iRhythm Holdings, Inc. (IRTC): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $120.80, iRhythm Holdings, Inc. (IRTC) is priced for +14.5% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-14.
Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/IRTC
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | IRTC |
| Company | iRhythm Holdings, Inc. |
| Current price | $120.80/sh |
| Composition | Contracted third-party payors 53% / Centers for Medicare and Medicaid 24% / Healthcare institutions 17% / Non-contracted third-party payors 7% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | revenue-multiple |
| EV / sales paid | 5.3x |
| Steady-state operating margin assumed | 28.2% |
| Implied growth | 14.5% |
The company earns no operating profit yet; the inversion runs on the revenue multiple and an assumed steady-state margin.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage, holding a 28.2% terminal operating margin (70.6% gross margin x the 40% mature-conversion prior); each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied revenue growth ~6.7pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -1.42σ |
| sustained it ~5 years at this level | 49% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | — | 0 | — |
| Earnings | — | 0 | — |
| Relative | 1.25x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.39x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=5)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $53.98 | 2.24x | yes | FCF base $0.0B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.9%, 7yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $96.95 | 1.25x | yes | P/S fallback (negative EPS): Sector P/S 4.0x × TTM revenue — excluded from consensus |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $4.96 | 24.35x | yes | Book value floor: BV/sh $4.96, ROE negative (excluded from median) |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $4.46 | 27.09x | yes | Book value with convergence: BV/sh $4.96, ROE converges to ke (excluded from median) |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $135.75 | 0.89x | yes | Rev $0.8B, growth 27% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.0x / 5.0x / 6.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero EPS — earnings-based value floored at $0 |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | $86.62 | 1.39x | yes | Margin ramp: -4% → 12% over 7yr, rev growth 27% (input: historical growth; tapered) |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 12080.00x | yes | FCF $18.8M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $96.95 | 1.25x | yes | Revenue $0.79B × sector P/S 4.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $100.7m |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 2.4% |
| Burning cash | no |
Operating profit is negative or near zero and the company has no demonstrated through-cycle (mid-cycle) operating margin to normalize against, so years-to-repay cannot be computed honestly.
Operating profit is negative or near zero and there is no demonstrated through-cycle (mid-cycle) operating margin to normalize against, so interest coverage cannot be computed honestly.
Bullet Takeaways
- iRhythm sells Zio, an FDA-cleared, 14-day wear-and-mail heart-rhythm patch, at a 70.6% gross margin, and Q1 2026 revenue of $199.4 million grew 25.7% year over year, so this is a fast-growing medical-device franchise that has not yet flipped to GAAP profit.
- The biggest risk is the gap between growth and earnings: the company still posts an operating loss, runs on a net cash cushion of about $455 million, and a 2.4% annual rise in share count means the path to profitability has to outrun both spending and dilution.
- What moves the story next is the product roadmap and reimbursement: a next-generation Zio submission is in front of the FDA, and management raised full-year 2026 revenue guidance to $875 to $885 million with an adjusted profitability target, so each quarterly print against that 17% to 18% growth bar is the thing to watch.
Bull Case
iRhythm sits in the awkward middle of the company life cycle, and reading its numbers correctly starts with knowing that. It is past the pre-revenue phase, with $199.4 million of quarterly revenue growing 25.7% year over year, but it has not yet crossed into GAAP profit, posting a small operating loss on a trailing basis. A trailing earnings multiple on a company in that phase is meaningless, and the value methods that lean on book value or current earnings price the shares near their roughly $5 book value per share precisely because there are no positive earnings to capitalize. Those methods are not wrong about today; they are answering the wrong question. The right lens for a growth-stage device company with a 70.6% gross margin is whether revenue is scaling toward operating leverage, and on that question the recent quarter is unambiguous: revenue up over a quarter year on year, with the loss shrinking.
The product underneath is the reason the growth has legs. Zio is a wear-and-mail cardiac patch that records up to 14 days of continuous heart rhythm, against the 24-to-48-hour Holter monitors it competes with, and that longer window is the clinical argument. Management cited new real-world data in post-ablation and pregnancy populations showing the 14-day record catching clinically important arrhythmias that shorter tests miss. The device carries FDA clearance, a CE mark, and Japan regulatory approval, so the runway is not one market but several. Growth in the quarter was broad: cardiology, primary care, newer sales channels, and international all contributed, which is what diversified demand looks like rather than a single hot account. A 70.6% gross margin means each incremental dollar of that revenue drops a large share toward covering the fixed cost base, which is the mechanical path to the profitability the price is waiting on.
Here is the part the bull leans on hardest. At today's price the embedded assumption is modest: it prices in roughly 6.2% annual revenue growth toward a terminal operating margin near 28%. Set that 6.2% against a company that just grew 25.7% and raised full-year guidance to 17% to 18% growth, and the priced-in pace sits well below what the business is actually delivering, more than two standard deviations under its own recent record. The price is not demanding heroic growth; it is demanding a sharp deceleration that has not started. If Zio's penetration in primary care and international markets keeps revenue compounding anywhere near the guided rate while the 70.6% gross margin converts scale into the targeted profitability, the gap between what the price assumes and what the company does is the bull case in one sentence.
Bear Case
The variable with the most leverage on this thesis is not growth, it is the two systems that stand between a recorded heartbeat and a paid invoice: the FDA and the payers. iRhythm's business is a single product family that has to be cleared to sell and reimbursed to get paid, and both levers sit outside the company's control. The next-generation Zio submission is in front of the FDA and not yet cleared, which means the roadmap the bull is paying for is still a regulatory pending item, not a shipped product. The price embeds a terminal operating margin near 28% on a company running an operating loss today, and that 28% is not a market the company can simply grow into; it is a number that depends on holding the price per test while scaling volume. Reimbursement rates for remote cardiac monitoring are set by Medicare and commercial payers, and a single adverse coding or pricing decision compresses the margin the entire forward case rests on. That exposure is the kind a fast-growth narrative tends to underweight until it arrives.
The financial structure is the second pressure. iRhythm still does not earn an operating profit, and while it is not burning cash and holds about $455 million of net cash, the absence of GAAP earnings is what forces the value-based methods to price the equity near its $5 book value per share, more than twenty times below the current price. The whole distance between that floor and today's price is the market crediting growth that has not yet turned into profit. A net cash cushion buys time, but it is not the same as self-funding profitability, and the share count rising about 2.4% a year quietly works against per-share progress. The bull needs operating leverage to show up on schedule; the bear notes that the company has been promising profitability for years and is still posting losses, so the schedule is an assumption, not a track record.
The third risk is what a 14-day patch competes against and how durable the lead is. The advantage over a Holter monitor is real, but the broader remote cardiac monitoring field includes other patch makers and the large diagnostics and device companies that can fund longer development cycles. The bull case rests on iRhythm sustaining premium pricing and category leadership long enough for scale to deliver the 28% terminal margin. If competition or payers chip at either the volume growth or the price per test, the forward-growth methods that currently reach the price stop reaching it, and the only support left is a sector revenue multiple of about 4 times sales, which is itself a function of the growth staying intact. Strip the growth assumption and there is no earnings floor to catch the fall, only a book value far below the price.
Valuation
Because iRhythm runs an operating loss, the price is read on revenue and the margin that revenue can eventually carry, not on trailing earnings. Inverted, today's price embeds something surprisingly undemanding: roughly 6.2% annual revenue growth toward a terminal operating margin near 28%. The growth piece is the striking part. A company that grew 25.7% in the most recent quarter and guides to 17% to 18% for the full year is being priced as if growth decelerates to single digits, a pace more than two standard deviations below its own recent record. The bet the price is making, then, is less about whether iRhythm can grow and more about whether it can convert that growth into the high-20s operating margin its gross margin of 70.6% structurally allows.
The families of methods split along the same fault line. The forward-growth and relative-multiple lenses both reach the price, and they should: a sector price-to-sales near 4 times applied to about $790 million of revenue lands close to today's level, and a margin-ramp model that walks the company from a small loss toward a low-double-digit operating margin gets there too. The asset-value lens, by contrast, sits far below, pricing the equity near its book value of about $5 per share because there are no positive earnings to capitalize. That is not a contradiction to resolve; it is the signature of a growth-stage company. The static, earnings-based methods cannot frame a business whose value is forward, so the live question is whether the growth and margin assumptions in the methods that DO reach the price are credible. With the company guiding above the priced-in growth rate and targeting positive adjusted profitability, the assumptions are at least anchored to management's own raised outlook rather than to a hope.
Solvency sets the boundary under all of it. iRhythm holds about $455 million of net cash and is not burning cash, which funds the path to profitability without forcing a raise. But the company does not yet earn an operating profit, so the usual leverage and coverage math does not apply, and the share count rising about 2.4% a year is the dilution the per-share story has to clear. What the price rests on is concrete: revenue compounding near the guided rate, the 70.6% gross margin converting into the targeted operating margin, and no regulatory or reimbursement shock to the price per test. The net cash floor means a stumble is survivable; it does not mean the 28% terminal margin is earned. That margin is the assumption the whole forward case is built on, and it is the one number the company has not yet demonstrated.
Catalysts
The first-quarter 2026 print, reported April 30, 2026, was the most recent catalyst and a strong one. Revenue came in at $199.4 million, up 25.7% from $158.7 million a year earlier, ahead of the roughly $194 million consensus. The GAAP loss narrowed to $13.9 million, or $0.43 per share, while adjusted earnings of $0.35 per share landed well above expectations. Management raised full-year 2026 guidance to net revenue of $875 to $885 million, representing 17% to 18% growth, up from a prior $870 to $880 million, and lifted the adjusted EBITDA margin target to 12% to 13% of revenue from 11.5% to 12.5%. Growth was broad across the Zio monitor and Zio AT lines, with momentum cited in cardiology, primary care, newer channels, and international.
The product and regulatory roadmap is the catalyst set that matters beyond the next print. A next-generation Zio submission sits with the FDA and is not yet cleared, and a mobile cardiac telemetry product line is part of the forward plan; clearance timing on either is the kind of event that resets the growth runway. Management also pointed to new real-world clinical data in post-ablation and pregnancy populations supporting the 14-day monitoring window over shorter Holter tests, and named primary care penetration through AI risk-stratification partnerships, an adjacency push into obstructive sleep apnea, and continued international execution behind its U.S., European, and Japan regulatory footprint as 2026 growth levers.
The reads to track are whether each subsequent quarter holds the high-teens-to-mid-20s revenue growth against the raised guidance, whether the adjusted profitability target firms up as scale builds on the 70.6% gross margin, and whether the next-generation Zio clearance lands on a timeline that extends the product cycle. Those are the events that would either confirm the deceleration the price assumes is not happening, or signal that it has begun.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Ambulatory cardiac monitoring (single segment) (reported)
- DXCM (DEXCOM, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …In the future, we plan to expand our product offering to people who are pregnant and cleared/approved indications to address people with pre-diabetes, people who are obese, and people in the hospital setting. Although the majority of our revenue has been generated in the United States, we have expanded our operations…
- FY2025 10-K: …new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. In selling our current CGM systems, we compete directly with the Diabetes Care division of Abbott Laboratories; Medtronic plc's Diabetes Group (which implemented a spinoff of its diabetes business into a separate company called MiniMed);…
- PODD (INSULET CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …funds with a limited number of financial institutions that have a high investment grade credit rating. See Notes 4 and 5 for customer concentration. Supply Risk- The Company uses different types of semiconductor chips, which are sourced from external suppliers, in the manufacturing of its products. While the Company…
- FY2025 10-K: …Omnipod ® 5 and its predecessors Omnipod DASH and Classic Omnipod. Each product features a small, lightweight, self-adhesive disposable tubeless Omnipod device ("Pod") that the user fills with insulin and wears directly on the body for up to three days at a time, which delivers personalized doses of insulin and…
- ATRC (AtriCure, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: AtriCure Solutions and Products We believe that we are currently the market leader in the surgical treatment of Afib and LAAM, and pioneers of the application of Cryo Nerve Block in cardiac, thoracic and amputation surgical procedures. We anticipate that substantially all our revenue for the foreseeable future will…
- FY2025 10-K: …on cryoablation devices used when freezing nerves during an extremity amputation procedure. Products for appendage management: • AtriClip System . The AtriClip ® LAA Exclusion System includes various combinations of an implantable device (AtriClip) coupled to a single-use disposable applier. The AtriClip device is…
- AORT (ARTIVION, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …in cardiac procedures. Implantable devices may be entirely synthetic, such as mechanical heart valves, or contain both synthetic materials and xenograft tissue components, such as bioprosthetic heart valves. These devices may be implanted surgically through open heart surgery, or in some cases, without sternotomy…
- FY2025 10-K: …surgery, can be a significant concern for patients, particularly younger patients that tend to choose mechanical heart valves over bioprosthetic heart valves. On the other hand, the requirement that mechanical heart valve recipients undergo long-term anticoagulation drug therapy can be a concern for patients that may…
- TMDX (TransMedics Group, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates. Revenue…
- FY2025 10-K: ; • recall, suspension or termination of distribution, administrative detention, injunction or seizure of organ-specific OCS Consoles or disposable sets; • customer notifications or repair, replacement or refunds; • operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production; • refusing or delaying…
- PEN (Penumbra, Inc)
- FY2025 10-K: …which involves removal of the clot causing the blockage by mechanical means and restoring blood flow to the blocked vessels. Outside of the United States, we estimate, based on published sources, that there are approximately 9.7 million ischemic strokes annually and that 1.9 million of these patients are treatable…
- FY2025 10-K: …mechanical or computer assisted vacuum thrombectomy in the U.S. We estimate there are approximately 2 million annual DVTs outside the U.S. that are eligible for thrombectomy. • Acute Limb Ischemia ("ALI") : ALI occurs when the leg experiences an occlusion in an artery, caused either by a blood clot in the artery or…
- INSP (Inspire Medical Systems, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …12 months following initial treatment. STAR trial follow-up has shown similar results to the initial data at 18 months, three years, and five years. At five years, median AHI remained low at 6.2 events per hour. The results from our ADHERE patient registry also reflect similar median AHI reductions to the STAR trial…
- FY2025 10-K: …and the related notes to those statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Some of the numbers included herein have been…
- AXGN (AXOGEN, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …they are currently commonly treated as general supplies utilized in surgery, and the cost is currently included in payment to the facility for the procedure. When Avance Nerve Graft and Axoguard Connector are used in an outpatient setting where the nerve repair is the primary reason for the procedure, facilities…
- FY2025 10-K: …event, or that continued use in an investigational setting may be unethical. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of research, for example, if the research is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's requirements or if the research has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
iRhythm Q1 2026 earnings release and call, April 30, 2026 · iRhythm Q1 2026 10-Q and earnings materials, 2026 · iRhythm Q1 2026 earnings call, April 2026