LivaNova PLC (LIVN): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $81.90, LivaNova PLC (LIVN) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~5.2 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/LIVN

Headline

FieldValue
TickerLIVN
CompanyLivaNova PLC
Current price$81.90/sh
CompositionCardiopulmonary 57% / Neuromodulation 43% / Other Revenue 1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)8.0%
Operating margin today13.4%
Margin compression (value-band)-5.4pp
Must persist for5.2y
Multiple paid22x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.1% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.7 years.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.37σ
cohort percentile (of 116 peers)47
sustained it ~5.2 years at this level35%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset4.04x5expensive
Earnings2.98x5expensive
Relative1.32x5expensive
Growth0.83x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=18)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$116.280.70xyesFCF base $0.3B, growth 12% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.7%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$98.200.83xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 19.9x / 21.9x / 23.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelative$62.281.32xyesP/E 29.63x (blended: static sector reference 24x + trailing (TTM) 43x), scenarios: 24.4x / 29.6x / 34.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 16x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$20.713.95xyesBV/sh $21.65, ROE (TTM) 8.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$20.254.04xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$71.291.15xyesRev $1.4B, growth 12% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.6x / 3.2x / 3.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$53.801.52xyesEPS $1.96, growth 27% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.56 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$14.975.47xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.08B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.7% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$20.174.06xyesBV $21.65 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 8.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 5.7%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$30.902.65xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.96 × BVPS $21.65) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$60.861.35xyesEBITDA $0.20B × sector EV/EBITDA 16.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$34.632.37xyesFCF $161.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$27.522.98xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.12B (FCF $0.16B − SBC $0.04B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$63.241.30xyesEPS $1.96 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$8.0010.24xyesBV $21.65 × (ROIC 3.2% / WACC 8.7%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$102.490.80xyesRevenue $1.43B × sector P/S 4.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$73.501.11xyesEPS $1.96 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$21.193.87xyesEPS $1.96 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$251.8m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-1.66x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-1.31x (net cash)
Interest coverage4.5x
Share count CAGR (dilution)0.8%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The market is pricing LivaNova for an acceleration, and the most recent quarter is the first real evidence that the acceleration is showing up. The gap between what the price assumes and what the trailing numbers show has been the bear's whole argument, but Q1 FY2026 narrowed it: net revenue grew 14.3% year over year to $362.3 million, with the cardiopulmonary segment up 18.3% and neuromodulation up 9.3%. That is double-digit growth on a business the static methods had written off as a low-single-digit grower, and it is exactly the kind of print that turns a durability premium from a hope into a trend. Management responded by raising full-year guidance, which is the signal that the quarter was not a one-off.

The franchises underneath are genuinely defensible. The neuromodulation business is built on the VNS Therapy System, which the 10-K describes as "an implantable pulse generator, a lead that connects the generator to the vagus nerve, and other accessories" for treating epilepsy. The economics of an implant franchise are unusually sticky: once a patient is implanted, the recurring revenue follows, and crucially the filing notes "the lead does not need to be removed to replace a generator with a depleted battery," so each implanted patient becomes a multi-decade stream of generator replacements. That installed base is an annuity the static earnings methods do not credit because it does not show up as growth, only as durability.

The growth call option is the sleep-apnea entry. LivaNova received FDA approval for the aura6000 hypoglossal nerve stimulation system for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, and management has highlighted it as the first such device approved without certain procedural counterindications. Obstructive sleep apnea is a large and under-penetrated market, and a company with a proven neuromodulation platform extending it into a new and bigger indication is the cleanest version of the durable-compounding thesis. The supporting OSPREY trial results, published in a peer-reviewed journal, give the launch clinical credibility rather than leaving it as a regulatory checkbox. If cardiopulmonary keeps printing high-teens growth while the sleep-apnea franchise ramps on top of the epilepsy annuity, the 23% operating-profit growth the price requires stops looking heroic and starts looking like simple math on two compounding franchises.

Bear Case

The bear case starts with how management has historically deployed capital, because LivaNova's record is one of value leaking out the back door even when the front-door business performed. Return on equity sits at about 8.8%, below the roughly 9.3% cost of equity, which means the company has been earning less on its book of capital than that capital costs, a quiet form of value destruction the headline revenue growth obscures. For a medical-device company with sticky implant franchises, an ROE below the cost of equity is a red flag about where the cash has gone: into acquisitions, legacy liabilities, and a balance sheet that has not translated franchise quality into shareholder returns. The excess-return methods reflect this directly, landing near $20 a share against a $78 price (June 27, 2026), because a business earning below its cost of capital generates no premium over its $21.65 book value in those frames.

The valuation requirement compounds the concern. At roughly 21 times company-wide operating income, the price needs operating profit to grow about 23% a year for five years, against a company whose own full-year guidance calls for constant-currency revenue growth of 7% to 8%. The arithmetic of that gap is unforgiving: for 23% operating-profit growth on 8% revenue growth, the company has to expand operating margin sharply and sustain it, from a current 13.4% toward a level it has not held. Only the forward-growth lens reaches the price at all; the earnings-power method lands near a fifth of it, and the asset-value methods near a quarter. The whole price rests on margin expansion that has to come from operating leverage the company has historically struggled to capture, which is precisely the capital-discipline question restated.

The structural overhang is regulatory and reimbursement dependence. A device company lives and dies on whether payers cover its products, and the 10-K flags exactly this exposure, warning of "changes or reduction in reimbursement for the Company's products" and the risk of "restricted access and pricing as well as payback requirements and limited reimbursement". The sleep-apnea opportunity the bull leans on is entirely contingent on reimbursement following the FDA approval, and the neuromodulation franchise faces the same payer scrutiny in its core epilepsy market. Legacy liabilities and the cost of integrating acquisitions have weighed on the balance sheet before, and a company priced for 23% profit growth has no room for the kind of one-time charge or reimbursement setback that its own risk disclosures describe as routine in its industry. The bear does not dispute the franchises; it disputes that a management team earning below its cost of capital will convert them into the returns the price assumes.

Valuation

The price assumes an acceleration the company's own guidance does not. At today's level the market pays roughly 21 times company-wide operating income, which inverts to a requirement of about 23% operating-profit growth a year for five years. LivaNova guides to constant-currency revenue growth of 7% to 8%, so the price is not paying for revenue growth; it is paying for a large and sustained margin expansion on top of modest revenue growth, lifting operating margin from the current 13.4% toward something well above it.

The methods split with only one family reaching the price. The forward-growth lens gets there: a perpetual-growth DCF crediting 12% growth and an exit-multiple model holding today's EV/EBITDA near 21 times both land at or above the price. But the static frames read the stock as richly valued. The peer-multiple lens, anchored on a blended P/E near 29 times, sits below the price. The earnings-power method, capitalizing normalized operating profit with no growth, lands near $15 a share. And the asset-value methods land near $20, because return on equity at 8.8% sits just under the 9.3% cost of equity, generating essentially no excess return over the $21.65 book value. The pattern is the durability-premium configuration: only the growth-crediting method defends the price, which means the entire valuation is a bet on durable compounding that the methods anchored on demonstrated economics structurally cannot frame.

The cohort comparison places the bet in context. The peer set spans medical-device and dental names, Solventum, Align Technology, Bausch and Lomb, Merit Medical, and Artivion, businesses the market also values on franchise durability and pipeline rather than trailing profit, so LivaNova's premium is not unusual within its cohort; it is a member of a group the market prices forward. Solvency is not the primary concern: dilution runs about 1.1% a year and the company generates positive free cash flow, with guidance reaffirming $160 million to $180 million for the year. The decisive figure is the one that recurs across every static method: an 8.8% return on equity below the cost of capital. The buyer at this price is underwriting that a company which has historically earned less on its capital than that capital costs will now expand margins fast enough to validate a growth multiple, and that is the assumption the whole valuation rests on.

Catalysts

The Q1 FY2026 print was the catalyst that moved the stock, and it cut for the bull. Net revenue grew 14.3% year over year to $362.3 million, with cardiopulmonary up 18.3% and neuromodulation up 9.3%, adjusted operating income reached $71.1 million, and adjusted diluted EPS rose to $0.98. On the strength of that, management lifted full-year guidance to constant-currency revenue growth of 7% to 8% and adjusted EPS of $4.20 to $4.30, while reaffirming adjusted free cash flow of $160 million to $180 million. A double-digit revenue quarter paired with a guidance raise is the combination that supports the durability thesis, and the stock responded with a sharp move higher.

The regulatory catalyst is the sleep-apnea entry. LivaNova received FDA premarket approval for the aura6000 system for adults with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea, which management framed as the first hypoglossal nerve stimulation device approved without certain procedural counterindications. The clinical support came from the OSPREY randomized controlled trial, whose full twelve-month results were published in a peer-reviewed journal showing sustained responses. Approval is the starting gun, not the finish line: the launch trajectory and, critically, payer reimbursement for the new indication are the markers that determine whether the sleep-apnea opportunity becomes the growth engine the price needs.

The watch items are concrete and near-term. Track the cardiopulmonary segment's ability to sustain high-teens growth as comparisons stiffen, the early commercial uptake of aura6000 and the reimbursement decisions that gate it, and any sign that operating margin is expanding toward the level the price requires rather than holding flat. Because the valuation rests on margin expansion the company has historically found difficult, the most important catalyst is not the next revenue number but the next operating-margin number, since that is the variable the static methods say the price most needs to see move.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Cardiopulmonary (reported)

Neuromodulation (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 FY2026 earnings release · FY2024 10-K · aura6000 FDA approval, March 2026 · FY2024 10-K risk factors · OSPREY trial publication, 2026

View the full interactive LIVN report on boothcheck