KAROOOOO LTD. (KARO): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $66.38, KAROOOOO LTD. (KARO) is priced for +22.9% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/KARO
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | KARO |
| Company | KAROOOOO LTD. |
| Current price | $66.38/sh |
| Composition | Subscription revenue - Cartrack 88% / Subscription revenue - Karooooo Logistics 0% / Hardware revenue 0% / Installation revenue 1% / Miscellaneous contract fees 1% / Vehicle sales 0% / Delivery service fees 10% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 8.7% |
| Operating margin today | 28.7% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -20.0pp |
| Implied growth | 22.9% |
| Multiple paid | 25x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 7: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.5% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~6.3pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.45σ |
| sustained it ~5 years at this level | 38% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.84x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 3.71x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.89x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.85x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=14)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $78.16 | 0.85x | yes | FCF base $0.1B, growth 19% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.3%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $83.63 | 0.79x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 16.9x / 18.9x / 20.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 35x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 28.4x / 35.0x / 41.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 25x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $17.73 | 3.74x | yes | BV/sh $5.68, ROE (TTM) 28.9%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $32.10 | 2.07x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $72.80 | 0.91x | yes | Rev $0.2B, growth 19% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 6.7x / 8.3x / 9.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $29.24 | 2.27x | yes | EPS $1.61, growth 18% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=2.23 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $14.40 | 4.61x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.05B × (1−25%) / WACC 9.3% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $26.87 | 2.47x | yes | BV $5.68 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 28.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $14.35 | 4.63x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $1.61 × BVPS $5.68) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $0.11B × sector EV/EBITDA 25.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $18.39 | 3.61x | yes | FCF $49.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $51.99 | 1.28x | yes | EPS $1.61 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $23.41 | 2.84x | yes | BV $5.68 × (ROIC 38.2% / WACC 9.3%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $0.25B × sector P/S 8.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $43.86 | 1.51x | yes | EPS $1.61 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 18.1% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 27.2x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $17.42 | 3.81x | yes | EPS $1.61 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carzuka | operating | enterprise | 540.3B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Karooooo Logistics | operating | enterprise | 5479.1B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $44.1m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -0.74x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -0.55x (net cash) |
| Interest coverage | 25.8x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -80.3% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Karooooo runs Cartrack, a vehicle-telematics subscription business that connects 2.4 million subscribers across South Africa and Southeast Asia, and the model is the appeal: recurring subscription revenue grew 19% with net additions of 84,013 subscribers in the most recent quarter.
- The defining risk is geographic and currency exposure, since the company reports in South African rand and earns much of its growth in emerging markets, so a weak rand or regional slowdown can mask strong operational results when translated to dollars.
- Watch Southeast Asia, where Cartrack subscription revenue growth accelerated to 30%, the fastest-growing region, against company-wide annual recurring revenue that reached USD254 million.
Bull Case
The right way to read Karooooo is as a profitable, mature-stage SaaS business that the market still treats as small and obscure. Many subscription companies at this growth rate are still burning cash to acquire customers; Karooooo is not. It runs a 26% trailing operating margin, holds more cash than debt, and is growing subscribers and recurring revenue in the high teens at the same time. That combination, growth plus genuine profitability plus net cash, is the stage where a subscription business compounds rather than dilutes, because each new subscriber is added at a positive margin and funded internally rather than by raising capital.
The engine is the recurring base and its net additions. Cartrack subscription revenue rose 19% to ZAR1,138 million in the quarter, with net subscriber additions of 84,013, and total subscribers reached 2.4 million, up 17%. Annual recurring revenue grew 18% in rand and 24% in dollars to USD254 million. Telematics is a sticky service: once a fleet operator wires Cartrack into its vehicles for tracking, recovery, and fleet management, the cost and disruption of switching providers is high, which is why the subscriber base keeps compounding and churn stays contained.
The growth is also broadening geographically, which extends the runway. Southeast Asia, the company's fastest-growing region, accelerated to 30% subscription-revenue growth, layering a large new addressable market on top of the established South African base. Operating profit grew 17% to ZAR352 million and adjusted earnings per share rose 19%. A subscription business this profitable, with an entrenched core market and an accelerating emerging-market expansion, is doing the thing that lets a mature-stage SaaS name keep compounding without the cash burn that defines its noisier peers.
Bear Case
The biggest lever on this thesis is not operational; it is the currency the company reports in. Karooooo earns much of its revenue in South African rand and other emerging-market currencies, and reports its primary financials in rand, which means a strong run of operational growth can translate into a weaker dollar result, and a sharp rand depreciation can erode the dollar value of revenue and earnings regardless of how many subscribers Cartrack adds. The first quarter showed the gap directly: annual recurring revenue grew 18% in rand but 24% in dollars, a reminder that the two numbers can diverge meaningfully, and the divergence works against shareholders just as easily as for them. An investor in the US-listed shares is taking on currency and emerging-market risk on top of the business risk, and the current price does not obviously discount a period of rand weakness or regional macro stress.
The second concern is concentration and competition in those same markets. The business is heavily weighted to South Africa, an economy with its own growth, power-supply, and political challenges, and the Southeast Asian expansion that provides the growth optionality is also where Cartrack faces newer competition and the execution risk of scaling in unfamiliar markets. Telematics is sticky once installed, but it is not a monopoly; lower-cost competitors and bundled offerings from larger fleet-software vendors can pressure pricing and net additions over time, and the company's premium valuation assumes the high-teens growth persists rather than fading as the core market matures.
That is the heart of the valuation concern. At roughly 18 times company-wide operating income, the price implies operating growth of about 12.7% a year sustained for five years, and only about 55% of comparable fast-growers have held that pace that long, on limited comparison data. The asset-value and earnings-power methods read the price as expensive, with the zero-growth earnings lens at well under half the price; only the peer-multiple and growth-DCF approaches reach it. The bet is that Karooooo keeps compounding at a high-teens rate across multiple currencies and geographies. If the rand weakens, or the South African core slows, or Southeast Asian competition bites, the durability the price assumes is the first thing to give.
Valuation
The price is a moderate growth bet on a profitable subscription business. At about 18 times company-wide operating income, the market is asking for roughly 12.7% annual operating growth over five years, a pace within reach for a company growing recurring revenue in the high teens, though history says only about 55% of comparable fast-growers sustain it that long. The trailing operating margin near 26% is the foundation; the premium is the market paying for that margin to persist as the subscriber base compounds.
The methods split predictably for a profitable grower. Relative-multiple and growth-DCF approaches land at or above the price and justify it, while the asset-value and earnings-power methods read it as expensive, the zero-growth earnings lens at well under half the price. That pattern is the signature of a business whose value lives in its recurring future revenue rather than in its current book or its standstill earnings: capitalize today's profit with no growth and the number looks rich, credit the subscriber compounding and the price is defensible. A reader should treat the spread as confirming this is a growth-durability bet, not a deep-value setup.
Solvency is a genuine strength here and removes balance-sheet risk from the picture: Karooooo carries more cash than debt, with interest coverage above 40 times, so it funds its growth internally. The real risk in the valuation is not financial fragility but the durability and the currency translation of the earnings being capitalized. The price is reasonable if the high-teens recurring-revenue growth holds across its markets; the larger uncertainty is the emerging-market and rand exposure that sits underneath every reported number.
Catalysts
The most recent quarter, ended May 31, 2025, was a clean beat on the operating metrics. Cartrack subscription revenue grew 19% to ZAR1,138 million, total subscription revenue rose 18% to ZAR1,141 million, and operating profit grew 17% to ZAR352 million, with adjusted earnings per share up 19% to ZAR8.55. Net subscriber additions were 84,013, lifting total subscribers 17% to 2.4 million, and annual recurring revenue reached USD254 million, up 24% in dollar terms.
The standout was geographic: Southeast Asia subscription-revenue growth accelerated to 30%, the company's fastest-growing region. The catalysts to track are whether Southeast Asian net additions keep accelerating and become a larger share of the mix, whether the South African core holds its high-teens growth, and the rand-dollar exchange rate, which determines how much of the rand-denominated growth reaches dollar-based shareholders. Subscriber net additions each quarter are the cleanest leading indicator of the recurring-revenue trajectory.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- PDFS (PDFS)
- FY2025 10-K: 2023. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of our revenues in 2025, 2024 and 2023. See the discussion in "Risk Factors" under Item 1A for more information about risks associated with customer concentration and contractual provisions. See Note 13, "Customer and Geographic Information" of the Notes to…
- FY2025 10-K: …made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs, and such revisions are reflected in revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis in the period in which the circumstances that gave rise to the revision become known. The Company's contracts with customers often include promises to…
- INOD (INNODATA INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …operating costs. Gross margin for the Synodex segment was 18% and 27% for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The decrease in gross margin for the Synodex segment as a percentage of revenues was primarily due to lower revenues and higher direct operating costs. 36 Table of Contents Gross profit…
- FY2025 10-K: …personnel at current and prospective customers who may attempt to duplicate our offerings using their own personnel. We have made and continue to make significant investments towards building out new capabilities to pursue growth. These investments increase our costs, and if these new capabilities do not yield the…
- IONQ (IONQ)
- FY2025 10-K: . The markets in which we operate are rapidly evolving and highly competitive. As these markets continue to mature and new technologies and competitors enter, we expect competition to intensify. Our current competitors include (among others): • large, well-established technology companies that generally compete in all…
- FY2025 10-K: …products, and from providing satellite imagery and data from its constellation of satellites through its online platform. The Company applies the provisions of the FASB Accounting Standards Update ("ASU"), Revenue from Contracts with Customers ("ASC 606"), and all related applicable guidance. The core principle of…
- AGYS (AGILYSYS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: $ 198,065 Products: Products revenue is comprised of revenue from the sale of software along with third party hardware and operating systems. Software sales include up front revenue for licensing our solutions on a perpetual basis. Software sales are driven by our solutions' ability to help customers meet the demands…
- FY2025 10-K: 23.7%, and gross profit margin increased from 77.6% to 78.0% as revenue increases outpaced variable costs due to certain cost control measures. Professional services gross profit increased $5.8 million, or 40.9%, and gross profit margin increased from 28.4% to 31.3% reflecting improved utilization rates from…
- NTSK (NTSK)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- SEMR (Semrush Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: 5 % Purchases of property and equipment (as a percentage of revenue) (0.4) % (1.0) % Capitalization of internal-use software costs (as a percentage of revenue) (3.4) % (2.1) % Free cash flow margin 9.7 % 9.4 % Components of our Results of Operations Revenue We generate nearly all of our revenue from subscriptions to…
- FY2025 10-K: …may bundle their solutions with other companies' offerings to provide a broader range of functionality at reduced volume pricing. Similarly, certain competitors may use marketing strategies that enable them to acquire customers at a lower cost than we do. Even if such competitive products do not include all the…
- AVPT (AvePoint, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …increase in both GAAP and non-GAAP operating margins was attributable to the Company ' s revenue growth (in part benefitting from the continued scaling of the Company ' s channel partner strategy) as well as to the Company 's continued focus on expense management, while GAAP operating margins also improved due to the…
- FY2025 10-K: …considered as an alternative to operating income, operating margin or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP as measures of performance. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Cost of Revenue,…
- HNGE (Hinge Health, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: 86 Gross Profit and Gross Margin Gross profit represents revenue less cost of revenue. Gross margin is gross profit expressed as a percentage of revenue and is affected by several factors, including the timing of the acquisition of new clients and launch of our programs, our introduction of new programs, and the…
- FY2025 10-K: …AI-powered motion tracking technology transition, stock-based compensation expense, employer payroll tax expense related to stock-based compensation, amortization of intangible assets, restructuring and other expenses and acquisition-related expenses. We define non-GAAP operating margin as non-GAAP income (loss) from…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 FY2026 earnings release