HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC. (HE): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $13.13, HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC. (HE) is priced for +3.2% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HE

Headline

FieldValue
TickerHE
CompanyHAWAIIAN ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
Current price$13.13/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)4.3%
Operating margin today7.3%
Margin compression (value-band)-3.0pp
Implied growth3.2%
Multiple paid21x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.3% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~7.9pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~17.7%/yr; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.22σ
cohort percentile (of 72 peers)46
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by earnings-power and relative-multiple value, while asset-based/growth-DCF land below the price. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.75x5expensive
Earnings1.10x2expensive
Relative0.47x5justifies
Growth1.89x2expensive

Families that justify the price: Earnings, Relative Families that call it expensive: Asset, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=14)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$0.00noFCF base $0.0B, growth -3% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 5.0%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$8.221.60xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 6.0x / 8.0x / 10.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$21.720.60xyesP/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.9x / 20.0x / 23.1x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$8.111.62xyesBV/sh $9.45, ROE (TTM) 7.9%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$7.511.75xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$6.022.18xyesRev $3.1B, growth -3% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.6x / 0.7x / 0.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$25.900.51xyesEPS $0.74, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.50 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAsset$7.411.77xyesBV $9.45 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 7.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 5.2%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$12.541.05xyes√(22.5 × EPS $0.74 × BVPS $9.45) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$28.630.46xyesEBITDA $0.53B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$0.011313.00xyesFCF $44.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median)
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$23.880.55xyesEPS $0.74 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$2.205.97xyesBV $9.45 × (ROIC 1.2% / WACC 5.0%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$44.510.29xyesRevenue $3.09B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$27.750.47xyesEPS $0.74 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$8.001.64xyesEPS $0.74 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$2.3b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)13.05x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)10.30x
Interest coverage2.0x
Share count CAGR (dilution)1.3%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Start with where the price sits against the methods, because for Hawaiian Electric the spread is the whole bull case. The relative-multiple and peer methods read the stock as cheap, landing well above today's price, while the asset-value and growth-oriented methods read it as expensive. That split is what you would expect from a regulated utility emerging from a catastrophe: the earnings-power and peer lenses see a monopoly electric provider that, once the litigation overhang clears, should trade like other utilities; the asset and growth methods are still penalizing the depressed returns and the wildfire scar. The bull thesis is that the company moves from the second framing toward the first.

The de-risking is concrete, not hypothetical. Hawaiian Electric satisfied all final settlement conditions and made the first of four annual $479 million payments in April 2026, and wildfire-related expenses fell to $1.5 million after tax in the quarter from $12.6 million a year earlier, the signature of a company moving from crisis management to ongoing risk mitigation. The settlement itself, entered effective November 1, 2024, replaced an open-ended legal liability with a defined payment schedule. A known cost is far easier for the market to price than an unbounded one, and the rating agencies have started to acknowledge it with an upgrade.

Underneath the headline is an ordinary, valuable thing: a regulated electric monopoly on the Hawaiian islands. Utilities recover their costs through rates, and the company describes how its requirements for operations, fuel, debt, and interest are "generally funded through the collection of the Utilities' re" venue under regulatory rate-setting. A joint proposal filed in March seeks a 5.3% base-rate increase over two years, and Act 258 securitization offers a path to fund roughly $350 million of wildfire-safety investment while limiting the bill impact on customers. If the settlement financing goes smoothly and the rate case lands, the bull case is a normal utility multiple applied to a company the market has been pricing for disaster.

Bear Case

The disconnect that should worry a buyer is not in any single ratio; it is that the price has begun to credit a recovery the balance sheet has not yet earned. Hawaiian Electric is a small utility carrying a very large, multi-year obligation, and it has front-loaded its risk: it has paid the first $479 million of four annual settlement payments, with three more to come. The company has been clear that future payments will draw on a mix of debt and equity, with the April 2028 payment currently expected to come from debt or convertible bonds, subject to market conditions. That single sentence contains the bear case: the company does not yet know exactly how it will fund the remaining obligation, and each financing round either dilutes existing holders or adds to an already heavy debt load.

The leverage is the hard constraint. Net debt sits near 10 times operating income and interest coverage is only about 2 times, a precarious cushion for a company that must keep accessing capital markets to meet its settlement schedule. The filing is explicit that the recorded settlement amount "is not intended to provide a reasonably possible loss in excess of the recorded amount" under loss-contingency accounting, which is a careful way of saying the booked liability is the estimate, not a ceiling on every conceivable outcome. A utility this thinly covered has almost no margin for a financing cost spike, a rate-case denial, or any further wildfire-related claim.

The operating numbers underline how little is improving beneath the de-risking narrative. Core earnings per share were $0.18 in the quarter, flat year over year, as higher operating and maintenance expenses offset revenue gains. The growth-oriented and asset-based valuation methods read the stock as expensive precisely because the returns are depressed and the growth is not there yet. The proposed rate increase, if approved, raises customer bills $8 to $12 a month in 2027, which is its own political and regulatory risk on an island grid already under scrutiny. The price is starting to pay for a clean utility, while the company is still a heavily indebted one with three settlement payments and an unfinished financing plan ahead of it.

Valuation

At about $13 (June 27, 2026) Hawaiian Electric trades near 21 times company-wide operating income, which inverts into an assumption of roughly 3.9% annual operating-profit growth over five years. That is a modest pace within what the company has recently delivered, so the headline assumption reads as within range. The complication is that the operating income itself is depressed and the comparison data is thin, so the multiple says less here than it would for a stable utility.

The method spread is the more revealing read, and it is unusually wide. The relative-multiple and peer methods land well above the price, valuing the company as the regulated electric monopoly it structurally is. The asset-value and growth-oriented methods land below it, penalizing the depressed return on equity near 8% and the absence of growth. That divergence is the wildfire overhang showing up in the numbers: the market cannot yet decide whether to price Hawaiian Electric as a recovering utility or as a distressed one, and the truth depends on the settlement financing and the rate case landing as hoped. The peer cohort the screen surfaces leans toward midstream energy names rather than pure regulated utilities, so the cleaner comparison is to other regulated electrics, and against those the relative methods say the stock is inexpensive if the recovery holds.

Solvency is where the caution has to live, and it is the load-bearing fact. Net debt near 10 times operating income with interest coverage of only about 2 times is a stretched profile for any company, let alone one that must fund three more annual $479 million payments. The company is not currently burning cash at the operating line, and utility revenue is regulated and predictable, but the financing plan for the remaining settlement is unsettled and will mean more debt, more equity, or both. What a buyer underwrites at this price is a bet that the de-risking continues, the rate case is approved, and the remaining payments are financed without distress, with the thin coverage as the reminder of how little room there is for any of those to go wrong.

Catalysts

The pivotal event of Hawaiian Electric's recent quarter was the start of its Maui wildfire settlement payments. The company satisfied all final settlement conditions on April 10, 2026, and made the first of four annual $479 million payments, with wildfire-related expenses dropping to $1.5 million after tax in the quarter from $12.6 million a year earlier. Core earnings per share were $0.18, flat year over year, as higher operating and maintenance costs offset revenue gains. The progress on the settlement also brought a Moody's credit-rating upgrade, an external signal that the worst-case uncertainty is narrowing.

The financing of the remaining obligation is the central forward question. Future settlement payments will use a mix of debt and equity, and the April 2028 payment is currently expected to be funded by debt or convertible bonds, subject to market conditions. That plan is not yet fixed, which keeps a financing overhang on the stock.

Two regulatory catalysts matter most over the next year. A joint proposal filed March 6 seeks a 5.3% increase in consolidated base rates over two years, which would lift average monthly bills $8 to $12 in 2027 and a further $2 to $3 in 2028 by island. Separately, an application for roughly $350 million in wildfire-safety investment awaits Commission approval, with Act 258 securitization offering a path to finance it while limiting customer rate impact. Both outcomes feed directly into the de-risking thesis.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

HE Q1 2026 results, May 2026 · HE FY2025 10-K

View the full interactive HE report on boothcheck