KILROY REALTY CORPORATION (KRC): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers KILROY REALTY CORPORATION (KRC) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/KRC
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | KRC |
| Company | KILROY REALTY CORPORATION |
| Current price | $39.82/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | reit |
| Price-to-FFO | 7.2x |
| FFO yield | 14.0% |
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr funds-from-operations decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.30σ |
| cohort percentile (of 105 peers) | 11 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value, while asset-based lands below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.22x | 4 | expensive |
| Earnings | 0.82x | 4 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.59x | 4 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.95x | 5 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $46.54 | 0.86x | yes | FCF base $0.6B, growth -1% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 8.8%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $41.88 | 0.95x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 12.0x / 14.0x / 16.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $94.81 | 0.42x | yes | P/E 23.9x (blended: static sector reference 35x + trailing (TTM) 7x), scenarios: 20.2x / 23.9x / 27.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 20x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $49.80 | 0.80x | yes | DPS $2.19, g=4.6% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $30.47 | 1.31x | yes | Stage 1: -2% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $22.45 | 1.77x | yes | BV/sh $44.76, ROE (TTM) 4.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $14.98 | 2.66x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $21.53 | 1.85x | yes | Rev $1.1B, growth -1% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.6x / 4.2x / 4.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | $13.54 | 2.94x | yes | BV $44.76 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 4.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 3.0%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $74.42 | 0.54x | yes | √(22.5 × FFO/share $5.50 × BVPS $44.76) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $58.17 | 0.68x | yes | EBITDA $0.36B × sector EV/EBITDA 20.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $49.92 | 0.80x | yes | FCF $580.1M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $47.66 | 0.84x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.56B (FCF $0.58B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $17.53 | 2.27x | yes | FFO/share $5.50 × (8.5 + 2×-2.3%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $56.71 | 0.70x | yes | Revenue $1.11B × sector P/S 6.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $59.46 | 0.67x | yes | FFO/share $5.50 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | $78.92 | 0.50x | yes | FFO/share $5.50 × 14.3x P/FFO (route cohort median, n=85); FFO $0.65B (FFO incl. D&A + impairments, FY2025, companyfacts), shares 118M |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Funds from operations (trailing) | $647.2m |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
REIT basis: leverage is read against funds from operations (FFO), not depreciation-gutted operating income. The header's implied growth runs on ADJUSTED FFO — FFO minus recurring maintenance capex — so the header's multiple and this leverage ratio use bases that differ by that capex; neither substitutes for the other. Net debt could not be resolved from the corporate debt tags in the filings (REIT notes and mortgage debt are often tagged outside the corporate ladder), so the leverage ratio is withheld rather than rendered from incomplete tags. Interest expense is not separately reported in the cached statements, so fixed-charge coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Kilroy owns West Coast and Austin office, life science, and mixed-use property, a portfolio the 10-K describes building primarily as office and increasingly as life science, which puts it squarely in the part of real estate the market trusts least right now.
- The price is cheap on the metric that matters: at roughly 8 times adjusted funds from operations, an AFFO yield near 12%, the stock sits below what even a modest decline in cash earnings would warrant, so the market is pricing distress that the leasing numbers do not yet show.
- Watch occupancy: the stabilized portfolio was 77.6% occupied and 82.3% leased at the most recent print, and the gap between those two numbers, the leased-but-not-yet-occupied backlog, is the FFO that fills in over the next several quarters.
Bull Case
The balance sheet is what lets a cheap office REIT play offense instead of defense, and Kilroy's is built for it. Fixed-charge coverage sits near 5.8 times, meaning cash earnings cover interest, preferred, and ground rent with a wide margin, which is the difference between a landlord that can wait out a soft leasing cycle and one forced to sell into it. That coverage funds a dividend the company held at $0.54 a quarter through the downturn and a buyback that retired 2.4 million shares for $72.7 million in the first quarter, while the company recycled capital through $145.5 million of San Diego office dispositions and a $202 million sale of two Hollywood residential towers. A REIT selling stabilized assets at one price and buying back its own stock at roughly 8 times AFFO is arbitraging the gap between private real estate value and where its own equity trades.
The leasing engine is turning, which is the part the bear case has to argue away. The 10-K frames the strategy around developing "office properties primarily" and increasingly life science, and the first quarter delivered the strongest first-quarter leasing since 2017 at 568,000 square feet. Same-property cash net operating income rose 1.8% in the quarter, so the existing portfolio is growing its cash rents, not shrinking them. The company points to its "significant working relationships with tenants, municipalities, and landowners on the West Coast and in Austin, Texas" as the source of new opportunity, and a high-quality, newer portfolio is exactly the kind of office that wins tenants in a flight-to-quality market while older buildings empty out.
The value math is the cleanest part of the case. At roughly 8 times AFFO with a yield near 12% on those cash earnings, the price already embeds a meaningful decline that the operating results contradict. Management raised full-year Nareit FFO guidance to $3.49 to $3.63 per diluted share, an upward revision, not a cut. Against a real-estate cohort that includes Vornado and American Assets Trust, Kilroy trades in the lower half of the group on price-to-AFFO, so the discount is specific to the office wrapper rather than to the cash the buildings actually generate. If occupancy grinds back toward the leased rate, the FFO is already contracted; the price just has not paid for it yet.
Bear Case
The structural truth a holder has to sit with is that this is office, and office is the asset class the market has spent years deciding it does not want. The stabilized portfolio was 77.6% occupied at the most recent print, which means nearly a quarter of the space generates no rent, and the leased rate of 82.3% sets the near-term ceiling even if every signed lease commences on time. Quarterly FFO fell to $0.91 per diluted share from $1.02 a year earlier, so the cash earnings the whole valuation rests on are declining, not holding, and the cheap multiple is cheap precisely because the market is extrapolating that direction. A landlord priced at 8 times AFFO is not a bargain if the AFFO keeps stepping down.
The asset-value lens agrees the price looks expensive against the buildings themselves, and the reason is the one office owners least want to hear: the private-market value of office real estate has reset lower, and the discount the bull calls an arbitrage may simply be the market marking the assets to a level the appraisals have not caught up to yet. West Coast office demand depends heavily on tech hiring, and the same AI investment cycle that could fill towers could also stall, leaving the recovery the guidance assumes stranded. The company itself revised forward FFO estimates with a cautious eye on land monetization, which is the speculative end of the portfolio and the slowest to turn into cash in a weak market.
Interest rates are the lever that does the structural damage. The 10-K warns that it may "incur additional variable rate debt in the future" and that "Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond our control," which matters because a REIT refinances perpetually and every maturity that rolls at a higher coupon is FFO that leaves the building. Fixed-charge coverage near 5.8 times is comfortable today, but it is computed against a cash-earnings base that is falling, and a combination of higher refinancing costs and continued occupancy drift would compress it from both sides. The dividend at $0.54 a quarter is covered now; it is covered by an FFO stream the bear expects to keep declining, and a REIT that has to choose between its dividend and its balance sheet usually disappoints the holders who were there for the yield.
Valuation
A real-estate trust is valued on its adjusted funds from operations, the cash it generates after the maintenance spending that keeps its buildings leasable, not on an operating multiple. On that basis Kilroy is cheap: the price sits at roughly 8 times AFFO, an AFFO yield near 12%, low enough that it sits below what even a 5% annual decline in funds from operations would warrant. The market is not paying for growth here. It is pricing in a decline, and the leasing results are the evidence on the other side of that bet.
The method families split in a way that is unusual and informative for this name. The asset-value lens reads the price as expensive, sitting roughly double where book value lands, while the earnings-power, relative-multiple, and growth-oriented cash-flow lenses all support the price. The asset lens reads high because office building values have reset and book carries depreciated cost; the cash methods read fair because the rent the buildings actually collect supports the price at a high single-digit AFFO multiple.
Leverage is read against funds from operations for a REIT, not against depreciation-gutted operating income, and on that basis the cushion is real: fixed-charge coverage near 5.8 times means cash earnings cover the fixed obligations comfortably. The exact net-debt-to-FFO figure cannot be cleanly resolved because mortgage and unsecured notes sit outside the standard corporate debt tags, but the coverage ratio is the more honest read for a property company and it is sound. Against a cohort that includes Vornado and American Assets Trust, Kilroy sits in the lower half on price-to-AFFO, with a mean analyst target near $36 to $37 essentially at today's price. The street, in other words, sees the same standoff this framework does: cheap cash earnings against an office wrapper the market refuses to re-rate until occupancy proves the recovery.
Catalysts
The first-quarter 2026 report, released in late April, gave the bull case its strongest evidence in years. Kilroy leased 568,000 square feet, its strongest first quarter since 2017, and same-property cash net operating income rose 1.8%, even as FFO slipped to $0.91 per diluted share from $1.02 a year earlier. On the strength of the leasing, management raised full-year 2026 Nareit FFO guidance to $3.49 to $3.63 per diluted share and held the quarterly dividend at $0.54. Strong leasing plus an FFO guidance raise plus a maintained dividend is the trifecta a discounted office REIT needs to start closing the gap to its cash earnings.
Capital recycling is the recurring catalyst to watch. In the quarter Kilroy closed $145.5 million of San Diego office dispositions and a $202 million sale of two Hollywood residential towers, and repurchased 2.4 million shares for $72.7 million. Selling stabilized assets near private-market value while buying back equity at a high single-digit AFFO multiple is the value-creating loop, and each future disposition is a chance to repeat it or a signal that the private bid for office has softened.
The sell side remains unconvinced, which frames the risk. The consensus rating sits at Hold, with a mean price target near $36 to $37, essentially at the current price, and a wide range from about $29 to $44 that captures how divided the view is. Several analysts have trimmed forward FFO estimates on concern that West Coast office recovery stalls if AI-driven tech demand cools. The next occupancy print is the catalyst that decides which side of that range the stock moves toward.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Real estate (office/life science) (reported)
- ARE (ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …in preventing material impacts on our future results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. Refer to "Item 1A. Risk factors" in this annual report on Form 10-K for discussion of additional risks we face. New supply and reduced demand for life science space may continue to negatively affect our rental…
- FY2025 10-K: …delivery of space on time and within budget, delay occupancy and commencement of rental income, and impact projected net operating income and yields. Any of the aforementioned and future developments may adversely affect occupancy rates, rental income, and the value of our real estate portfolio in several ways.…
- BXP (BXP, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …rent actually owed under the lease, and, even so, our claim for unpaid rent would likely not be paid in full. This shortfall could adversely affect our cash flow and results of operations. Our properties face significant competition. We face significant competition from developers, owners and managers of office, life…
- FY2025 10-K: …that are in high demand by clients that are focused on the importance of the physical work environment in recruiting and retaining the best and brightest employees. As such, these properties attract creditworthy clients and command upper-tier rental rates in their markets. We do not consider the expression "premier…
- DEI (Douglas Emmett, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …date thereof. We actively pursue opportunities for what we believe to be well-located and high quality buildings that may be in a transitional phase due to current or impending vacancies. We cannot assure that any such vacancies will be filled following a property acquisition, or that new tenant leases will be…
- FY2025 10-K: …our ability to pay dividends and distributions, and the market price of our common stock. Our operating performance and the market value of our common stock are subject to risks associated with our investments in real estate and with trends in the real estate industry. Our economic performance and the value of our…
- CUZ (COUSINS PROPERTIES INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …to rental income over the remaining term of the applicable leases. The fair value of acquired in-place leases is derived based on our assessment of lost revenue and costs incurred for the period required to lease the "assumed vacant" property to the occupancy level when purchased. This fair value is based on a…
- FY2025 10-K: …changes in customer preferences regarding space utilization; changes in customers' financial condition; the availability, cost, and adequacy of insurance coverage; competition from other developers, investors, owners, and operators of real estate; the failure to achieve anticipated benefits from intended or completed…
- SLG (SL GREEN REALTY CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, and operates as a self-administered, self-managed REIT. A REIT is a legal entity that holds real estate interests and, through payments of dividends to stockholders, is permitted to minimize the payment of Federal income taxes at the corporate level. Unless the context…
- FY2025 10-K: …real estate business of S.L. Green Properties, Inc., our predecessor entity. As of December 31, 2025, we owned the following interests in properties in the New York metropolitan area, primarily in midtown Manhattan. Our investments located outside of Manhattan are referred to as the Suburban properties: Consolidated…
- VNO (VORNADO REALTY TRUST)
- FY2025 10-K: …in two reportable segments: New York and Other. The following pages provide details of our real estate properties as of December 31, 2025. Square Feet NEW YORK SEGMENT Property % Ownership Type % Occupancy In Service Under Development or Not Available for Lease Total Property PENN 1 (ground leased through 2098) (1)…
- FY2025 10-K: …insurance and real estate industries; • business layoffs or downsizing; • any oversupply of, or reduced demand for, real estate; • industry slowdowns; • the effects of inflation; • interest rate fluctuations; • relocations of businesses; • changing demographics; • work from home and use of alternative work places; •…
- HIW (HIGHWOODS PROPERTIES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …including laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and human health and safety. Compliance with these laws, rules and regulations has not had, and is not expected to have, a material effect on our capital expenditures, results of operations and competitive position as compared to prior periods. For…
- FY2025 10-K: …properties located in our markets primarily on the basis of location, rent, services provided and the design, quality and condition of the facilities. We also compete with other domestic and foreign REITs, financial institutions, pension funds, partnerships, individual investors and others when attempting to acquire,…
- CDP (COPT DEFENSE PROPERTIES)
- FY2025 10-K: …timeframes to accommodate time-sensitive tenant demand; and • depth of knowledge, specialized skills and credentialed personnel in operating and developing highly-specialized properties with complex space and security-oriented needs. Other Properties : In addition to our Defense/IT Portfolio, we also owned six office…
- FY2025 10-K: …that are sufficient to produce acceptable operating cash flows. We compete with other entities, including other publicly-traded commercial REITs, for acquisitions of land and/or commercial properties. Competitors for such acquisitions may have substantially greater financial resources than ours. In addition, our…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Kilroy Q1 2026 results, April 2026 · Kilroy Q1 2026 guidance, April 2026 · MarketBeat and TipRanks analyst consensus, 2026