IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $15.89, IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is priced for +1.5% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/IAG

Headline

FieldValue
TickerIAG
CompanyIAMGOLD Corporation
Current price$15.90/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)6.9%
Operating margin today38.3%
Margin compression (value-band)-31.4pp
Implied growth1.5%
Multiple paid9x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 6: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 11.4% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~4.6pp.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.05σ
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.16x5expensive
Earnings1.19x4expensive
Relative1.14x5expensive
Growth0.68x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=17)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$45.790.35xyesFCF base $0.8B, growth 25% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.1%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$23.310.68xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 4.2x / 9.2x / 14.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$17.270.92xyesP/E 14x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.5x / 14.0x / 16.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 8x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$13.391.19xyesBV/sh $7.18, ROE (TTM) 17.2%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$18.050.88xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$23.060.69xyesRev $2.9B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.5x / 3.3x / 4.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 6x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$13.921.14xyesEPS $1.16, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=6.42 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$4.413.60xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.39B × (1−24%) / WACC 9.1% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$18.100.88xyesBV $7.18 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 17.2% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$13.691.16xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.16 × BVPS $7.18) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$13.671.16xyesEBITDA $1.09B × sector EV/EBITDA 8.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$14.401.10xyesFCF $849.1M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$37.430.42xyesEPS $1.16 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$13.271.20xyesBV $7.18 × (ROIC 16.8% / WACC 9.1%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$7.242.20xyesRevenue $2.85B × sector P/S 1.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$43.500.37xyesEPS $1.16 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$12.541.27xyesEPS $1.16 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$226.9m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)0.27x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.21x
Interest coverage9.9x
Share count CAGR (dilution)4.8%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

What the standard valuation models miss about IAMGOLD is that gold miners are call options on the metal price wearing the clothes of operating companies. The methods value the business on its trailing earnings and book, and on that basis the price looks fully captured. But the trailing earnings are themselves a function of a gold price that has moved sharply, and the company's leverage to that price is the whole point. In the first quarter of 2026, revenue rose 116% year over year to $1,030.1 million, adjusted EBITDA reached $666 million, and mine-site free cash flow was $525 million, all on a realized price of $4,859 per ounce. A miner converts each incremental dollar of gold price almost straight to cash, because its costs are largely fixed in the ground. That operating leverage is what a trailing multiple cannot frame.

The production base is finally working in IAMGOLD's favor. All three operating mines, Côté Gold, Westwood, and Essakane, delivered year-over-year production improvements, and attributable output rose to 183,600 ounces in the quarter from 161,000 a year earlier. Côté is the swing factor: still ramping, still debottlenecking, but contributing 52,300 attributable ounces in the quarter and guided to 270,000 to 310,000 ounces for the full year as throughput improves through 2026. A new mine reaching steady state turns a high-cost producer into a lower-cost one, and the unit-cost improvement compounds the gold-price tailwind.

The balance sheet has been transformed by the cash the gold price is throwing off. Net debt sits at just $226.9 million against trailing operating income that is now very large, leaving leverage at a fraction of a single year's operating profit and interest coverage above six times. Return on equity runs about 17% on a book of $7.38 per share, and return on invested capital near 17% sits comfortably above the cost of capital, which is the signature of a miner earning real economic returns rather than just spending capital. The methods reflect this: asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and the growth-DCF lens all support the price, which is unusual and tells you this is a value-and-asset name rather than a stretched growth bet. The bull case is simply continued execution at Côté while the gold price stays elevated.

Bear Case

Frame the bear around what the methods are actually saying, because they disagree in an informative way. The asset, earnings-power, peer-multiple, and growth-DCF lenses all sit near or below today's $16.89 price (June 27, 2026), which on the surface reads as support. But the conservative methods are the more honest read for a miner, and they flash caution where the optimistic ones do not. The earnings-power method, which capitalizes normalized operating profit through the cycle with no growth, lands near $4.53 per share, because it averages out the current gold-price spike rather than extrapolating it. That gap, between a price near $17 and a through-cycle earnings-power value near $5, is the bear case in one number: most of today's profitability is the gold price, not the business, and the gold price is the one variable IAMGOLD does not control.

The operational risk is concrete and recent. Côté Gold, the mine the entire growth thesis rests on, suffered conveyor-belt failures that pushed its all-in sustaining cost up 28% year over year. A new mine ramping into steady state is exactly when mechanical and throughput problems surface, and each setback delays the unit-cost improvement that justifies the capital spent to build it. If Côté underdelivers against the 270,000-to-310,000-ounce guidance, the company's blended cost rises just as the gold-price tailwind would, in any normal cycle, eventually fade. Mining is a business where the good years look permanent and the cost discipline is tested only when the metal price turns.

Dilution is the quiet drag the asset story tends to ignore. IAMGOLD's share count has grown at about 4.8% a year, the opposite of the buyback signal a mature cash generator usually sends, which means per-share value creation has to outrun the new shares being issued. Combined with a profit stream that is heavily geared to a commodity price, the bear read is that a holder is paying a near-fair price for a business whose normalized earnings power is far below its current run-rate, whose flagship mine is still proving it can run reliably, and whose share count keeps expanding. The downside is not insolvency, net debt is trivial against current cash flow, it is that a reversion in the gold price would expose how much of the current valuation rests on $4,859 gold rather than on $17 IAMGOLD.

Valuation

What the price is betting is unusual for this report: not much beyond what the company already shows. The inversion reads IAMGOLD as a value-and-asset name, with the implied growth assumption slightly negative, meaning the price does not require the business to expand at all to be defended. That is the profile of a cyclical producer at a favorable point in its cycle, where the question is not whether growth is priced in but whether today's profitability is sustainable. The current operating margin of about 32% is a gold-price artifact as much as an operational achievement.

The methods are unusually aligned in supporting the price, which is the signal worth reading carefully. Asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and the growth-DCF lens all land near or below $16.89, so on the surface every family endorses the price. The disagreement that matters is within that support. The optimistic models, the perpetual-growth DCF near $47 and the PEG-based methods near $43, extrapolate recent growth and reach far above the price. The conservative models pull the other way: the through-cycle earnings-power method lands near $4.53, and the sector price-to-sales method near $7.44, because they refuse to treat a gold-price spike as permanent. For a commodity producer, the conservative lenses are usually the more honest, and the spread between them and the optimistic ones is precisely the gold-price-sustainability question. The price sits roughly in the middle of that spread, which is a fair, not cheap, reading.

Solvency is the clear strength and bounds the downside firmly. Net debt of $226.9 million against more than $400 million of liquid assets and very large trailing cash flow leaves leverage at a fraction of a year's operating income, with interest coverage above six times. The company is not burning cash; it is generating it in volume. The one mark against the capital picture is the share count growing at about 4.8% a year, which dilutes the per-share claim on that cash flow. The decisive number for IAMGOLD is the distance between its current-price profitability and its through-cycle earnings power, a gap that is entirely about the gold price and entirely outside the company's control.

Catalysts

IAMGOLD reported first-quarter 2026 results in early May, and they showcased the leverage a miner has to a rising gold price. Revenue rose 116% year over year to $1,030.1 million, adjusted EBITDA reached $666 million, and mine-site free cash flow was $525 million, all driven by a realized gold price of $4,859 per ounce and higher volumes. Attributable production climbed to 183,600 ounces from 161,000 a year earlier, with year-over-year improvements at all three operating mines, Côté Gold, Westwood, and Essakane.

The forward story is Côté Gold's ramp. The mine produced 52,300 attributable ounces in the quarter but hit conveyor-belt failures that pushed its all-in sustaining cost up 28% year over year, and management expects production to increase through 2026 as it debottlenecks and incorporates operating improvements. Full-year 2026 attributable guidance is 720,000 to 820,000 ounces for the company and 270,000 to 310,000 ounces for Côté specifically. The watch items are straightforward for a gold producer: whether Côté hits its ramp targets and brings its unit costs down, and where the gold price goes, because the second variable currently drives the financials more than the first.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

IAMGOLD Q1 2026 earnings release, May 2026

View the full interactive IAG report on boothcheck