MURPHY USA INC. (MUSA): what the price requires
At today's price, MURPHY USA INC. (MUSA) is priced for +0.3% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-14 · Exported: 2026-07-16 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/MUSA
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | MUSA |
| Company | MURPHY USA INC. |
| Current price | $609.93/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 1.4% |
| Operating margin today | 3.7% |
| Margin compression implied | -2.3pp |
| Implied growth | 0.3% |
| Multiple paid | 19x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7.1% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~7.9pp.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~15.3%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.28σ |
| cohort percentile (of 210 peers) | 55 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple; asset-based/earnings-power/growth-DCF land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.52x | 4 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.08x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.61x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.61x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $258.93 | 2.36x | yes | FCF base $0.6B, growth -1% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.6%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $543.95 | 1.12x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 10.5x / 12.5x / 14.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $635.82 | 0.96x | yes | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.9x / 20.0x / 23.1x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $319.97 | 1.91x | yes | BV/sh $35.21, ROE (TTM) 84.1%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $1702.37 | 0.36x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $379.53 | 1.61x | yes | Rev $19.7B, growth -1% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.5x / 0.6x / 0.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $1006.25 | 0.61x | yes | EPS $28.75, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.59 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $292.85 | 2.08x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.80B × (1−23%) / WACC 7.6% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $536.04 | 1.14x | yes | BV $35.21 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 84.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $150.92 | 4.04x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $28.75 × BVPS $35.21) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $696.63 | 0.88x | yes | EBITDA $1.12B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $182.07 | 3.35x | yes | FCF $555.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $166.99 | 3.65x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.53B (FCF $0.56B − SBC $0.03B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $927.67 | 0.66x | yes | EPS $28.75 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $22.50 | 27.11x | yes | BV $35.21 × (ROIC 4.9% / WACC 7.6%) (excluded from median) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $1577.77 | 0.39x | yes | Revenue $19.68B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $1078.13 | 0.57x | yes | EPS $28.75 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $310.81 | 1.96x | yes | EPS $28.75 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $2.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 3.90x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 3.02x |
| Interest coverage | 6.4x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -7.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Murphy USA runs a low-cost fuel-and-convenience network, many stores sited near Walmart under exclusivity arrangements, and earns its profit on fuel margins and merchandise rather than headline revenue.
- The biggest risk is structural fuel demand: the 10-K flags that "increased use of lower- or zero-emission automobiles" and tightening fuel-economy standards could erode demand for its core product over time.
- Watch fuel margins, which jumped to 35 cents a gallon last quarter, and the buyback, where a new $2 billion authorization runs through 2030 and the share count is shrinking about 7% a year.
Bull Case
The earnings trajectory tells the bull story plainly. First-quarter 2026 net income more than doubled to $136.3 million, with diluted EPS of $7.28 against $2.63 a year earlier, on the back of fuel margins that widened sharply. Total fuel contribution reached 35.0 cents per gallon, up from 25.4 cents, and retail fuel margins rose 7%. Murphy USA is a low-cost fuel retailer, and when fuel margins expand, the operating leverage on its high-volume, thin-margin model is dramatic. The merchandise side compounded the result, with contribution dollars up 7.3% to $210.2 million on a 20% unit margin, helped by strong nicotine sales.
The moat is the cost position and the real estate. Many Murphy stores sit on or near Walmart parking lots under exclusive arrangements, and the 10-K describes restrictions that even prohibit the company from accepting third-party offers where the consideration would exceed Walmart's. That siting drives high traffic at low occupancy cost, and Murphy's scale in fuel buying lets it source competitively across multiple suppliers. Low cost per store plus high volume is a structurally advantaged position against independent fuel retailers. The company continues to expand, on pace to open 45 to 55 new stores in 2026.
Capital allocation is the engine that turns this cash machine into per-share growth. Operating cash flow of $320 million in the quarter comfortably funded capital spending, the dividend, and $70.9 million of buybacks, and the board authorized a new repurchase program of up to $2 billion through 2030. The share count has been shrinking roughly 7% a year, which is why earnings per share compound even when total profit is steady. A return on equity above 80%, inflated by the buyback-shrunk equity base, reflects how efficiently the model converts capital into shareholder returns. The bull case is a low-cost retailer with a Walmart-anchored footprint, expanding merchandise margins, and a buyback that steadily concentrates the per-share claim.
Bear Case
The bear case starts with capital allocation, because the very strategy that flatters the per-share numbers also masks how the business is valued. Years of aggressive buybacks have shrunk Murphy USA's book equity to about $35 per share, which is why the reported return on equity tops 80%: it is a small denominator, not an extraordinary business. The buyback compounds EPS, but it also means the company is returning cash rather than reinvesting in a model facing a long-term demand question, and it has funded part of that return with debt. Net debt sits near $2.15 billion at roughly 2.6 times operating income. None of this is reckless, but a buyer should understand the high ROE and rising EPS are partly financial engineering on a thin-margin retailer, not pure organic compounding.
The structural risk is the product. Murphy USA sells gasoline, and the 10-K is candid that "increased use of lower- or zero-emission automobiles" and tightening fuel-economy and emissions standards "could decrease demand for our products" over time. The electric-vehicle transition is slow and uneven, but it is a one-directional headwind to the core fuel volume, and the convenience-store merchandise that would have to replace it leans heavily on tobacco and nicotine, themselves under regulatory and secular pressure. A retailer whose two biggest profit pools both face long-term demand erosion is fighting a current, even if the current is gentle today.
The cyclicality of fuel margins is the near-term version of the same problem. The 35-cents-a-gallon fuel margin that drove the doubling of earnings is well above the historical norm, and fuel margins are volatile, set by the spread between wholesale costs and pump prices that can compress as fast as it expands. The price embeds roughly flat operating growth, which is undemanding, but the earnings-power and growth-DCF methods still read the stock as expensive: Earnings Power Value lands near $301 on normalized profit, less than the price, and the zero-growth FCF method lands near $182. Only the relative-multiple lens supports the price. Same-store fuel volumes actually declined 0.8% in the quarter, a reminder that the volume base is flat-to-down and the earnings strength came from margin, which does not persist at peak levels indefinitely. The bet is that elevated fuel margins and the buyback keep compounding EPS faster than the structural demand headwind erodes the base.
Valuation
At $550.92, Murphy USA's price implies roughly flat company-wide operating growth over five years, a slight decline on a single solve, which is an undemanding bet that reflects the market's view of a mature, thin-margin fuel retailer rather than a growth story. The framework labels the embedded assumption within range. The complication is that the trailing earnings were lifted by unusually strong fuel margins, so a multiple that looks reasonable against the recent quarter looks fuller against a normalized margin.
The methods split along the usual line for a cash-generative but slow-growth business. The relative-multiple family supports the price, with the relative P/E method near $636 and EV/EBITDA Relative near $697 at sector multiples. The earnings-power family lands below the price, with Earnings Power Value near $301 on normalized five-year-average operating income and the zero-growth FCF method near $182, both reflecting that the current margin is above the through-cycle level. The asset-value methods are distorted by the buyback-shrunk book value, so the high return on equity inflates some of them; they are less reliable here than the earnings-based lenses. The methods that flatter the price, Peter Lynch and the growth-adjusted Graham formula above $900, lean on a 35% historical EPS growth rate that is itself a margin-and-buyback artifact and should be discounted. The honest read is a stock priced fully to modestly rich on normalized earnings, supported mainly by where peer multiples sit.
The peer comparison is imperfect; the cohort mixes auto dealers with the one true convenience-store comp, Casey's General Stores, against which Murphy USA's lower-cost, fuel-led model trades at a discount on inside-sales mix. Solvency is comfortable: net debt at about 2.6 times operating income with interest covered 7.3 times leaves room for the buyback and the store expansion. The decisive variable is the durability of fuel margins and the pace of the structural demand transition. If fuel margins normalize lower and EV adoption gradually erodes volume, the earnings-power methods are the honest anchor; if margins hold and the buyback keeps shrinking the share count, the per-share compounding justifies the relative multiple the price leans on.
Catalysts
The first-quarter 2026 results, reported in late April, were the dominant recent catalyst and they were strong. Net income more than doubled to $136.3 million, with EPS of $7.28 against $2.63 a year earlier, driven by total fuel margins of 35.0 cents per gallon, up from 25.4. Merchandise contribution rose 7.3% to $210.2 million on a 20% unit margin, with strong nicotine performance, while same-store fuel volumes slipped 0.8%. The doubling of profit on widened fuel margins is the single most important recent development, and the swing factor going forward.
Store growth and capital return are the steadier catalysts. Murphy USA is on pace to open 45 to 55 new stores in 2026, with 18 under construction at quarter-end. Operating cash flow of $320 million funded capital spending, the dividend, and $70.9 million of buybacks, and the board authorized a new repurchase program of up to $2 billion through 2030. That authorization is the clearest signal of the long-term capital-return strategy that drives per-share earnings.
Analyst sentiment is balanced, with the price targets bracketing the current price: an average near $515, a low of $435, and a high of $554, and an even split between Buy and Hold ratings. The mixed view reflects the tension between the strong margin environment and the structural questions around long-term fuel demand. The next quarterly print, and the trajectory of fuel margins in particular, are what move the story from here.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Marketing (reported)
- CASY (CASEY’S GENERAL STORES, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- GLP (Global Partners LP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Murphy USA Q1 2026 results, April 2026 · MUSA FY2025 10-K · stockanalysis.com, 2026