HDFC BANK LIMITED (HDB): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $23.84, HDFC BANK LIMITED (HDB) is priced for 7.2% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-29.
Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/HDB
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | HDB |
| Company | HDFC BANK LIMITED |
| Current price | $23.84/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | financials |
| Return on equity needed | 7.2% |
| Return on equity now | 8.8% |
| ROE gap | -1.6pp |
| Price-to-book | 0.68x |
Solve inputs: computed at a 8.7% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage, on common book equity (FY2025); each 1pp of cost of equity moves the implied ROE ~0.7pp.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -2.66σ |
| cohort percentile (of 163 peers) | 2 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.71x | 3 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.55x | 2 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.64x | 3 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.49x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=11)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Bank Fair Value (P/TBV) | — | $17.51 | 1.36x | yes | TBVPS $21.44 × 0.82x (ROE (TTM) 8.8% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), NPL 13.67% → ×0.92) |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $37.10 | 0.64x | yes | P/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.1x / 10.0x / 11.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | $165.21 | 0.14x | yes | DPS $0.72, g=8.8% (sustainable: ROE (TTM) × retention; not the terminal-growth assumption), ke=9.3% |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $15.24 | 1.56x | yes | Stage 1: 7% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $33.38 | 0.71x | yes | BV/sh $35.20, ROE (TTM) 8.8%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $32.51 | 0.73x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $16.05 | 1.49x | yes | Rev $25.6B, growth 26% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.9x / 2.4x / 2.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $37.44 | 0.64x | yes | EPS $3.12, growth 7% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.08 (Fair) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | $49.71 | 0.48x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $3.12 × BVPS $35.20) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $59.50 | 0.40x | yes | EPS $3.12 × (8.5 + 2×7.1%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $33.36 | 0.71x | yes | EPS $3.12 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 7.1% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 10.7x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $33.73 | 0.71x | yes | EPS $3.12 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 8.5% |
Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).
Bullet Takeaways
- HDFC Bank is India's largest private-sector lender, and the ADR pays a premium near 2.1 times book for a deposit franchise where retail deposits make up more than 80% of the total and end-of-period deposits grew 14.4%, outpacing 12% loan growth.
- The biggest risk is the premium against an unfinished recovery: no standard valuation method reaches the price, the US-basis return on equity sits near 8.8% while the local books show about 14.1%, and the merger that swelled the equity base has yet to prove its return on the enlarged capital.
- Watch the margin and the loan-to-deposit normalization: net interest margin slipped to 3.38% from 3.54% a year earlier as the acquired mortgage book reprices, and the bank is deliberately slowing loan growth to bring its loan-to-deposit ratio down from the high-80s ahead of a tighter RBI provisioning framework in 2027.
Bull Case
Start with what the market is paying for. At about $25 (June 29, 2026) the ADR trades near 2.1 times book value, the top of its peer group, a multiple that on its face implies an elite and durable return on equity. Then look at the reported return, and the two do not seem to match. On a US-reporting basis the bank has recently been earning a return on equity near 8.8%, which would be unremarkable for any bank. That gap, a top-of-group multiple against an ordinary-looking return, is the bull case, because the ordinary-looking return is an artifact, not the franchise. On its local Indian books the most recent quarter showed a return on equity of about 14.1% and a return on assets near 1.96%. The depressed US-basis figure is the lingering footprint of the July 2023 merger with parent HDFC Limited, which roughly doubled the equity base before the acquired mortgage book finished repricing. As that digestion completes, the underlying earning power reasserts itself, and the market is pricing the reassertion rather than the transitional headline.
The deposit franchise is the durable asset under that premium, and it is unusually high quality. End-of-period deposits grew 14.4% year over year to about ₹31.1 trillion, outpacing the 12% growth in gross advances, with retail deposits making up more than 80% of the total. That is a funding mix most banks would envy, because retail money is stickier and cheaper than wholesale money, and deposits growing faster than loans is exactly the repair the post-merger balance sheet needed. Asset quality backs it up: gross non-performing assets sat at 1.15%, and lower still excluding agriculture, which for a bank that grew its book through a complex merger is a clean number.
The structural bet is India and HDFC Bank's place atop it. This is the country's largest private-sector lender, compounding a high-quality deposit base into a still-young credit cycle, and management is deliberately moderating loan growth to bring the loan-to-deposit ratio down from the high-80s toward a more conservative 78 to 80 percent over the coming year. That is a bank choosing balance-sheet strength over short-term growth, the kind of discipline that supports the premium rather than spends it. The buyer at 2.1 times book is underwriting two things: that the local-basis return holds as the merger fully clears, and that India's long runway lets a disciplined leader keep compounding it.
Bear Case
The capital-allocation question sits right in the data and the premium does not appear to discount it. To pull off the 2023 merger with parent HDFC Limited, the bank issued enough equity to roughly double its book, which is why the share count has compounded near 8.5% a year. A merger funded with stock is only accretive if the combined entity earns an adequate return on the swollen capital base, and on a US-reporting basis it has not yet: the return on equity near 8.8% is what that doubled equity is currently earning. The bank also retains the large majority of its profit rather than returning it, plowing it back to support growth and rebuild the funding base. That is defensible for a fast-growing lender, but it means the holder is trusting management to redeploy retained earnings at returns that justify the premium, and the proof of that redeployment is still in front of the company, not behind it. The merger digestion that the bull frames as nearly complete is the same process the bear reads as unfinished: the return on the new capital has to climb materially from the US-basis 8.8% before the dilution looks earned.
The operating data shows the strain that capital choice is managing. Net interest margin slipped to 3.38% from 3.54% a year earlier, because the acquired HDFC mortgage book carries lower spreads than the bank's legacy mix and is still repricing. The bank is deliberately moderating loan growth to bring its loan-to-deposit ratio down from the high-80s, which is prudent but also caps the growth that the premium assumes, and it does so just as a tighter RBI expected-credit-loss framework approaches in 2027. Slower loans, a compressed margin, and a higher provisioning regime ahead is not the backdrop a top-of-group multiple usually carries.
Then there is the cycle, the risk every fast-growing lender shares: today's loan growth becomes tomorrow's credit cost. HDFC Bank has been expanding its book near 12% a year into a still-young Indian credit cycle, and losses on rapidly originated loans season over time rather than appearing in the quarter the loans are written. Today's clean 1.15% gross non-performing ratio reflects benign conditions; a downturn in the Indian economy or a rise in unsecured-lending delinquencies would test whether the growth was disciplined or merely fast. The valuation leaves no room for that test to go badly. No family of standard valuation methods reaches today's price: the asset-value, earnings-power, peer-multiple, and even the forward-growth lenses all read the stock as rich. When every conventional frame says the price is beyond what it supports, the stock is a pure bet on India's runway holding and the merged bank earning its enlarged capital, with nothing in reserve if either disappoints.
Valuation
A bank is worth the return it earns on its capital, so the lens is price against book. At about $25 the ADR trades near 2.1 times book, the top of its peer group, and that multiple assumes the bank sustains an elite-tier return on equity for a long horizon before it normalizes. The complication is which return to read. On a US-reporting basis the bank has recently earned closer to 8.8%, depressed by the 2023 merger that swelled its equity base; on its local Indian books the most recent quarter showed about 14.1%. The whole valuation question is whether the local-basis return reasserts itself as the acquired book finishes repricing, and then holds for the long stretch the price demands.
The methods are unanimous, which is itself the signal. No valuation family reaches the price. The asset-value methods, which read the bank off its current book and current returns, sit well below it; the peer-multiple and earnings-power lenses do too; and even the forward-growth method, which credits future compounding, does not close the gap. That means the price is not defended by any standard frame. It rests entirely on the durability of India's growth and HDFC Bank's position atop it, plus the recovery of the post-merger return toward the local-basis level. The premium is real and arguably earned by the franchise, but it is a premium with no static support underneath it.
The solvency frame for a bank is regulatory capital and payout capacity, not leverage; deposits are funding, not corporate debt. On that frame HDFC Bank is sound, with clean asset quality at a 1.15% gross non-performing ratio and a retail-heavy deposit base that the bank is deliberately growing faster than its loans. The wrinkle is payout: the bank retains most of its earnings to fund growth and repair the funding base, so per-share progress depends on that retained capital earning an adequate return, the same recovery the whole price leans on. What a buyer underwrites here is patience: that the merger fully clears, the return climbs, and India's runway holds long enough for a premium with no method behind it to be vindicated by the franchise instead.
Catalysts
HDFC Bank's most recent quarter showed a bank that has largely worked through its merger transition. Profit after tax rose about 9.1% year over year to roughly ₹192 billion, with a local-basis return on equity near 14.1% and return on assets of about 1.96%. Gross advances grew 12% year over year to about ₹29.6 trillion and end-of-period deposits 14.4% to about ₹31.1 trillion, with retail deposits comprising more than 80% of the total. Asset quality stayed clean, with a gross non-performing ratio of 1.15%, lower still excluding agriculture. The cause behind the steady result was volume growth offsetting margin pressure: net interest margin declined to 3.38% from 3.54% a year earlier as the acquired mortgage book continued to reprice.
The defining structural event remains the July 1, 2023 merger of HDFC Limited into HDFC Bank, which combined the country's largest mortgage lender with its largest private bank. The most recent quarter is the clearest evidence yet that the combined entity has found its post-merger operating rhythm, with deposits now growing faster than advances, which strengthens the funding base. The bank is in a deliberate phase of loan-growth moderation, aiming to bring its loan-to-deposit ratio down from the high-80s toward 78 to 80 percent over the next year ahead of a tighter RBI expected-credit-loss framework slated for 2027.
The forward catalysts are the trajectory of net interest margin as the acquired book finishes repricing, the recovery of the post-merger return on equity toward the local-basis level, and the pace of the loan-to-deposit normalization. Analyst sentiment on the ADR has stayed constructive, with consensus targets sitting above the current price, reflecting the expectation that margin recovers as the merger fully clears. Each subsequent print is a test of whether that recovery is on track, because the price already credits it.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- KB (KB Financial Group Inc.)
- FY2025 20-F: …on us and the financial industry, such regulations could reduce our profit margins, limit our operational flexibility and increase competition, which, in turn, could have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Risks relating to competition Competition in the Korean financial…
- FY2025 20-F: As a result of the factors described above, our profit for the year increased 11.1% from ₩4,526 billion in 2023 to ₩5,029 billion in 2024. Results by Principal Business Segment We compile and analyze financial information for our business segments based upon segment information used by our management for the purposes…
- SHG (Shinhan Financial Group Co., Ltd.)
- FY2025 20-F: …See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report for further details on segment information, including the related components of income and expense. Operating Income by Principal Business Segment The table below provides the income statement data for our principal business segments…
- FY2025 20-F: …and will continue to affect our business, results of operations and financial 7 Table of Contents condition." Furthermore, if competing financial institutions seek to expand market share by lowering their lending rates, Shinhan Bank may suffer customer loss, especially among customers who select their lenders…
- WF (Woori Financial Group Inc.)
- FY2025 20-F: …many of which have greater experience and resources than we do, may seek to compete with us in providing financial products and services either by themselves or in partnership with existing Korean financial institutions. Increased competition and continuing consolidation may lead to decreased margins, resulting in a…
- FY2025 20-F: …important sources of revenue. In the area of credit cards, increased competition in the payments market and the resulting increase in our marketing activities, as well as the general trend towards lower merchant fees, are adversely affecting profits in the segment. In our new capital segment, our profitability may be…
- BSAC (BANCO SANTANDER-CHILE)
- FY2025 20-F: …to companies in the Retail Banking and Middle-market areas. Products include short-term financing and deposits, brokerage services, derivatives, securitization and other products tailored to the needs of clients. The Treasury area also handles the intermediation of positions, as well as the company's own investment…
- FY2025 20-F: DM. Therefore, variations of loan volumes and profit and loss items reflect business trends as well as client migration effects. Overall, this aggregation has no significant impact on the understanding of the nature and effects of the Bank's business activities and the economic environment. The Bank's reportable…
- HSBC (HSBC HOLDINGS PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: , fee and other incom e was lower reflecting an increased cost of customer rewards following the relaunch of HSBC Premier . - In Commercial Banking, lower business banking fees due to proposition changes were partly offset by higher corporate lending fees. ECL of $0.7bn increased by $0.3bn compared with 2024, on a…
- FY2025 20-F: …that affect period-on-period comparisons. These impacts are not included in our notable or material notable items. The impact of strategic transactions is computed by including the operating income statement results of each business in any period for which there are no results in the comparative period. Ñ See page…
- BNS (BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA)
- FY2025 40-F: …credit and liquidity facilities. Excludes mortgages related to covered bonds held by the Bank or used for securities lending transactions. Includes assets that have been received from counterparties through normal course of business in securities financing and derivative transactions. Non-retail drawn includes loans,…
- FY2025 40-F: …and provision for income taxes are reported on a taxable equivalent basis, with the offset in the Other segment. Effective January 1, 2024, the Bank no longer claims the dividend received deduction on Canadian shares that are mark-to-market property, which has resulted in a lower TEB gross-up for fiscal 2024.…
- BMO (BANK OF MONTREAL /CAN/)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- COF (CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …primary sources of revenue for our Commercial Banking business are net interest income from loans and deposits and non-interest income earned from products and services provided to our clients such as capital markets, advisory services, net interchange and treasury management. Because our Commercial Banking business…
- FY2025 10-K: Total net revenue margin is calculated based on total net revenue for the period divided by average loans during the period. (4) Charge-offs exclude $18.0 billion of Discover loans acquired in the second quarter of 2025 that were fully charged-off, with expected recoveries of $3.1 billion included as a benefit to the…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
HDFC Bank Q4 FY2026 results, April 2026 · HDFC Bank analyst commentary, April 2026 · ChartMill analyst ratings, 2026