Haleon plc (HLN): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $9.95, Haleon plc (HLN) is priced for -2.7% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HLN

Headline

FieldValue
TickerHLN
CompanyHaleon plc
Current price$9.95/sh
CompositionOral Health 31% / VMS 15% / Pain Relief 23% / Respiratory Health 17% / Digestive Health 9% / Therapeutic Skin Health & Other 4%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)10.3%
Operating margin today21.9%
Margin compression (value-band)-11.6pp
Implied growth-2.7%
Multiple paid17x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.2% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~7.2pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~11.4%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-5.77σ
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.85x5expensive
Earnings2.15x4expensive
Relative1.60x5expensive
Growth0.98x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=17)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$14.480.69xyesFCF base $2.9B, growth 4% (input: historical growth), terminal g 3.9%, WACC 7.6%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$10.200.98xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 14.3x / 16.3x / 18.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$9.471.05xyesP/E 22x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 18.6x / 22.0x / 25.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$5.121.94xyesBV/sh $4.65, ROE (TTM) 10.2%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$5.371.85xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$7.321.36xyesRev $14.0B, growth 4% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.7x / 3.2x / 3.7x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$5.651.76xyesEPS $0.47, growth 8% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=2.66 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$3.053.26xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $2.55B × (1−22%) / WACC 7.6% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$5.411.84xyesBV $4.65 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.2% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 6.6%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$7.021.42xyes√(22.5 × EPS $0.47 × BVPS $4.65) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$8.151.22xyesEBITDA $3.51B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$4.262.34xyesFCF $2926.6M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$9.591.04xyesEPS $0.47 × (8.5 + 2×7.9%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$4.372.28xyesBV $4.65 × (ROIC 7.1% / WACC 7.6%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$6.221.60xyesRevenue $13.96B × sector P/S 2.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$5.581.78xyesEPS $0.47 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 7.9% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 11.9x
Earnings YieldEarnings$5.091.95xyesEPS $0.47 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$9.6b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)3.87x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)3.02x
Interest coverage7.1x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.7%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The moat here is shelf space and habit. Haleon owns brands that sit in medicine cabinets for years, Sensodyne for sensitive teeth, parodontax for gums, Centrum for vitamins, Panadol for pain, and consumers reach for them by name rather than comparing labels. That brand pull is the structural advantage, and it shows up where it matters: the Oral Health portfolio kept strong momentum in Q1 2026, with innovation and geographic expansion driving double-digit growth in both Sensodyne and parodontax even as the overall market was soft. A power brand that can grow double digits while the category is sluggish is demonstrating exactly the pricing power that defines a consumer-health franchise.

The economics behind those brands are genuinely good. The business runs at an operating margin around 19%, the kind of profitability that comes from selling branded everyday-health products at prices well above their cost to make, and it sits within a peer set of the largest consumer-staples names, Kenvue, Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Colgate. Pricing did the heavy lifting in the quarter, up 2.4%, which is what a portfolio of trusted brands is supposed to be able to do: pass through cost and protect margin without losing the customer.

The debt is manageable and the geographic spread gives the recovery multiple paths. Net debt sits around $8.5 billion but only about 0.8 times operating income, with interest covered roughly six times over, so this is a stable balance sheet rather than a stretched one. Emerging markets grew organic revenue 4.3% in the quarter despite a weaker macro backdrop, and management expects growth to accelerate through the remainder of the year toward its 3% to 5% full-year range. The bull case is a defensive compounder: durable brands, healthy margins, a sound balance sheet, and a guided reacceleration once the weak cold-and-flu season laps.

Bear Case

The uncomfortable fact for a holder is that the growth a consumer-health stock is supposed to deliver, more units sold, is not what is showing up. In Q1 2026 the entire 2.2% organic revenue gain came from price; volume actually fell 0.2%. For a branded staples company, persistent volume declines masked by price increases are the warning sign, because pricing power has a ceiling. Push price too far and value-conscious consumers trade down to private label or store brands, and the very brand pull that justifies the premium starts to erode at the margin.

That dynamic collides with the price. At roughly 28 times operating income, Haleon trades richly against every standard frame: the asset, earnings-power, peer-multiple, and even forward-growth lenses all sit below the current price. The price embeds operating-profit growth near 13.7% a year, and yet the company itself guides to high-single-digit adjusted operating-profit growth and only 3% to 5% organic revenue growth for the year. When the market's implied requirement runs roughly double management's own guided pace, the gap is the bear case: the stock is priced for an acceleration the company is not promising.

The operating backdrop is not helping in the near term. A weak cold-and-flu season took an estimated 130 basis points off the quarter, North America grew just 1.0%, and emerging-markets strength reflected a weaker macro backdrop in places like Brazil. These are not disasters, but they are reminders that a consumer-health portfolio is exposed to the seasonal respiratory cycle, currency swings, and consumer wallets in a way that makes the guided second-half acceleration a hope rather than a certainty. The bear case does not need Haleon to stumble badly; it needs only for a high-single-digit-growth business to keep being priced as a low-teens compounder, and for volume to keep going the wrong way.

Valuation

Haleon trades around 28 times operating income, and the inversion reads that price as a bet on operating-profit growth near 13.7% a year for five years. The tension is immediate: the company's own full-year guidance is for high-single-digit adjusted operating-profit growth and 3% to 5% organic revenue growth. The price, in other words, is asking for roughly double what management is guiding to, and that gap is the heart of the valuation.

The families of method all point the same direction, which is unusual and worth weighing. None of them reach the current price: the asset-based, earnings-power, peer-multiple, and even the forward-growth lenses all land below it. When every standard frame sits under the price, the stock is being valued for quality and defensiveness, the premium investors pay for a portfolio of recession-resistant brands, rather than for any cash-flow math that supports the level.

The balance sheet is the steadying element. Net debt around $8.5 billion is only about 0.8 times operating income, interest is covered roughly six times, and the operating margin near 19% generates dependable cash. This is not a leverage story; it is a multiple story. The question the valuation poses is not whether Haleon survives, which is not in doubt, but whether a stable, high-single-digit-growth consumer-health business deserves a low-teens-growth price tag. The methods say it is paying up for durability; whether that durability is worth the premium is the judgment the buyer is making.

Catalysts

The Q1 2026 trading update set a modest tone with a guided improvement to come. Organic revenue grew 2.2%, with price up 2.4% and volume down 0.2%, held back by a weak cold-and-flu season estimated at about 130 basis points of drag. Regionally, North America grew 1.0% and emerging markets 4.3% against a softer macro backdrop, while Oral Health stood out as Sensodyne and parodontax posted double-digit growth on innovation and geographic expansion, including the rollout of the Sensodyne Clinical platform and Panadol Dual Action.

The forward catalyst is the guided second-half acceleration. Management reaffirmed full-year organic revenue growth of 3% to 5%, with growth expected to pick up over the remainder of the year, and high-single-digit adjusted operating-profit growth at constant currency. The cleanest checkpoints are the next trading updates and a normal respiratory season, which would lift the roughly 130 basis point headwind that depressed the first quarter. The key things to watch are whether volume turns positive rather than relying on price, and whether the Oral Health momentum broadens to the other categories; those two signals decide whether the back-half reacceleration is real.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 trading statement

View the full interactive HLN report on boothcheck