NICE LTD. (NICE): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers NICE LTD. (NICE) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/NICE

Headline

FieldValue
TickerNICE
CompanyNICE LTD.
Current price$99.64/sh
CompositionCloud 76% / Services 19% / Product 5%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)3.5%
Operating margin today21.9%
Margin compression (value-band)-18.4pp
Multiple paid9x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 11: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 9.2% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history-1.55σ
cohort percentile (of 187 peers)5
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.84x5justifies
Earnings0.95x5justifies
Relative0.29x2justifies
Growth0.61x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$303.410.33xyesFCF base $0.8B, growth 11% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.2%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$163.340.61xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 4.8x / 6.8x / 8.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 24.94x (blended: static sector reference 35x + trailing (TTM) 10x), scenarios: 20.7x / 24.9x / 29.2x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 17.71x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$109.510.91xyesBV/sh $64.15, ROE (TTM) 15.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$141.280.71xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$90.501.10xyesRev $2.9B, growth 11% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.7x / 2.0x / 2.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$331.960.30xyesEPS $9.67, growth 34% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.29 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$74.601.34xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.45B × (1−13%) / WACC 9.2% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$143.920.69xyesBV $64.15 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 15.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$118.140.84xyes√(22.5 × EPS $9.67 × BVPS $64.15) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.84B × sector EV/EBITDA 25.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$129.620.77xyesFCF $697.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$102.750.97xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.55B (FCF $0.70B − SBC $0.15B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$312.020.32xyesEPS $9.67 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$109.430.91xyesBV $64.15 × (ROIC 15.7% / WACC 9.2%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $2.95B × sector P/S 8.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$362.630.27xyesEPS $9.67 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$104.540.95xyesEPS $9.67 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Customer Engagementoperatingenterprise$2.5b$665.1m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value
Financial Crime and Complianceoperatingenterprise$485.4m$166.8m operating-incomewithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$417.4m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-0.74x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-0.65x (net cash)
Share count CAGR (buyback)-1.4%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Begin with the balance sheet, because it tells you what kind of company this is. NICE carries no debt at all and holds roughly $417 million in net cash, and it generates trailing operating income near $2 billion. A software company that funds its own growth from cash flow, owes nothing to lenders, and has been shrinking its share count by about 1.4% a year is one that management runs with confidence in its own economics. There is no refinancing risk, no interest burden, and no dilution; the cash the business throws off belongs to shareholders or can be reinvested at the company's discretion. That financial freedom is the foundation the growth story sits on.

The growth itself is a clean cloud-transition story that is mostly complete. Cloud revenue reached $603 million in the first quarter, 79% of total revenue, up 14.6% year over year, and the company grew total revenue 10% to $769 million while exceeding the high end of its own guidance. A business that has already moved the bulk of its revenue to recurring cloud subscriptions has the most durable revenue model in software: customers who embed a contact-center platform into their operations do not switch lightly, and the recurring base compounds. Management reiterated full-year revenue guidance of $3.17 to $3.19 billion and raised its earnings outlook, a sign the momentum is holding.

Artificial intelligence is the accelerant, and it is showing up in the numbers rather than the press release. AI annual recurring revenue grew 66% year over year to $345 million, now 14% of cloud revenue, and AI is included in every new enterprise deal. That matters because it reframes the bet: NICE is not a legacy software vendor hoping to bolt AI on, it is selling AI into a base that already runs its platform, monetizing the same customer relationship at a higher value. For a buyer at today's price, the bull case is a debt-free, cash-generative software leader with a nearly complete cloud transition and a fast-growing AI layer, trading at a multiple that prices in barely any of it.

Bear Case

The structural truth a NICE holder would rather not face is that the same artificial intelligence driving its growth could shrink the thing it sells. NICE's platform has historically been priced around human agents: more contact-center seats, more software licenses. AI that resolves customer queries without a human agent reduces the number of those seats. The company is leaning into this by selling AI directly, with AI annual recurring revenue up 66% to $345 million, but the open question is whether AI revenue grows fast enough to offset the seats it displaces. If automation deflates the seat count faster than the AI upsell replaces it, the core platform revenue could stall even as the AI line grows, and the bear case is that the market has not fully reckoned with that substitution inside the company's own base.

Competition compounds the risk because customer-experience software is a crowded, fast-moving field. The platform competes against large horizontal software vendors and a wave of AI-native challengers, all targeting the same enterprise contact-center budgets. In a market where the technology is being rewritten by AI, incumbency is less protective than usual, because a buyer rethinking its contact-center stack for an AI-first world may reconsider its vendor entirely. NICE has to keep winning that re-evaluation, deal by deal, against competitors that do not carry a legacy seat-based business to protect.

The valuation is the part the bear has the least to stand on, and it is worth being honest about that. Reading the price backward, the market pays only about seven times operating income, a multiple so low it sits below what even a gradual operating-profit decline would justify. The relative and forward-growth methods support the price, while the asset-based and earnings-power methods read it as expensive, but those latter two anchor on a lower trailing operating-income basis that diverges meaningfully from the headline figure, so they overstate the richness. The honest bear case here is not that the stock is overvalued; it is the opposite risk in disguise: a price this low can signal the market doubts the durability of the cloud-and-AI growth, worried that the AI transition cannibalizes the platform or that competition compresses the returns. The bet against NICE is a bet that those doubts prove right.

Valuation

The price is making an unusually modest bet for a growing software company. Reading today's level backward, the market pays only about seven times operating income, a multiple so low that the price sits below what even a gentle operating-profit decline would warrant. For a business growing total revenue 10% and cloud revenue nearly 15%, that is a price embedding pessimism, not optimism. The framework reads the assumption as within range, and the near-term pace is consistent with what the company has delivered, so the valuation question is why a steadily growing, debt-free software leader trades at a multiple usually reserved for businesses in decline.

The methods split, and the split is informative once you account for a measurement quirk. The relative and forward-growth methods sit at or near the price, crediting the cloud and AI growth. The asset-based and earnings-power methods read the price as expensive, near three times their estimates, but those methods anchor on a trailing operating-income figure that diverges substantially from the headline basis, which inflates how rich they make the price look. The pattern is a value-and-growth-supported name where the static asset lenses are the outlier, not the signal.

Solvency is not a constraint; it is a strength. NICE holds about $417 million in net cash with no debt, and generates substantial operating cash flow, so there is no leverage, no interest burden, and no financing risk to underwrite. A buyer at today's price is not paying for a balance-sheet story or a turnaround; they are buying a profitable, cash-rich software franchise at a low multiple. The decisive variable is the durability of the cloud-and-AI growth: if the AI revenue keeps compounding and the cloud base holds against competition and automation, the low multiple was an opportunity; if AI cannibalizes the seat-based platform faster than it adds revenue, the market's caution was justified.

Catalysts

The artificial-intelligence ramp is the catalyst with the clearest momentum. AI annual recurring revenue grew 66% year over year to $345 million, now 14% of cloud revenue and 18% of cloud backlog, and AI is included in every new enterprise deal. Each quarter's AI revenue growth is the single most direct measure of whether the company is monetizing the technology faster than it disrupts its own seat-based model, so that figure is the headline to track.

The cloud transition and guidance set the financial cadence. First-quarter revenue rose 10% year over year to $769 million, cloud revenue grew 14.6% to $603 million, and the company exceeded the high end of its guidance on both revenue and earnings. Management reiterated full-year non-GAAP revenue guidance of $3.17 to $3.19 billion, about 8% growth at the midpoint, with cloud revenue expected to grow 13% to 15%, and raised its non-GAAP earnings-per-share outlook to a range of $10.98 to $11.18. Delivery against that cloud-growth range is the metric the market will weigh.

Leadership and execution are the slower threads. The company is operating under chief executive Scott Russell, who framed the quarter around disciplined execution and momentum across the AI-native platform. How consistently the company exceeds guidance, retains its enterprise base, and converts AI interest into recurring revenue are the operational catalysts that determine whether the low multiple re-rates.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Customer Engagement (reported)

Financial Crime and Compliance (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

NICE Q1 2026 results · company financial data

View the full interactive NICE report on boothcheck