HOME BANCSHARES, INC. (HOMB): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $29.62, HOME BANCSHARES, INC. (HOMB) is priced for 11.7% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HOMB
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | HOMB |
| Company | HOME BANCSHARES, INC. |
| Current price | $29.62/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | financials |
| Return on equity needed | 11.7% |
| Return on equity now | 11.1% |
| ROE gap | +0.6pp |
| Price-to-book | 1.30x |
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.9% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 10-year stage, on common book equity (FY2026).
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.82σ |
| cohort percentile (of 122 peers) | 48 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 71% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.07x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.13x | 1 | expensive |
| Relative | — | 0 | — |
| Growth | 1.36x | 1 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=5)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Bank Fair Value (P/TBV) | — | $19.48 | 1.52x | yes | TBVPS $15.35 × 1.27x (ROE (TTM) 10.5% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), credit 1.95% allowance/loans → ×1.00, NPL 1.09% → ×0.98) |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.3x / 10.0x / 11.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $21.73 | 1.36x | yes | Stage 1: 12% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $25.91 | 1.14x | yes | BV/sh $22.73, ROE (TTM) 10.5%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $27.59 | 1.07x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | — | — | no | Rev $0.9B, growth 6% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 5.4x / 6.4x / 7.5x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | EPS $2.42, growth 12% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.03 (Fair) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | $35.18 | 0.84x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.42 × BVPS $22.73) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | EPS $2.42 × (8.5 + 2×11.9%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | EPS $2.42 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 11.9% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 17.9x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $26.16 | 1.13x | yes | EPS $2.42 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
The issuer is a funded financial business. Debt, interest, and cash flows are operating inputs, so industrial EV, net-debt, WACC, and free-cash-flow lenses do not apply; value the common-equity claim with book, earnings, capital, and payout economics.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Banking Segment | financial | equity | 1.1B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved standalone equity facts required |
No unit-level total common-equity value is stated. Each financial unit requires supported standalone common equity, normalized earnings, capital adequacy, and payout capacity. Consolidated debt, interest, and cash are operating balances, not an enterprise-to-equity bridge; company-level book, earnings, capital, and payout lenses remain the coherent cross-checks.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -0.6% |
Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).
Bullet Takeaways
- Home BancShares, parent of Centennial Bank, is one of the most profitable banks of its size, posting a Q1 2026 return on average assets of 2.09% and an efficiency ratio of 41.6%, meaning it spends less than 42 cents to earn a dollar of revenue.
- The biggest specific risk is credit concentration: non-performing loans jumped to $182.1 million in the quarter, driven mostly by a single relationship of $92.1 million placed on non-accrual.
- The capital cushion is the comfort: CET1 of 16.7% sits far above regulatory minimums, giving the bank room to absorb credit losses, fund acquisitions, and return capital while book value per share rose to $22.15.
Bull Case
Banks are not valued like ordinary companies. The right lens is what return the bank earns on its capital and how cheaply it produces a dollar of revenue, and on both measures Home BancShares is exceptional. Its first-quarter 2026 return on average assets was 2.09%, roughly double what a typical community bank earns, and its efficiency ratio was 41.6%, meaning it converts revenue to profit with unusually little overhead. A net interest margin of 4.51% sits well above peers, the product of disciplined deposit pricing and a loan book that earns strong spreads.
The profitability is durable because it is built into how the company operates rather than borrowed from a favorable rate cycle. Net income held at $118.2 million with diluted EPS of $0.60, consistent with the prior quarter on stable revenue and tight cost control. The filing shows management actively tuning the margin, noting in its annual report that holding approximately $500 million in excess liquidity was dilutive to the net interest margin by 8 basis points, the kind of granular attention to spread that explains the sustained outperformance.
The capital position is what lets the bank play offense. CET1 stood at 16.7%, far above the level regulators require, with Tier 1 capital at the same mark and a leverage ratio of 14.3%. That excess capital is dry powder: it absorbs credit losses without threatening the dividend, funds the acquisitions that have built the franchise, and supports buybacks. Book value per share rose to $22.15, and the stock sits in the lower half of its peer group on price-to-book despite earning a return near the top of that group. The bull case is a best-in-class operator earning a premium return, priced at a discount to peers, with a fortress balance sheet behind it.
Bear Case
When the valuation methods disagree about a bank, the conservative ones usually deserve the benefit of the doubt, because a bank's reported profit is only as good as the loans behind it, and loan losses arrive suddenly. Home BancShares gave a live example this quarter: non-performing loans jumped to $182.1 million, driven mostly by a single relationship of $92.1 million placed on non-accrual. One borrower going bad is not a crisis for a bank this well-capitalized, but it is a reminder that the pristine 2.09% return on assets and the high net interest margin can be undercut by concentration in the loan book that does not show up until a credit sours.
The earnings-power and peer-multiple lenses read the stock as supported but not cheap, and that caution is well founded for a bank earning at a cyclical-best level. A 2.09% return on assets and a sub-42% efficiency ratio are extraordinary, which is precisely the problem with extrapolating them: returns this far above the industry norm tend to normalize as competition for deposits and loans intensifies and as the credit cycle turns. The company itself acknowledges in its 10-K that in an economic downturn it becomes more difficult for us to estimate the losses that we will experience in our loan portfolio, and that regulators may force a larger allowance for credit losses. An allowance build flows straight through to earnings.
The price already assumes the good times persist. At roughly 1.3 times book the market is paying for a sustained return on equity near 12%, modestly above the roughly 11% the bank has recently earned. That gap is not large, but it leaves little room if the net interest margin compresses in a falling-rate environment, if the single large non-accrual is the first of several, or if the bank's acquisitive growth, which has lifted the share count about 4.6% a year, dilutes the per-share return. The bear case is not that Home BancShares is a weak bank; it is the opposite. The risk is that a bank earning at the top of its cycle, with a fresh credit blemish, is priced for that peak to hold.
Valuation
A bank is worth the return it earns on its capital, so the valuation runs off price-to-book rather than an earnings multiple, and Home BancShares trades around 1.3 times book. That price embeds a sustained return on equity near 12%. The useful benchmark is what the bank has actually been earning: roughly 11.1% on equity, supported by a 2.09% return on average assets that is among the best for its size. The implied return sits just above the recent result, so the price is not demanding a leap, only that the current profitability holds.
The families of method line up supportively, which is what makes this a value-and-quality read rather than a growth bet. The asset-based, earnings-power, peer-multiple, and growth approaches all back the current price, and the stock sits in the lower half of its peer group on price-to-book even though it earns a return near the top of that group. That combination, premium profitability at a discounted multiple, is the heart of the valuation case. The catch is the one the credit picture raises: the implied 12% return assumes the net interest margin and the loss rate stay near today's favorable levels.
For a bank, solvency is read through regulatory capital rather than corporate leverage, and here the picture is unusually strong. CET1 of 16.7% and a leverage ratio of 14.3% sit far above what regulators require, giving the bank ample buffer to absorb the recent non-performing-loan increase and still return capital through dividends and buybacks. The valuation, then, is less about whether the bank is sound, it plainly is, than about whether returns this far above the industry can persist. The discounted multiple says the market is skeptical they fully will; the fortress capital position says the downside is well protected either way.
Catalysts
The Q1 2026 report, released in mid-April, showed top-tier profitability holding steady. Net income was $118.2 million with diluted EPS of $0.60, a return on average assets of 2.09%, a net interest margin of 4.51%, and an efficiency ratio of 41.6%, results the company described as consistent with the prior quarter on stable revenue and disciplined expense management. Book value per share rose to $22.15, and total revenue reached $266.7 million. The one blemish was credit: non-performing loans climbed to $182.1 million, the bulk of it a single $92.1 million relationship moved to non-accrual.
The forward agenda has two threads to watch. First, the credit trajectory: whether the large non-accrual resolves cleanly or signals broader stress, and whether the allowance for credit losses needs to build, which would pressure earnings. The bank's heavy capital cushion, CET1 at 16.7%, means it can absorb a setback without threatening its distributions. Second, the company's long-running acquisition strategy, which has expanded the franchise across the Southeast and Texas and is the most likely source of step-change growth. The cleanest checkpoints ahead are the quarterly net interest margin against the current 4.51%, the path of non-performing loans, and any announced deal activity that would deploy the excess capital.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Banking Segment (reported)
- PB (PROSPERITY BANCSHARES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …with a wide variety of banking products and services. The Company staffs its banking centers with experienced bankers who possess lending expertise to effectively serve their community and gives them authority with centralized support to make certain pricing and credit decisions, avoiding the bureaucratic structure…
- FY2025 10-K: …business is highly competitive, and the profitability of the Company depends principally on its ability to compete in its market areas. The Company competes with other commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and…
- ABCB (Ameris Bancorp)
- FY2025 10-K: …may also enter into repurchase agreements. These repurchase agreements are treated as short-term borrowings and are reflected on the Company's balance sheet as such. MARKET AREAS AND COMPETITION The banking industry in general, and in the southeastern United States specifically, is highly competitive and dramatic…
- FY2025 10-K: …with state and federal banking regulators, in addition to the U.S. Department of Justice, the CFPB, the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Internal Revenue Service. Violations of AML requirements can also lead to criminal penalties. In addition, the federal banking agencies are required to consider the…
- CVBF (CVB FINANCIAL CORP.)
- FY2025 10-K: …limit loans or extensions of credit to "insiders", including officers, directors, and principal shareholders, and loans or extension of credit by banks to affiliates or purchases of assets from affiliates, including parent bank holding companies, except pursuant to certain exceptions and only on terms and conditions…
- FY2025 10-K: …penalties, including, fines and reimbursements. The Bank and the Company are also subject to federal and state laws prohibiting unfair or fraudulent business practices, untrue or misleading advertising and unfair competition. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure and reporting requirements and…
- CATY (Cathay General Bancorp)
- FY2025 10-K: …or make acquisitions on favorable terms. We face substantial competition from our competitors. We face substantial competition for deposits, loans, and for other banking services, as well as acquisitions, throughout our market area from the major banks and financial institutions that dominate the commercial banking…
- FY2025 10-K: …Bank's deposits are generally obtained from residents within its geographic market area. The Bank utilizes traditional marketing methods to attract new clients and deposits, by offering a wide variety of products and services and utilizing various forms of advertising media. From time to time, the Bank may offer…
- IBOC (INTERNATIONAL BANCSHARES CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …opening branches in retail locations and shopping malls. Today, we have 166 facilities and 247 ATMs serving 75 communities in Texas and Oklahoma. Through the Subsidiary Banks, we are engaged in the business of accepting checking and savings deposits and the making of commercial, real estate, personal, home…
- FY2025 10-K: …business may be damaged by adverse publicity and negative information regarding the wider financial-services industry generally. As a result, customers may choose to maintain deposits with larger financial institutions, to remove their deposits from the banking system altogether, or to 32 Table of Contents invest in…
- CHCO (CITY HOLDING COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …is primarily intended to protect the interests of depositors of the banks and FDIC's insurance fund. The National Bank Act generally 5 requires each national bank to maintain reserves against deposits, restricts the nature and amount of loans that the bank may make and the interest the bank may charge on such loans,…
- FY2025 10-K: …value and may fluctuate. Strategic Risks Due to Increased Competition, the Company May Not be Able to Attract and Retain Banking Customers. The Company faces substantial and intense competition in all areas of its operation, including interest rates and other terms for loans and deposits and the range and quality of…
- TCBK (TriCo Bancshares)
- FY2025 10-K: …21.5% and our CRE concentration, net of owner-occupied loans, as a percentage of capital totaled 188.6% Bank Secrecy Act / Anti-Money Laundering The Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 and the USA Patriot Act of 2001 require financial institutions to develop policies, procedures, and practices to prevent and deter money…
- FY2025 10-K: …the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for credit losses. Banking regulations or the actions of our banking regulators may limit our growth, earnings and the return to our shareholders by restricting certain of our activities,…
- BANR (Banner Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …by developing long-term client relationships and delivering a relationship-based banking model tailored to local markets. We continue to invest in technology and digital delivery channels to enhance client experience and remain competitive. Certain nonbank competitors are not subject to the same regulatory framework…
- FY2025 10-K: …sector entities in its primary market areas. The Bank's primary business is that of traditional banking institutions - accepting deposits and originating loans in locations surrounding our offices in Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho, Utah and Nevada. The Bank is also an active participant in secondary loan…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 earnings release