Itron, Inc. (ITRI): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $97.53, Itron, Inc. (ITRI) is priced for +5.5% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-24.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Exported: 2026-08-31 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ITRI

Headline

FieldValue
TickerITRI
CompanyItron, Inc.
Sector / IndustryTechnology
Current price$97.53/sh
CompositionProduct revenues 85% / Service revenues 15%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)5.1%
Operating margin today13.2%
Margin compression (value-band)-8.1pp
Implied growth5.5%
Multiple paid17x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 8.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.08σ
cohort percentile (of 188 peers)20

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.38x5expensive
Earnings1.51x5expensive
Relative1.69x2expensive
Growth1.03x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.8%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$94.921.03xyesFCF base $0.4B, growth -6% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 6.8%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$109.110.89xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 12.0x / 14.0x / 16.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.3x / 18.0x / 20.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$67.641.44xyesBV/sh $36.91, ROE (TTM) 17.0%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$90.381.08xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$51.221.90xyesRev $2.3B, growth -6% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.6x / 1.9x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$71.761.36xyesEPS $5.98, growth 5% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=2.89 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$16.965.75xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.16B × (1−33%) / WACC 6.8% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$90.961.07xyesBV $36.91 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$70.471.38xyes√(22.5 × EPS $5.98 × BVPS $36.91) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.37B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$75.601.29xyesFCF $385.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$60.441.61xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.32B (FCF $0.39B − SBC $0.06B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$96.721.01xyesEPS $5.98 × (8.5 + 2×5.4%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$11.158.75xyesBV $36.91 × (ROIC 2.1% / WACC 6.8%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $2.30B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$48.432.01xyesEPS $5.98 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 5.4% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 8.1x
Earnings YieldEarnings$64.651.51xyesEPS $5.98 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Device Solutionsoperatingenterprise$447.1mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Networked Solutionsoperatingenterprise$1.6bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Outcomesoperatingenterprise$359.7mwithheldunresolved no unit value
Resiliency Solutionsoperatingenterprise$3.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$864.8m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)4.27x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)2.84x
Interest coverage13.3x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.3%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Electricity demand is arriving faster than anyone can build for it. Data centres want load in eighteen months; a new transmission line takes a decade, and a new plant is not much quicker. That leaves utilities with one practical option, which is to find capacity inside the wires they already own. Doing that requires knowing, at the level of an individual transformer and an individual meter, what the network is actually doing minute by minute, and then acting on it. Metering, the network that carries the readings, and the software that turns them into decisions is exactly the stack Itron sells.

The evidence that the mix is moving toward the higher-value end of that stack is in the segment lines. Outcomes, the software and managed-services business, grew 22% to $96 million in the first quarter, and a new resiliency solutions segment contributed $16 million from the Urbint and Locusview acquisitions. Adjusted gross margin reached 40.7%, up 490 basis points on the prior year. Revenue fell 3% over the same span and adjusted EBITDA still rose 5% to $92 million. A business whose profit rises while its top line falls is changing what it sells, not merely cutting.

That shift has already done something remarkable to the earnings base. Trailing operating income now runs $302.0 million on roughly $2.35 billion of revenue, a 12.7% operating margin. Average the last five years and the figure is about half that, because the early part of the window covers a period when components were scarce, deliveries slipped and the company earned almost nothing. Any method that normalises across those five years is valuing a company that no longer exists. The one that values what exists today sees a different business entirely.

The order book is the reason this is more than a margin story. Bookings ran $476 million in the quarter and total backlog closed at $4.4 billion, close to two years of revenue already contracted, in an industry where a utility deployment signed today gets installed over three to five years and generates service revenue for a decade after. The revenue timing is lumpy because deployments are lumpy, and the full-year outlook of $2.35 billion to $2.45 billion is explicitly weighted to the back half on large network rollouts. Lumpy is not the same as shrinking.

Capital structure is the quiet advantage. Borrowings are entirely convertible notes: $805 million at zero interest maturing in 2032 and $805 million at 1.375% maturing in 2030, against $713 million of cash at the end of March. That is roughly $1.6 billion of financing on which the company pays almost nothing, which is why operating income covers the interest bill about 13.3 times over despite net borrowings running near 3.0 times a year of operating profit. Free cash flow of $79 million in the quarter, with $100 million already spent on repurchases in February, says the cash is being used rather than accumulated.

Set against all that, what today's quote demands is modest. The price implies operating profit growing about 0.7% a year. Over its recent record the company's operating profit has compounded at an average near 18.4% annually. The gap between those two figures is the bull case stated in one line.

Bear Case

A low bar is still a bar, and the direction of travel matters more than the height. Today's price implies operating profit growing about 0.7% a year, which sounds like nothing. Then look at what is actually happening to the business generating that profit. First-quarter revenue fell 3% to $587 million, and networked solutions, the largest single line, fell 13% to $351 million. Device solutions fell 1%. Total backlog closed at $4.4 billion against $4.7 billion a year earlier. Second-quarter guidance calls for $560 million to $570 million, another step down. Growing operating profit at any positive rate requires the shrinkage to stop.

The margin story cuts both ways, and this is the part a holder should sit with. Adjusted gross margin of 40.7% is up 490 basis points on the prior year. Trailing operating income of $302.0 million against a five-year average near half that level is not evidence of a new normal; it is evidence of an unusually good year following unusually bad ones. Component costs normalised, backlog priced during scarcity got delivered, and mix moved toward software. Each of those is a level shift that happens once. If the current margin is the peak rather than the base, then the earnings the price is capitalising are the wrong earnings, and the modest growth requirement gets applied to a number that falls first.

Where the standard frames land supports that reading. The price sits about 1.25 times where the earnings-power methods land and about 1.20 times what the book-value methods reach. Only peer multiples, at 0.73 times, and the cash-flow methods that credit growth, at 0.92 times, get above the quote. The frames that simply capitalise what the company earns now put it below today's price; the frames that assume the business keeps growing put it above. That is the whole disagreement, and it is a disagreement about whether the recent improvement persists.

Customer concentration is structural and does not go away. Itron sells to regulated utilities, and a regulated utility spends what a rate case allows it to spend. Deployment schedules move when a commission takes longer, when a tariff changes the landed cost of hardware, or when a utility decides the money is better spent on wildfire mitigation this year. The record backlog is real, but backlog is a schedule, not a receipt, and the company has already described project timing as the swing factor in its own results.

The balance sheet is cheap rather than strong. The $1.6 billion of borrowings are convertible notes, which is another way of saying the company sold call options on its own equity to get a zero and a 1.375% coupon. Cash came down roughly $300 million from year-end, absorbing the Locusview purchase, a $460 million repayment of older converts and $100 million of buybacks against $79 million of free cash flow generated. Net borrowings of $897.1 million now sit at about 3.0 times a year of operating profit. That is manageable while operating profit stays near a record. It is less manageable if the peak-earnings reading turns out to be the right one, and the share count, essentially flat over the past four years despite repurchases, shows the converts quietly working against the buyback.

Valuation

Start with what is being asked of the business rather than what it is worth. At $84.58, the enterprise is valued around 15.5 times a year of operating profit, and the price implies that profit growing roughly 0.7% a year. Measured against the pace this company has recently delivered, that is undemanding, and the assumption sits comfortably inside the range of what comparable industrials achieve. The interesting question is not whether 0.7% is achievable. It is whether the profit base it is applied to is the right one.

That base is unusual. Trailing operating income of $302.0 million represents a 12.7% operating margin, roughly double the five-year average, and the improvement is recent and specific: adjusted gross margin rose 490 basis points year over year in the first quarter on better mix and normalised component costs. Methods that average five years therefore value a company that spent the first half of the window barely profitable, and one such method lands so far below the price that it distorts its own family. Reading it literally would be reading the supply-chain crisis as Itron's steady state.

The families split cleanly along that fault line. Capitalise today's earnings with no growth and the price sits about 1.25 times where those methods land; value the equity on book plus profitability and the price sits about 1.20 times what those methods reach. Peer multiples land above the quote, at 0.73 times, and so do the cash-flow methods that credit forward growth, at 0.92 times. So the static lenses call this fully priced and the forward lenses call it cheap, which is the signature of a company whose recent results look nothing like its recent history. Neither camp is being unreasonable; they are answering different questions about the same margin.

The contracted book is what makes the forward reading defensible rather than hopeful. Backlog stood at $4.4 billion at the end of March with $476 million of new bookings in the quarter, against a full-year revenue outlook of $2.35 billion to $2.45 billion weighted to the second half on large network deployments. Roughly two years of revenue is already under contract. Against that, the same backlog was $4.7 billion a year earlier, so the book is being drawn down faster than it is being replaced.

Solvency neither rescues nor threatens the case. Cash of $713 million sat against $1.61 billion of convertible notes at the end of March, all of it issued at a zero or 1.375% coupon, leaving net borrowings of $897.1 million at about 3.0 times a year of operating profit with interest covered roughly 13.3 times over. The cost of that debt is close to nothing in cash terms, which is why the coverage looks so comfortable, and the real consideration is the conversion feature rather than the interest. Free cash flow of $79 million in the quarter funds the business without recourse to markets. The decisive number remains the one on the order book, because everything the forward methods credit runs through it.

Catalysts

July 28, 2026 is the date. Second-quarter results are due that morning, and management has already guided to revenue of $560 million to $570 million with non-GAAP diluted earnings of $1.25 to $1.35 a share, both below the year-ago quarter at the midpoint. The guided decline is known. What is not known is the bookings figure, which ran $476 million in the first quarter, and the backlog, which closed at $4.4 billion against $4.7 billion a year earlier. A backlog that stabilises would say the drawdown is a deployment-timing effect. A second consecutive decline would say demand has moved.

The full-year shape is the second thing to watch, because it is unusually loaded. The 2026 outlook of $2.35 billion to $2.45 billion is explicitly weighted to the back half on large network rollouts. That leaves the entire year riding on deployments that have to start on schedule. Utilities do not deploy on a company's fiscal calendar, and project timing has already been named by management as the main swing factor in the results delivered so far.

The segment to watch inside the print is Outcomes, which grew 22% to $96 million in the first quarter, together with the new resiliency solutions line that contributed $16 million from the Urbint and Locusview acquisitions. Those two carry the higher margins and the recurring revenue, and the gross margin expansion of 490 basis points depends on them continuing to take share of the mix. If hardware keeps falling and software keeps rising, the earnings base holds even on a lower revenue line. If both fall together, the margin story loses its engine.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Device Solutions (reported)

Networked Solutions / Outcomes / Resiliency Solutions (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Itron Q1 2026 earnings release · Itron press release, Itron to Announce Second Quarter Results on July 28 · Itron 2026 outlook, Q1 2026 earnings call · Itron Q1 2026 quarterly report · Itron Q1 2026 earnings release and quarterly report · Itron Q1 2026 earnings call · Itron Q1 2026 earnings release and 2026 outlook · Itron Q1 2026 earnings release and Itron press release, Itron to Announce Second Quarter Results on July 28

View the full interactive ITRI report on boothcheck