Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $14.83, Mirion Technologies, Inc. (MIR) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~15.6 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/MIR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerMIR
CompanyMirion Technologies, Inc.
Current price$14.83/sh
CompositionMedical segment: Cancer care 26% / Medical segment: Other 8% / Nuclear & Safety segment: Nuclear 40% / Nuclear & Safety segment: Labs and research 13% / Nuclear & Safety segment: Other 13%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Must persist for15.6y
Multiple paid86x operating income

Solve inputs: computed at a 10% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~2.4 years.

How unusual the bet is: high

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.61σ
cohort percentile (of 190 peers)97
sustained it ~10 years at this level14%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset8.48x2expensive
Earnings4.85x4expensive
Relative1.91x5expensive
Growth1.06x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=14)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$10.511.41xyesFCF base $0.1B, growth 13% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.6%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$16.740.89xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 17.3x / 19.3x / 21.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelative$7.781.91xyesP/E 39.6x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 145x), scenarios: 32.6x / 39.6x / 46.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14.2x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$1.1113.36xyesBV/sh $7.51, ROE (TTM) 1.4%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$0.6024.72xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% (excluded from median)
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$14.011.06xyesRev $1.0B, growth 13% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.0x / 3.7x / 4.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$3.504.24xyesEPS $0.10, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=4.13 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAsset$0.4334.49xyesBV $7.51 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 1.4% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 0.9%/yr (excluded from median)
Graham NumberAsset$4.113.61xyes√(22.5 × EPS $0.10 × BVPS $7.51) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$9.071.64xyesEBITDA $0.19B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$3.614.11xyesFCF $89.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$2.905.11xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.07B (FCF $0.09B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$3.234.59xyesEPS $0.10 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$0.13114.08xyesBV $7.51 × (ROIC 0.2% / WACC 8.6%) (excluded from median)
P/Sales SectorRelative$10.021.48xyesRevenue $0.98B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$3.753.95xyesEPS $0.10 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$1.0813.73xyesEPS $0.10 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$358.4m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)9.76x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)7.71x
Share count CAGR (dilution)7.9%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

One number anchors the whole thesis, and it is not earnings. It is orders. First-quarter total orders rose 42% to $288 million, with the strength concentrated in nuclear power, and management expects the second quarter to grow another 15% to 20% sequentially. Orders are the leading edge of revenue for a company that sells long-cycle instrumentation, so a book growing far faster than the current top line is the clearest signal that the demand environment is inflecting. If that order pace holds, the multiple that looks absurd against trailing earnings looks merely expensive against the earnings that are coming.

The franchise underneath the orders is genuinely hard to replicate. The 10-K describes products "installed at the vast majority of addressable active nuclear power re"actors, which is the kind of entrenched position that compounds quietly: every reactor with Mirion equipment is a customer for decades of calibration, replacement, and safety service. The tailwind is structural. Management points to "increased demand for nuclear due to the escalated energy needs created by cloud computing and artificial intelligence data centers" and to the recommissioning of plants as the investment community recommits to nuclear power. When the customer base is the global nuclear fleet and the fleet is expanding for the first time in a generation, the supplier that already sits inside nearly all of it is positioned unusually well.

The second leg is medical. Mirion's dosimetry and cancer-care lines, including the "innovative Instadose dosimetry platform" and its range of "eye, finger, and extremity dosimeters," grew on price increases and organic volume, a steadier business that diversifies the cyclicality of the nuclear capital cycle. Together the segments produced 27.5% revenue growth in the first quarter to $257.6 million, and management reaffirmed full-year revenue growth of roughly 22% to 24%. The bull case is that this is a durable compounder early in a multi-year nuclear up-cycle, with a medical business providing ballast. At that growth rate, the durability the price is paying for is at least plausible, which is more than the static valuation lenses can say.

Bear Case

The plainest way to put the bear case is that the company is excellent and the price has run ahead of it. Mirion earns a thin operating margin today, near 5%, and converts a modest slice of its revenue to free cash. The market is paying for a business many times more profitable than the one currently reporting. That gap is not hidden in a ratio; it is the whole valuation. Only the most aggressive growth-based method reaches the price, while every static lens, asset value, earnings power, and peer multiples, reads the stock as richly valued. When a single optimistic frame is the only one that can justify a price, the margin for disappointment is thin.

Quantify what the price assumes and the demand becomes clearer. At roughly 166 times operating income, the price implies the kind of growth Mirion is producing now, sustained for about two decades. History is unkind to that assumption: only about 14% of comparable fast-growers have held such a pace even ten years. The bull is right that the nuclear cycle is inflecting, but a cyclical inflection is not the same as twenty years of uninterrupted compounding, and the price is underwriting the latter. Even the analysts most constructive on the name peg fair value in the high twenties, which credits substantial growth and still implies the durability question is the entire debate.

Two structural risks compound the valuation risk. First, dilution: the share count is growing, not shrinking, so even strong total growth is divided among more shares each year, and a one-time CEO retention option grant just trimmed full-year adjusted EPS guidance to $0.48 to $0.55. Second, customer concentration in government and utility budgets. The 10-K flags that revenues from government customers depend on "government budgets" and that results are exposed to "delays or cancellations of customer projects." Nuclear projects are large, slow, and politically sensitive; a budget freeze or a deferred new-build does not just slow growth, it can erase a quarter of orders. The bear does not dispute the franchise. It disputes that a thin-margin company priced for two decades of perfect execution leaves any room for the ordinary friction that long-cycle, government-funded businesses always encounter.

Valuation

Start with the bet the price is making, because for Mirion it is unusually stark. At $18.60 the market is paying on the order of 166 times trailing operating income, which inverts not to a growth rate but to a duration: it implies Mirion grows at roughly its self-funding ceiling for about twenty-two years. That is the price assuming the current up-cycle is not a cycle at all but a two-decade compounding run. Only about 14% of fast-growing companies have sustained that kind of pace for even ten years. The price is paying for the rare outcome.

The methods agree on the shape of the bet. Asset value, earnings power, and peer multiples all read the stock as richly valued; only the growth-based cash-flow method reaches the price, and it does so by crediting a 13% growth rate carried forward. This is the signature of a durability or moat premium, the kind of value the static frames are structurally unable to price, because they capitalize what the business earns today rather than what an entrenched position inside the global nuclear fleet might earn over decades. That premium is not a flaw in the analysis; it is exactly what the price is paying for, isolated so a buyer can see it. The investor is not buying current earnings power. They are buying the proposition that the installed base and the nuclear tailwind convert a thin-margin company into a much more profitable one over time.

Solvency is comfortable enough not to be the binding constraint, but it is not a fortress. Net debt of about $358 million sits at roughly four times trailing operating income on an after-tax basis, the company holds nearly $400 million of liquid assets, and it generates positive free cash that management guides toward $155 million to $175 million for the year. The balance sheet can fund the growth. The pressure point for the equity is not the debt but the dilution: the share count rises each year, which means per-share value has to outrun an expanding denominator. The decisive variable for this valuation is not the next quarter's margin or the leverage ratio. It is whether the 42% order growth is the front edge of the multi-year nuclear build the price assumes, or a strong cyclical year the price has mistaken for a permanent one.

Catalysts

Mirion's first-quarter 2026 print was the kind that fuels the growth thesis. Revenue rose 27.5% to $257.6 million, beating the roughly $245 million consensus, and total orders surged 42% to $288 million on strong nuclear demand. The company reaffirmed full-year 2026 revenue growth of about 22% to 24%, with adjusted EBITDA guided to $285 million to $300 million and adjusted free cash flow to $155 million to $175 million. The one blemish was adjusted EPS guidance, trimmed to $0.48 to $0.55 to absorb a one-time CEO retention option grant rather than any operating shortfall.

The forward setup is order-driven. Management expects second-quarter orders to grow another 15% to 20% sequentially, again led by favorable nuclear-market dynamics, which keeps the book-to-bill momentum intact. The structural catalyst is the nuclear demand cycle itself: the company links the strength to energy needs from cloud computing and AI data centers and to plant recommissioning, the macro trend that has re-rated the entire nuclear supply chain. Analyst opinion remains constructive on the growth story, with some fair-value estimates in the high twenties that still hinge on the durability question. The watch items into the rest of the year are the order-conversion pace, any large nuclear new-build or recommissioning awards, and whether the medical segment keeps providing steady ballast against the lumpier capital cycle.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Medical (reported)

Nuclear & Safety (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Mirion Q1 2026 results, 2026 · Mirion FY2025 10-K · Mirion Q1 2026 valuation commentary, 2026

View the full interactive MIR report on boothcheck