Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers Millrose Properties, Inc. (MRP) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/MRP
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | MRP |
| Company | Millrose Properties, Inc. |
| Current price | $29.32/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Multiple paid | 12x operating income |
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~0.6%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| cohort percentile (of 80 peers) | 9 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.05x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 0.33x | 3 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.41x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.12x | 5 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=18)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $586.40 | 0.05x | yes | FCF base $4.2B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 6.9%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $243.34 | 0.12x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 8.6x / 11.6x / 14.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $72.19 | 0.41x | yes | P/E 25.21x (blended: static sector reference 35x + trailing (TTM) 11x), scenarios: 20.2x / 25.2x / 30.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 20x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $241.31 | 0.12x | yes | DPS $3.00, g=7.9% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $106.37 | 0.28x | yes | Stage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $30.14 | 0.97x | yes | BV/sh $35.26, ROE (TTM) 7.9%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $27.83 | 1.05x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $42.54 | 0.69x | yes | Rev $0.7B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 5.5x / 6.8x / 8.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $97.65 | 0.30x | yes | EPS $2.79, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.30 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $0.84 | 34.90x | yes | Normalized EBIT (latest-period EBIT; under 3y history) $0.17B × (1−4%) / WACC 6.9% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $27.47 | 1.07x | yes | BV $35.26 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 7.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 5.1%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $47.05 | 0.62x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.79 × BVPS $35.26) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $59.93 | 0.49x | yes | EBITDA $0.61B × sector EV/EBITDA 20.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $231.46 | 0.13x | yes | FCF $3756.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $90.02 | 0.33x | yes | EPS $2.79 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $10.18 | 2.88x | yes | BV $35.26 × (ROIC 2.0% / WACC 6.9%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $25.76 | 1.14x | yes | Revenue $0.71B × sector P/S 6.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $104.63 | 0.28x | yes | EPS $2.79 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $30.16 | 0.97x | yes | EPS $2.79 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millrose Properties (single segment) | operating | enterprise | 0.6B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $2.4b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 4.06x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 3.90x |
| Interest coverage | 4.7x |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
At $28.42 Millrose trades below its book value of about $35.26 per share and offers a high single-digit to roughly 11% yield. It is a land-banking REIT, so the standard earnings-growth models miss what the business actually is: a recurring option-fee stream secured by land.
The model disagreement is extreme. The growth-DCF methods read the post-spinoff ramp and land in the hundreds of dollars, while the asset and REIT methods that fit the business land near $28 to $30. The conservative methods are the honest read for a company this new.
The defining variable is counterparty concentration. Lennar is the largest counterparty by far, with about $6.9 billion of homesites under option, and the company is actively diversifying, now working with 17 counterparties versus 15 a quarter earlier.
Bull Case
What traditional valuation models miss here is the shape of the business. Millrose is not a homebuilder and not a typical operating company; it is a land-banking vehicle that buys and holds land and earns option and milestone payments while homebuilders take down lots over time. The filing describes the structure plainly: its counterparties are "U.S. based homebuilders and Land Development companies," and as of year-end 2025 it held Lennar "Homesites under option contracts of $6.9 billion" (FY2025 10-K, accession 0002017206-26-000002). The earnings stream is therefore a recurring, asset-backed fee yield, not a volatile operating margin, which is why a generic earnings-growth lens distorts it in both directions.
The right lens shows an asset-backed yield trading below book. Millrose carries total assets of about $9.6 billion and invested capital of $8.7 billion, and Q1 2026 produced AFFO of $0.76 per share, an 8.7% annualized yield on equity, fully distributed as a $0.76 dividend. At $28.42 against book value of $35.26, the stock trades at a discount to the land and receivables on its balance sheet while paying out a high yield, the combination an asset-based investor looks for. The current operating margin near 85% reflects how lean the fee-collection model is.
The diversification is the growth the models cannot yet see. Invested capital outside the Lennar agreement rose $365 million in the quarter to $2.7 billion at a weighted-average yield of 10.7%, and the counterparty count went from 15 to 17. The company funded $1.0 billion of land acquisition and development in the quarter, and analysts project 43% revenue growth for fiscal 2026 as that capital deploys. The filing frames the opportunity through its competitive set of "significant market participants with substantial financial resources" (accession 0002017206-26-000002), against which Millrose is building a multi-counterparty book. For a buyer who values the recurring fee yield and the asset backing, the bull case is a below-book REIT with a high distribution and a visible path to diversify its revenue.
Bear Case
The valuation methods disagree so violently that the disagreement is itself the warning. The growth-DCF reads the post-spinoff ramp literally and lands at $568, the simple dividend-discount method at $241, and the forward-PEG approaches near $100, all multiples of the price. The asset and REIT-appropriate methods land in a completely different place: Simple Excess Return at $30, Two-Stage Excess Return at $28 (June 27, 2026), Residual Income at $27, and ROIC-justified book at $10. When the optimistic and conservative methods are an order of magnitude apart, the conservative ones almost always tell the truer story, because the growth methods are extrapolating a brand-new company's first reported numbers as if they were a durable trend. Millrose has a short public history, and the high growth-DCF outputs are an artifact of annualizing a ramp, not a forecast you can underwrite.
The reason to trust the conservative read is counterparty concentration. Lennar is overwhelmingly the largest counterparty, with $6.9 billion of homesites under option, and the entire spin-off thesis depends on that relationship plus the ability to add others. The filing is direct about the risk: if Millrose fails "to secure new counterparties, we could lose a substantial source of revenue and income," and it may not "attract new counterparties on acceptable terms" (FY2025 10-K, accession 0002017206-26-000002). Diversification to 17 counterparties is progress, but the revenue base is still anchored to one homebuilder whose own land needs drive most of the business.
The cyclicality sits underneath everything. Land banking is a leveraged bet on homebuilding demand, which moves with interest rates and the housing cycle, and Millrose carries net debt of about $2.4 billion at roughly 3.9x operating income with interest coverage near 4.7x and only $49 million of liquid assets. A housing downturn would slow lot takedowns, pressure the fee stream, and test the balance sheet at the same time. The reverse solve already prices modest operating-profit decline, which the model reads as within range only with a caveat that comparison data is limited. The bear case is that the honest methods say the stock is worth roughly what it trades for or a touch more, the exciting methods are extrapolation, and the concentration and cyclicality are real reasons the discount to book exists.
Valuation
Millrose is a case study in matching the method to the business. The growth-DCF and dividend-growth methods produce enormous numbers, DCF Perpetual Growth at $568, Simple DDM at $241, FCF yield at $231, because they annualize a newly public land-banking company's ramp and treat it as durable compounding. Those are not credible fair values for a company with this short a history; they are extrapolation artifacts. The methods that fit a land-and-receivables REIT cluster tightly near the price: Simple Excess Return at $30.14, Two-Stage Excess Return at $27.83, Residual Income at $27.47, and Earnings Yield at $30.16, against a $28.42 price and a book value of $35.26.
The inversion confirms the conservative read. At $28.42 the market is paying about 14x company-wide operating income, which implies operating income declining about 4.6% a year over five years, computed at a 7.5% cost of capital. That is a benign assumption, and the reverse solve labels it within range, though with an explicit caveat that comparison data is limited and the label should be taken directionally given how new the company is. A roughly 85% current operating margin reflects the fee-collection model, and the trailing return on equity near 7.9% sits just below the cost of equity, which is why the asset methods land slightly below book.
The synthesis is a below-book REIT priced for a slight decline, with a high distribution and an asset base behind it. The triple-digit growth-method outputs are the spread to discount, not to chase. The price reflects a market pricing the recurring fee yield and the asset backing while discounting the counterparty concentration and housing-cycle exposure, which is a coherent within-range valuation rather than either a deep bargain or a high-growth bet.
Catalysts
The Q1 2026 print, reported May 6, 2026, was strong: revenue of $194.9 million beating forecasts by about 9.6%, net income of $122.9 million or $0.74 per share, AFFO of $0.76 per share at an 8.7% annualized yield on equity, and a $0.76 dividend fully distributing AFFO (StockTitan; Investing.com). Total assets reached $9.6 billion and invested capital $8.7 billion, with $1.0 billion funded for land in the quarter.
The forward catalyst is diversification away from Lennar. Invested capital outside the Lennar Master Program Agreement rose $365 million to $2.7 billion at a 10.7% weighted-average yield, and the counterparty count grew from 15 to 17. The swing factors into the next prints are the pace of new-counterparty additions, the yield on newly deployed capital, the trajectory of homebuilding demand and lot takedowns given interest rates, and whether the high distribution remains fully covered by AFFO. Analysts project roughly 43% fiscal-2026 revenue growth as capital deploys, and Citizens initiated coverage at Market Outperform, with commentary highlighting the near-11% yield and below-book valuation (Investing.com; Seeking Alpha).
Sources: Millrose Properties Q1 2026 results (StockTitan; Investing.com; MRP 8-K and 10-Q, 2026); Seeking Alpha yield and valuation coverage; Investing.com analyst-initiation note (2026).
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Millrose Properties (single segment) (reported)
- FOR (FORESTAR GROUP INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Austin Tampa/Sarasota Dallas Volusia County Fort Worth Houston Georgia Atlanta San Antonio Augusta Savannah Utah Salt Lake City/Provo/Ogden Illinois Chicago Virginia Northern Virginia Richmond Indiana Indianapolis Virginia Beach/Williamsburg Maryland Suburban Washington, D.C. Washington Vancouver…
- FY2025 10-K: …These contracts generally are non-recourse, which limits our financial exposure to our earnest money deposited into escrow under the terms of the contract and any pre-acquisition due diligence costs we incur. This enables us to control land with limited capital investment. We attempt to mitigate our exposure to real…
- JOE (The St. Joe Company)
- FY2025 10-K: 5, assuming $100 was invested on December 31, 2020, in our common stock, in the S&P SmallCap 600 Index, and a custom real estate peer group (the "Custom Real Estate Peer Group"). The Custom Real Estate Peer Group is composed of Alexander & Baldwin Inc. (ALEX), CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO), Five Point Holdings, LLC…
- FY2025 10-K: .6 Other revenue 10.0 9.6 10.1 Total real estate revenue 165.0 116.8 155.7 Leasing revenue 0.1 0.2 0.1 Total revenue 165.1 117.0 155.8 Expenses: Cost of real estate and other revenue (a) 83.5 62.0 77.9 Cost of leasing revenue (a) - 0.1 - Other operating expenses (a)…
- NLY (Annaly Capital Management, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …with unrealized gains (losses) through earnings 5,020,784 3,546,902 Interests in MSR Interest in net servicing cash flows Fair value, with unrealized gains (losses) through earnings 28,626 - Assets transferred or pledged to securitization vehicles Residential mortgage loans Fair value, with unrealized gains (losses)…
- FY2025 10-K: …Portfolio Weighted Average Portfolio Range Portfolio Weighted Average (dollars in thousands) Unpaid principal balance $ 1 - $ 4,396 $ 459 $ 1 - $ 4,396 $ 471 Interest rate 2.00 % - 18.00 % 6.67 % 2.00 % - 18.00 % 6.43 % Maturity 11/1/2029 - 1/1/2066 1/3/2054 7/1/2029 - 12/1/2064 2/3/2053 FICO score at loan…
- DX (DYNEX CAPITAL, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …that might maximize value for our shareholders. Pursuing such an opportunity or transaction could require us to issue additional equity or debt securities. RMBS. As of December 31, 2025, the majority of our investments were Agency-issued pass-through RMBS collateralized primarily by pools of fixed-rate single-family…
- FY2025 10-K: …and other members of management regularly present to the Board of Directors, the Risk Committee, and its other committees on our cybersecurity strategy and activities, results of testing and training, and, as needed, to inform the Board of Directors and the Risk Committee of any new or emerging threats or risks. The…
- AGNC (AGNC Investment Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …properties that are similarly guaranteed by a GSE. Our investments in Agency multifamily MBS primarily consist of securities issued under Fannie Mae's Delegated Underwriting and Servicing ("DUS") program, which are generally backed by a single mortgage loan secured by a single property and include lender…
- FY2025 10-K: …one or more multifamily properties that benefit from a GSE guarantee of timely payment of principal and interest. Our investments in Agency multifamily securities primarily consist of securities issued under Fannie Mae's Delegated Underwriting and Servicing ("DUS") program, which are generally backed by a single…
- ARR (ARMOUR Residential REIT, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …was 8.07:1 and 7.95:1 at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. Securities Portfolio Matters For the Years Ended December 31, 2025 December 31, 2024 Securities purchased using proceeds from repurchase agreements and principal repayments $ 10,997,325 $ 7,271,101 Average securities portfolio, including…
- FY2025 10-K: …term of the contract for REIT taxable income. At December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, we had approximately $( 313,284 ) and $( 189,450 ) of net deductible expense relating to previously terminated interest rate swap and treasury futures/shorts contracts amortizing through the years 2040 and 2034, respectively. At…
- EPRT (Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …eprt:OperatingPartnershipUnitMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001728951 eprt:OperatingPartnershipUnitMember eprt:EssentialPropertiesRealtyTrustHoldingLimitedLiabilityCompanyMember 2025-12-31 0001728951 eprt:EldridgeIndustriesLimitedLiabilityCompanyMember eprt:OperatingPartnershipUnitMember 2024-01-01 2024-12-31…
- FY2025 10-K: …Base Rent % of Annualized Base Rent EquipmentShare.com Inc. EquipmentShare 57 $ 18,934 3.4 % Express Wash Operations, LLC Whistle Express Car Wash 33 10,900 2.0 % CNP Holdings, LLC Chicken N Pickle 8 8,641 1.6 % BW Ultimate Parent, LLC Allsup's/YesWay 13 8,337 1.5 % Dave & Buster's Inc. Dave & Buster's 5 8,078 1.5 %…
- ADC (Agree Realty Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: 95,437,412 See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements . F-6 Table of Contents AGREE REALTY CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (In thousands, except share and per-share data) Preferred Stock Common Stock Additional Paid-In Capital Dividends in excess of net income Accumulated Other…
- FY2025 10-K: …the Operating Partnership, of which the Company is the sole general partner and in which the Company held a 99.7% common interest as of December 31, 2025. Refer to Note 1 -Organization in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in this Form 10-K for further information on the ownership structure. Under the…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.