Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/KDP
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | KDP |
| Company | Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. |
| Current price | $32.16/sh |
| Composition | LRB 70% / K-Cup pods 23% / Appliances 4% / Other 3% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Multiple paid | 23x operating income |
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 6% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 6% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 5% sits below it).
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.74σ |
| cohort percentile (of 69 peers) | 58 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 3.75x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.01x | 2 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.90x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.76x | 5 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=14)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $115.71 | 0.28x | yes | FCF base $2.7B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 6.8%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $55.17 | 0.58x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 19.8x / 21.8x / 23.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 22x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 17.6x / 22.0x / 26.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 16.33x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $27.31 | 1.18x | yes | DPS $0.92, g=5.7% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $32.52 | 0.99x | yes | Stage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $11.34 | 2.84x | yes | BV/sh $18.39, ROE (TTM) 5.7%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $8.58 | 3.75x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $42.26 | 0.76x | yes | Rev $20.1B, growth 27% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.7x / 2.2x / 2.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $34.65 | 0.93x | yes | EPS $0.99, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.88 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $0.25 | 128.64x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $2.97B × (1−31%) / WACC 6.8% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $8.24 | 3.90x | yes | BV $18.39 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 5.7% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 3.7%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $20.24 | 1.59x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $0.99 × BVPS $18.39) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $3.37B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 3216.00x | yes | FCF $1970.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 3216.00x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $1.86B (FCF $1.97B − SBC $0.11B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $31.94 | 1.01x | yes | EPS $0.99 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $2.13 | 15.10x | yes | BV $18.39 × (ROIC 0.8% / WACC 6.8%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $20.09B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $37.13 | 0.87x | yes | EPS $0.99 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $10.70 | 3.01x | yes | EPS $0.99 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. Refreshment Beverages | operating | enterprise | $10.4b | $2.9b operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| U.S. Coffee | operating | enterprise | $4.0b | $962.0m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $32.7b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 14.58x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 10.04x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -1.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Keurig Dr Pepper pairs a strong US beverage portfolio led by Dr Pepper with the Keurig coffee system, a razor-and-blade model where the brewers seed demand for high-margin K-Cup pods, and the most recent quarter was carried by 11.9% growth in US refreshment beverages.
- The defining issue is the balance sheet after the JDE Peet's acquisition, with net debt of roughly $28 billion sitting near 8 times trailing operating income, a level that reshapes the risk profile of what had been a steadier consumer name.
- Watch the integration and planned reorganization of the combined coffee business, alongside roughly $190 million of pretax coffee JV costs expected for the balance of 2026.
Bull Case
The useful way into this stock is to weigh what the market is pricing against what the business is actually showing, and right now the two are reasonably aligned. The price implies modest, mid-single-digit growth in operating profit, which is roughly what a mature beverage company with pricing power can deliver, and the first quarter backed it up: revenue grew to nearly $4.0 billion, EPS of $0.39 beat estimates, and the engine was the US beverage business, where refreshment beverages grew 11.9% on favorable pricing and solid demand. The market is not paying for a growth miracle; it is paying for steady, defensible compounding, and the company is delivering it.
The beverage side is the quality core. Dr Pepper and the broader carbonated soft-drink portfolio operate on a concentrate model, where the company manufactures concentrate that is "sold as a packaged beverage to retailers" or turned into syrup shipped to fountain customers, an asset-light, high-margin structure that throws off cash. The Keurig coffee system adds a razor-and-blade dynamic: the company "regularly launch[es] new brewers with new features and benefits" to expand the installed base, and each brewer pulls recurring K-Cup pod demand behind it. Coffee innovation is working, with Lavazza K-Cup sales growing over 50% and a new Keurig Alta system launching direct-to-consumer later this year.
The trailing operating margin near 21% reflects the strength of those two franchises, and the valuation is supported on the lenses that matter for a consumer staple. Peer-multiple and growth-DCF methods land at or above the price, consistent with a business whose value lives in durable brands and recurring consumption rather than in book assets. The company continues to retire shares modestly and pay a dividend. For an investor seeking defensible cash generation, a beverage-and-coffee portfolio with pricing power, recurring pod demand, and a price that asks only for ordinary growth is doing the steady work that consumer compounders are bought for.
Bear Case
The bear case is about capital allocation, and the JDE Peet's acquisition is the centerpiece. KDP took on an enormous amount of debt to buy a global coffee business, and the balance sheet now reflects it: net debt of roughly $28 billion sits near 8 times trailing operating income, a level of leverage that turns a defensive consumer name into a far riskier one. The immediate costs are visible, with the company expecting roughly $190 million in pretax coffee joint-venture costs for the balance of 2026 and integrating over 20,000 new employees. The question every shareholder should ask is whether management is creating value with this deal or empire-building: a debt-funded acquisition of a coffee business in a market where coffee economics are already challenged is exactly the kind of capital-allocation decision that can dilute returns for years if the synergies disappoint.
The coffee economics themselves are a structural headwind. The company's filing flags the volatility directly: high-quality coffee "tends to trade on a negotiated basis at a premium above the C price of coffee", a premium that can vary significantly with supply and demand, and coffee prices are exposed to weather, climate change, disease, and agricultural uncertainty. By doubling down on coffee, KDP has increased its exposure to a commodity it cannot control, at a time when input-cost inflation already pressures margins across the portfolio. The Keurig single-serve system also faces its own maturity and private-label competition on pods, the high-margin part of the model.
That combination, heavy leverage, increased commodity exposure, and a large integration, is what the valuation has to absorb. The price is supported on relative and growth methods, but the asset-value and earnings-power lenses read it as expensive, with the zero-growth earnings lens at less than half the price. The bear reading is that a consumer staple priced for steady compounding now carries an acquisition-sized debt load and a commodity-cost risk that the steady-compounder framing understates. If integration costs run long, if coffee prices spike, or if the planned reorganization of the combined business proves messy, the leverage leaves little room, and the market may re-rate the name from a defensive holding to a leveraged turnaround.
Valuation
The price asks for ordinary growth, which is the right starting point for a mature beverage company. At roughly 20 times company-wide operating income, the embedded assumption is modest mid-single-digit operating growth, within range of what the business can plausibly deliver and consistent with the 4% to 6% constant-currency growth management guides for the legacy business. This is not a stretched growth bet; it is a steady-compounder valuation.
The methods divide along the usual line for a brand-driven staple. Peer-multiple and growth-DCF approaches justify the price, while the asset-value and earnings-power methods read it as expensive, the zero-growth earnings lens at under half the price. That pattern is expected for a business whose worth lives in brands and recurring consumption rather than on the balance sheet: capitalize today's profit with no growth and the number looks rich; value it against beverage peers and credit ongoing growth, and the price holds. A reader should treat the spread as confirming a quality-and-growth premium rather than a mispricing.
Where the valuation analysis gets serious is solvency, and here the JDE Peet's acquisition changes the picture materially. Net debt near $28 billion at close to 8 times trailing operating income is a heavy load for a consumer company, and it converts what was a low-risk balance sheet into a meaningful constraint. The trailing operating margin near 21% supports servicing that debt in normal conditions, but the leverage means the genuine downside is no longer just slower growth; it is the combination of an acquisition that must deliver its synergies, coffee-cost volatility, and a debt load that limits flexibility. The price is reasonable on the brands; the risk the valuation must carry now sits on the balance sheet.
Catalysts
The first quarter beat modestly and the company held its guidance. KDP reported revenue of about $4.0 billion and EPS of $0.39, ahead of the $0.38 consensus, driven by US refreshment beverages up 11.9% on favorable pricing and demand. For 2026 the company reaffirmed net sales of $25.9 to $26.4 billion and low-double-digit constant-currency adjusted EPS growth, comprising 4% to 6% net sales and EPS growth for the legacy business plus incremental contribution from JDE Peet's.
The defining corporate event is the JDE Peet's acquisition, which closed April 1, 2026, adding over 20,000 employees and combining the coffee portfolios, with roughly $190 million of pretax coffee JV costs expected for the balance of 2026. On the product side, Lavazza K-Cup sales grew over 50% and the Keurig Alta system is targeted for a direct-to-consumer launch later this year. The catalysts to track are the integration of JDE Peet's and the planned reorganization of the combined coffee business, coffee commodity prices given the increased exposure, and the pace of deleveraging from the post-acquisition debt load.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
U.S. Refreshment Beverages (reported)
- KO (COCA COLA CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …These include companies that, like our Company, compete globally in multiple geographic areas, as well as businesses that are primarily regional or local in operation. Competitive products include numerous nonalcoholic sparkling soft drinks; water products, including flavored and enhanced waters; juices, juice drinks…
- FY2025 10-K: …29, 1992, to the Indenture, dated as of July 30, 1991, between Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee - incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc.'s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29, 1992. 4.50 Second Supplemental…
- PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: 's, Mountain Dew, Mountain Dew Code Red, Mountain Dew Game Fuel, Mountain Dew Kickstart, Mountain Dew Zero Sugar, Mug, Munchies, Muscle Milk, Near East, Obela, Off the Eaten Path, Paso de los Toros, Pasta Roni, Pearl Milling Company, Pepsi, Pepsi Black, Pepsi Max, Pepsi Wild Cherry, Pepsi Zero Sugar, PopCorners,…
- FY2025 10-K: …products hold significant leadership positions in the convenient food industry in the United States and worldwide. In 2025, we and The Coca-Cola Company represented approximately 16% and 20%, respectively, of the U.S. liquid refreshment beverage category by estimated retail sales in measured channels, according to…
- MNST (Monster Beverage Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …experience competition from new entrants in the energy drink, energy shot, beer and beyond beer categories. For instance, a number of companies which market and distribute iced teas, coffees, juice cocktails, enhanced waters and sports drinks in various larger volume packages in glass and plastic bottles (including…
- FY2025 10-K: …fees given to our bottlers/distributors related to sales made by us direct to certain customers that fall within the bottlers'/distributors' sales territories; and (viii) certain commissions paid based on sales to our bottlers/distributors. The presentation of promotional and other allowances facilitates an…
- CELH (CELSIUS HOLDINGS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …with the highest volumes typically occurring during the second and third calendar quarters, aligning with the warmer months in our key markets. However, over the course of a full year, these seasonal fluctuations have not had a material impact on our financial results. Competition Our products compete broadly with…
- FY2025 10-K: …Our products compete with all liquid refreshments and with products of certain competitors that are much larger, some of which have significantly greater financial resources, such as Monster Beverage Corporation, Red Bull GmbH, The Coca-Cola Company, Pepsi, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Nestlé S.A., BlueTriton Brands,…
- FIZZ (National Beverage Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and our competitive position may vary by market area. Our products compete with many varieties of liquid refreshment, including water products, soft drinks, juices, fruit drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks, as well as powdered drinks, coffees, teas, dairy- based drinks, functional beverages and various other…
- FY2025 10-K: …135 years. Our strategy seeks the profitable growth of our products by (i) developing healthier beverages in response to the global shift in consumer buying habits and tailoring our beverage portfolio to the preferences of a diverse mix of ‘crossover consumers' - a growing group desiring a healthier alternative to…
- COKE (COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Neighborhood Market chains. (2) Includes bottle/can sales volume related to the Kroger and Harris Teeter chains. The loss of Walmart Inc. or The Kroger Co. as a customer could have a material adverse effect on the operating and financial results of the Company. No other customer represented greater than 10% of the…
- FY2025 10-K: …charge for concentrate. 4 Customers and Marketing The Company's products are sold and distributed in the United States through various channels, which include selling directly to customers, including grocery stores, mass merchandise stores, club stores, convenience stores and drug stores, selling to on-premise…
- CCEP (COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …Sustainability Statement Other Information Coca-Cola Europacific Partners plc 2025 Annual Report and Form 20-F 322 Glossary continued DTC Depository Trust Company DTRs The Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules of the UK Financial Conduct Authority EACs Energy Attribute Certificates EBITDA Earnings before…
- FY2025 20-F: …volume was down 0.1% versus 2024 on an adjusted comparable basis. This reflected volume decline (down 2.1%) of Coca-Cola Original Taste with growth in the Philippines and PNG, supported by new campaigns, offset by Europe. Coca-Cola Zero Sugar volumes increased versus 2024 (up 5.3%), driven by Europe and double-digit…
- SAM (THE BOSTON BEER COMPANY, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …The Company's beverages are sold by the Company's sales force to the same types of customers and drinkers in similar size quantities, at similar price points and through substantially the same channels of distribution. These beverages are manufactured using similar production processes, have comparable alcohol…
- FY2025 10-K: Inc. ("Pepsi"). Beginning in 2022, the Company sold products under the brand name ‘Hard Mountain Dew' under the Pepsi agreement. While the Company believes this agreement represents a strategic opportunity to increase volume in the longer term, the Hard Mountain Dew brand represented approximately 2% of net revenue in…
U.S. Coffee (reported)
- SJM (THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: International and Away From Home 20.6 17.4 U.S. Retail Coffee The U.S. Retail Coffee segment net sales increased $102.2 in 2025. Net price realization increased net sales by 5 percentage points, primarily driven by higher net pricing for the Folgers and Café Bustelo brands, partially offset by lower net pricing for…
- FY2025 10-K: …the domestic sales of Folgers , Dunkin' , and Café Bustelo branded coffee; the U.S. Retail Frozen Handheld and Spreads segment primarily includes the domestic sales of Uncustables , Jif , and Smucker's branded products; the U.S. Retail Pet Foods segment primarily includes the domestic sales of Meow Mix , Milk-Bone ,…
- MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …whether through same-day delivery platforms, shipped sources or different retail settings. Many consumers also continue to prioritize sustainability in their purchase decisions, valuing sustainably sourced ingredients, low carbon footprint preparation and lower waste packaging. We seek to continue to offer snacks…
- FY2025 10-K: …2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001103982 mdlz:ChocolateMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001103982 mdlz:GumAndCandyMember mdlz:LatinAmericaSegmentMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001103982 mdlz:GumAndCandyMember mdlz:AsiaMiddleEastAndAfricaSegmentMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001103982 mdlz:GumAndCandyMember…
- POST (Post Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …distributor of branded and private label dry pasta and private label nut butters, granola and dried fruit and nut products and is reported in the Post Consumer Brands segment. The acquisition was completed using cash on hand and borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility (as defined in Note 16). Based upon the…
- FY2025 10-K: …and our customers' ability to compete in our respective product categories, including the success of pricing, advertising and promotional programs, declines in demand for our products and the ability to anticipate and respond to changes in consumer and customer preferences and behaviors; • our ability to hire and…
- BRBR (BellRing Brands, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …regulations (such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act), and changes to such laws and regulations; • compliance with treaties, antitrust and competition laws, data privacy laws (including the General Data Protection Regulation and the E.U.'s General Data Protection Regulation and the E.U.-U.S. Data Privacy…
- FY2025 10-K: …typically higher throughout the remainder of the fiscal year as a result of stronger consumer demand in the second quarter of our fiscal year, promotional activity at key retailers and organic growth of the business. Seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and EBITDA may not be the same in the future as they have been…
Core business (reported)
- KO (COCA COLA CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …partners. These operations are generally included in our geographic operating segments. Additionally, we sell directly to consumers through retail stores operated by Costa. These sales are included in our EMEA operating segment, regardless of the physical location of the retail stores. In the United States, we…
- FY2025 10-K: …operations. These operations consist primarily of our consolidated bottling and distribution operations, which are included in our Bottling Investments operating segment. In certain markets, the Company also operates non-bottling finished product operations in which we sell finished beverages to distributors and…
- PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …physical and digital operations among retailers, as well as the international expansion of hard discounters, and the current economic environment continue to increase the importance of major customers. In 2025, sales to Walmart Inc. (Walmart) and its affiliates, including Sam's Club (Sam's), represented approximately…
- FY2025 10-K: …the effective net pricing, productivity savings, and lower advertising and marketing expenses. IB Franchise Net revenue increased 2%, primarily reflecting effective net pricing. Unit volume grew 1.5%, primarily reflecting growth in the Middle East, China and Pakistan. Operating profit increased 21%, primarily…
- MNST (Monster Beverage Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …Bull GmbH, KDP, Molson Coors, Constellation Brands, AB InBev, The Boston Beer Company and The Mark Anthony Group. We also compete with companies that are smaller or primarily national or local in operations, such as CELSIUS, PRIME, C4, Alani Nu, GHOST, ZOA, GORGIE, and others as well as local craft breweries in our…
- FY2025 10-K: …Strategic Brands segment primarily generates net operating revenues by selling "concentrates" and/or "beverage bases" to authorized bottling and canning operations. Such bottlers generally combine the concentrates and/or beverage bases with sweeteners, water and other ingredients to produce ready-to-drink packaged…
- STZ (CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Officer. The business segments reflect how our operations are managed, how resources are allocated, how operating performance is evaluated by senior management, and the structure of our internal financial reporting. Long-lived tangible assets and total asset information by segment is not provided to, or reviewed by,…
- FY2025 10-K: …We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers' financial position, and management is of the opinion that any risk of significant loss is reduced due to the diversity of our customers and geographic sales area. 22. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION Our internal management financial reporting consists of two…
- SJM (THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …consumer preferences. Positive factors pertaining to our competitive position include well-recognized brands, high-quality products, consumer trust, experienced brand and category management, varied product offerings, product innovation, responsive customer service, and an integrated distribution network. The…
- FY2025 10-K: …in the categories in which we compete, appealing to different consumer segments. We closely monitor the price gap, or price premium, between our brands and private label brands, with the view that value is about more than price and the expectation that number one brands will continue to be an integral part of…
- MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and powdered beverages around the world. We aim to be the global leader in snacking. Our strategy is to drive long-term growth by focusing on four strategic priorities: accelerating consumer-centric growth, driving operational excellence, creating a winning growth culture and scaling sustainable snacking. We believe…
- FY2025 10-K: …units while empowering our local and commercial operations to respond faster to changing consumer preferences and capitalize on growth opportunities. We believe our efforts to continue advancing a winning growth culture will help drive profitable top-line growth. 3 Table of Contents • Scale sustainable snacking . We…
- MKC (McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED)
- FY2025 10-K: 025 as compared to 2024 and increased by 1.9% on an organic basis. Favorable pricing impacted sales by 0.2%. Favorable volume and product mix increased sales by 1.7% driven by higher sales to foodservice customers in China. The unfavorable impact from foreign currency rates decreased sales by 0.9% and is excluded from…
- FY2025 10-K: 5 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements and the "Liquidity and Financial Condition" section of "Management's Discussion and Analysis." Competition Each segment operates in highly competitive markets around the world. In this environment, our growth strategies include customer engagement and product…
- CPB (THE CAMPBELL'S COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …with the acquisition of Sovos Brands; and • $35 million of net periodic benefit income, including pension and postretirement actuarial gains of $15 million. Operating Earnings Segment operating earnings increased 1% in 2025 from 2024 and increased 6% in 2024 from 2023. An analysis of operating earnings by segment…
- FY2025 10-K: …competition in all of our categories. This competition arises from numerous competitors of varying sizes across multiple food and beverage categories, and includes producers of private label products, as well as other branded food and beverage manufacturers. Private label products are generally sold at lower prices…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release · Q1 2026 earnings call · Q1 2026 guidance