NEXA RESOURCES S.A. (NEXA): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers NEXA RESOURCES S.A. (NEXA) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/NEXA

Headline

FieldValue
TickerNEXA
CompanyNEXA RESOURCES S.A.
Current price$14.04/sh
CompositionZinc 53% / Lead 18% / Copper 17% / Silver 4% / Other products 6% / Freight, insurance services and others 3%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)9.4%
Operating margin today16.6%
Margin compression (value-band)-7.2pp
Multiple paid6x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 6.1% sits below it).

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.12σ
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based value, while earnings-power/growth-DCF land below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.77x5justifies
Earnings4.84x3expensive
Relative0
Growth1.72x2expensive

Families that justify the price: Asset Families that call it expensive: Earnings, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=10)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$0.00noFCF base $0.0B, growth 4% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.5%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$6.742.08xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 7.8x / 12.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 14x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.5x / 14.0x / 16.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$18.210.77xyesBV/sh $9.74, ROE (TTM) 17.3%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$24.590.57xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$10.421.35xyesRev $3.0B, growth 4% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.5x / 0.6x / 0.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$2.904.84xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.29B × (1−21%) / WACC 9.5% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$24.650.57xyesBV $9.74 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.3% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$14.800.95xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.00 × BVPS $9.74) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.50B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$0.011404.00xyesFCF $13.1M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median)
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$0.8416.71xyesEPS $1.00 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$12.301.14xyesBV $9.74 × (ROIC 12.0% / WACC 9.5%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $3.00B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$10.811.30xyesEPS $1.00 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Zinc (LME)operatingenterprise2.9B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value
Copper (LME)operatingenterprise9.9B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value
Silver (LBMA)operatingenterprise0.0B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value
Gold (Fix)operatingenterprise3.4B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$1.2b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)3.01x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)2.38x
Interest coverage1.6x
Share count CAGR (dilution)0.0%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Nexa Resources is a Latin American zinc miner and smelter, with revenue led by zinc at about 53% and the rest in lead, copper, and silver. The capital-allocation picture is the heart of the story: the company carries net debt of about $1.13 billion against trailing operating income near $983 million, roughly 1.1x, but interest coverage is thin at about 1.1x, so deleveraging and disciplined investment are the priorities.

At $14.24 (June 27, 2026) the price pays only about 6x company-wide operating income, low enough to sit below what even a 5%-per-year operating-profit decline would warrant. The asset-based and peer-multiple frames support the price while the earnings-power and growth methods call it expensive, so the read is value and asset-supported, not a growth bet.

The most recent quarter was strong on a commodity-price tailwind, with adjusted EBITDA up about 126% and a margin near 32%. The cheapness reflects a leveraged, cyclical miner whose fortunes track metal prices it does not control.

Bull Case

How Nexa deploys its cash is the clearest window into where management sees value, and right now the priority is unmistakable: strengthen the balance sheet and ramp the assets that lift production at low cost. The company carries net debt of about $1.13 billion, and with interest coverage thin, every dollar of the cash flow now pouring in from higher metal prices is most valuable applied to reducing leverage and funding the mines that are scaling. That is a disciplined, deleveraging-first allocation stance, and it is the right one for a cyclical miner that wants to survive the next downturn and compound through it.

The operational results give that strategy real cash to work with. In the most recent quarter adjusted EBITDA more than doubled year over year to $283 million at a margin near 32%, and net income was $118 million, or $0.67 per share. Mining zinc production reached 79,000 tons, up 18% as all five mines benefited from better ore grades, and the Aripuana mine hit a quarterly record of 13,000 tonnes of zinc, signaling the operational stability that was the key question after its ramp. Crucially, mining cash cost net of byproducts was negative $0.76 per pound, below guidance, meaning the byproduct credits from copper, silver, and gold are effectively paying for the zinc production. A miner producing at negative cash cost is the lowest-risk position in the industry.

The customer base and the project pipeline round out the case. Nexa's zinc demand is highly diversified, with 81.9% of 2025 sales going to galvanizing, die casting, and related industrial uses across transport, construction, and infrastructure (FY2025 20-F, accession 0001292814-26-001787), so it is not dependent on a single end market. The next capital-allocation decision, Phase 2 of Cerro Pasco to integrate two mines and lift ore output, is under evaluation with an update expected in the second half of 2026, a potential growth catalyst funded from the current cash flow. At about 6x operating income, the price asks for decline; a stable-to-rising metal-price environment plus a deleveraging, well-run asset base is the value-and-asset-supported setup the methods describe.

Bear Case

The advantage a commodity miner relies on is its cost position, and the honest observation is that Nexa has no moat beyond it, so the thesis is only as good as metal prices and ore grades stay favorable, both of which erode over time. The spectacular recent results came from a price surge, copper up 38%, zinc up 14%, silver up 157%, and gold up 69% year over year, and from strong byproduct grades that drove cash cost negative. Those are cyclical tailwinds, not durable advantages. As ore bodies deplete, grades typically decline and cash costs rise, and as commodity prices mean-revert, the byproduct credits that are currently subsidizing zinc production shrink. The 6x multiple is cheap on peak earnings and would not look cheap on normalized ones.

The balance sheet is the amplifier of that cyclicality. Net debt of about $1.13 billion is only around 1.1x current operating income, but interest coverage is just 1.1x, which is dangerously thin for a business whose cash flow swings with metal prices. In a strong price environment Nexa services its debt comfortably; in a downturn, with prices falling and costs rising as grades normalize, that coverage could compress quickly, leaving little room for the deleveraging the company needs. A leveraged miner at the favorable end of the commodity cycle is exactly the profile that looks safest right before it is not.

The valuation evidence reflects the tension. The earnings-power and growth-DCF frames both call the stock expensive, because the current 8.6% trailing operating margin is thin and the methods do not credit the cyclical EBITDA surge as durable. Only the asset-based and peer-multiple frames support the price, and they do so on the value of the resource base rather than on sustainable earnings. The Aripuana ramp and Cerro Pasco expansion add execution and capital risk on top of the price risk. The bear case is straightforward: this is a cheap, leveraged, cost-position-dependent miner at a cyclical high, where a reversal in metal prices or a rise in mining costs would hit margins, coverage, and the multiple together.

Valuation

At the current price the market is paying about 6x company-wide operating income, a multiple so low that the price sits below what even a 5%-per-year operating-profit decline would warrant. That is a bound, not a solved point: computed at a 7% cost of capital floor (the CAPM rate of 5.9% sits below it) with 4% terminal growth, the price does not require growth, only that operating profit not fall faster than a modest decline. On that basis the stock screens deeply cheap.

The family pattern, though, is split in a telling way. The asset-based and relative-multiple methods support the price, valuing Nexa on its resource base and peer comparison, while the earnings-power and growth-DCF methods call it expensive. That divergence is the signal: the value case rests on the assets and the cheap multiple, not on sustainable earnings, because the current operating margin is thin and the recent EBITDA surge is cyclical. The reverse-DCF carries no reliability flag here, a caution that the inputs are volatile, which is itself characteristic of a commodity producer.

The judgment hinges on the metal-price assumption you are willing to make. At 6x, the price is cheap relative to current earnings, and if zinc, copper, and the precious-metal byproducts hold, Nexa generates strong cash that pays down debt and funds growth, and the asset-supported value is real. If prices revert and ore grades normalize, the same 6x applies to a much smaller earnings base, the thin interest coverage tightens, and the cheapness evaporates. This is less a valuation question than a commodity-cycle and balance-sheet question, and the low multiple is the market pricing exactly that risk.

Catalysts

The most recent print, Q1 2026, was strong on a commodity-price tailwind: adjusted EBITDA more than doubled year over year to $283 million at a margin near 32%, with net income of $118 million, or $0.67 per share, though the EPS reportedly missed expectations and the stock reacted negatively. Mining zinc production rose 18% to 79,000 tons on better ore grades across all five mines, Aripuana hit a record 13,000 tonnes of zinc, and mining cash cost net of byproducts was negative $0.76 per pound, below guidance, helped by copper up 38%, zinc up 14%, silver up 157%, and gold up 69% year over year.

The key forward catalyst is the Cerro Pasco Phase 2 decision, which would integrate two mines and lift ore output, with management expecting to update the market in the second half of 2026 on how it plans to manage the next stage. The continued ramp and stability of Aripuana is the other operational catalyst, since it is the swing producer for zinc volumes.

The dominant external catalysts are metal prices, particularly zinc, copper, and the precious-metal byproducts, which drive margins and cash flow. The watch items are zinc and byproduct prices, ore grades and cash costs, production volumes at Aripuana, the Cerro Pasco capital decision, and progress on reducing the debt load given the thin interest coverage. Sustained metal prices with continued deleveraging would support the value case; a price reversal or a cost increase would expose the cyclicality and leverage. Sources: Nexa Resources Q1 2026 results and earnings coverage (stocktitan.net; investing.com; finance.yahoo.com; theglobeandmail.com), 2026.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Zinc (LME) / Copper (LME) +2 more (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive NEXA report on boothcheck