Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL): what the price requires
At today's price, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~5.2 years. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-14 · Exported: 2026-07-16 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/JLL
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | JLL |
| Company | Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated |
| Current price | $321.62/sh |
| Composition | Real Estate Management Services 77% / Leasing Advisory 12% / Capital Markets Services 9% / Investment Management 2% / Software and Technology Solutions 1% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 1.4% |
| Operating margin today | 3.2% |
| Margin compression implied | -1.8pp |
| Must persist for | 5.2y |
| Multiple paid | 22x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 10.2% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.7 years.
How unusual the bet is: elevated
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.39σ |
| cohort percentile (of 82 peers) | 34 |
| sustained it ~5.2 years at this level | 29% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.39x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.45x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.56x | 4 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.77x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $627.67 | 0.51x | yes | FCF base $1.3B, growth 11% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.7%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $415.98 | 0.77x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 9.7x / 11.7x / 13.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $572.66 | 0.56x | yes | P/E 26.88x (blended: static sector reference 35x + trailing (TTM) 15x), scenarios: 22.3x / 26.9x / 31.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 20x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $202.19 | 1.59x | yes | BV/sh $152.86, ROE (TTM) 12.2%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $231.02 | 1.39x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $266.61 | 1.21x | yes | Rev $26.8B, growth 11% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.5x / 0.6x / 0.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $138.11 | 2.33x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.92B × (1−19%) / WACC 8.7% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $236.93 | 1.36x | yes | BV $152.86 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 12.2% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.0%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $274.20 | 1.17x | yes | √(22.5 × FFO/share $21.86 × BVPS $152.86) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $568.74 | 0.57x | yes | EBITDA $1.42B × sector EV/EBITDA 20.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $246.86 | 1.30x | yes | FCF $1206.7M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $221.64 | 1.45x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $1.10B (FCF $1.21B − SBC $0.11B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $87.02 | 3.70x | yes | FFO/share $21.86 × (8.5 + 2×-1.9%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $33.79 | 9.52x | yes | BV $152.86 × (ROIC 1.9% / WACC 8.7%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $3358.32 | 0.10x | yes | Revenue $26.76B × sector P/S 6.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $236.32 | 1.36x | yes | FFO/share $21.86 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | $309.92 | 1.04x | yes | FFO/share $21.86 × 14.2x P/FFO (route cohort median, n=85); FFO $1.04B (FFO incl. D&A + impairments, FY2025, companyfacts), shares 48M |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $1.5b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 2.30x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 1.86x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -1.6% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- JLL is two businesses bolted together: a steady, contracted base of property and facilities management plus a transaction engine in leasing and capital markets that swings hard with the real estate cycle, and the recovery in that second engine is what is driving results right now.
- The defining risk is that transaction revenue is inherently variable, with the company itself noting that investment sales, debt and equity advisory, and incentive fees "increase the variability of the revenue we earn", so a stall in deal activity hits the most profitable part of the model first.
- Watch full-year deal momentum against management's own framing, which expects high single-digit growth in Leasing Advisory and low double-digit growth in Capital Markets for 2026 while flagging that prolonged Middle East tensions could weigh on the back half of the year.
Bull Case
Read the balance sheet first, because it tells you how management feels about its own cycle. JLL carries net debt of roughly $1.5B against trailing operating income near $1.2B, leverage of about 1.25 times operating income, which is modest for a business with this much contracted, recurring management revenue underneath the transactional swings. The share count has been falling about 1.6% a year, which means even through a soft commercial real estate stretch the company kept buying back stock rather than hoarding cash or raising it. A management team that deleverages quietly and repurchases shares into a downturn is signaling confidence that the transaction engine comes back, and the most recent quarter says it has.
The model itself is built to absorb the cycle. Underneath the headline-grabbing capital markets and leasing fees sits a large annuity base: the company earns management and professional-services revenue "commensurate with the length and terms of the contract" and recognizes professional-services revenue as performance obligations are satisfied, which is the recurring spine that funds the firm when deal volumes are low. JLL splits its world into Advisory revenue, the transactional and cyclical part, and Resilient revenue, the contracted management part, and in the first quarter Resilient revenue grew 7% in local currency while Advisory grew 17%. The resilient base grows steadily; the advisory layer provides the torque.
That torque just showed up in full force. First-quarter revenue rose 11% to $6.4B, with Leasing Advisory up 16% in local currency, led by US office and accelerating industrial, and Capital Markets up 21% across investment sales, debt, and equity. Adjusted diluted EPS of $3.43 beat estimates of $3.03, and the operating leverage is the point: when transaction volumes recover, the incremental fee revenue drops to the bottom line at high margins because the cost base is already in place. A firm with a stable annuity floor and a recovering high-margin transaction layer, repurchasing its own stock through the trough, is positioned for the part of the cycle it appears to be entering.
Bear Case
The structural truth a holder should sit with is that a large share of JLL's profit comes from transactions that may not happen. This is not a steady fee machine wearing a cyclical costume; the company says so itself. Its capital markets and advisory revenues, including investment sales, debt and equity advisory fees, and incentive fees, "increase the variability of the revenue we earn", and that variability cuts both ways. The first quarter's 21% capital markets growth is the cycle turning up. The same line item fell just as sharply when deals dried up, and nothing about the business model prevents that from recurring the moment rates back up or credit tightens.
The demand backdrop is structurally unsettled, not merely cyclical. The company acknowledges that the evolution of corporate workplace strategies "continues to alter how companies use real estate, impacting demand across asset types, particularly the office sector". Office leasing led the recent recovery, but the long-run question of how much office space corporations actually need has not been resolved, only deferred. JLL is a leveraged bet on transaction volumes in an asset class whose largest category is still working out its post-pandemic equilibrium, and management's own guidance hangs a caveat on the year, citing prolonged Middle East tensions as a potential drag on the global economy in the second half.
Then there is what the price asks of a cyclical at what looks like an up-cycle moment. At roughly 20 times company-wide operating income, the market is pricing in something close to 22% annual operating growth sustained for five years. The near-term pace is within what JLL has recently delivered, but the demand is on duration, and only about a third of comparable fast-growers have sustained that kind of pace for five years. The trailing operating margin sits near 4.4%, thin by design for a services intermediary, which means small swings in revenue mix produce large swings in profit. Pay this multiple at this point in the cycle and the bet is that the transaction recovery is durable rather than a snap-back to a level that fades.
Valuation
The price is making a growth bet on a cyclical business, which is the tension to hold throughout. At about 20 times company-wide operating income, the market is asking JLL to compound operating profit roughly 22% a year for five years. The rate is within reach given the recovery underway; the stretch is whether it persists, and history says only about a third of comparable fast-growers held that pace for five years. The thin trailing operating margin near 4.4% is normal for a real estate services intermediary, where the firm takes a slice of large transaction values rather than owning the assets.
The methods divide cleanly. Relative-multiple and growth-DCF approaches land at or above the price, which is why the price reads as justified on a cyclical-recovery basis; the asset-value and several earnings-power methods land below it. The earnings-power lens that strips out growth, valuing the business on its zero-growth profit, sits well under the price, which is the mathematical statement of the cyclical setup: capitalize today's recovering earnings as if they were permanent and the number looks rich, credit the growth and it looks fair. No family flags the price as outright expensive, but the pattern says the defense rests almost entirely on the recovery continuing, not on the static value of current earnings.
On solvency, the picture is comfortable rather than fortress-like. Net debt of about $1.5B is roughly 1.25 times trailing operating income, the share count is shrinking, and the contracted management base provides cash-flow stability when transactions slow. One note on the numbers: the operating income that anchors the priced-in math and the figure read from the most recent quarterly filings differ by more than ten percent, a reminder that this is a business measured across a moving cycle, where the trailing window you pick materially changes the multiple.
Catalysts
The first-quarter print was the catalyst that mattered. JLL reported revenue of $6.4B, up 11% in USD, with diluted EPS of $3.33 and adjusted diluted EPS of $3.43, up 48% in USD, beating the $3.03 consensus. The recovery was broad: Leasing Advisory up 16% in local currency on US office strength and accelerating industrial, Capital Markets up 21% across investment sales, debt, and equity, and Real Estate Management Services up 7% on Workplace and Project Management.
For the rest of 2026 management expects high single-digit revenue growth in Leasing Advisory and low double-digit growth in Capital Markets, while explicitly building potential macroeconomic headwinds from prolonged Middle East tensions into its second-half framework. The near-term watch items are whether deal momentum in capital markets holds as the year progresses and whether office leasing keeps recovering, since both are the high-margin levers that drove the quarter. Longer term, management is leaning on its Accelerate 2030 strategy and its data and AI investments to scale the core services, a margin story that will take several prints to show up in the numbers.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Real Estate Management Services (reported)
- CBRE (CBRE GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CWK (CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CIGI (Colliers International Group Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NMRK (NEWMARK GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FSV (FirstService Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Leasing Advisory (reported)
- CBRE (CBRE GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CWK (CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CIGI (Colliers International Group Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NMRK (NEWMARK GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Capital Markets Services (reported)
- CBRE (CBRE GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CWK (CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CIGI (Colliers International Group Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NMRK (NEWMARK GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- WD (Walker & Dunlop, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Investment Management (reported)
- BX (Blackstone Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- KKR (KKR & Co. Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- APO (APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- ARES (ARES MANAGEMENT CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- BAM (BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Software and Technology Solutions (reported)
- CBRE (CBRE GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CWK (CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD LTD.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CIGI (Colliers International Group Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NMRK (NEWMARK GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FSV (FirstService Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- BEKE (KE Holdings Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release · Q1 2026 earnings release, April 30 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call