Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $358.33, Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~14.0 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/KRYS

Headline

FieldValue
TickerKRYS
CompanyKrystal Biotech, Inc.
Current price$358.34/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)42.0%
Operating margin today42.8%
Margin compression (value-band)-0.8pp
Must persist for14.0y
Multiple paid56x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 5: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.8% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~2.3 years.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~10.7 years; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: high

ReferenceValue
cohort percentile (of 116 peers)95
sustained it ~10 years at this level14%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset4.20x5expensive
Earnings3.47x4expensive
Relative1.49x5expensive
Growth0.94x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=17)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$380.720.94xyesFCF base $0.3B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.2%, 7yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$421.570.85xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 50.9x / 52.9x / 54.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr
Relative ValuationRelative$239.781.49xyesP/E 30.88x (blended: static sector reference 24x + trailing (TTM) 47x), scenarios: 24.8x / 30.9x / 37.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 27.06x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$82.524.34xyesBV/sh $43.31, ROE (TTM) 17.6%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$112.453.19xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$221.301.62xyesRev $0.4B, growth 26% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 9.6x / 12.0x / 14.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$261.451.37xyesEPS $7.47, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.34 (Fair)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAsset$112.283.19xyesBV $43.31 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$85.324.20xyes√(22.5 × EPS $7.47 × BVPS $43.31) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$127.412.81xyesEBITDA $0.18B × sector EV/EBITDA 16.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$114.253.14xyesFCF $237.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$94.213.80xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.18B (FCF $0.24B − SBC $0.05B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$241.031.49xyesEPS $7.47 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$48.247.43xyesBV $43.31 × (ROIC 10.3% / WACC 9.2%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$56.626.33xyesRevenue $0.42B × sector P/S 4.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$280.131.28xyesEPS $7.47 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$80.764.44xyesEPS $7.47 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net cash$823.4m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)-5.06x (net cash)
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)-4.61x (net cash)
Share count CAGR (dilution)5.0%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Valuing a biotech is uniquely hard because the standard cash-flow models systematically undervalue a pipeline of binary outcomes, and Krystal is the case where that gap matters most, because it has already crossed the line most biotechs never reach: profitability. Vyjuvek, approved in May 2023 for dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, is a real commercial product, and the 10-K records that the company "began commercial marketing and sales and began recognizing revenue during the third quarter of 2023." In the first quarter of 2026 Vyjuvek produced $116.4 million in revenue, up 32% year over year, at a 95% gross margin, and cumulative net revenue since launch has passed $846 million. A gene therapy at a 95% margin throws off cash like a software company, and Krystal already does.

The balance sheet turns that profitability into optionality the market cannot easily price. Krystal carries no debt and roughly $1 billion in cash and investments, which means it funds its entire research pipeline internally without returning to the equity market to dilute holders. That is the structural advantage over a typical clinical-stage biotech: a funded company can run multiple programs to readout on its own timeline rather than racing a cash runway. The first product is the platform proof, and the same delivery technology underpins the pipeline, so each new program is an extension of validated science rather than a fresh bet from zero.

The pipeline is broad and approaching catalysts, which is what a durability bet needs. The 10-K describes KB407, "an inhaled (nebulized) formulation of our novel vector designed to deliver two copies of the full-length CFTR transgene for the treatment of CF," alongside ophthalmology, respiratory, and oncology programs, several carrying FDA orphan designation. Management expects multiple data readouts before year-end, including two registrational dry-eye trials, early cystic fibrosis data, and oncology updates. International expansion is already adding to the base, with Vyjuvek growth coming from Europe and Japan and a recent UK approval. Against rare-disease peers like Vericel and Harmony Biosciences, Krystal pairs a profitable commercial product with a self-funded pipeline, which is the combination the bull case argues the static methods cannot capture.

Bear Case

The erosion risk a holder should weigh is concentration: nearly all of Krystal's revenue comes from a single product treating a single rare disease, and the moat around it is narrower than the price assumes. Vyjuvek generated essentially all of the quarter's $116.4 million, which means the entire commercial business rests on one therapy whose addressable patient population is, by the nature of a rare disease, finite. The 10-K warns plainly that competitors "may obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly or earlier than we may obtain approval for our product candidates, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market." Gene-therapy science moves fast, and a single product's lead can be chipped away by a newer modality or a competing approach to the same disease.

The price requires the pipeline to deliver, and pipeline delivery is where biotech valuations break. At roughly 57 times operating income the market is paying for about fourteen years of growth held at the self-funding ceiling, and only about 14% of comparable fast-growers have sustained that pace even a decade. That premium is not underwritten by Vyjuvek alone; it requires the dry-eye, cystic fibrosis, and oncology programs to convert from candidates into products. Each of those readouts is binary, and a clinical trial that misses does not dent the price proportionally; it removes a leg the valuation was standing on. The asset-value, earnings-power, and peer-multiple methods all read the price as richly valued, and only the most growth-optimistic method reaches it, which means there is no valuation floor underneath the price if a key readout disappoints.

Reimbursement and pricing are the slow structural pressure on even a successful product. The 10-K flags that health-care reforms and cost reductions could make "VYJUVEK or our product candidates, if approved, not commercially viable or may adversely affect our anticipated future revenue and gross margins," and notes the company already pays commercial rebates that reduce reported revenue. A gene therapy priced for a rare disease is exactly the kind of high-cost treatment payers scrutinize, and pricing pressure on the one product that funds everything would compress both the cash flow and the optionality the bull case rests on. The balance sheet is pristine and the science is real, but the bear case is that the price already pays for more than a decade of flawless pipeline execution from a company whose entire revenue base is, today, one drug.

Valuation

The price is making an aggressive durability bet that only makes sense if the pipeline becomes the business. At today's level the market values Krystal at roughly 57 times its operating income, which inverts to about fourteen years of growth held at the self-funding ceiling. Krystal's current operating margin near 43% is already exceptional, and the price requires that profitability to persist and the revenue base to keep compounding far longer than most fast-growers manage. The relevant base rate is the honest caution here: only about 14% of comparable fast-growers have sustained that pace even ten years.

The method families disagree in the pattern that defines a premium growth stock. The asset-value lens reads the price at more than four times where it lands, the earnings-power lens at nearly three and a half times, and even the peer-multiple lens at one and a half times. Only the growth-oriented cash-flow method reaches the price, crediting the long-duration compounding the inversion describes. When every static method says richly valued and only the forward-growth method reaches the price, the price is a bet on durable compounding the conservative frames structurally cannot price, and for a biotech that bet specifically means the pipeline delivers on top of Vyjuvek. There is no asset or earnings floor under this price; it is a pipeline-and-platform valuation.

Solvency is the one place the bet is de-risked. Krystal carries no debt and roughly $1 billion in cash and investments, so it can fund every program to readout without diluting holders, which is the single biggest structural advantage a biotech can have. The valuation rests not on whether the company survives, which is not in question, but on whether the pipeline converts fast enough and broadly enough to grow into a 57-times multiple. Against rare-disease peers Vericel and Harmony Biosciences, Krystal commands a premium for its self-funded pipeline and its 95% gross margin, and analyst targets span a wide range, from roughly $268 to a Citigroup high of $378, that brackets today's price. That spread is itself the read: the street agrees the company is excellent and disagrees sharply on how much of the pipeline's value should already be in the price, which is precisely the bet this framework isolates.

Catalysts

The first-quarter 2026 print, reported in early May, was a clean beat that validated the commercial engine. Krystal posted GAAP EPS of $1.83 against an estimate near $1.45, on revenue of $116.4 million up 32% year over year, all from Vyjuvek, at a 95% gross margin and up 9% sequentially. Cumulative Vyjuvek net revenue since launch passed $846 million, with US net revenue of $87.5 million in the quarter, more than 695 reimbursement approvals, and 570 unique prescribers, while international expansion in Europe and Japan and a recent UK approval added to the base. The company reiterated its full-year 2026 combined research and selling-and-administrative expense guidance of $175 million to $195 million on a non-GAAP basis.

The pipeline readouts are the catalysts that will move the stock most, because they are what the premium is paying for. Management expects multiple data readouts before year-end, including two registrational dry-eye trials, initial repeat-dose data from KB407 in cystic fibrosis, early data in Hailey-Hailey disease, and updates for KB707 in non-small cell lung cancer and KB408 in alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. Each readout is a binary event: a registrational success opens a new commercial product and extends the durability the price assumes, while a miss removes a leg of the valuation.

The sell side is broadly positive but split on magnitude. The consensus rating sits at Strong Buy, with analyst price targets ranging widely from roughly $268 to a Citigroup high of $378 set in May 2026, brackets that span today's price. With the stock already pricing more than a decade of growth, the back half of 2026 readout calendar is the stretch that determines whether the optimism is vindicated or repriced.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Krystal Biotech (single segment) (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Krystal Q1 2026 results, May 2026 · Krystal Q1 2026 earnings call, May 2026 · Krystal Q1 2026 balance sheet, May 2026 · MarketBeat and Benzinga analyst consensus, 2026 · Krystal 2026 guidance, May 2026 · MarketBeat and Benzinga analyst coverage, 2026

View the full interactive KRYS report on boothcheck