's plants are not gas-advantaged, compresses nitrogen margins directly. The company is also exposed to the farm economy as a whole: when crop prices are weak and farm incomes fall, farmers cut back on fertilizer application and on the discretionary products Nutrien's retail arm sells, so the retail buffer is not fully insulated from the same cycle that drives the commodity half.

The balance sheet carries real debt, about $10 billion net, which is manageable in good years but a constraint in bad ones. Interest is covered comfortably when fertilizer prices are high, but the coverage compresses as earnings fall, and a leveraged cyclical at the wrong point in the cycle has less room to fund its dividend and buyback at once. The bear case is not that Nutrien is a poor business; it is that an investor buying at today's price is implicitly underwriting fertilizer prices staying near current levels, and the history of commodities says they will not stay anywhere for long. The cheapness is real only if the cycle holds.

Valuation

Nutrien reads as a value-and-asset-supported name, with every method, asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and the growth-discounted lens, supporting today's price near $63 (June 27, 2026), and none calling it expensive. At roughly 11 times blended earnings, the price is not asking for growth; it is pricing the existing earnings power of a low-cost fertilizer producer plus the largest agricultural retail network. The implied assumption is modest, which is exactly what you would expect for a mature, cash-generative cyclical.

The caveat is the one that governs every commodity name: the earnings the methods are capitalizing are cyclical. First-quarter potash and nitrogen results rode higher global benchmarks and record potash volumes, and a multiple that looks cheap against those earnings would look richer if benchmarks normalized lower. The right way to read Nutrien is through the cycle, not at a single point in it: the low-cost potash mines and the retail arm's steadier EBITDA, guided to $1.75 billion to $1.95 billion, are the through-cycle anchors, while the commodity benchmarks are the swing factor. The methods support the price on current earnings; the judgment is whether those earnings sit near mid-cycle or above it.

Solvency is sound but not trivial. Nutrien carries about $10 billion of net debt, with interest covered comfortably at current earnings levels, and the share count has fallen about 3.9% a year as buybacks return capital alongside a dividend yielding around 3.1%. The leverage is normal for the sector and well within the company's cash generation in a typical year, but it tightens as the cycle turns down. The bet the buyer underwrites is that fertilizer earnings hold near current levels long enough for the low multiple and the capital return to compound, with the retail arm cushioning the commodity swings. The assets are genuinely irreplaceable; the earnings that value them are not fixed.

Catalysts

The first quarter of 2026 was strong on the commodity side. Nutrien reported net earnings of $139 million, or $0.27 per diluted share, with adjusted EBITDA of $1.11 billion and adjusted net earnings of $0.51 per share. Potash adjusted EBITDA rose to $578 million on higher global benchmarks and record sales volumes, nitrogen adjusted EBITDA reached $482 million on higher benchmarks, and retail adjusted EBITDA was $108 million.

Management reaffirmed full-year 2026 guidance, maintaining potash production of 14.1 million to 14.7 million tonnes and nitrogen of 9.2 million to 9.7 million tonnes, the latter inclusive of planned turnarounds at three nitrogen facilities, and held retail EBITDA guidance at $1.75 billion to $1.95 billion with high-single-digit growth projected in proprietary-product gross margin. The company returned $409 million to shareholders in the quarter through dividends and buybacks, with the dividend yielding around 3.1%.

The markers to watch are the commodity benchmarks above all: potash and nitrogen prices set the earnings, and their direction over the coming quarters matters more than any single operating metric. Alongside them, the strength of the farm economy and crop prices drives both fertilizer application rates and the retail arm's discretionary sales, and natural gas costs feed directly into nitrogen margins. Each tells you whether the current earnings are near a sustainable mid-cycle level or riding a peak that the price has not yet discounted.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Nutrien Q1 2026 results · Nutrien Q1 2026 earnings release · Nutrien Q1 2026 guidance

View the full interactive NTR report on boothcheck