HERSHEY CO (HSY): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $179.05, HERSHEY CO (HSY) is priced for +0.1% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HSY
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | HSY |
| Company | HERSHEY CO |
| Current price | $179.05/sh |
| Composition | North America Confectionery 81% / North America Salty Snacks 11% / International 8% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 8.1% |
| Operating margin today | 17.8% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -9.7pp |
| Implied growth | 0.1% |
| Multiple paid | 19x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 7.1% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.19σ |
| cohort percentile (of 69 peers) | 51 |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.26x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.10x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.34x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.02x | 4 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=16)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $292.18 | 0.61x | yes | FCF base $2.4B, growth 8% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.0%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $213.65 | 0.84x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 13.7x / 15.7x / 17.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 22x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 18.4x / 22.0x / 25.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $108.47 | 1.65x | yes | Stage 1: 5% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $79.37 | 2.26x | yes | BV/sh $22.49, ROE (TTM) 32.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $156.52 | 1.14x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $147.99 | 1.21x | yes | Rev $12.2B, growth 8% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.5x / 3.0x / 3.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $88.10 | 2.03x | yes | EPS $7.34, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=15.59 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $81.89 | 2.19x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $2.34B × (1−22%) / WACC 8.0% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $122.52 | 1.46x | yes | BV $22.49 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 32.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $60.96 | 2.94x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $7.34 × BVPS $22.49) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $2.69B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $89.15 | 2.01x | yes | FCF $2228.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $85.45 | 2.10x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $2.16B (FCF $2.23B − SBC $0.07B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $236.88 | 0.76x | yes | EPS $7.34 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $13.23 | 13.53x | yes | BV $22.49 × (ROIC 4.7% / WACC 8.0%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $12.16B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $275.30 | 0.65x | yes | EPS $7.34 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $79.37 | 2.26x | yes | EPS $7.34 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North America Confectionery | operating | enterprise | $9.5b | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| North America Salty Snacks | operating | enterprise | $1.3b | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $4.9b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 2.91x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 2.26x |
| Interest coverage | 9.5x |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- Hershey owns the leading position in U.S. confectionery (Reese's, Hershey's, Kit Kat) plus a growing salty-snacks business (SkinnyPop, Dot's), and the company tracks its share across channels covering roughly 90% of its U.S. confectionery and salty-snack retail sales.
- The biggest risk is cocoa: unprecedented cocoa inflation compressed the operating margin to about 14% from its usual low-twenties, and the price already credits a recovery that depends on cocoa moderating, which the company itself says will stay elevated for some time.
- Watch the adjusted-earnings recovery management has guided to in 2026 and whether pricing actions hold without eroding volume, after a new CEO took the helm in August 2025.
Bull Case
The counterintuitive fact about Hershey right now is that the methods calling it expensive are reading a margin that the business does not normally earn. Operating margin sits near 14%, well below where this company has historically run, because an unprecedented spike in cocoa costs flowed straight through the cost of chocolate. Capitalize that depressed margin and the stock looks richly valued on every static lens. But the depression is the input, not the conclusion: management has framed 2026 as a year of recovery, guiding to roughly 4% to 5% net sales growth and a 30% to 35% adjusted earnings recovery. The bull case is that the price is not paying for heroic growth; it is paying for a margin that snaps back toward normal once the cocoa shock passes.
Underneath the commodity noise, the franchise is as durable as branded food gets. Hershey leads the U.S. chocolate and non-chocolate confectionery category, and it measures that leadership rigorously, tracking consumer takeaway across channels representing about 90% of its U.S. confectionery and salty-snack retail business. Brands like Reese's and Hershey's are impulse purchases with pricing power that a private label cannot easily replicate, which is why the company has been able to raise prices through the cocoa cycle rather than absorb the whole hit. The North America Confectionery segment is roughly four-fifths of revenue and the engine of that pricing power.
The portfolio is also broadening in ways that reduce reliance on chocolate alone. Salty snacks add a category with its own growth, and management has pointed to an unexpected tailwind, noting that GLP-1 weight-loss drugs are boosting demand for mints and gum like Ice Breakers. The company manages cocoa exposure through derivatives, recording the gains and losses in cost of sales as "the changes in fair value of these derivatives are recorded as incurred", a hedging program that smooths but does not eliminate the cost. The bull case is a dominant brand portfolio working through a temporary input shock with a 30%-plus earnings recovery already in management's sights.
Bear Case
The structural truth a Hershey holder has to face is that the multiple is pricing a margin recovery that has not happened yet, while the thing that broke the margin is still elevated. The company's own CEO has said cocoa prices will remain high for some time even if they eventually moderate. At roughly 25 times operating income, the price embeds operating-profit growth of about 7.4% a year for five years, and the bulk of that is not unit growth in a mature confectionery market; it is the assumption that the operating margin climbs back from today's depressed 14% toward its historical level. If cocoa stays high longer than expected, that recovery slips, and the price is left supporting a far smaller earnings base than it currently assumes.
Pricing, the lever that protected Hershey through the shock, has a limit the bear case turns on. Confectionery demand is not perfectly inelastic, and management has flagged concern about competitive activity and volume elasticity as prices have risen. There is a level at which higher chocolate prices push shoppers toward smaller pack sizes, private label, or simply less indulgence, and a company that has leaned on price to offset cocoa would then face both a cost problem and a volume problem at once. The hedging program records commodity gains and losses through cost of sales, so the margin remains exposed to where cocoa actually settles, not where the company wishes it would.
The valuation leaves little margin for any of this going wrong, and a new CEO is steering through it. Only the growth-DCF lens reaches today's price; the asset-value, earnings-power, and peer-multiple lenses all read it as richly valued, the price standing well above book-value-plus-profitability and above what current cash earnings capitalize to. That is the signature of a durability premium, a bet that this franchise compounds in a way the static frames cannot capture. Net debt of about $5.4 billion sits at a bit over three times pre-tax operating income with interest coverage near seven times, manageable but not a fortress, and a leadership transition completed in August 2025 adds execution risk to a year that has to deliver a sharp earnings rebound for the price to make sense.
Valuation
Today's price works out to roughly 25 times company-wide operating income, which inverts to operating growth of about 7.4% a year over a five-year stage. Read as a direction rather than a measured figure, that number is the key to the whole picture, because in a mature confectionery market most of that implied growth is not new volume. It is the recovery of an operating margin that cocoa inflation pushed down to about 14% from its historical low-twenties. The price is, in effect, underwriting management's guided 30% to 35% adjusted earnings recovery. The bet is margin normalization, dressed up as growth.
The disagreement among the methods makes the durability premium explicit. The asset-value lens, the earnings-power lens, and the peer-multiple lens all read the price as richly valued on what the company earns today; only the growth-DCF reaches it. When a single forward-growth method is the only one that touches the price, the market is paying for durable compounding that the static frames structurally cannot price, the moat premium a dominant branded-food franchise earns. The risk in that pattern is specific: the premium is justified only if the margin recovery the growth lens assumes actually arrives, and that arrival is gated by a cocoa price the company does not control.
Solvency frames the downside without resolving the bet. Net debt of about $5.4 billion runs at just over three times pre-tax operating income, with interest coverage around seven times and a share count slowly declining, the balance sheet of a steady cash generator returning capital rather than one under pressure. The valuation does not hinge on the balance sheet; it hinges on cocoa and the margin recovery it gates. If the recovery lands, the static methods reprice toward the price; if cocoa stays high and elasticity bites, the price is supporting a thinner earnings stream than it assumes. That single dependency, more than any leverage figure, is what the buyer is weighing.
Catalysts
The dominant catalyst is the 2026 earnings recovery clearing or missing management's bar. The company has guided to roughly 4% to 5% net sales growth and a 30% to 35% adjusted earnings recovery for the year, a steep rebound that depends on pricing holding and cocoa costs beginning to moderate. Each quarterly print is a check on whether the margin is climbing back as guided, with the cocoa-cost line and the volume response to higher prices the two numbers that matter most. A new CEO since August 2025 makes execution against that recovery the central story.
The commodity and category threads run alongside it. Cocoa prices are the external variable the entire margin recovery turns on, so any sustained move in the cocoa market is a direct read on the thesis. On the demand side, management has pointed to GLP-1 drugs lifting mints and gum, an emerging tailwind for part of the portfolio, while the salty-snacks business offers a second growth lane beyond chocolate. The next earnings call's commentary on pricing elasticity and competitive activity will signal whether the price increases that protected the margin are starting to cost the company volume.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
North America Confectionery (reported)
- MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …on our manufacturing and other facilities, refer to Item 2, Properties ; and on risks related to our operations outside the United States, refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors . We also monitor our revenue growth across emerging markets and developed markets: • Our emerging markets include our Latin America region in its…
- FY2025 10-K: …was reflected across all categories. Favorable currency translation rate changes reflected the strength of most currencies across the region relative to the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, Russian ruble, British pound sterling, Polish zloty and Swedish krona, partially offset by the strength of the U.S. dollar…
- TR (TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …fluctuations in the U.S. dollar relative to dollar-denominated commodities in world markets, and in some cases, geo-political and military conflict risks. The Company believes that its competitors face the same or similar challenges. In order to address the impact of changes in input and other costs, the Company…
- FY2025 10-K: …and competition - The Company competes with other well-established manufacturers of confectionery products. A failure of new or existing products to be favorably received, a failure to retain preferred shelf space at retailers or a failure to sufficiently counter aggressive promotional and price competition could…
- KHC (Kraft Heinz Co)
- FY2025 10-K: …National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on July 6, 2015). 114 4.6 Indenture, dated June 4, 2012, between Kraft Foods Group, Inc. and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of…
- FY2025 10-K: January 2023) at Diageo plc, a multinational alcoholic beverage company. Rodolfo Camacho Global Chief People Officer 37 Global Chief People Officer (since August 2025); Global Chief Talent and Rewards Officer (January 2024 to July 2025); and Chief People Officer, International Zone (January 2020 to December 2023).…
- GIS (GENERAL MILLS INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …the Pet segment to the North America Pet segment to reflect that pet food results outside North America are recorded in the International segment. There were no changes to the composition of our reportable segments or information reviewed by our CODM and no impact on our historical segment operating results. Our…
- FY2025 10-K: …located. Our North America Pet operating segment includes pet food products sold primarily in the United States and Canada in national pet superstore chains, e-commerce retailers, grocery stores, regional pet store chains, mass merchandisers, and veterinary clinics and hospitals. Our product categories include dog…
North America Salty Snacks (reported)
- CAG (CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …including manufacturing facilities, within each reporting segment, are described in Item 2, Properties . Reporting Segments Our reporting segments are as follows: Grocery & Snacks The Grocery & Snacks reporting segment principally includes branded, shelf-stable food products sold in various retail channels in the…
- FY2025 10-K: ($ in millions) Fiscal 2025 Fiscal 2024 % Inc Reporting Segment Net Sales Net Sales (Dec) Grocery & Snacks $ 4,899.3 $ 4,958.7 (1.2)% Refrigerated & Frozen 4,662.3 4,865.5 (4.2)% International 956.5 1,078.3 (11.3)% Foodservice 1,094.7 1,148.4 (4.7)% …
- GIS (GENERAL MILLS INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …the Pet segment to the North America Pet segment to reflect that pet food results outside North America are recorded in the International segment. There were no changes to the composition of our reportable segments or information reviewed by our CODM and no impact on our historical segment operating results. Our…
- FY2025 10-K: …located. Our North America Pet operating segment includes pet food products sold primarily in the United States and Canada in national pet superstore chains, e-commerce retailers, grocery stores, regional pet store chains, mass merchandisers, and veterinary clinics and hospitals. Our product categories include dog…
- MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …on our manufacturing and other facilities, refer to Item 2, Properties ; and on risks related to our operations outside the United States, refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors . We also monitor our revenue growth across emerging markets and developed markets: • Our emerging markets include our Latin America region in its…
- FY2025 10-K: …units while empowering our local and commercial operations to respond faster to changing consumer preferences and capitalize on growth opportunities. We believe our efforts to continue advancing a winning growth culture will help drive profitable top-line growth. 3 Table of Contents • Scale sustainable snacking . We…
- KHC (Kraft Heinz Co)
- FY2025 10-K: …care facilities, and government agencies. Our products are also sold online through various e-commerce platforms and retailers. We have key customers in different regions around the world. In 2025, the five largest customers in our North America segment accounted for approximately 46% of North America segment net…
- FY2025 10-K: …of 2025, we concluded that the sustained decline in our share price and market capitalization was a triggering event requiring an interim goodwill impairment assessment for all reporting units. We performed an interim impairment test ("Q2 Impairment Test") as of the last day of our second quarter, June 28, 2025, and…
- JJSF (J&J SNACK FOODS CORP.)
- FY2025 10-K: The Food Service and the Frozen Beverages segments sell primarily to foodservice channels. The Retail Supermarkets segment sells primarily to the retail supermarket channel. The Company's customers in the Food Service segment include snack bars and food stands in chain, department and mass merchandising stores, malls…
- FY2025 10-K: …make soft pretzels which are extruded or shaped by hand. Soft pretzels, after baking, are quick-frozen and packaged for delivery. The Company's principal marketing program in the Food Service segment includes supplying ovens, mobile merchandisers, display cases, warmers, and similar merchandising equipment to the…
Core business (reported)
- MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and powdered beverages around the world. We aim to be the global leader in snacking. Our strategy is to drive long-term growth by focusing on four strategic priorities: accelerating consumer-centric growth, driving operational excellence, creating a winning growth culture and scaling sustainable snacking. We believe…
- FY2025 10-K: …units while empowering our local and commercial operations to respond faster to changing consumer preferences and capitalize on growth opportunities. We believe our efforts to continue advancing a winning growth culture will help drive profitable top-line growth. 3 Table of Contents • Scale sustainable snacking . We…
- TR (TOOTSIE ROLL INDUSTRIES INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …and competition - The Company competes with other well-established manufacturers of confectionery products. A failure of new or existing products to be favorably received, a failure to retain preferred shelf space at retailers or a failure to sufficiently counter aggressive promotional and price competition could…
- FY2025 10-K: …which could adversely impact the Company's results of operations and ability to compete in domestic or foreign marketplaces. ● Risk of continued developments in food industry legislation and regulatory requirements at the federal and state level - With recent leadership changes at the U.S. Department of Health and…
- CPB (THE CAMPBELL'S COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …with the acquisition of Sovos Brands; and • $35 million of net periodic benefit income, including pension and postretirement actuarial gains of $15 million. Operating Earnings Segment operating earnings increased 1% in 2025 from 2024 and increased 6% in 2024 from 2023. An analysis of operating earnings by segment…
- FY2025 10-K: …competition in all of our categories. This competition arises from numerous competitors of varying sizes across multiple food and beverage categories, and includes producers of private label products, as well as other branded food and beverage manufacturers. Private label products are generally sold at lower prices…
- SJM (THE J. M. SMUCKER COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …consumer preferences. Positive factors pertaining to our competitive position include well-recognized brands, high-quality products, consumer trust, experienced brand and category management, varied product offerings, product innovation, responsive customer service, and an integrated distribution network. The…
- FY2025 10-K: …in the categories in which we compete, appealing to different consumer segments. We closely monitor the price gap, or price premium, between our brands and private label brands, with the view that value is about more than price and the expectation that number one brands will continue to be an integral part of…
- CAG (CONAGRA BRANDS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …including retail channel preferences, and consumer price sensitivity continue to contribute to increased competition. Our 12 Table of Contents principal competitors have substantial financial, marketing, and other resources. Increased competition can reduce our sales due to loss of market share or the need to reduce…
- FY2025 10-K: …competitive response from one or more of our competitors to our marketplace efforts, or a consumer shift towards more generic, lower-priced, or other value offerings, could result in us reducing pricing, increasing marketing or other expenditures, or losing market share. Our margins and profits could decrease if a…
- MKC (McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED)
- FY2025 10-K: 025 as compared to 2024 and increased by 1.9% on an organic basis. Favorable pricing impacted sales by 0.2%. Favorable volume and product mix increased sales by 1.7% driven by higher sales to foodservice customers in China. The unfavorable impact from foreign currency rates decreased sales by 0.9% and is excluded from…
- FY2025 10-K: 5 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements and the "Liquidity and Financial Condition" section of "Management's Discussion and Analysis." Competition Each segment operates in highly competitive markets around the world. In this environment, our growth strategies include customer engagement and product…
- MZTI (The Marzetti Company)
- FY2025 10-K: Foodservice segments. Efficient and cost-effective production remains a key focus as evidenced by our cost savings initiatives. Certain items are also manufactured and packaged by third parties located in the United States, Canada and Europe. COMPETITION All of the markets in which we sell food products are highly…
- FY2025 10-K: …by account specific to the time lapse between the actual change in ingredient and freight costs we incur and the effective date of the associated price increase or decrease. As a result, the reported operating margins of the Foodservice segment are subject to increased volatility during periods of rapidly rising or…
- LW (Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …3%, reflecting planned investments in price and trade driven by an increasingly competitive market, with moderate offsets in channel and product mix. Despite a low single-digit percentage point decline related to softer North America restaurant traffic in fiscal 2025, compared with fiscal 2024, volume increased 1%.…
- FY2025 10-K: …products, is highly competitive. Competitors include large North American and European frozen potato product companies that compete globally, local and regional companies, and retailers and foodservice distributors with their own branded and private label products. Some of our competitors are larger and have…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
company FY2025 10-K · company guidance and leadership announcements, 2025-2026 · company FY2026 guidance, 2026 · company commentary, 2026 · company leadership announcement, 2025