MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE): what the price requires
At today's price, MGE Energy, Inc. (MGEE) is priced for -1.4% growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-14 · Exported: 2026-07-17 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/MGEE
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | MGEE |
| Company | MGE Energy, Inc. |
| Current price | $82.40/sh |
| Composition | Electric 71% / Gas 28% / Non-Regulated Energy 0% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Implied growth | -1.4% |
| Multiple paid | 20x operating income |
Solve inputs: computed at a 6.8% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~8.1pp.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~16.9%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.82σ |
| cohort percentile (of 70 peers) | 49 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.83x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.95x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.57x | 5 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.81x | 2 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=15)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $183.41 | 0.45x | yes | Reference only (OCF-based, capex excluded): OCF $0.3B |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $67.28 | 1.22x | yes | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.5x / 20.0x / 23.5x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 15.99x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $42.15 | 1.95x | yes | BV/sh $36.85, ROE (TTM) 10.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $44.98 | 1.83x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $70.16 | 1.17x | yes | Rev $0.8B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.2x / 3.9x / 4.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $46.80 | 1.76x | yes | EPS $3.90, growth 9% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=2.24 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $14.57 | 5.66x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.15B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.0% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $45.51 | 1.81x | yes | BV $36.85 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 6.9%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $56.86 | 1.45x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $3.90 × BVPS $36.85) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $35.80 | 2.30x | yes | EBITDA $0.17B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $89.50 | 0.92x | yes | EPS $3.90 × (8.5 + 2×9.4%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $8.54 | 9.65x | yes | BV $36.85 × (ROIC 1.9% / WACC 8.0%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $52.39 | 1.57x | yes | Revenue $0.77B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $55.23 | 1.49x | yes | EPS $3.90 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 9.4% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 14.2x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $42.16 | 1.95x | yes | EPS $3.90 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $951.2m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 6.29x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 4.97x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.3% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
MGE Energy is a small, well-run Wisconsin regulated utility, about 71% electric and the rest gas, serving the Madison area. Q1 2026 GAAP EPS rose to $1.32 from $1.14 on higher electric and gas revenues and new rates, with rate base growing on renewable projects.
The stock carries a premium. At about $76 the price sits well above nearly every valuation frame: the blended X-ray is near $46, and only the growth-DCF reaches the price. The market is paying for the quality and consistency, not for a cheap multiple.
The dividend is the franchise. MGE Energy just raised its payout for the 49th consecutive year, approaching Dividend King status, at about $1.90 a share for a 2.6% yield. The growth comes from regulated renewable investment (solar, wind, battery), funded in part by recent equity offerings.
Bull Case
Lead with where the price sits relative to the methods, because for MGE Energy that distance is the entire debate. At about $76 the stock trades above almost every valuation frame: earnings power value near $15, simple excess return near $42, EV/EBITDA relative near $36, relative valuation near $66, with a blended X-ray near $46. Only the growth-DCF reaches the price. For most companies that pattern is a warning. For a regulated utility with MGE's record, it is the market pricing a durability premium that the static frames structurally cannot capture, because they cannot see decades of uninterrupted, rate-base-driven compounding.
The quality is real and the numbers back it. Q1 2026 GAAP earnings rose to $48.5 million, or $1.32 per share, from $41.6 million ($1.14) a year earlier, on total operating revenue up to $242.7 million from $219.0 million, driven by higher electric and gas revenues and new rates effective in 2026. The electric segment alone added $5.5 million of earnings, which the company tied to "strategic capital investments that grew rate base," largely through renewable projects. That is the regulated growth engine: invest approved capital, grow the rate base, earn the allowed return, repeat. The current trailing operating margin near 22% reflects a clean, focused utility.
The dividend is the proof of the franchise and the core of the return. MGE Energy just raised its dividend for the 49th consecutive year, putting it within striking distance of Dividend King status, at about $1.90 per share for a 2.6% yield. The 10-K shows the regulated structure protecting that payout, noting a dividend restriction that applies only "if MGE's common equity ratio... is less than 55%," a restriction that "did not restrict MGE's payment of dividends in 2025." A utility that has grown its dividend for nearly half a century, is expanding its rate base through renewables, and benefits from tax credits that lowered its effective tax rate to about 10.8% has the kind of slow, reliable compounding that justifies a premium multiple. The inversion implies essentially no growth is required (about negative 1.2%), so the bar the price sets is low.
Bear Case
Set MGE Energy against its regulated-utility peers and the bear case is about the premium, because on valuation MGEE competes with names like Black Hills, IDACORP, Spire, and Portland General for income investors' dollars, and it is priced richer than most of them while offering a similar regulated-monopoly profile. The conservative frames that work across the whole peer group say MGEE is expensive: earnings power value near $15, the asset frames in the $42 to $46 range, all far below the roughly $76 price. When a small utility trades at a meaningful premium to the methods that value its peers, the premium itself is the risk: it can compress toward the group simply because another regulated utility offers the same dividend safety at a lower multiple. An analyst consensus that skews to Sell and Hold (zero Buys among the small coverage) reflects exactly that, with several views calling the shares slightly overvalued.
The growth is being bought with shareholder dilution, which the premium does not advertise. To fund its renewable capital program, MGE Energy completed a $250 million follow-on stock offering in early May 2026 (about 3.3 million shares at $75.75) and filed an additional $175 million offering. Issuing equity to fund rate-base growth is normal for a capital-intensive utility, but it means existing holders are being diluted to finance the growth that justifies the premium, and issuing shares is most expensive when the stock trades above its asset value, which is precisely MGE's situation. Capital expenditures more than doubled to $101.1 million in the quarter, so the dilution is set to continue.
The leverage and regulatory dependence cap the upside. Net debt of about $951 million sits at roughly 5.6 times trailing operating income, typical for a utility but a reminder that the model relies on continuous access to capital at reasonable rates. The earnings also lean on favorable tax treatment: the effective tax rate fell to 10.8% on renewable and storage tax credits, a tailwind that can fade if federal policy shifts. The bear conclusion is that MGE Energy is a high-quality utility trading at a high-quality price, where the dividend safety is genuine but the premium multiple, the ongoing equity dilution, and the dependence on supportive rate cases and tax policy leave little room for error and modest expected return from here.
Valuation
MGE Energy is best read as a premium regulated utility, where the value is the rate base and allowed return, and the price sits clearly above the standard frames. The conservative methods cluster well below the price: earnings power value near $15, simple excess return near $42, two-stage excess return near $45, EV/EBITDA relative near $36, with a blended X-ray near $46 against the roughly $76 price. Relative valuation lands near $66, closer but still below, and only the perpetual-growth DCF (near $188) reaches and exceeds the price. The system characterizes this as the classic durability-premium pattern: asset, earnings-power, and peer-multiple frames all say richly valued, and only the growth-DCF justifies the tape.
The inversion reads the price as undemanding on growth, implying about negative 1.2% operating-profit growth, which makes sense for a slow-growing utility, but it does not resolve the premium-to-assets question. The sensitivity is high at about 7.7 points of implied growth per point of cost of capital, which matters because a utility's value is rate-sensitive, and the reliability of the solve is rated ok.
The honest synthesis: MGE Energy is not cheap on any frame anchored to current assets or earnings; it is expensive on those and fair only on the growth-DCF and against the steady dividend. The justification is the quality, the 49-year dividend-increase record, the regulated rate-base growth funded by renewable investment, and the durability that the static frames cannot price. The risk is that the premium compresses toward peer utilities offering similar safety at lower multiples, especially while MGE issues equity above its asset value to fund growth. For an income investor the roughly 2.6% yield, growing steadily, is the return; for a value investor the price already reflects the quality and leaves little margin.
Catalysts
Q1 2026 (reported May 5) was a solid quarter: GAAP EPS of $1.32 (up from $1.14), with total operating revenue rising to $242.7 million from $219.0 million on higher electric and gas revenues and new 2026 rates. The electric segment added $5.5 million of earnings tied to rate-base growth from renewable projects, and the effective tax rate fell to 10.8% on renewable and storage tax credits.
The growth program is renewable capital investment: capital expenditures more than doubled to $101.1 million on solar, wind, battery, and storage projects, which expand the regulated rate base. To fund it, MGE Energy completed a $250 million follow-on stock offering in early May (about 3.3 million shares at $75.75) and filed an additional $175 million offering.
The dividend is the headline draw: a 49th consecutive annual increase, approaching Dividend King status, at about $1.90 per share for a 2.6% yield.
Analyst sentiment is cautious on valuation: a consensus that skews to Sell and Hold (no Buys among the small coverage) with an average target near $76 to $81, around the current price. The swing factors are rate-case outcomes in Wisconsin, the pace and cost of the renewable capital program, the dilution from continued equity issuance, and the durability of the renewable tax credits that are currently lowering the tax rate.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Electric (reported)
- WEC (WEC ENERGY GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- LNT (ALLIANT ENERGY CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- AEE (AMEREN CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- EVRG (EVERGY, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- XEL (XCEL ENERGY INC)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- OTTR (OTTER TAIL CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- POR (PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NWE (NORTHWESTERN ENERGY GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Gas (reported)
- NJR (NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- SWX (Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NWN (NORTHWEST NATURAL HOLDING COMPANY)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- SR (Spire Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NFG (NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- ATO (ATMOS ENERGY CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Non-Regulated Energy / Transmission Investment (reported)
- TXNM (TXNM Energy, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- OGE (OGE ENERGY CORP.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NWE (NORTHWESTERN ENERGY GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- OTTR (OTTER TAIL CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- IDA (IDACORP INC)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- BKH (BLACK HILLS CORP /SD/)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CPK (CHESAPEAKE UTILITIES CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NFG (NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.