Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $232.26, Installed Building Products, Inc. (IBP) is priced for +24.6% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/IBP

Headline

FieldValue
TickerIBP
CompanyInstalled Building Products, Inc.
Current price$232.26/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)5.6%
Operating margin today12.7%
Margin compression (value-band)-7.1pp
Implied growth24.6%
Multiple paid19x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10.8% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~6.9pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~14.2%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: elevated

ReferenceValue
vs own history-0.36σ
sustained it ~5 years at this level31%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.86x4expensive
Earnings2.35x5expensive
Relative1.37x5expensive
Growth1.50x4expensive

Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=18)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$127.201.83xyesFCF base $0.3B, growth 0% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.9%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$207.191.12xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 13.8x / 15.8x / 17.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$170.021.37xyesP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.3x / 18.0x / 20.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$163.841.42xyesStage 1: 5% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$102.152.27xyesBV/sh $24.75, ROE (TTM) 38.2%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$227.201.02xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$147.241.58xyesRev $2.9B, growth 0% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.8x / 2.1x / 2.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$112.322.07xyesEPS $9.36, growth 5% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=5.43 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$89.152.61xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.34B × (1−26%) / WACC 7.9% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$160.881.44xyesBV $24.75 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 38.2% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$72.203.22xyes√(22.5 × EPS $9.36 × BVPS $24.75) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$169.401.37xyesEBITDA $0.44B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$99.012.35xyesFCF $314.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$90.472.57xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.29B (FCF $0.31B − SBC $0.02B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$137.641.69xyesEPS $9.36 × (8.5 + 2×4.5%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$9.5824.24xyesBV $24.75 × (ROIC 3.0% / WACC 7.9%) (excluded from median)
P/Sales SectorRelative$273.170.85xyesRevenue $2.95B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$63.503.66xyesEPS $9.36 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 4.5% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 6.8x
Earnings YieldEarnings$101.192.30xyesEPS $9.36 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$607.3m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)2.20x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)1.62x
Interest coverage11.1x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-2.3%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Valuing a building-products installer requires reading the housing cycle, not the trailing quarter, and that is where IBP gets interesting. The company sits at the back end of new-home construction, installing insulation and related products after the frame goes up, so its volume rises and falls with housing starts. The trailing numbers capture a single-family market that just contracted, which means the earnings the methods are valuing are cyclically depressed rather than representative. The right question is not what IBP earns at the bottom of a single-family slowdown but what it earns across the cycle, and across the cycle this is a high-return business: return on equity runs about 38% and the operating margin is 12.7%, strong for a labor-intensive installation business.

The diversification away from single-family is the bull's most concrete near-term point. In the first quarter of 2026, even as single-family softened, the commercial end market grew at a double-digit rate, with heavy commercial installation sales up more than 20%, and multifamily starts rose 21%. A pure single-family installer would have seen revenue fall harder; IBP's revenue declined only 3.5% to $660.5 million because the other end markets are picking up the slack. That mix shift is deliberate, and it makes the business less of a one-way bet on single-family starts than it was a few years ago.

The acquisition engine is how IBP grows when the market does not. The company completed four acquisitions in the quarter, Biomax Spray Foam, Thermo-Tech Mechanical Insulation, Northstar Comfort Services, and Waterproofing, Inc., expected to add about $28 million of annual revenue, and it targets at least $100 million of acquired annual revenue in 2026. Buying small, local installers at sensible multiples and folding them into a national platform is a proven roll-up model in a fragmented industry, and IBP has the balance sheet for it: net debt of about $607 million sits at a comfortable 1.6 times operating income, with interest coverage above eleven times. Management lifted the dividend and refinanced debt during the quarter, and the share count has fallen at about 2.3% a year. The bull case is that the cycle turns back up, the acquired branches season, and the through-cycle earnings power reasserts itself well above what the depressed quarter shows.

Bear Case

The methods disagree in a way that is worth taking seriously, and the conservative ones are likely the more honest read. No family of valuation method reaches today's $218.17 price (June 27, 2026), but the more telling split is between the models that capitalize current profit and the models that lean on returns. The earnings-power method, capitalizing normalized operating profit with no growth, lands near $90 per share. The zero-growth cash-flow methods land near $99. The Graham number lands near $72. These are the conservative lenses, and they cluster far below the price because they refuse to extrapolate. The optimistic models that reach toward the price do so by crediting either the high return on equity or continued growth, and that is exactly the assumption a cyclical downturn calls into question. When the durable, no-growth lenses say a stock is worth less than half its price, the burden of proof sits on the growth assumption.

The return-on-equity figure that flatters IBP hides a weaker underlying number. Return on equity is about 38%, but return on invested capital is only about 3.0%, well below the cost of capital. That gap is the acquisition strategy showing through: years of buying installers has loaded the balance sheet with goodwill and intangibles, so the equity base is thin relative to the capital actually deployed, which inflates the equity return while the return on total invested capital tells the truer story. A roll-up that earns 3% on invested capital is creating value through leverage and multiple arbitrage, not through superior operations, and that model works only as long as acquisition multiples stay low and the integrated branches perform.

The cyclical risk is live, not theoretical, and the recent quarter is the evidence. Single-family starts fell 6% year over year, revenue declined, net income dropped to $34.8 million from $45.4 million, and the stock fell sharply on an earnings miss. Gross margin slipped to 32.1% from 32.7% on higher labor, vehicle, insurance, and freight costs. Housing is rate-sensitive and the single-family market can stay soft for an extended stretch if mortgage rates remain elevated. The price assumes the company holds elevated growth for roughly five years, a demanding bet for a business whose largest end market is contracting. The downside is not solvency, the balance sheet is sound, it is that a cyclical installer priced above what any standard method supports, in the early innings of a single-family downturn, has the multiple and the cycle working against it at the same time.

Valuation

The price is betting on growth that the current housing market is not delivering. The inversion reads the price as requiring the company to sustain elevated operating-profit growth for roughly five years, which is a demanding assumption for a cyclical installer whose largest end market, single-family construction, just contracted. The operating margin of 12.7% is solid for the business, but the bet embedded in the price is about persistence of growth through a soft patch, and that persistence reads as elevated relative to what a housing-cycle-dependent business reliably delivers.

How far the price sits from the methods is wide and consistent, and the pattern is the signal. No family of method reaches $218.17. The asset and earnings-power lenses, reading book value and capitalizing current profit, land roughly between $72 and $160 per share, with the most conservative durable models near $90 to $99. Peer multiples, using a sector earnings multiple near 18 times, land around $170. Only the most growth-favorable readings approach the price, and they do so by crediting the high return on equity or continued expansion. The spread between the price and the conservative lenses is the cyclical-growth premium, and it is large, roughly two to three times on the earnings-power methods. A useful caution sits in the return figures: return on equity of about 38% looks exceptional, but return on invested capital of about 3.0% reveals how much of that equity return rests on an acquisition-loaded, goodwill-heavy balance sheet rather than on operating quality.

Solvency is the clear strength and bounds the downside. Net debt of about $607 million sits at a comfortable 1.6 times trailing operating income, interest coverage runs above eleven times, and the company refinanced debt and lifted its dividend in the quarter while the share count fell at about 2.3% a year. The balance sheet can carry the acquisition strategy through a downturn. What it cannot do is make the price cheap against a cyclically soft single-family market. The decisive number is the gap between a price above every standard method and a housing cycle that is currently working against the growth the price requires.

Catalysts

Installed Building Products reported first-quarter 2026 results and the stock fell sharply, dropping more than 10% on an earnings miss. Revenue declined 3.5% to $660.5 million, net income fell to $34.8 million from $45.4 million, and diluted earnings per share came in at $1.29 versus $1.64 a year earlier. The driver was the single-family housing market: U.S. single-family starts fell 6% year over year. Gross margin slipped to 32.1% from 32.7% on higher labor, vehicle, insurance, and freight costs, partly offset by lower material costs.

The forward story has two threads. The first is the end-market mix: commercial installation grew at a double-digit rate, heavy commercial sales rose more than 20%, and multifamily starts were up 21%, all of which cushion the single-family weakness. The second is the acquisition program: IBP completed four deals in the quarter adding about $28 million of annual revenue and targets at least $100 million of acquired annual revenue in 2026, alongside a dividend increase and a debt refinancing. The watch items are mortgage rates and single-family starts, which set the direction of the core business, and the pace and pricing of acquisitions, which is how IBP intends to grow while the largest part of its market stays soft.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Installed Building Products Q1 2026 earnings release, 2026

View the full interactive IBP report on boothcheck