HENRY SCHEIN, INC. (HSIC): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $89.52, HENRY SCHEIN, INC. (HSIC) is priced for +6.4% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HSIC

Headline

FieldValue
TickerHSIC
CompanyHENRY SCHEIN, INC.
Current price$89.52/sh
CompositionGlobal Dental merchandise 37% / Global Dental equipment 14% / Global Value-added services 2% / Global Medical 32% / Global Specialty Products 12% / Global Technology 5% / Eliminations -1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)3.2%
Operating margin today4.9%
Margin compression (value-band)-1.7pp
Implied growth6.4%
Multiple paid19x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 8% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.41σ
cohort percentile (of 225 peers)43

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.10x5expensive
Earnings2.50x5expensive
Relative3.83x2expensive
Growth0.80x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.4%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$111.280.80xyesFCF base $0.5B, growth 6% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.4%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$114.730.78xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 9.7x / 11.7x / 13.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.1x / 18.0x / 20.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 12x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$37.492.39xyesBV/sh $28.67, ROE (TTM) 12.1%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$42.602.10xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$90.010.99xyesRev $13.4B, growth 6% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.6x / 0.8x / 0.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$39.722.25xyesEPS $3.31, growth 3% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=7.90 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$68.751.30xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.78B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.4% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$43.642.05xyesBV $28.67 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 12.1% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 7.9%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$46.211.94xyes√(22.5 × EPS $3.31 × BVPS $28.67) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.98B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$31.272.86xyesFCF $445.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$27.763.22xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.41B (FCF $0.45B − SBC $0.04B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$41.712.15xyesEPS $3.31 × (8.5 + 2×3.3%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$10.868.24xyesBV $28.67 × (ROIC 3.2% / WACC 8.4%)
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $13.38B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$16.555.41xyesEPS $3.31 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 3.3% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 4.9x
Earnings YieldEarnings$35.782.50xyesEPS $3.31 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Global Distribution and Value-Added Servicesoperatingenterprise$11.1bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Global Specialty Productsoperatingenterprise$1.5bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Global Technologyoperatingenterprise$675.0mwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$2.2b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)4.27x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)3.37x
Interest coverage4.3x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-4.4%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Henry Schein is a mature company in a defensive niche, and the right way to read its numbers is as a slow-moving distribution franchise repositioning toward higher-margin businesses, not as a growth story. That framing matters because the consolidated margin understates the direction of travel. The company's own filing is explicit that gross margin "vary between our segments" and that it "realize[s] substantially higher gross margin from products we develop and manufacture within our Global Specialty Products segment compared to products distributed". Global Specialty Products net sales rose 6.7% for the year, and every dollar of mix shift toward owned specialty and technology lifts the blended margin without needing the top line to accelerate.

The core distribution business is recovering and compounding in the part that matters. In the first quarter, global dental distribution sales rose 6.1%, with Global Dental up 9.0%, offsetting softer medical demand. Dental supply distribution is the kind of recurring, consumable demand that does not disappear in a downturn: practices keep ordering the materials they use every day. On top of that, the company is taking out cost, with a restructuring plan targeting $75 million to $100 million in annual savings, weighted to the second half of 2026.

Capital allocation reinforces the maturity thesis. The share count has fallen at roughly 4% a year, direct evidence of buyback deployment showing up where it cannot be faked, and management has guided to total sales growth of 3% to 5% with margin expansion. The presence of an activist and an expanded KKR position with board seats adds a second source of pressure toward the same goal: sharper capital discipline and a cleaner portfolio. The bull case is a steady distributor with a recurring demand base, a margin-mix tailwind, and outside shareholders pushing management to harvest it.

Bear Case

The variable with the most leverage on Henry Schein is discretionary healthcare demand, and the price does not fully reflect how exposed the distribution model is to it. Dental and medical procedures are deferrable; when households tighten, elective dentistry slips, and a distributor with thin per-unit margins feels it through volume rather than price. Global medical grew just 1.7% in the first quarter against dental's 9.0%, a reminder that the segments do not move together and that the weaker one is the one an activist wants sold. A macro slowdown in elective procedures would pressure the volume the whole distribution engine runs on.

The governance and execution risk is unusually acute right now. Activist Ananym Capital is preparing a proxy fight, seeking to nominate up to six directors and pressing for cost cuts, succession planning, and a sale of the medical-distribution business, arguing the moves could lift the share price meaningfully. Activist campaigns can unlock value, but a contested board, a CEO-succession question, and a $75 million to $100 million restructuring all running at once is a lot of organizational disruption layered on a business still completing its recovery from the 2023 cyberattack that took systems offline for weeks. Each of those is manageable alone; together they raise the odds of an execution stumble in a year management has already back-loaded.

The valuation reflects a business priced for steady, not spectacular, results, which leaves little room for disappointment. On asset value and on earnings power, the price already sits above where the methods land; only the peer-multiple and growth-DCF lenses reach it, and they do so by crediting modest forward growth and the margin-mix improvement. At roughly 17 times operating income, the price embeds operating growth of around 3.6% a year, which is within what the company has delivered but assumes the restructuring lands and the activist disruption does not derail it. Net debt of about $2.2 billion against trailing operating income leaves leverage near three-and-a-third times pre-tax operating income with interest coverage around four times, comfortable in a steady year and tighter if elective demand softens while the restructuring costs run.

Valuation

Today's price works out to roughly 17 times company-wide operating income, which inverts to operating growth of about 3.6% a year over a five-year stage. Read that as a direction rather than a precise figure, but it is a telling one: the price is not asking for heroics. It asks for steady low-single-digit operating growth, which is within what this distributor has historically delivered and broadly in line with management's own 3% to 5% sales-growth guidance. This is a price set on continuation, not transformation.

The methods disagree in the pattern typical of a mature, asset-light distributor. The asset-value and earnings-power lenses read the price as full on what the company earns today, because a distribution business carries little book value relative to its market price and capitalizing current earnings without growth lands below the price. The peer-multiple and growth-DCF lenses reach today's level by crediting the modest forward growth and the ongoing shift toward higher-margin specialty and technology products. That split says the price is a reasonable bet on continuation plus a margin-mix tailwind, not a stretch beyond what standard methods support, with the relative-multiple lens landing essentially at the price.

Solvency is a supporting consideration rather than the crux. Net debt of about $2.2 billion sits at a bit over three times pre-tax operating income, with interest coverage around four times and a share count that has been shrinking, the profile of a cash-generative business returning capital rather than one under strain. The downside is bounded less by the balance sheet than by demand: a slowdown in elective dental and medical procedures would compress the volume the distribution model depends on, and that, more than any leverage concern, is what the price has to be right about. The activist push and the restructuring are the swing factors on whether the steady-continuation case improves from here or merely holds.

Catalysts

The defining near-term catalyst is the second half of 2026, by management's own framing. The company has said benefits from its value-creation programs and the $75 million to $100 million restructuring are weighted toward the back half of the year, with stronger earnings performance expected then. That makes the mid-year prints a test of whether the savings show up on schedule, against full-year guidance of 3% to 5% total sales growth. Dental momentum, up 9.0% in the first quarter, is the line to watch for whether the recovery and share gains are durable.

The governance situation is the other live catalyst and could move faster. Ananym Capital is preparing a proxy fight, nominating up to six directors and pushing for cost cuts and a potential sale of the medical-distribution business, while KKR has expanded its stake and taken board seats. Any resolution, a settlement, a board refresh, or a decision to explore a medical-distribution divestiture, would directly reshape the portfolio and the capital-allocation story. The contest gives the next several months an event-driven character on top of the operating recovery.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Global Distribution and Value-Added Services (reported)

Global Specialty Products (reported)

Global Technology (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

company materials and activist filings, 2026 · Q1 FY2026 results, May 2026 · company FY2025 10-K · company materials, 2026 · company FY2025 guidance, 2026 · activist filings, 2026 · activist and PE filings, 2026

View the full interactive HSIC report on boothcheck