Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $38.38, Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR) is priced for -2.1% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/LAUR

Headline

FieldValue
TickerLAUR
CompanyLaureate Education, Inc.
Current price$38.39/sh
CompositionMexico 52% / Peru 48% / Corporate 0%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)5.7%
Operating margin today24.0%
Margin compression (value-band)-18.3pp
Implied growth-2.1%
Multiple paid14x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.9% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~6.3pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~6.3%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.46σ
cohort percentile (of 212 peers)32
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.51x4expensive
Earnings2.35x5expensive
Relative1.22x3expensive
Growth0.74x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$58.140.66xyesFCF base $0.3B, growth 14% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.3%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$51.830.74xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 12.3x / 14.3x / 16.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelative$35.941.07xyesP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 14.9x / 18.0x / 21.1x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$21.241.81xyesBV/sh $7.37, ROE (TTM) 26.6%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$36.511.05xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$37.201.03xyesRev $1.7B, growth 14% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.6x / 3.1x / 3.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$16.352.35xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.30B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.3% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$31.761.21xyesBV $7.37 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 26.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$17.612.18xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.87 × BVPS $7.37) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$31.561.22xyesEBITDA $0.42B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$16.442.33xyesFCF $263.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$15.412.49xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.25B (FCF $0.26B − SBC $0.01B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$8.624.45xyesEPS $1.87 × (8.5 + 2×-1.5%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelative$30.541.26xyesRevenue $1.74B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$20.221.90xyesEPS $1.87 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$123.2m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)0.37x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.30x
Interest coverage36.4x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-5.4%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Where the price lands against the methods is the most encouraging thing about Laureate, because for once they broadly agree. The forward-growth methods, the relative multiples, and the asset-and-profitability lens all cluster close to the current price rather than miles below it. Only the strictest zero-growth earnings-power read calls it expensive, and a company growing enrollment in two underpenetrated markets should not be valued as if it will never grow again. That clustering tells you the market is paying for plausible expansion, not a fantasy.

The business underneath is a genuine franchise. Laureate's flagship Universidad del Valle de México enrolls about 132,200 students and is, in the company's own filing, "Ranked Top 5 university in Mexico" with a five-star QS rating for employability. That is brand equity in a market the company describes as one where "public institutions tend to be less expensive, if not free, but limited in capacity". The constraint on free public education is the entire opportunity: every qualified 18-to-24-year-old who cannot get a public seat is a potential private student, and Laureate has the scaled, accredited brand to capture them. New enrollments grew 9% and total enrollments 6% in the most recent quarter, so the demand is showing up in the numbers, not just the thesis.

Capital allocation reinforces the case. The operating margin sits at 24%, interest coverage is comfortable at more than thirty times, and net debt is only about a third of a year's operating income, so the balance sheet is not the bet. Management has been retiring stock, with the share count down about 5% a year, which means each remaining share owns a growing slice of a growing business. A profitable, cash-generative education operator buying back its own equity while enrollment compounds is the unglamorous version of a good outcome, and the price is not asking for heroics to get there.

Bear Case

The competitive ground under Laureate is more crowded than its top-five branding suggests. The company itself describes higher education in Mexico and Peru as "highly fragmented and marked by large numbers of local competitors" chasing the same 18-to-24-year-old demographic. On one side sit public universities that are "less expensive, if not free"; on the other, a long tail of lower-priced private operators. Laureate competes by being better-known and better-ranked, but that is a position it has to keep paying to defend through campuses, faculty, and program updates, and the filing concedes the risk of failing to add programs "as quickly as required by prospective students and employers or as quickly as our competitors begin offering similar programs". Online-first challengers can move faster on exactly that axis. Peer operators in the sector warn of the same pressure from "competitors with lower p riced programs", which is the disruption vector here: price and speed, not prestige.

The macro and currency exposure compounds it. Both segments earn in emerging-market currencies, and the most recent quarter showed the gap starkly: revenue rose 15% as reported but only about 1% in constant currency, with the difference largely translation. A stronger dollar quietly erodes the reported growth the price is paying for, and neither the peso nor the sol is the analyst's choice for stability. Laureate also flags that it "may not be able to maintain or accelerate the current growth rate, effectively manage expanding operations or building new campuses", which is the execution risk of a capacity-led growth model.

On valuation, the price assumes company-wide operating profit grows about 13.6% a year for five years, against a recent pace it has roughly matched but a track record that shows only about 47% of comparable fast-growers held it that long. The earnings-power methods, which credit no growth, sit well below today's price, so if enrollment growth fades or currency keeps eating the constant-currency line, the multiple compresses toward those lower reads. The downside is bounded by real profits and a manageable balance sheet, but the upside is paying for growth that history sustains only about half the time.

Valuation

The price is making a contained bet, not a heroic one. At today's quote the market pays roughly 26 times company-wide operating income, which works out to operating profit growing about 13.6% a year for five years. That is close to the pace Laureate has recently delivered, and against the historical record only about 47% of comparable fast-growers sustained a rate like it for five years. So the assumption is demanding but not exotic; the question is durability rather than a leap of faith.

What makes the read comfortable is that the methods broadly converge near the price. The relative-multiple lens, sitting at a sector price-to-earnings of about 18 times, lands almost exactly at the current price. The forward-growth methods, crediting next-period enrollment expansion, reach it as well. The asset-and-profitability methods, which capitalize a 26.6% return on equity off a $7.37 book value per share, also land near today's price once that excess return is carried forward. The methods that say expensive are the zero-growth earnings-power reads, which capitalize free cash flow with no growth at all and therefore land far below; for a company still growing enrollment, that is the wrong lens, and the spread between it and the others IS the growth premium the market is paying. It is a moderate one.

Solvency does not threaten the thesis and does not flatter it either. Laureate carries about $123 million of net debt against $417 million of trailing operating income, leverage of roughly a third of a year, with interest covered more than thirty times. The company is not burning cash, and the share count has fallen about 5% a year, so capital return is real and visible. The genuine downside variable is not the balance sheet but the currency: most of the profit is earned in pesos and soles, and a translation swing can move reported results more than enrollment does, as the gap between 15% reported and 1% constant-currency revenue in the latest quarter showed.

Catalysts

The first quarter of 2026 kept the growth story intact. New enrollments rose 9% and total enrollments 6%, with revenue up 15% as reported to $272.6 million, though only about 1% in constant currency after roughly $9 million of intra-year academic-calendar timing. The enrollment momentum was led by Peru, where new enrollments grew 13% on rapid online expansion, while Mexico grew new enrollments 4% under more moderate economic conditions.

Management set 2026 full-year guidance at revenue of $1.89 to $1.91 billion and adjusted EBITDA of $583 to $593 million, with enrollment expected to grow about 4.2% for the year. The second quarter, which captures the larger southern-hemisphere academic intake, is guided to revenue of $597 to $601 million. The company also pointed to first-quarter share repurchases as a use of its cash flow, consistent with the falling share count.

The next real test is the seasonal enrollment cycle landing in line with the 4.2% full-year target, because that figure is what underwrites the growth the price assumes. The currency line is the offset to watch alongside it: enrollment can grow as guided while a weaker peso or sol holds back the reported, dollar-denominated result.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Laureate Q1 2026 earnings release, May 2026 · Laureate Q1 2026 earnings call, May 2026

View the full interactive LAUR report on boothcheck