Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI): what the price requires
At today's price, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. (HLI) is priced for +8.9% earnings growth. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HLI
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | HLI |
| Company | Houlihan Lokey, Inc. |
| Current price | $132.58/sh |
| Composition | Corporate Finance 67% / Financial Restructuring 20% / Financial and Valuation Advisory 13% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | fee-financial |
| Implied earnings growth | 8.9% |
| Price-to-earnings | 22.7x |
| Earnings yield | 4.4% |
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.6% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage, on a 5-year median GAAP earnings base; each 1pp of cost of equity moves the implied earnings growth ~4.3pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.57σ |
| cohort percentile (of 49 peers) | 55 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.92x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.72x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.49x | 4 | expensive |
| Growth | 0.73x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.6%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=17)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $279.15 | 0.47x | yes | FCF base $0.7B, growth 10% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.6%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $181.35 | 0.73x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 13.8x / 15.8x / 17.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $101.46 | 1.31x | yes | P/E 14.79x (blended: static sector reference 12x + trailing (TTM) 21x), scenarios: 12.3x / 14.8x / 17.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $67.26 | 1.97x | yes | BV/sh $34.23, ROE (TTM) 18.2%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $93.09 | 1.42x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $117.27 | 1.13x | yes | Rev $2.6B, growth 10% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.9x / 3.5x / 4.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $74.64 | 1.78x | yes | EPS $6.22, growth 9% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=2.50 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $59.12 | 2.24x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.47B × (1−27%) / WACC 8.6% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $92.31 | 1.44x | yes | BV $34.23 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 18.2% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $69.22 | 1.92x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $6.22 × BVPS $34.23) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $108.83 | 1.22x | yes | FCF $681.8M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $77.03 | 1.72x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.48B (FCF $0.68B − SBC $0.20B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $133.02 | 1.00x | yes | EPS $6.22 × (8.5 + 2×8.5%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $15.99 | 8.29x | yes | BV $34.23 × (ROIC 4.0% / WACC 8.6%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $114.76 | 1.16x | yes | Revenue $2.62B × sector P/S 3.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $79.38 | 1.67x | yes | EPS $6.22 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 8.5% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 12.8x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $67.24 | 1.97x | yes | EPS $6.22 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $1.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -3.03x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -2.21x (net cash) |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Houlihan Lokey is a fee-based advisory firm built on three legs, Corporate Finance, Financial Restructuring, and Financial and Valuation Advisory, and its distinctive feature is that the restructuring arm advises debtors and creditors when deals dry up, giving it a counter-cyclical hedge most M&A advisors lack.
- The central risk is the deal cycle itself: revenue depends on transactions closing, and the firm acknowledges that for unclosed engagements its fees are generally limited to the fees paid at the time an engagement letter is signed, so a stalled M&A market hits the largest segment directly.
- Watch fiscal 2027 momentum, particularly the record backlog and pipeline management cited alongside a 16.7% dividend increase to $0.70 per share; the next prints show whether the M&A recovery the firm is positioned for actually arrives.
Bull Case
Houlihan Lokey sits at a mature, cash-generative stage where the question is not whether it grows but how steadily, and that stability is its strongest selling point. This is a capital-light advisory firm: it owns almost no hard assets, carries effectively no debt, and holds net cash of roughly $1.19 billion. The business converts banker talent and reputation into fees, and fiscal 2026 was a record year, with revenue of $2.62 billion, up 10% from the prior year's $2.39 billion. Both Corporate Finance and Financial and Valuation Advisory produced record segment revenues. A firm that grows its top line at a double-digit rate while needing no capital to do it is a compounding machine with very little to break.
The structural edge is the restructuring leg. Most M&A advisors are pure-play cyclicals: they feast when deals flow and starve when they stop. Houlihan Lokey built a Financial Restructuring practice that, per the firm's own description, provides advice to debtors and creditors precisely when the economy turns down and companies need to renegotiate their balance sheets. The segment had one of its strongest years on record in fiscal 2026, ending at $529 million in revenue. That counter-cyclicality smooths the earnings the M&A franchise cannot, and it is the reason the firm can keep raising its dividend across cycles.
Management is allocating capital like a confident steward. Fiscal 2026 included two completed acquisitions, a 16.7% dividend increase to $0.70 per share, and the firm flagged a record backlog and pipeline heading into fiscal 2027 with cautious optimism, especially in restructuring. The share count has barely moved, growing about 0.1% a year, so the per-share claim on those rising fees is not being diluted away. An investor here is buying a debt-free, dividend-growing advisory franchise with a built-in hedge against the very downturn that would sink its competitors.
Bear Case
The variable with the most leverage on Houlihan Lokey is one it does not control: the volume of corporate deals getting done. Advisory revenue is a function of transactions closing, and when M&A volumes decline or private-equity sponsors delay activity, the fees simply do not materialize. The firm is candid that for engagements that fall through, fees are generally limited to the fees paid at the time an engagement letter is signed plus any progress fees, meaning a stalled deal market converts pipeline into very little realized revenue. The firm even warns that its concentration leaves it more exposed to swings than other larger, more diversified competitors in the financial services industry, and that those swings can drive large moves in the stock.
That sensitivity already showed up in the most recent quarter. Fiscal fourth-quarter revenue of $635.6 million and EPS of $1.63 came in below the roughly $686 million and $1.84 consensus, a miss that landed even as the full year set a record. The restructuring segment, the supposed hedge, was down 3% for the year at $529 million, a reminder that the counter-cyclical leg is only counter-cyclical when there is a downturn to advise through; in a soft-but-not-broken market, neither engine runs flat out. The firm itself notes its revenue in any given period can be unpredictable, exposed even to catastrophes and disruptions outside its control.
The price is what turns these operational risks into an investment risk. At about 24 times earnings, the stock implies fee earnings growing roughly 10.7% a year for several years, and it sits in the upper half of comparable fee-financial firms on price-to-earnings. Among firms growing earnings that fast, only about half sustained the pace for five years. Only the forward-growth methods reach the current price; the asset-based, earnings-power, and peer-multiple lenses all read it as richly valued. The bear case is straightforward arithmetic on a cyclical input: the price pays a premium for durable double-digit compounding, and the engine that produces it runs on a deal cycle that has already shown it can disappoint.
Valuation
An advisory firm is worth the fees it earns, not the assets it owns, so the right lens is price-to-earnings rather than book value. On that lens Houlihan Lokey trades at about 24 times earnings, a 4.1% earnings yield, and that price embeds a specific bet: that the firm grows its fee earnings roughly 10.7% a year. Measured against its own record, that pace is within what it has delivered; record fiscal 2026 revenue of $2.62 billion grew 10% over the prior year. So the assumption is not heroic on rate. The stretch is durability, holding that growth across a deal cycle that swings.
The families of method tell a consistent story. Only the forward-growth approach reaches the current price; the asset-based, earnings-power, and peer-multiple lenses all sit below it. For a capital-light fee business that pattern is expected, because there is little asset value to anchor on and the premium is entirely a claim on the durability of the earnings stream. Relative to the fee-financial cohort, the stock sits in the upper half on price-to-earnings, so it is priced as a quality compounder rather than a bargain.
The balance sheet removes the usual financial risk from the equation, which sharpens what the bet actually is. The firm carries roughly $1.19 billion of net cash and no funded debt, so there is no leverage to amplify a downturn and no refinancing risk; interest coverage is not even a meaningful question here. That leaves the entire investment case resting on one thing: whether the deal and restructuring cycle lets the firm compound fee earnings at the pace the price assumes. The cash cushion bounds the downside, but it does not make the growth assumption any less the heart of the matter.
Catalysts
The fiscal 2026 results, reported at the firm's late-spring fiscal year-end, were a record-but-soft-finish story. Full-year revenue reached $2.62 billion, up 10%, with adjusted EPS of $6.22, and both Corporate Finance and Financial and Valuation Advisory set segment records. The fourth quarter, however, came in light: revenue of $635.6 million and EPS of $1.63 against consensus near $686 million and $1.84. Financial Restructuring ended the year at $529 million, down 3%, even after one of its strongest years on record.
The forward setup is about a deal-cycle recovery. Management pointed to a record backlog and pipeline, two completed acquisitions during the year, and a 16.7% dividend increase to $0.70 per share, while expressing cautious optimism for fiscal 2027 with particular emphasis on restructuring. The countervailing pressure is the macro backdrop: declining M&A volumes and delayed sponsor activity are the headwinds the firm named directly. The next several quarters are the test of whether the record backlog converts into closed transactions or whether sponsor hesitation keeps the largest segment from running at full pace. For a firm whose revenue depends on deals actually closing, backlog is a promise and the conversion is the catalyst.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Corporate Finance (reported)
- LAZ (Lazard, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …operating loss are non-GAAP measures. Corporate Results of Operations Year Ended December 31, 2025 versus December 31, 2024 Corporate net revenue decreased $119 million as compared to 2024, primarily due to a gain on the sale of an owned office building of $114 million in 2024. Corporate adjusted net revenue…
- FY2025 10-K: …and support staff. Our Corporate segment included 22 managing directors and 429 professionals and support staff. Generally, our employees are not subject to collective bargaining agreements, except that our employees in some offices, including France and Italy, are covered by national, industry-wide collective…
- EVR (EVERCORE INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 29 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 53 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data 54 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure 114 Item 9A. Controls…
- FY2025 10-K: …CODM reviews net revenues and pre-tax income against current and past performance on a quarterly basis when making decisions about allocating resources to the segments, inclusive of decisions regarding new hires, expansion into new geographical locations and entering into material contracts, including lease…
- PJT (PJT Partners Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …as well as other broad considerations, including the market opportunity, available expertise across the Company and the strength and efficacy of professionals' collaboration. The measure of segment assets is presented on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as total consolidated assets. The CODM reviews…
- FY2025 10-K: …company regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority, is subject to a minimum capital requirement of $ 30 thousand in the form of liquid assets as a lower prudential risk firm. deNovo Partners Finance, a limited liability company established in accordance with the companies' regulations of the Kingdom of Saudi…
- PIPR (PIPER SANDLER COMPANIES)
- FY2025 10-K: …statements following its effective date. See Note 22 for the unaudited proforma earnings per share on a post-split basis. NOTE 2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Principles of Consolidation The Company consolidates entities in which it has a controlling financial interest. The Company determines whether…
- FY2025 10-K: …retention purposes ("Retention MFRS Awards"). As employees must fulfill service requirements in exchange for rights to these awards, compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Retention MFRS Awards have both ratable and graded vesting terms with vesting periods of…
- JEF (Jefferies Financial Group Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …funded equally, to support loan underwritings by Jefferies Finance. For further information on this facility, refer to Note 10, Investments in our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In addition, we have loans outstanding to certain of our officers and employees (none of…
- FY2025 10-K: …Our Chief Executive Officer and President serve collectively as our chief operating decision maker ("CODM"). In this capacity, the CODM evaluates the performance of each business segment and allocate resources based on a variety of strategic and financial considerations. These considerations include measures of…
Financial Restructuring (reported)
- PJT (PJT Partners Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …backdrop of evolving political landscapes. Restructuring and Special Situations Our Restructuring and Special Situations business is one of the world's leading global advisors in liability management, restructurings and special situations, including bespoke financings, tort liability resolutions, distressed M&A and…
- FY2025 10-K: …such period. The composition of the group comprising our largest clients may vary significantly from year to year, and a relatively small number of clients may account for a significant portion of our consolidated revenues in any given period. As a result, our operating results, financial condition and liquidity may…
- EVR (EVERCORE INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and trading policies and procedures, but such policies and procedures may not be effective in all cases. 18 Table of Contents If the number of debt defaults or bankruptcies declines or other factors affect the demand for our liability management and restructuring services, our liability management and restructuring…
- FY2025 10-K: …and capital markets services and our Equities business. However, we cannot be certain that we will be able to significantly offset lower revenues from a decline in our M&A activities with increased revenues generated from liability management and restructuring and capital markets services or from our Equities…
- LAZ (Lazard, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …management or competition from other financial advisors and financial institutions. As a result, our engagements with clients are constantly changing, and our Financial Advisory fees could decline quickly due to the factors discussed above. If the number of debt defaults, bankruptcies or other factors affecting…
- FY2025 10-K: …the nature of our business, financial results could differ significantly from period to period, which may make it difficult for us to achieve steady earnings growth on a quarterly basis. • Our ability to retain and attract managing directors and other key professional employees, including maintaining compensation…
Financial and Valuation Advisory (reported)
- LAZ (Lazard, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …FASB issued an accounting standard update to eliminate accounting consideration of software project development stages and enhance the guidance related to when an entity would begin capitalizing software costs. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2027, and the interim periods…
- FY2025 10-K: …Offered We advise clients on a wide range of strategic and financial issues. When we advise clients on the potential acquisition of another company, business or certain assets, our services include evaluating potential acquisition targets, providing valuation analyses, evaluating and proposing financial and…
- EVR (EVERCORE INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …both of which represent variable consideration. This variable consideration will be included in the transaction price, as defined, and recognized as revenue to the extent that it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur. When assessing probability, we apply careful analysis and judgment to…
- FY2025 10-K: …on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, and subsequently recognized in Advisory Fees on the Consolidated Statements of Operations during the applicable time period within which the service is rendered. 48 Table of Contents Announcement fees for advisory services are recognized upon announcement (the…
- PJT (PJT Partners Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …date do not change for the remaining life of the asset. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025, with early adoption permitted. The Company early adopted ASU 2025-05 during the fourth quarter of 2025 with no material impact on its consolidated financial statements. In…
- FY2025 10-K: …Statements of Financial Condition. 59 Recent Accounting Developments In December 2023, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update 2023-09, Improvement to Income Tax Disclosures ("ASU 2023-09"). ASU 2023-09 provides guidance to enhance existing income tax disclosures related…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q4 fiscal 2026 earnings call