The St. Joe Company (JOE): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $61.81, The St. Joe Company (JOE) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~6.9 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/JOE
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | JOE |
| Company | The St. Joe Company |
| Current price | $61.81/sh |
| Composition | Residential 33% / Hospitality 44% / Commercial 24% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 12.2% |
| Operating margin today | 28.5% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -16.3pp |
| Must persist for | 6.9y |
| Multiple paid | 26x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 7: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 10.4% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.8 years.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~24.5%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: elevated
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.39σ |
| cohort percentile (of 79 peers) | 43 |
| sustained it ~6.9 years at this level | 22% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.33x | 4 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.94x | 4 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.06x | 6 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.63x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.5%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $172.87 | 0.36x | yes | FCF base $0.2B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.5%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $97.57 | 0.63x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 17.6x / 19.6x / 21.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $88.71 | 0.70x | yes | P/E 35x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 28.2x / 35.0x / 41.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 20x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $21.07 | 2.93x | yes | BV/sh $13.32, ROE (TTM) 14.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $26.21 | 2.36x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $86.93 | 0.71x | yes | Rev $0.5B, growth 27% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 5.5x / 6.9x / 8.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $42.60 | 1.45x | yes | FFO/share $2.84, growth 15% (input: historical FFO/share growth, 6y median), PEG=2.11 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $11.64 | 5.31x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.10B × (1−25%) / WACC 8.5% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $26.96 | 2.29x | yes | BV $13.32 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 14.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $29.17 | 2.12x | yes | √(22.5 × FFO/share $2.84 × BVPS $13.32) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $63.31 | 0.98x | yes | EBITDA $0.19B × sector EV/EBITDA 20.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $33.17 | 1.86x | yes | FCF $199.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $91.64 | 0.67x | yes | FFO/share $2.84 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $2.11 | 29.29x | yes | BV $13.32 × (ROIC 1.3% / WACC 8.5%) (excluded from median) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $54.05 | 1.14x | yes | Revenue $0.52B × sector P/S 6.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $63.90 | 0.97x | yes | FFO/share $2.84 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 15.0% (input: historical FFO/share growth, 6y median)) → PE 22.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $30.70 | 2.01x | yes | FFO/share $2.84 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | $40.68 | 1.52x | yes | FFO/share $2.84 × 14.3x P/FFO (route cohort median, n=85); FFO $0.16B (FFO incl. D&A + impairments, FY2025, companyfacts), shares 58M |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $244.1m |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 2.22x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 1.66x |
| Interest coverage | 4.9x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -0.6% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- The St. Joe Company is essentially a single, irreplaceable land position in Northwest Florida being slowly converted into homes, hotels, and leased commercial space, so the business is less a developer competing for sites than a landowner monetizing a bank it already holds at a low cost basis.
- The concentration that is the moat is also the risk: the company tells investors success "will be dependent on continued strong" growth in Northwest Florida and that events such as hurricanes may dramatically change demand and pricing, leaving the whole enterprise exposed to one region's weather and economy.
- Watch the recurring revenue build, with a first-quarter record hospitality result of $44.7 million and a new contract with Pulte for up to 2,653 home sites, against a softer bottom line where Q1 net income fell 21% on lower joint-venture income.
Bull Case
The structural advantage here is unusual because it is not a skill, a brand, or a process; it is the land itself. St. Joe owns a large, contiguous position in Northwest Florida carried at a low historical cost basis, and the entire business is the patient conversion of that position into residential lots, hotel rooms, and leased buildings. The company is explicit that its strategy is concentrated, stating its success "will be dependent on continued strong" growth in Northwest Florida, where it "is focused on developing real estate and expanding operations". A competitor cannot replicate this by spending more; the supply of entitled, coastal Florida land that one owner controls is fixed, and that scarcity is the moat.
What makes the model compound is that each phase of development pulls the next. The Latitude Margaritaville Watersound community now has 2,273 occupied homes, and those rooftops generate demand for the commercial ecosystem around them, a planned 500,000-square-foot Watersound West Bay Center plus brokerage, insurance, and marina services. The reported margins show the mix shifting toward recurring economics: hospitality revenue hit a first-quarter record of $44.7 million, up 13%, with margins improving to 24.4%. As residential sales seed the population, the hospitality and leasing segments grow into a more durable annuity that does not depend on selling another lot.
The land also lets management monetize without carrying all the risk. The new contract with Pulte for up to 2,653 home sites, the builder's first entry into Northwest Florida, converts raw land into cash and homebuilding activity while St. Joe keeps the surrounding commercial and hospitality upside. The share count is roughly flat to slightly down, the company pays a growing dividend, and the operating margin near 28.5% reflects a business selling an asset whose cost was largely sunk decades ago. This is a long-duration compounding story where the raw material is already paid for.
Bear Case
The balance sheet and the business model share a single point of failure, and it is geography. Net debt of about $244 million is roughly 1.66 times trailing operating income, and interest coverage of 4.9 times is adequate but not generous for a company whose cash flows are tied to the pace of real estate sales in one region. That leverage is comfortable only as long as Northwest Florida keeps absorbing homes and filling hotel rooms. The company itself frames the fragility bluntly: it is "subject to various geographic risks" and warns that events such as hurricanes may dramatically change demand and pricing for its products and services. A single major storm, or a regional demand stall, hits revenue, the value of the land collateral, and the ability to service debt at the same time.
The earnings underneath are also lumpier than the land-bank narrative suggests. First-quarter net income fell 21% even as revenue rose 5% to $99.1 million, driven by lower equity income from joint ventures, and leasing revenue declined 10% on a property sale. Reported results swing with the timing of land closings and joint-venture distributions, which means the trailing operating income that anchors any valuation is a moving target. One note on the numbers underscores this: the operating income read from the most recent quarterly filings and the figure used in the priced-in math differ by nearly 19%, a reminder that for a developer the measurement window changes the multiple materially.
Against that, the price is demanding. At roughly 34 times company-wide operating income, the market is paying for operating profit to grow at its self-funding ceiling for about nine years, an exceptionally long runway. The static valuation methods do not support it: the asset-value lens reads the price at well over twice what book-and-profitability methods justify, and the zero-growth earnings lens lands at roughly half the price. Only peer-multiple and growth-DCF approaches reach it. The conservative reads are the more honest ones here, because they value the land at what it currently earns rather than at what nine years of uninterrupted development would produce in a region one hurricane season could disrupt.
Valuation
The price is making a patience bet. At about 34 times company-wide operating income, the market is paying for St. Joe to grow operating profit at its self-funding ceiling for roughly nine years, an unusually long horizon that only makes sense if you believe the land bank converts steadily for the better part of a decade. The reported operating margin near 28.5% is high because the company is selling an asset whose cost was largely sunk long ago, but the price is not paying for today's margin; it is paying for the duration of the development pipeline.
The methods disagree sharply, which is the tell. Peer-multiple and growth-DCF approaches land at or above the price, while the asset-value and earnings-power methods read it as expensive, the asset lens at more than double where book-and-profitability methods land. The reason the static methods fall short is structural: they capitalize current earnings or book value, and St. Joe's value lives in undeveloped land that produces little income until it is converted. That makes the growth-DCF read the only one that captures the thesis, and it captures it only by crediting a long, steady monetization runway. The spread between the methods IS the bet on duration.
Solvency is the binding constraint to keep in view. Net debt around $244 million sits at 1.66 times operating income with interest coverage near 4.9 times, manageable in normal conditions but tied entirely to one region's real estate market and weather. The genuine question this price raises is not whether the land is valuable; it plainly is. It is whether the conversion proceeds smoothly enough, for long enough, to earn a multiple that already assumes nine years of uninterrupted progress.
Catalysts
The first quarter showed the mix shifting even as the bottom line softened. Revenue rose 5% to $99.1 million, but net income fell 21%, mainly on lower equity income from joint ventures, and the stock slipped after the print. The bright spot was hospitality, which hit a first-quarter record of $44.7 million, up 13%, with margins improving to 24.4%, while leasing revenue declined 10% on the sale of a senior living property.
The forward catalysts center on the development flywheel. The contract with Pulte Group for up to 2,653 home sites brings a major national builder into Northwest Florida for the first time and converts land into near-term activity, while the growing Latitude Margaritaville Watersound community, now at 2,273 occupied homes, supports the planned 500,000-square-foot Watersound West Bay Center and the commercial services around it. The board declared a $0.16 quarterly dividend. The signals to track are whether the recurring hospitality and leasing base keeps growing into a steadier earnings stream and whether home-site demand holds as new builders enter the market.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Residential (reported)
- HHH (HOWARD HUGHES HOLDINGS INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …minimum rent and common area maintenance recovery revenue. Effective Annual Rent Per Square Foot is the Effective Annual Rent divided by the average occupied square feet. (c) These properties are entirely leased by a single tenant. Therefore, the Annualized Base Rent and Effective Annual Rent details have been…
- FY2025 10-K: Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) Operating leases 16.3 16.4 Weighted-average discount rate Operating leases 7.2 % 7.1 % Lessor Arrangements The Company receives rental income from the leasing of retail, office, multifamily, and other space under operating leases, as well as certain variable tenant…
- FOR (FORESTAR GROUP INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …than those included in the expense categories reported on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations. All revenues and real estate assets are attributable to operations in the United States. Segment assets that are reported as total assets and capital expenditures are reviewed by the CODM and are presented…
- FY2025 10-K: …quarter of fiscal 2029, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this standard will have on its disclosures. 51 Table of Contents FORESTAR GROUP INC. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 2 - Segment Information The Company manages its operations through its real estate…
- MRP (Millrose Properties, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …judicial and administrative interpretations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within our control may affect our ability to remain qualified as a REIT. Although we believe that we will qualify as a REIT beginning with our first taxable year ended December 31, 2025, we cannot…
- FY2025 10-K: …taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code and expect to qualify as a REIT when we file a REIT tax election with our federal income tax return for the taxable year ended December 31, 2025. To qualify as a REIT, we must meet a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a…
Hospitality (reported)
- VAC (MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …and results of operations and materially impair our ability to market and sell our products and maintain our competitive position, and could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Our inability to rely on the strength of the Marriott, Sheraton, Westin, or Hyatt…
- FY2025 10-K: …to excel in the vacation industry by further enhancing the vacation experience for our owners and guests of every type. Drive profitable revenue growth We intend to drive long-term growth by leveraging our trusted hospitality brands and membership programs to attract new owners and members and expand revenues in an…
- HGV (Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …competes with other entities engaged in the leisure and vacation industry, including resorts, hotels, cruises, accommodation alternatives, such as condominium and single-family home rentals, and alternative travel products like travel clubs. We also compete with home and apartment sharing services that operate…
- FY2025 10-K: …areas. All of the foregoing factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Contraction in the global economy or low levels of economic growth could adversely affect our revenues and profitability as well as limit or slow our future growth. Consumer demand for…
- TNL (Travel & Leisure Co.)
- FY2025 10-K: …new owner tours from different marketing channels, but there can be overlap when consumers are members of more than one loyalty program and/or travel to more than one resort within a market. We compete for property acquisitions and partnerships with entities that have similar investment objectives. There is also…
- FY2025 10-K: . We earn interest revenue on our portfolio as well as club and resort management fees. We also seek to enhance our future upgrade pipeline through sales to new owners. On average, new owners nearly double their initial VOI purchase within six years, resulting in predictable, high-margin future revenue streams.…
- RHP (RYMAN HOSPITALITY PROPERTIES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …accessible through our website, is not incorporated by reference in, or considered to be part of, this Report on Form 10-K or any document unless expressly incorporated by reference therein. Competition Hospitality Our current hotel properties compete with numerous other hotels throughout the United States and…
- FY2025 10-K: …which generates substantially all of our Hospitality segment revenue, is concentrated in Marriott. ● Restrictive covenants and other provisions in our hotel management agreements with third-party hotel managers could limit our ability to sell or lease our hotel properties or refinance our existing debt. In addition,…
- MTN (Vail Resorts, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Hyatt, Marriott, Ritz-Carlton and Westin. Our properties also compete for convention and conference business across the national market. We believe we are highly competitive in the resort hotel niche for the following reasons: • all of our hotels are located in unique, highly desirable resort destinations; • our…
- FY2025 10-K: …segment, which represents hotels achieving the highest average daily rates ("ADR") in the industry, and includes such brands as the Four Seasons, Ritz-Carlton and Marriott's Luxury Collection hotels. Our other hotels are categorized in the upper upscale and upscale segments of the hotel market. The luxury and upper…
Commercial (reported)
- WPC (W. P. Carey Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: Member wpc:RealEstateSubjectToOperatingLeaseMember wpc:MesquiteTexasMember 2025-09-18 2025-09-18 0001025378 srt:RetailSiteMember wpc:RealEstateSubjectToOperatingLeaseMember wpc:KissimmeeFloridaMember 2025-09-23 0001025378 srt:RetailSiteMember wpc:RealEstateSubjectToOperatingLeaseMember wpc:KissimmeeFloridaMember…
- FY2025 10-K: …2025-12-31 0001025378 wpc:RealEstateSubjectToOperatingLeaseMember wpc:RetailFacilitiesInPhoenixAZAndColumbiaMDMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001025378 wpc:RealEstateSubjectToOperatingLeaseMember wpc:RetailFacilityInGorzowPolandMember 2025-12-31 0001025378 wpc:RealEstateSubjectToOperatingLeaseMember…
- O (REALTY INCOME CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: $ 6.2 million for the Fund Credit Facilities are included in 'Other assets, net' on our consolidated balance sheets, and are being amortized over the remaining term of the facilities. An additional $ 3.0 million was allocated to the delayed draw term loan arrangement and will not be amortized until the loan is drawn.…
- FY2025 10-K: …2025-12-29 2025-12-29 0000726728 o:TheFundMember us-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember 2026-01-01 2026-01-01 0000726728 o:TheFundMember us-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember 2026-01-01 0000726728…
- ADC (Agree Realty Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …by facts and circumstances at the time of loss. Commercial Paper Program In March 2025, the Operating Partnership established a commercial paper program (the "Commercial Paper Program"), pursuant to which it may issue short-term, fixed rate, unsecured commercial paper notes (the "Commercial Paper Notes") under the…
- FY2025 10-K: …stockholders and holders of the units of the Operating Partnership (the "Operating Partnership Common Units"), and future property acquisitions and development. In March 2025, the Operating Partnership established a commercial paper program (the "Commercial Paper Program"), pursuant to which it may issue short-term,…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings call · Q1 2026 earnings release · company announcement, 2026